The Breivik investigation missing key evidence

Book publisher wanted

Enquiries: defenceoftherealm@hush.com

Breivik - "A Question of Doubt"

The Norwegian police prosecutors have stated from the very beginning that Breivik acted alone in the totality of his actions from start to finish which dates back to 2002 and his trips to the Liberian civil war and then the alleged London meeting, meaning there are no accomplices, thus no network, meaning Breivik is a 'lone wolf' who committed his terrorist acts which includes compiling a 1500 page manifesto, all alone.

They have consistently said that as each day passes they are more certain that Breivik acted alone and there is no network.

For some reason the Norwegian police prosecutors have completely closed the door firmly shut to other possibilities surrounding Breivik meaning they will not deviate from their long standing official line of Breivik the 'lone wolf' nut who is officially certified as insane.

Although the certified label has not legally stuck which is why there is now another report being prepared with the justice system in Norway attempting to defend the integrity of its judicial process by saying Breivik can be insane and sane at the same time - Work that one out?

There is overwhelming compelling circumstantial evidence and other evidence to state the contrary to the official 'lone wolf' line, so how are the Norwegian police prosecutors ever going to be able to turn around and change the official line that has been propagated through the worlds media for the past 7 months and say that Breivik did not act alone and that there are accomplices out there meaning a network/group is involved with him?

Their whole integrity and reputation is on the line.

They state that as each day passes they are more certain Breivik acted alone which leads me to personally believe that there is an official 'white wash' of the whole case for some reason. In my opinion I would say that as each day passes and more information is released through the media it looks more like there are others working with Breivik, or at the very least there is enough suspicious activity to warrant leaving the door open to the possibility of others working with him until 'over the course of time' completely and satisfactorily discounted or proven. This would mean rather than saying he is a 'lone wolf' who acted alone and as each day passes we are more certain of this fact, it should be "we are uncertain whether or not Breivik acted alone" which leaves the door open to any other possibility and other peoples involvement.

We are keeping an 'open mind' is usually the statement used.

Instead Norwegian politicians travel the world telling everyone Breivik is a 'lone wolf' nut who acted completely alone, without the investigation reaching its natural and final conclusion after searching out all avenues of enquiry, thus continually propagating the unfounded official line on government level.

If it is a Norwegian Government 'white wash' for political reasons then in my personal opinion it will bring down the government because it would be an affront to every ethnic Norwegian on all sides of the political spectrum that their ruling government who Breivik specifically targeted due to their conduct against the Norwegian people would then use such a horrific National tragedy that has effected all corners of Norwegian society for cheap political gains at the complete detriment of those murdered and maimed by Breivik on July 22nd.

Closing the Breivik enquiry down, and officially claiming he is a 'lone wolf' who is certified as insane (that nobody believes), without leaving the enquiry open for other possibilities, is in my opinion, an attempted Norwegian government white wash of the whole event - That's my conclusion

If Breivik is a 'lone wolf' in the totality of his actions then there is another explanation to my own, as to how I ended up in the middle of the enquiry as the man behind the monster that butchered and murdered 69 kids on their summer camp in Norway whilst dressed as a policeman as an act of political rage against his government, but I cannot see any other explanation and there is always an explanation. So either the Norwegian police are no better than some third world village police force or they are being closed down from above.

Take your pick!

2 questions for now; Who is Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'? And was Breivik trained in Belarus?

Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is a key to open up something in relation to the whole enquiry, and confirmation of the training camps in Belarus would prove beyond doubt that Breivik is not a 'lone wolf' as has been consistently stated in the media, which would then beg the question as to why and for what reason have the Norwegian police attempted to close down the case in the public eye with the official 'lone wolf' lie?

Even going so far as stating as each day passes we are more certain he acted alone...

The Norwegian anti-Islamisation immigration movement

TV2: Democrat MP's recorded discussing blowing up Government building

Now the world knows Anders Breivik we also know his claims and one of them is that he is the leader of the Norwegian resistance movement against Islamisation and immigration that comes under the political banner of multi-culturalism.

He is an extreme right-wing political terrorist basing his actions and view point upon domestic and European politics and not a religious terrorist basing his actions upon Holy War and that view point.

Yet Breivik wrapped up his extreme right-wing political acts in Templarism, where true Christianity, based upon a firm belief in Jesus Christ and His sacrifice for mankind is the cornerstone. Without that nobody could ever call themselves a Templar, and to attempt to call yourself a Templar based upon 700 years of history without the true foundation makes a wolf in sheep’s (spiritual) clothing attempting to find common ground where there is none.

Extreme right-wing Neo-Nazism is old news and unacceptable to the mainstream majority so the extreme right-wing Nazi’s want to dress up in new clothes so as to be acceptable in today’s 21st Century geo-political climate and have stolen the clothes of the 'Defenders of the faith' and butchered and maimed a bunch of innocent kids in them.

Breivik’s Norwegian anti-Islamisation immigration movement is a political movement with political players. To say that Breivik is a ‘lone wolf’ and not a part of a larger movement in Norway is ridiculous when there were 2 Democrat MP’s recorded at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference talking about blowing up the Government building and assassinating members of their own Government. They were both subsequently arrested but I have no more information about it.

Breivik committed the exact same acts that they spoke several months before July 22nd 2011.

Is there are suspicious parallel to be drawn?

Does Anders Breivik have support in Norway? Is Anders Breivik a part of a wider Norwegian movement? Or is he a ‘lone wolf’ nut as the official line states, who knows nobody within the anti-Islamisation immigration movement in Norway and nobody supports him?

Those 2 Norwegian Democrat MP’s must support him if nobody else!

Breivik’s “2083” manifesto was named after one of his fellow Norwegian comrades (Fraudman) essays.

All these Norwegians with the exact same views of Norwegian society and what to do about it which reaches from inside the government level extreme right-wing political scene down now into several murder scenes, one of them being the scene of a mass murder of innocent kids on their summer camp.

Can anyone else see a larger common theme here in Norway or is it only me?

Fraudman made a comment about me to an Aftenposten journalist where he called me “a dog that barks but does not bite.” In the scheme of things, massacring a bunch of innocent left wing kids on their summer camp whilst dressed as a policeman is definitely not my style of biting which differentiates us morally.

Why did Fraudman say this when we were both in the middle of the larger enquiry? Either he is directly involved and was gloating to the journalist as if to undermine me in some warped way, or he was reveling in his new found self perceived authority of being directly linked to a mass murdering Norwegian political terrorist who had just butchered and murdered a load of innocent Norwegian kids on Utoya island and named his actions after one of his own essays.

Ill let others decide on that one.

Either way what he quoted was definitely not befitting someone who wants absolutely no association with Breivik and his atrocities, and put with other information makes him look completely guilty of some level of involvement.

Hiding computers when the police are about to come knocking on your door comes to mind (guilty conscience).

Fraudman is linked to the SIO movement, he is directly linked to Alan Lake, he is directly linked to the SION group and the Democrat MP’s talking about conducting a coup against their elected government and he is directly linked to Breivik himself. They even had direct email contact, probably (in my opinion) before actually meeting in person somewhere on the political anti-jihad scene in Norway.

The 2 Norwegian Democrat MP’s recorded talking about a government coup obviously have close links to Alan Lake because they spoke about meeting the leader of the EDL. That would have only been facilitated by the Director behind the EDL and also the wider ‘group’ behind the EDL (CLA) who help form and organise the SIO groups throughout Europe because IRA “Tommy” is their puppet.

Alan Lake has stated that he has contacts within the political scene in Norway so it’s pretty obvious it is these ones talking about a government coup at the SION conference pictured above.

This information gives a little glimpse into the background of the anti-Islamisation immigration movement in Norway that Breivik professes to belong to, and of which, on whose behalf he acted, making him the leader of the armed side of the movement to which they all belong, either linked directly which is most probable, but certainly ideologically. The manifesto was named after Fraudman's work after all.

When Breivik was arrested on Utoya island he told the police it was a coup de tat.

There can be no doubt that there are others out there in Norwegian society who think like Breivik, but the question is; was Breivik completely alone in Norway and committed his actions with no one knowing anything about anything or was he a part of a network/group? A group linked to players further afield than Norway itself who have their own political agendas.

All traced back to Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake the suspected English 'mentor'.

The call to the ministry

Dagbladet: Breivik did not make the call to the ministry

There was a call to the ministry in Norway said to be sometime in March 2011 where someone is said to have talked about targeting the AUFere’s and a manifesto. The person who took the call is said to have taken the information to her Supervisor but no further action was taken at that time.

So if this information is true, there is a ministry employee and her Supervisor who both agree that this call and the information contained within this call took place sometime in or around March 2011.

The Norwegian police have said that they cannot find information in the records to say that this call took place. Probably not by Breivik himself, thus they cannot find a direct link to him so they attempt to deny the call ever took place. They rule out the possibility that it could have been made by someone else because Breivik is meant to be a ‘lone wolf’ and to say otherwise obviously has serious implications for people.

I should imagine there are a few obscure numbers on the list that do not equate which leaves enough proof that the call was made on the back of the witness statements. I wonder if there are any public phone box numbers on the list.

If you state a government endorsed official line (lone wolf) and rule out any other possibility before you investigate properly, then any future discrepancies in the enquiry that shed a completely different light on the whole case have to be denied or ruled out because they go against the government endorsed official line which calls everything into question, even the integrity of the investigation itself and those carrying it out.

Just because the Norwegian police cannot find the call log from Breivik himself does not mean that the call did not take place by someone else. There is supposed to be 2 witnesses who both agree that a call was made, and detail the information contained in that call that corroborates with Breivik’s actions on July 22nd 2011.

When Breivik was first asked about this call he said he made the call but could not remember what he said.

I straight away thought, well he must be psychotic then if he cannot remember making a call of such significance, where he is said to have talked about his impending attack and the manifesto.

But I don’t think he is psychotic so there had to be another reason for his critical large scale memory loss.

My thoughts instinctively were that someone else must have made the call and when put ‘on the spot’ by the Norwegian police Breivik knowing someone else must have made the call, covered for them with a lie, stating he made the call but could not remember what he said to cover his/their tracks.

He really didn’t know what was said because he did not make the call.

This was confirmed at a later date when he was questioned over the call again. He then denied making that exact call detailing the impending attack and the manifesto.

Breivik himself was admitting someone else must have made that specific call if it did take place.

What he said to the Norwegian police was that he was in the middle of making his bomb and preparing for the coming attacks and was trying to cut out all possibilities of detection and capture before the final attack stage, so making the call detailing his future plans possibly causing detection and arrest was definitely not going to be on his agenda at that point in time, so it definitely was not him who made it.

Under such a heightened state of alert and fearing capture before successfully achieving the goal, ringing the ministry talking flippantly about his plans himself would definitely not be something he would be doing unless he was psychotic.

Did someone else make that call? Or was it Breivik himself?

If the call was definitely made (2 witnesses say it was) and it was not Breivik himself then it is a 100% certainty there are others in Norway who had prior knowledge of the attacks which includes most importantly the “2083”manifesto. This means Breivik is part of a wider network/group in Norway with the attack being an inspired high impact attack and not a 'lone wolf' attack. This fits in-line with his claims about being a part of a Norwegian resistance movement and fits in-line with the ideological scene and players out there that he is directly linked to in Norway and further afield.

What is the truth behind the telephone call?

2 witnesses within the ministry say that the call took place prior to July 22nd and detail the information contained within the call because it was of such a ‘nature’ (threats) that it had to be passed to a Supervisor to determine what action if any should be taken.

For the Norwegian police to say or insinuate the call never took place, substantiates their 7 month long government endorsed official claim of Breivik being a ‘lone wolf’ which is why they state they cannot find any evidence that the call took place.

Neither officially confirmed or denied – A question of doubt

Suspicious men at Breivik's bomb making farm/factory

Dagbladet: Mystery men visiting Breivik's bomb making farm/factory

Its safe to say that judging by the close proximity between Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory and the adjacent farms nearby as can be seen in the picture above, he did not test detonate any bombs there to hone his bomb making skills ready for July 22nd.

So unless Breivik was some type of freak of nature and was able to create his massive bomb that was able to destroy a large part of his Government building on his first attempt of ever detonating a bomb in his life with it being based upon a ‘lone wolf’ internet recipe downloaded from the net, then he must have had outside help and training.

FACT!

We don’t know yet whether there were any test sites on the farm but it’s safe to say there were not, and we still do not know about the paramilitary training camps in Belarus.

There are several witness statements from other farm owners detailing suspicious people around Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory prior to July 22nd.

If you go with the official Norwegian government line of Breivik the ‘lone wolf’ with no support or network in Norway or further afield then these witnesses and their statements have to be dismissed just like with the telephone call to the ministry.

We know he has support on a political level in Norway because 2 Democrat MP’s were recorded at a SION conference talking about carrying out terrorist acts against the elected Government that Breivik did actually carry out, but is there an active network in Norway who helped him is the question. There are enough anomalies to the official ‘lone wolf’ lie contained in the witness statements released through the media to say that not everything is as it seems with the official claim. This should give reason to leave the door 'officially' open to the possibility that Breivik did work with others in Norway itself prior to July 22nd who possibly gave him support with constructing the bomb. They would have also had prior knowledge of the planned (inspired) attack which is why they rang the ministry giving a detailed description of what was to come. That’s if it was not Breivik himself and the call definitely took place. This would mean ‘someone’ other than Breivik was making a statement for future reference to help put things into context when the time came which is now.

If it is a Government white wash of the whole case with it closed down from the very beginning with the official line being that Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’, then all information conflicting with this has to be dismissed regardless of the truth and other possibilities.

Then you have to question why?

A witness who lives at a nearby farm to Breivik’s bomb making farm/factory has stated that she saw several men parked up at the farm prior to July 22nd. In the newspaper article it states that she said she is glad she does not have friends like that because they looked big and intimidating (grim). They obviously carried a dark presence that she felt.

Breivik dismissed these men and said they were Poles looking for work.

Is Breivik covering up for accomplices who helped him with the final construction of the bomb?

10 years in the planning, was the success of the bomb critical enough for outside help to have been sent to Breivik for the final construction of the elements to make sure it did not fail when parked outside the Government building?

As Breivik stated to his arresting officers "its a coup de tat" so the bomb not going off would not have looked very professional.

The Norwegian police have accepted Breivik’s explanation that it was Poles looking for work, but the only thing with this is that the witness from a nearby farm has stated that she has never had any Poles knock at her farm looking for work.

It is pretty logical to think that if Poles knocked at Breivik’s farm looking for work then they would have knocked at all surrounding farms looking for work also because this was their plan of action to get work in Norway. Knock at all the farms in the vicinity looking for work. Coincidence and very suspicious if Breivik’s was the only farm these alleged Poles knocked on don’t you think?

Unless there are other witness statements from other farm owners around Breivik’s farm who confirm the Poles story. If not it’s safe to say Breivik’s explanation does not add up which means there is another explanation and it does not take Einstein to work out another possible explanation in the scheme of things.

Quote: We have a fairly good view and we have yet no information about any visitor who may be suspicious, said information officer Roar Hanssen in the Oslo police's terrorism investigation.

The Norwegian police must have several witness statements from adjacent farms to corroborate Breivik’s Poles story then if they have no information about any visitors who may be suspicious. Would be interesting to know seen as though Dagbladet based this article and the information contained in it around suspicious activity based upon witness statements.

Another witness has stated that he saw a man and a woman standing on the courtyard of Breivik’s farm on July 20th, 2 days before the fateful day.

The last goodbye…?

Unless there are other witness statements that support Breivik’s claims that counter the witness statements mentioned here, there is a question of doubt surrounding the visitors to the bomb making farm/factory which should leave the door open for other possibilities.

All suspicious evidence put together paints a bigger clearer picture if not positively and clearly discounted or explained. The most obvious for the backdrop of the picture has got to be the 2 Democrat MP’s recorded talking about carrying out a coup at a SION conference which cannot be discounted. These Norwegians along with Fraudman “the dog that bites” are facts in the Breivik picture.

The picture goes against the Government endorsed official line of Breivik the ‘lone wolf’ so there is a question of doubt over the 7 month official line that needs to be addressed in the mainstream media with the door opened to other possibilities and peoples direct involvement.

Don’t forget about the Norwegian who emailed one of Breivik’s inspirations Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs either. If it was not Breivik who emailed her about a coming armed insurrection in Norway prior to 2011, then it was someone else thinking like Breivik which adds more detail to the overall picture.

The Norwegian police still, to my knowledge, have not uncovered who Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’ is either, and both of these people are now integral and critical to explaining Breivik’s English mentor role, and why this was placed inside the “2083” manifesto.

Breivik enquiry: Some questions surrounding Alan Lake & Co

Update: Alan Lake suspended from his 'Powerful bank'

Quote: The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development suspended Alan Ayling after he was named as the EDL founder who uses the alias ‘Alan Lake’.

The powerful bank was set up by international treaty to fund development and privatisation schemes in Eastern Europe and Central Asia following the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991.

............................................................................

Its is my firm belief based upon the facts that I was set up as a convenient fall guy for the day after July 22nd in Norway as part of the media frenzy that was knowingly going to ensue. It was all nicely and conveniently tailored to leave me in the frame with the real possibility of arrest and imprisonment under the prevention of terrorism act.

Look at what Breivik did and then he and others pointed the finger of suspicion directly at me as an accomplice and another terrorist cell ready to strike.

Contrary to the media misconception (lie), I was not alleged to be Breivik's inspiration, I was alleged to be his English 'mentor' based upon the facts which are 2 completely different allegations that the media have had a problem differentiating between. The 'mentor' allegation cannot stick because I travelled to Norway to prove the point, so the inspiration label is the next best thing even though it's false and libelous.

Breivik was in London in 2002 supposedly attending a meeting of like minded people after his trip to the Liberian civil war a few weeks before and it was during this meeting in London with a secretive group of people that he says he was assigned his English 'mentor' who he called 'Richard the Lionheart' inside his manifesto. These trips to Liberia and London are both facts.

Is Breivik lying about his story behind the meaning concerning these facts, and there is absolutely no meaning behind both these trips and he met no one and talked to no one on his suspicious international travels? Or is he telling the truth about meeting like minded people in Liberia and in London which was his recruitment process into a secretive extreme right-wing group?

I go with him telling the truth because to believe he met no one and and talked to no one in Liberia and London is unbelievable to anyone and not humanly possible, so the question is who did he meet and what was discussed? Was it exactly as he says it was? Maybe tweaked a little later on for maximum impact and effect.

Video: The folly of Alan Lake

It is the facts concerning London along with 'Richard the Lionheart' and a few more pointers that placed me in the frame as being his English 'mentor' and not the media lie of being his inspiration.

At the very beginning, literally 1 or 2 days into me being placed in the frame I was willing to accept that I could have been his inspiration because of what the media were stating and my whole world at that point being turned upside down with me trying to make sense of it all after being implicated with a man who had just murder 69 innocent kids on their summer camp and blown up his government building killing 8 people inside. When I sat back and looked at the facts though I saw that I was not alleged to be his inspiration where there has to be no factual links to smear someone you just need to make it look convincing and believable in the media based upon perceptions and not facts. I was actually alleged to be his English 'mentor' based most importantly upon the 2002 London meeting, the name 'Richard the Lionheart' and other things Breivik stated within the manifesto that conveniently pointed suspicion in my direction. This made me sit back and look at the picture to see what was really going on and the only thing that made sense to me was that Breivik or whoever had helped write the manifesto had set me up to be a fall guy for after his atrocities because his actions towards me were hostile in nature.

Not knowing Breivik or ever having any contact with him made me wonder why he would want to set me up and for what reason?

The only assumption I had was that Alan Lake & Co were behind Breivik because he/they had reason to set me up, they are ideologically intertwined, both linked through their expression of the anti-jihad movement (EDL & SIO) which brings in Fraudman who the manifesto is named after and who is part of the real inspiration behind Breivik. Lake & Co had motive and real reason to attack me with the hope of removing me from being a threat to their continued political agenda (because it was only a matter of time), or at the very least destroy my reputation by always being linked through the media to a mass murdering monster who murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp. Its Fraudman who cannot escape that direct link now though because the blood soaked manifesto is named after his own work although his supporters are all in denial about how linked Fraudman is. I personally am not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere yet stood accused.

After Lake's police interrogation he gave an interview to Dagbladet where he encouraged people to read Fraudman's work just like Breivik did through his terrorist acts, and stated that Breivik was 'special'.

What does the psychology of that say?

I don't know all of the pointers placed within the manifesto that directed everyone in my direction, but one of the main ones was Malta which was laughable at how obvious it was when I was sitting there the moment the manifesto was given to the world after Breivik's atrocities, and another was 'Richard the Lionheart' the name he gave his English 'mentor' although I have never ever used that name.

For Breivik the self proclaimed atheist Knights Templar who revels in his self perceived historical and social intellect after supposedly writing his 1500 page manifesto to state that Malta was a base for his Knights Templar Order and not even mention one of the greatest Christian military Order's victories over the Ottoman Empire in 1565 which is more commonly known as the "Great Siege of 1565" shows a blatant flaw in his understanding of Malta which makes me wonder whether he ever really travelled to Malta or wrote the pointers inside the manifesto directing towards me, because how could anyone call themselves a Knight and talk of Malta in Holy War terms and not mention the Great siege of 1565?

Impossible. So who wrote Malta into the manifesto?

Because the media attention was conveniently set up to be directed my way the day after the attacks it deflected any real attention from anyone else in the immediate aftermath other than the EDL because of Breiviks boasts about them inside the manifesto. The EDL director Alan Lake and EDL leader "Tommy" immediately pointed the finger at me across their UK media platform which then set the stage for the media story that was then spread around the World that whoever was behind the whole scenario knew was going to happen. This is why I was conveniently and suspiciously placed in the frame to take the flack at the very beginning, thus the fall guy which suited Alan Lake & Co.

The media story is then very hard to change at a later date because how can the papers go back on their libelous claims and leave themselves open for a libel case based upon their own words? Of course they couldn't they would prefer for the mud to stick because it is not sticking on them or their personal lives so what do they care? That's why there has been no real media coverage about Alan Lake & Co and his links to the Breivik enquiry other than in the Sunday Times and the Guardian, because how would it look if they were used by Lake & Co and crucified an innocent mans reputation? There has pretty much been complete silence about Lake being interviewed by the Norwegian police concerning his possible involvement along with his little cabal who are all connected to him and the EDL, and this includes questioning who this real life 'Richard the Lionheart' is who Alan Lake's little cabal refrained from mentioning to anyone the days after Breivik struck leaving me to take all the blame.

The director behind the EDL leadership interviewed about his possible involvement with the Norwegian mass murdering extreme right-wing political terrorist Anders Breivik and the British media have pretty much stayed silent?

Suspicious? Who is behind Lake protecting him?

At the very beginning I stated that I believed it was Alan Lake behind Breivik and all circumstantial evidence and individuals actions now prove that claim to be right. The most important piece of evidence is the fact that he has a friend who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' when he posts online who he invited to attend a strategy and discussion meeting at his London flat in 2009 concerning the anti-Islamisation street protest movement. As far as anyone is aware at this moment in time nobody (Norwegian/British Police) have traced or interviewed this person and the media are not asking the question about who he is either which would send shockwaves and open up the whole case in the media.

Why?

The only ones who have questioned this in the media is Dagbladet and the Norwegian police have confirmed the existence of this 'Richard the Lionheart'.

So why has he not been traced and interviewed yet? 6 months after Breivik's terrorist attacks.

Who invited this person to sit in on the pre-founding EDL meeting in Lakes London flat along with the other person present Kinana who is said to be a Catholic priest which would fit in ideologically with a secretive group involved in extreme right-wing politics and professing to be a Knights Templar Order.

Why was this 'Richard the Lionheart' shown the importance to have been invited to that first meeting by Alan Lake that was set up by the leader of the British wing of CVF Ann/Gaia, and is this the man Breivik talks of, who he said he sent ideological material to at the start of the EDL?

I was involved with the anti-Jihad street protest movements that were on the scene before the EDL and I was involved with Luton's UPL before the EDL was born. After the UPL protest in Luton and then several smaller outings that culminated in Birmingham on July 4th 2009 I turned to Ann/Gaia of CVF about bringing the street protest movement that was small at that time together with the ideological political side to transform it into a National movement as that was the vision I had that was spelled out on the very first ever EDL interview after the Birmingham demo. Ann/Gaia agreed and turned to Alan Lake who I did not know at that time and set the meeting in place at his London flat in the Barbican. It was at this meeting that I first met Alan Ayling who called himself Alan Lake, and his friends Kinana and 'Richard the Lionheart' to discuss a way forward with the street protest movement.

Who invited Kinana and 'Richard the Lionheart' to this meeting? Was it Alan Lake or was it Ann/Gaia of CVF? And why were they invited to that meeting? What was the reasoning behind them being there?

Why when I turned to Ann/Gaia about setting up a National anti-Islamisation street protest movement did she turn to Alan Lake? What was her reasoning behind turning to Alan Lake?

Several weeks later the founding EDL meeting took place at the same location where Steven Yaxley-Lennon aka "Tommy" assumed the leadership position of the EDL movement at my behest. There were others present at this second meeting which included amongst others, the military tactician Gandalf of the Up Pompeii blog who if you were going to commit such terrorist acts in the name of extreme right-wing politics like Breivik's as part of a wider terrorist campaign, would be an ideal candidate for putting together a 'strategy' for the campaign which would include setting me up as a fall guy to take the blame, thus defelecting blame and suspicion from anyone else. This is the same reason why he was invited to the founding EDL meeting where he discussed Roman military formations as a 'strategy' for the street protest movement.

Who invited Gandalf to this founding EDL meeting? Was it Alan Lake, Kinana, Ann/Gaia, or Chris Knowles who were all present?

Who is this Gandalf and what is his background and who is he connected to?

Several weeks after this meeting I received news from Dymphna at Gates of Vienna informing me that Alan Lake had been telling everyone that they had to get rid of me from the EDL leadership. This suited several founder leaders like Chris Renton who I already had issues with and eventually created the hijacking of the original leadership structure where they removed the Christian spiritual influence over the movement who brought all the Templar iconography an ideology to the original EDL and put the vision for the movement in place and replaced it with an American Jewish Rabbi (work that one out)? Lake did this because after the founding meeting he knew my influence was a threat to his personal ambitions and agenda using the street protest movement because he wanted complete control over the movement for his own reasons (agenda) and unlike "Tommy" I could not be bought with money or vanity. Regardless of anything if I do not believe something is right I will stand by my belief and convictions and defend them with anyone which placed Alan Lake in a position he did not want to be in which was one where he could not dictate or control the movement whilst I still had influence over the leadership.

I was a threat to his ambitions (agenda) so in his mind I had to go and because I was not in the Country to defend myself due to my involvement in getting the EDL off of the ground in the first place, one thing led to another and Alan Lake achieved his goal of removing me from any involvement with the EDL. This reached a head after his Newcastle speech and resulted in a public confrontation with myself and Nick+. He did not remove me completely from the picture though and then the bigger picture became clear to me about the Luton EDL leadership (explained later) and their mish-mash of blind anti-jihad supporters and endorsers. Because of this and other things I targeted the leadership of the EDL and exposed them for the IRA supporters/family members, frauds that they are and cowards who target women and English grandmothers, whilst using and abusing what was a righteous patriotic movement. They were endorsed by the likes of Lake & Co (Fraudman, Pamella Geller) whilst using the EDL membership as a bunch of useful idiots, all being used for different reasons by the leadership whilst running around the Country under the English banner and the call of anti-Islamisation. This threat to Alan Lake & Co's future political agenda, their reputations which includes that of their political endorsers who they are linked with and after 2 years hard work, along with all the money they had invested whilst using the EDL movement and their puppets "Tommy" & Uncle Kev is in my belief why their 'special' friend Breivik targeted me as part of his/their terrorist attack against the Norwegian Government and people. Breivik boasts about all of his EDL friends after all and I definitely was not one of them.

After the founding EDL meeting I emailed Ann/Gaia about Alan Lake because I knew there was something wrong about him, I could just sense that he was not on the same wavelength and that he was coming to the table with a different agenda, his own agenda. My view was that he wanted to be another Geert Wilders. He was coming to things from a different angle from everyone else present, an angle that was not pure and I could see that. I asked how she knew him and she said she doesnt really know him and that he had started to attend their CVF lunches but was held at arms length so there was obviously other people with concerns about him. I then pointed out how easy it would be for someone like Lake to inflitrate the movement for his own purposes if nobody knows anything about him or where he was coming from. It looks like my perception was completely right.

Email 1 - Email 2

What was Ann/Gaia's reasoning behind going to Alan Lake about setting up the National anti-Islamisation street protest movement in the first place?

How did Alan Lake end up attending CVF lunches? Who vouched for him or invited him, and why?

What was Alan Lake's background for him to want to get involved with the anti-Jihad movement?

I have my own reasons so what are Alan Lake's reasons?

Where did he come from and who is he linked to pre the EDL? Is he a part of a secretive extreme right-wing neo-Gladio style group who infiltrated the anti-Jihad movement to further their political ideals that has ended in Breivik?

Considering Alan Lake has potentially used CVF and the SIO groups for his own agenda and damaged everyones hard work within the anti-Jihad movement by possibly being linked to Breivik whilst working under the cover of their organisations, America's Frank Gaffney and Chrstine Brim should be getting to the bottom of these questions from their UK and European leaders so they know exactly who Alan Lake is, how he inflitrated their groups and how deeply is he entrenched within them. Unless of course they support him which I do not personally believe because at the core I believe the top tier of these organisations are on the right page and would never support or endorse someone like Breivik or anyone else committing such acts in the name of their groups or under the cover of their groups, but you never know and Lake is in the middle of them all.

Ann/Gaia has already blatantly lied to the Sunday Times journalist about her involvement in this whole affair so she obviously has something to hide because people only lie when they want to hide from the truth. The question is; did she know about Breivik via Lake before July 22nd 2011 which means she could quite possibly be complicit in the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century?

She kept completely silent at the very beginning when she knew there was a 'Richard the Lionheart' directly linked to Alan Lake and allowed me to take the blame for being this person.

Conspiracy?

Breivik is said to have attended the EDL demo in support of Geert Wilders in London when he was inside the "House of Lords" showcasing his film Fitna to those on the guest list. As far as I am aware Paul Weston was on that guest list and in attendence of the screening of Fitna that day. Paul Weston is a part of Lake & Co and has been an ardent EDL leadership supporter and ideological endorser online since the EDL's birth.

Whilst Paul Weston and everyone else were inside the "House of Lords" that day and the EDL were outside, the EDL was being led on the day by Alan Lake and "Tommy" with Fraudman and Ned May of Gates of Vienna present along with Breivik if he too was there.

Paul Weston has taken over the BFP which is an offshoot of the BNP started by expelled BNP members. He has now taken on the leader of the EDL "Tommy" and given him a place on the Executive committee of the BFP. It was Ann/Gaia who helped facilitate this merger as she is a friend of Paul Weston and has had a controlling hand on the EDL via Lake since its birth in Lakes London flat in 2009. She covered the story of the merger for the BFP site after the meeting in Birmingham.

This scenario in London involving the "House of Lords" shows the level and the type of people connected to each other and gives an insight into why certain individuals have been protected from the Breivik enquiry and why there has been no real media coverage of Lake & Co's involvement with the EDL or the Norwegian mass murder enquiry. Imagine how damaging it would be if Alan Lake was involved with Breivik and he is directly connected to other people not yet known who were also in attendence within the "House of Lords" that day?

All the likely suspects in the same place on the same day.

This new revelatory information covered by the Sunday Times concerning Ann/Gaia gives you another example of the level of people this cabal of Lake & Co are connected to: Companion of Honour linked to Breivik enquiry

Someone must have thought a peasent like me was an easy target to set up as a fall guy for Breivik.

Was me knowing what I know and being a threat to their political agenda using a couple of drug dealing IRA supporters from Luton more added motivation for someone to want rid of me considering I was going no where until my issue with this cabal behind the EDL leadership and the leadership of "Tommy" & Uncle Kev was finished?

The question is; whose names and faces are now on the intelligence whiteboard of being directly linked to this cabal surrounding Alan Lake & Co?

You can only wonder what has been going on behind the scenes in the upper levels of society concerning this group and their influence over the security apparatus of the Country and the British side of the Breivik enquiry and the misdemenours of the EDL leadership!
Further reading: Alan Lakes threats to murder me

Thankfully not everyone thinks the same on that level of society so there are others who think differently about this case and peoples involvement who I am sure are working to get to the bottom of this because either Alan Lake & Co are behind Anders Breivik or they are not and there is enough evidence for a full and thorough investigation.

At the beginning stages of the aftermath of the terrorist attacks it emerged that several Norwegian politicians had been recorded at a Stop the Islamisation of Norway conference talking about blowing up the government building and assassinating government figures which is exactly what Breivik ended up doing.

Stop the Islamisation of Norway can be linked to Alan Lake & Co, Fraudman and Breivik.

Who are Alan Lake's friends in the Norwegian government and how did he make these friends along with his friends in the Swedish government?

Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake was also director of a financial company linked to Norway and Breivik himself was involved with financial companies in different Countries?

The whole thing with Breivik was tailored by people involved with the European anti-Jihad movement and if it is traced back to Alan Lake as I believe it will be with him already being involved in Swedish politics and having his eyes on the Scandinavian Countries for some reason (not publicly known yet) as is shown through his interview that was aired on Norwegian TV pre-Breivik's attacks, then you will see why pointers were placed inside the manifesto to direct attention my way at the beginning hoping that it would completely destroy me, thus removing the threat to Alan Lake & Co and their control over the EDL and all of its European off-shoots and their future political agenda in the anti-Jihad movement.

As the old saying goes "killing two birds with one stone".

Breivik is not a 'lone wolf' who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed whilst sitting in the confines of his bedroom playing computer games over 10 years while his mother was cooking and cleaning for him downstairs with nobody knowing anything about him. For the media and public figures to still be spinning that 'lone wolf' line after knowing the facts about Liberia and London, and we dont know the truth behind Belarus yet, points to a cover up (white wash) of the whole truth behind Breivik.

Then you have to question by who and why?

Isnt it about time the bigger picture and suspicion of other peoples involvement is brought out into the public domain and serious questions asked.

You can never commit a perfect crime and for some reason Breivik has left a large trail of information and evidence behind him, but he doesnt care now because he is sitting in prison under the strictest security so nobody can get to him and has now gone way beyond the level of those who helped place him in prison and is waiting to start dictating to his new followers from the safety and security of his prison cell. Look at Hitler who called for a Revolution, ended up in prison and then finished up leading Nazi Germany, staring World War II and committing the Holocaust.

As Alan Lake himself stated to Dagbladet "He is special".

Maybe Breivik has his own reasons that are different from those who helped place him in prison, and he is not the gullible 'useful idiot' they believed him to be whilst they were brainwashing him with the perfect Knight idea (just a thought). He has excelled all of them and now sits isolated from the world outside under State protection and has the ultimate power (knowledge) over those who helped placed him in there, and for some reason has given the Norwegian police alot of evidence to work through and understand. He is now the leader of their European group. He was not killed during his terrorist attacks and now has his hand on the whole picture concerning him and his friends and holds the ultimate power over each of them especially his London link who is the most important one to Breivik as this is where his attacks eminate from with the manifesto and everything else in British English including his Anglacised name obviously for the UK extreme right-wing market place for phase 2.

The most prominent right-wing group in the UK is the EDL and Alan Lake is/was the director behind the leadership?

Who knows Breiviks mind, his reasons and motives but he himself and those now seeking to understand him and what he has done.

He is not just a mass murderer who killed a bunch of innocent kids to feed a natural born psychopathic blood lust, he is the leader of an extreme right-wing political movement dressed up in the clothes of Templarism with him now calling himself the Grandmaster of the Order who targetted the Left-wing in his Country with a 1500 page manifesto explaining his reasoning and justification.

If Breivik does have people on the outside who he was involved with to carry on the work which he does based upon the facts, along with his new followers recruited online via the manifesto and media coverage then for him to claim that title might sound like madness to those who cannot see the truth through the lies, but fits into context with the 'strategy' although he could never be a Templar let alone a Grandmaster because he is not a Christian but in today's anti-Islamisation climate it was the best thing (strategy) to dress up his agenda in just like the hijacked EDL - Wolves in sheeps clothing

Dressing up his acts as a neo-Nazi was never going to get mainstream right-wing support throughout Europe and beyond that those who are behind the strategy knew, so they took on Templarism as the public image and in the process with not knowing the true heart of Templarism which is a firm foundation of belief and faith in Jesus Christ have damaged the identity of true Templarism that dates back almost 1000 years to the Crusades because no Templar would support or condone Breivik's extreme right-wing political acts against 69 innocent left-wing children on their summer camp which also includes all those left scared from the events that day.

Templarism is against Islamic fundamentalism which is holy war and not a godless left v right-wing political war.

John 8:44 You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.

A companion of honour linked to Breivik enquiry

Further reading: EDL backers linked to Breivik enquiry

Turner artist drops far-right aide

Dipesh Gadher

Published: 15 January 2012

One of Britain’s leading artists has accepted his assistant’s resignation after learning that she made a donation to the far-right English Defence League (EDL).

Sir Howard Hodgkin, a Turner prize winner, said it was “impossible” to continue employing Ann Marchini, 62, because he felt the EDL had “despicable and abhorrent” views.

Marchini, a widow, is a member of the British Freedom party (BFP) which was set up by disaffected members of the right-wing British National party. The EDL is considering an alliance with the BFP to enable EDL members to stand as candidates at council elections.

The Sunday Times revealed last month that she had been photographed alongside the EDL’s leader, Stephen Lennon, at a rally and had helped organise a meeting in 2009 between EDL members and so-called “counter-jihad” thinkers in a bid to broaden its appeal.

Last week it emerged that Marchini had been an assistant to Hodgkin, 79, for 17 years. He was awarded the Turner prize in 1985, knighted in 1992 and made a Companion of Honour in 2003.

When approached by The Sunday Times, Hodgkin said Marchini, who worked 1 day a week at his studio, had admitted giving money to the EDL — albeit a small sum, understood to be £50. The artist said in a statement: “I find their views and activities despicable and abhorrent. It was therefore impossible to continue employing her. She tendered her resignation with immediate effect, which I accepted.”

..............................................................

No wonder the little cabal behind the English Defence League leadership are being protected from the Anders Breivik mass murder enquiry if this one link is anything to go by.

The question has got to be; who else is linked to them that goes right to the top, who do not want to be brought out into the public eye through heir association because of how damaging it would be?

Its just what decisions are made at the top with regards all of this.

That little cabal of Ann Marchini and Alan Ayling (aka Alan Lake) & Co set me up with Breivik because I was a threat to their long running political agenda, its just a matter of the Norwegians, hopefully with British backing, proving their complicity (if they are guilty) with Anders Breivik, and there is still one striking question that needs answering that they both knew and withheld from the enquiry at the beginning stages so that I would take the blame for being the English 'mentor': Who is Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How long does it take to find out?

Ann Marchini has worked for this man who walks in the highest realms within our Country, for 17 years, so either he had his head buried deep in the sand over those 17 years or there is some level of complicity.

The story has not finished yet and now the bigger picture is starting to emerge of the people who have reputations to lose, just like me who was an innocent man framed, and one thing is for sure, nobody should be protected from police interrogation when it concerns the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian kids on their summer camp no matter who they are linked too, and I hope that comes from the top down.

Further reading: Alan Lake - Agent/Asset of the State

Breivik's stepfather a retired Army Major

Dagbladet: Breivik's stepfather is a retired Major

The Anders Breivik plot thickens.

The biological son of the Norwegian government diplomat to London, and stepson of a retired Norwegian Army Major turns into a right-wing political terrorist who has declared war against the political left?

The key to understanding the bigger picture and who is involved is establishing who selected Anders Breivik to travel to Liberia in 2002 and how the chain of events occured. Knowing his families diplomatic military background its not hard to understand why a young Anders Breivik was selected and recruited into a right-wing neo-Gladio network/group in 2002 that ended up with the events on July 22nd 2011.

The question is who were the ones who selected him?

One thing is for sure is that for some reason whoever is in control of the Breivik enquiry at the top of the chain in Norway, and the media front controlling public opinion, in my personal opinion have attempted to whitewash the whole event in the public eye by continually claiming that Anders Breivik is a 'lone wolf' nut who is now legally certified, then the full truth can be hidden from reality with a nice clean media story of a certified 'lone wolf' connected to no one with no real reason or motive behind his killings other than his own personal madness brought about by his use of the internet.

You have to be 'mad' yourself to belief that official line and the Norwegians I have spoken too have bought it hook line and sinker because its the official line promoted through the Norwegian mainstream media.

There are still unanswered questions ?

The birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist is pivotal to understanding everything and when I wrote my opinion I only knew about his father being the government diplomat to London, now knowing his stepfather who lived with him at the time when he was 22 - 23 years old in 2002 obviously sheds a different light upon that time frame of history.

What circles was Anders Breivik mixing in? With those he was mixing with knowing his family background.

His stepfather who was a Major in the Army obviously has an excellent understanding of peoples characters and abilities due to the fact that for many years he had many Norwegian soldiers under his command so is military trained to have an eye for peoples strengths, weaknesses and abilities so his opinion holds great weight.

This is his personal opinion about the events of July 22nd 2011, and don't forget this mans professional background and how well he knew Breivik on an intimate personal level.

Quote: Tollefsen thought therefore that Breivik could not possibly have made the bomb that killed eight people in the government building in Oslo itself.

- I thought he had a helper to the bomb because he was not so technical, says Tollefsen.

Make your own mind up...

Chris Knowles linked to Breivik enquiry

(Sunday Times article below)

Foreword: The Norwegian police have now confirmed that Anders Breivik was in London in 2002 and 2003 (Below). This is on top of the confirmation that he was also in Liberia in 2002 during the civil war there (upon invitation from someone), and also that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus.

Anders Breivik was not a 'lone wolf', he was a part of a group/network with Liberia and London being pivotal moments in the birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist.

The only question left that now needs answering is did Alan Ayling/Lake disclose his actual friend 'Richard the Lionheart' in police interview or did he withhold vital information to the Breivik enquiry?

3 witnesses can confirm that Alan Ayling/Lake invited another man to his London flat at the pre-founding EDL meeting who called himself 'Richard the Lionheart'.

Who is this anonymous person whose identity Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, and Kinana all withheld from the enquiry so that I would take the fall and blame for their actions against the Norwegian government and people?

Breivik was recruited in 2002 by a network/group.

Council suspends worker linked to Norway gunman

By Dipesh Gadher

Published: 18 December 2011

A council worker has been suspended following a Sunday Times investigation into a network of far-right groups.

Chris Knowles, who is employed by the children’s services department at Leeds city council, has been questioned over his links to the English Defence League (EDL) and a website featuring anti-Muslim content.

Knowles has been accused by Paul Ray, a former senior EDL figure, of operating under an alias to disguise his controversial views. He has been using the name “Aeneas Lavinium” on Facebook and other websites linked to Anders Breivik, the Norwegian gunman who massacred 69 people in summer.

Last week Oslo police confirmed for the first time that Breivik travelled to Britain at least twice — in May 2002 and December 2003.

The gunman has claimed in his 1,600-page “manifesto” that during a trip to London in 2002 he met an English “mentor” who inducted him into a modern-day version of the Knights Templar Order. Police, however, have no evidence to verify this claim.

Ray says that Knowles attended a meeting in July 2009 at which members of the EDL were introduced to key ideological figures in the so-called “counter-jihad” community.

He was involved at the time with a right-wing organisation called the Centre for Vigilant Freedom (CVF), which used an address in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, for correspondence. Another member of the organisation was Ann Marchini, a buy-to-let property tycoon who was revealed last weekend as an EDL backer.

The CVF is now part of the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) whose website includes many contributions from a writer called “Aeneas”. One article is about Fjordman, an anti-Islam blogger named 111 times by Breivik in his manifesto.

The site also features favourable items on the EDL and a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with an exploding bomb on his head.

When Knowles was asked if he was Aeneas, he said: “I’m not willing to confirm anything.”

Leeds council launched its probe after being shown the ICLA website. A spokeswoman said: “We take the allegations made by The Sunday Times very seriously and a member of staff has been suspended while we undertake a thorough investigation. If there has been any breach of the council’s policies or code of conduct we will take appropriate action.”

Additional reporting: Mark Lewis in Oslo

2 crucial pieces of information

Norwegian police confirm Anders Breivik's trips to Liberia and Belarus.

These 2 key pieces of information that are now in the public domain prove that Ander's Breivik was not a 'lone wolf' as has been consistently spoken through the media, and was, in reality, a part of a neo-Gladio style network.

A 'lone wolf' is radicalised and trained in his bedroom and then goes out on his own under his own inspiration and commits a small terrorist attack in the name of his beliefs, which is the type of people Breivik & Co are hoping to inspire through the "2083" manifesto.

Further reading: Questioning the 'lone wolf' scenario

Breivik was recruited into a group (false Knights Templar's) who financed him, trained him, and then sent him out to declare war on their behalf. This is now proven by the fact that he was in Liberia during the civil war in the Country in 2002, and that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus later on.

What about the London meeting in 2002 and the formation of the false Knights Templar group? Have the Norwegian police confirmed whether or not Breivik was in London when he says he was?

You can safely assume that if Liberia and Belarus are facts, which they are, then London is too.

Who were Ander's Breivik's contacts in the 'group'?

Who is Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How serious is this group that is linked to Serbians soldiers, and do they have access to small scale nuclear weapons to threaten to use as their ultimate deterrent?

Who has a grievance with Norway and was linked to arms smuggling who could have been the bridge between Breivik and Liberia in 2002, and who could possibly be linked to the old style Gladio networks and London?

P.S Dont be too surprised if Fraudman is much more involved with the Norwegian/Mainland European field of operations for individuals in Breivik's false Knights Templar group. He is directly linked to Breivik and to a certain connected clique of ideological inspirations that are linked to all SIO groups and Alan Lake. Also there is too much circumstantial evidence and suspicious behaviour directly linking him.

He hid himself from the world around 2005. WHY?

Is it all coincidence?

Aftenposten: Police confirm Liberia and Belarus link

Further reading: The birth & baptism of Anders Breivik

Breivik - The EDL & Street Politics Part 1

I am against the Islamisation of Great Britain which includes the mass building projects of mega mosques all over the country funded much of the time by oil money from Saudi Arabia where there is not one single Church and from other foreign sources wanting to see Islam take its hold over Britain. Also I am against Islamic fundamentalists in government and on the streets who are actively engaged in a cultural war to convert British society into an Islamic State ruled by sharia law.

My position does not entail the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp.

From the very beginning of this blog I have put my name and face to my words because I have nothing to hide and I do not fear murder from anyone who wants to kill me. It is the Almighty’s responsibility to watch over that angle of my life and direct my steps because He is the One who called me to serve Him and when He wants me to take my place within His Kingdom then He will call me home.

The anti-Jihad movement should not be in the shadows if all of those who are actively involved in it believe in what they are saying, and if they have something to say then they should not hide from the words that they speak.

But this Ander’s Breivik case has brought the online anti-Jihad world into the mainstream psyche and what do those see that are now looking see other than people hiding from their words and deeds and denying that their words are in-part responsible for Anders Breivik.

I was voluntarily arrested and spent 18 months under arrest because of my words on this blog and was willing to stand in a court of law to defend my position. When Anders Breivik struck and I initially got the blame for being the man behind him I was willing to take responsibility for my words which is why about 48 hours after the event I admitted that the accusations could be right as all I heard was moslems, Islam, Islamisation, immigration Knights Templar etc coming at me from reporters and trying to make sense in the immediate aftermath and blame being leveled at me I owned up to my words and position on this blog.

Then I sat back and thought “no way” my position and anyone following my position on this blog over 5 years would know that I could not possibly have driven someone to execute 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their left wing political ideology. It did not fit me, so I had to sit back and think long and hard about what was going on and the only conclusion I could come up with was that I had been set up to take a fall by someone.

Then I thought to myself who could possibly have done this and wanted to do this and my only conclusion was Alan Lake.

He had reason, motive and means.

Now after 5 months all circumstantial evidence points to him, we don’t know about any factual evidence yet, and all ideological evidence points to him.

Alan Lake and his colleagues wanted rid of me because I was an imminent threat to their long term political agenda that they had been working on for several years so I had to be removed before all their hard work came to nothing with no more political agenda in place using the EDL which would mean back to the drawing board with everything they had already achieved lost, and nothing left in their hands, and then back to the day job.

Part of Alan Lake’s inner circle includes the alias Kinana Nadir and Ann/Gaia and they had factual evidence of a real life ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and not me ‘Lionheart’ yet to my knowledge did not offer this information up to the Breivik mass murder enquiry, instead they were more than happy to see me take the fall as his alleged ‘mentor’ and potentially remove me from being a threat to all their hard work that they would have eventually lost anyway because of their endorsement of the EDL’s leadership of Irish “Tommy” & Uncle Kev.

They had made their bed and had to lay in it with them no matter what the cost.

Further reading: Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Not a very nice thing for them to do to me was it? And fits in-line with them wanting rid of me for good.

Not a very wise thing for them to do either, withholding critical information from the Breivik mass murder enquiry that is the biggest act of right-wing political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century which can only mean complicity at some level, either knowingly or unknowingly. That’s a job for the investigators to determine now though.

And what about the reputations of all their high level political contacts they are connected too?

Imagine how damning and damaging it will be for them if I am right and these people did use Breivik, not only to commit a terrorist atrocity in Norway but also attempt to frame me for it.

I know who some of them are and I am sure there are many more we do not know about yet, and all these influential people connected to them on the back of their control over the EDL is more reason to want rid of me because with no hands on a political agenda to raise money and prestige then what use are they walking in high political circles, and what reputations do they then have, when shown for who they are and what they have done to innocent people.

How high their political contacts go we do not know yet, but the Security Services do.

It was only a matter of time for this click, from my point of view, because I could see clearly what was coming their way, and they could too which is why I had to go because it was either me, or them losing all their hard work and future political aspirations that they had worked long and hard on.

I wonder whether they will want to take another pop at me before this is completely over? One thing I do know is that I have been sold out by all institutions of State employed to offer assistance to a citizen in need, and have been left to sit in the middle of all of this whilst faced with a very wealthy and politically connected click of people who want rid of me for good so as to silence me.

The plot gets much thicker and dirtier when you look at the whole truth, and I thank God that we have a just Queen sitting upon the throne who must also look at the concerns of her loyal people when faced with such darkness within her realm that also threatens its ‘peace and security’, and those who have brought shame upon Her Nation in the eyes of others.

That is if the plot to commit cold blooded murder in Norway does actually emanate from Britain, we don’t know yet, but I am certain enough to share my thoughts and opinions and point my finger in Alan Lakes direction and give all of my evidence for others to judge upon.

The integrity of the Queen’s realm will be instilled in others eyes when the truth is told and those responsible for Beivik are brought to justice and any future extreme right-wing terrorist ambitions against the UK thwarted.

To say that Anders Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ who successfully carried out the worst act of political terrorism of the 21st Century defies belief in any intelligent mind, not least because the evidence contradicts that point of view.

Only time will tell now.

Contrary to the lies that are told by the EDL leadership Alan Lake has been the director behind the movement, he has been the point man between all political/ideological individuals who have endorsed the movement. This is proven by Rabbi Shifren himself who is the access for the EDL to large funds from the U.S Teaparty movement: Video – Alan Lake & Breivik

There was a discussion and strategy meeting that took place in Alan Lakes London flat about the way forward with the street protest movement before the actual founding meeting that took place several weeks later in the same London flat.

I have already stated in numerous posts who was present at both meetings.

So Alan Lake was there at the very beginning, and is also the person who for whatever reason set about sowing discord amongst the leadership group on both the ideological/political side and the boots on the ground side to have me removed from having any influence over the EDL movement.

After 2 ½ years the list of high profile anti-jihad figures in the online world has grown and you can see the core supporters on this list here: EDL supporters

This list of influential people was drawn up after Pamella Geller and Robert Spencer publicly removed their support of the EDL after advice from Roberta Moore the Brazilian head of the Jewish Division of the English Defence League. This happened a few weeks before Anders Breivik struck and the reasons for their support being withdrawn needs to be explained in detail because the reasons given conflict with reality. This is for another time.

Alan Lake is the point man, so Director behind the EDL, and Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia of Civil Liberties Alliance are his endorsement and the endorsement of the EDL in the wider anti-Jihad community because it is one and the same and they have all been there since the beginning of its formation.

After 2 ½ years the EDL has grown under their direct control and influence along with that list of supporters above, which includes Fraudman and Gates of Vienna. It has also spawned off shoots all over Europe and further afield because at its core in its original form it was a righteous cause and just movement.

All of these off shoots come under the control of the EDL Directorship, and not the leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev who are just puppets, and that is Alan Lake and his group of wealthy politically minded supporters and endorsers.

These are all directly linked to all Stop the Islamisation groups spread around Europe and the U.S that is ultimately traced back to Frank Gaffney of the American Center for Security Policy and his Center for Vigilant Freedom organisation.

I am not saying any of these are behind Anders Breivik himself but their silence and tacit support of Alan Lake’s agenda if he is involved with Breivik means their complicity because without their continued endorsement of him then the EDL would have had no credibility and validity in the wider online anti-jihad community. They turned a blind eye to the truth about the EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev and what they had done and continued to do against Loyal Patriots whose Country Britain is, and also some other very serious things that I will come to next time.

All these external forces using what can only be described as useful English idiots to further their right-wing political agenda, upon English soil and under and English banner which is an affront to any true Loyal Patriot.

A hijacked basterdised version of what was originally a righteous movement and just cause.

The EDL as a movement supported all of those on the above lists political agenda’s and they did not care about anything else, let alone very serious internal disputes within the EDL.

Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia still supported “Tommy” & Uncle Kev so that was good enough for them.

Remove “Tommy” & Uncle Kev from the equation and then what did Alan Lake & Co have left as a street protest movement? Definitely something that was no longer under their control.

Remove Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia and what did their supporters have left in the EDL, and what did the EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev have? Nothing...

It was only a matter of time until one of those scenarios became a reality and they knew this, because both myself and Nick+ had attempted this coup from Malta so as to give control over the movement back to the people who made it what it was, rather than a Dictatorship under their control, using and abusing the membership with all of their lies and making vast amounts of money in the process on the back of the movement.

We were unsuccessful at that point in time because I was living in self imposed exile and Nick+ was banned from entering the UK.

The way we aimed at taking back control was to take the domain names from their hands and give them to a neutral third party, then they no longer had the propaganda control over what the membership were fed to base their opinions on, and their continual lies and conduct to the membership could be exposed for all to see and then the EDL members could form an their opinion based on the facts with which to base a judgment over.

Democracy not Dictatorship.

The domain names were under the control of the BNP Renton brothers (Jack Smith) who knew how critical control of them were after the attempted coup within the BNP that was only averted because who had control over the domain names had control of the propaganda, so they knew what they were doing and the importance of the domain names with advice from others. They are now working with expelled BNP members in the BFP and one of them was the BNP’s web controller.

That fearful of this attack on their leadership (“Tommy” & Uncle Kev) and the potential to rip everything from their hands led to their very serious and desperate actions against my family, of which the British police have done absolutely nothing about up until this point in time?

Video: Tommy "Grass" Robinson

At that time the coup was also unsuccessful because most of the EDL membership and any high level figures within the movement were still blinded to the lies they were being told and supported “Tommy” & Uncle Kev.

Since that time they have all now seen the error of their ways and realise what was said and attempted was right and justified in light of everything being proven since it was stated, when at the time they laughed it off.

This internal attempted coup is well documented.

But as you can see the danger to that EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev and Alan Lake was ever present especially after what they did.

Remove both those elements and what is left of that politically/financially influential groups control over the EDL?

Something that is no longer under their control that they have spent so much time, money and political influence on over the past 2 1/2 years.

It is for others to judge how much emphasis was placed upon the EDL movement by those involved with it and endorsing it, and whether or not that fits in with the motive to frame me.

Without “Tommy” & Uncle Kev they had nothing and without Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia, “Tommy” and Uncle Kev had nothing, well nothing that was going to last and become credible because they needed the support from the online ideological/political side of the anti-jihad movement that the list further above brought to the movement to seem credible in other people’s eyes.

Bedfellows.

Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia are now attempting to further their political agenda using the EDL and their puppets “Tommy” & Uncle Kev by forming an allegiance with the British Freedom Party under Paul Weston’s control, who has been another one of their endorsers since the beginning.

Further reading: EDL backers directly linked to Breivik enquiry

My name was inextricably linked to the EDL from the beginning and I had seen what they had done and were continuing to do with the movement that I had formed by bringing both elements together, and to the people involved with it on the ground who were there for the right reasons, and because of what they did to me and my family personally I relentlessly exposed them for who and what they are for others to see and judge upon over the last 18 months.

I was a direct threat to their whole plans and their reputations and was not going anywhere until the end.

Is that reason and motive enough to want to get rid of me if they could?

Remove me and there is no serious threat to themselves and their future political plans all over Europe.

They did absolutely everything to me bar killing me and I stood my ground against them and continue to stand my ground against them. And anything that comes upon them now is their own fault for what they did to me and attempted to do to me because what you sow is what you reap.

Then all of a sudden out of nowhere Breivik commits a right-wing terrorist atrocity and all fingers point in my direction as being the man behind him when I did not even know him. The carefully crafted manifesto left pointers directing to me so I was originally smeared all over the worlds media as the English ‘mentor’, thus destroying my reputation, whilst they sat back in silence with damning evidence crucial to the investigation.

Further reading: In my defence

Funny thing is, is that many of Breivik’s inspirations who he wrote so glowingly about inside its pages have been some of the EDL’s most ardent supporters and that includes Fraudman who the manifesto is named after, and Pamella Geller.

Anders Breivik was mentally immersed in that anti-jihad scene of which they are all a part of, and that includes the EDL who he spoke so glowingly about, and I had had absolutely no involvement with them for almost 2 years and was one of their most ardent critics because I knew what was going on from the inside.

Then he commits his terrorist atrocity and I am originally set up for the fall for it.

See my point?

The question is, was he working with someone else with his agenda, was it a coincidence that I got the blame, or did he set this up all on his own?

I go with the first opinion and believe Alan Lake was behind it from the beginning, but that is for others to judge based upon the evidence.

I will cover the EDL leadership of Irish “Tommy” & Uncle Kev tomorrow as Part 2 so people can see the type of people that list of influential supporters have been endorsing amongst other things that I believe are relevant to this perception of the Anders Breivik enquiry.