(Supportive embedded links will be added later)Breivik states that he was invited to Liberia in 2002 by a Serbian warlord, which was during the civil war in the Country. It was this point that both myself and Nick+ said “no way”, but the Norwegian police confirmed it as being factual to me in interview, which puts most other key points in the manifesto as being factual too, if this truly is the case.
How a 22 year old Norwegian like Anders Breivik gets invited to Liberia by a Serbian war lord is very difficult to work out and understand until you look at what is staring you in the face. The Norwegian police said it was a fact that he was there in that country at that time, so it’s safe to assume that just like he says, he was invited there as a guest by someone, or sent on behalf of someone.
From there Breivik then states that he ended up in a meeting in London that same year as part of the formation of a false Knights Templar group. Maybe going to Liberia for whatever reason was his initiation to be trusted into their secretive group, thus earning his stripes.
So from Liberia to London involving high level people at age 22 with no military or intelligence background is strange on the outset, you obviously don’t meet these types of characters who send you off to a warzone down your local pub, but we are told that Breivik was definitely in Liberia in that year which says he must have been at the other London location too. The Norwegian and British police will know whether or not he was in London at this time and the English ‘mentor’ position hinges on this point. The Norwegian investigator did question me about being in London in 2002 and refused to confirm or deny whether this was a factual point so I go with the assumption that it was factual that’s why they asked me about it.
In my mind the only way someone like Breivik could have ever been in the company of such people is through his father who was the Norwegian diplomat to London, which is the piece of evidence staring the uninformed in the face. I cannot possibly see any other way this event occurred. Who knows where Breivik went, and who he spoke to when in London pre his 2002 trip to Liberia whilst visiting his father the Norwegian Government diplomat, or what contacts in London he made via this family link.
I wonder whether his father knows Alan Ayling (Alan Lake) or anyone connected to Alan Ayling through mutual business concerns, domestic British politics or Freemason lodges. We know Alan Ayling has connections into the British Establishment somehow. How far those connections go we don’t know yet, or whether we will ever know, but I can safely say the Queen who is head of the Realm does not sanction Alan Ayling and his nefarious political actions, and she sits at the top of British affairs, although you can never be fully sure because what do us peasants know about the affairs of State, but I would safely stand on my belief as being fact. She would not sanction an act of war against Norway, if Ayling/Lake is behind Anders Breivik so his connections can only go so high. This would be of his own doing and that of his supporters. How high up the Establishment tree his supporters go, who knows, but them themselves and MI5 who have now shone the light on Alan Ayling’s private affairs and uncovered the people he rubs shoulders with.
I wonder how far sections of the British Establishment will go to protect the reputations of those very high level people who are directly connected to Ayling/Lake via their mutual political beliefs. We know based on historical evidence that murder is a sure and safe age old tool to silence any threat to powerful Establishment figures reputations.
The only information there is about Breivik and his father is that he left him when he was a child, and that’s all we know, everything else in the media goes blank after that. Which is usually the way when Government officials do not want to get mixed up in a high profile media frenzy surrounding one of their children who has turned out to be a political terrorist/mass murderer of innocent kids on a summer camp, they all close ranks and protect the information because they have the ability to do that, unlike us mere mortals further down the food chain who are hung out to dry in the worlds media like I was.
Government coverup.
If it is true that Breivik did go to the Liberian warzone and was at a meeting in London in 2002 then I can pretty safely say it was via his father the Norwegian diplomat living in London in some way. It is the most obvious piece of evidence staring everyone in the face there is. Diplomats and those on that level of society always get invited to political functions, private parties and even military shows where arms dealers and international political figures are present, with some of them themselves having sidelines in certain business interests. We know this from our own British MP’s when the scandal breaks about their abuse of office for financial gain.
I wonder whether the Norwegian investigators have located Breivik’s fathers Swiss bank accounts yet, and traced where his money came from pre 2002 to 2011 because that has to be a part of the investigation, or whether or not he has lived above his means since 2002, with houses and yachts plotted up around the world in his name and that of those closest to him. I am sure the public enquiry will get to the bottom of this information because it’s crucial to the full case that the parents of the dead children will now want to know considering his son murdered their children callously in cold blood. Just because Anders Breivik’s father was a diplomat does not give him immunity to a full police inquiry especially over such a big one like this.
The London link definitely starts with his father, and cannot be based upon anything else, it’s just how and why does it go from London to Liberia and then back to London again?
And who is paying for all of the expenses for the trips of a 22 year old Norwegian son of a diplomat, and what better cover if it blows up in their faces whilst he is travelling in Africa?
You can see it now, Breivik stopped and arrested in some neutral third world hell hole like the Ivory Coast for his African adventure in the Liberian warzone, and what better way to get him out than use his father’s diplomatic position as an emergency get out of jail free card. Breivik was the perfect man for the job; he had all the credentials which is probably why he was recruited for the job in the first place. Luckily for them that never happened and Breivik did what he had to do under the radar for whomever in Liberia and then returned to London, to, I would imagine, the ones who sent him there in the first place – The English ‘mentor’ & Co.
We know that most people working in high positions in society are also members of the Freemasons or similar organisations which fits in with the Knights Templar meeting because for most of them I believe, a form of Knights Templar grouping is a branch that some of them take once involved in the Masons. So it would not be unusual for a London Freemason to set up his own little private group with influential friends out of the way of prying eyes to discuss mutual political and business matters close to their hearts and call themselves Knights Templar’s because it has a militant undertone which is befitting the Serbian connection.
Money, weapons, politics and war.
Breivik says that there were different people present representing different Countries at the meeting in London with someone I believe representing the Serbian because he was stuck in Liberia. At this stage of the game was Breivik an errand boy between the members of the London group and the Serbians? If so you could probably assume that there was arms trading going on at some level, especially because Breivik travelled to Liberia during the civil war there. Why else would a ethnic European son of a government diplomat travel to Liberia during the civil war?
Diplomats, private functions, supposed Knights Templar’s, Serbian war lords, civil war in Liberia and diamonds.
What’s your assumption based upon the facts and possibilities?
Arms trading.
So at 22 years or age Breivik found himself in the right place at the right time (somehow?), to be recruited into a secret group, quite possibly dealing in arms and diamonds, and for whatever reason (son of a diplomat) they trusted him and sent him to Liberia.
The test.
Norwegian diplomat to London, his impressionable young son, and an English ‘mentor’. 2 + 1 = 3
It is after this trip that the founding meeting of the Knights Templar is said to have taken place in London, and Breivik is then assigned his English ‘mentor’ from the group, and their future vision of how they are to communicate and their responsibilities is then mapped out between them.
After this we don’t really know too much, or I don’t anyway, other than Breivik travelled around getting involved in right-wing politics in Norway, and travelling around Europe meeting different neo-nazi’s and affiliated types of extreme groups. He was obviously then well on his travels walking his path but with the knowledge in the back of his mind that he was involved with people (military/business/political/quasi-religious) who were involved in very big things that he was a part of. That’s a heavy thing for a young man to carry in his mind, and to think he never spoke to anyone in almost 10 years about his secret and his African adventure is naïve, or that he was not on a Nato list pre 2011. Those in the secret Knights Templar group could not account for a Breivik with loose lips, they could only trust in him and hope for the best.
It is during the period between 2002 and 2011, I don’t know exact date, he is said to have travelled to Belarus several times, once on the radar and I believe twice off the radar after working out his way in and out of the Country without passing through border control. The Belarusian security services codenamed him the “Viking”.
So if this is true it’s pretty safe to say that he was in Belarus for some purpose that he did not want the authorities knowing about, which would fit in with the claim that he had attended training camps run by a former Soviet Colonel who is also a Chechen moslem convert. And if this is true then you can see the parallels between the target Breivik chose on Utoya Island, and the Beslan school siege. Which would mean he learned his art of political terrorism from a Chechen moslem convert.
The ultimate act of political terrorism - Target vulnerable children for shock and awe - and in this case the children of his left-wing Marxist government for maximum effect.
Was his father left or right-wing politically?
This could also count for the fact as to why he did not target moslems if he is supposed to be so anti-moslem and anti-Islamisation. After knowingly being trained in terrorism ideologically by a moslem, he wasn’t likely to go out and kill moslems even though he now claims Islam and moslems are his agenda. From what I can tell he was more anti-Marxist/anti-Government/anti-Multiculturalism with the former added on top for good measure which is extreme right-wing politics and nothing to do with Templarism. His manifesto clearly shows this, although the media propagate the line Islam and moslems was his agenda which fits in with his claim he is on a false crusade and somehow implicates me in that. That’s the cover and detraction from the real truth, and is in line with other extreme right-wing groups who support Breivik like the EDL who also run around promoting and pretending to be Templar’s when they are not even Christian.
Wolves in sheeps clothing.
After Breivik committing his act of terrorism, he now claims “anti-moslem/anti-Islamisation” in the media through his lawyer. This is a fallacy to detract from his real agenda because If Breivik was a Knights Templar concerned about the Islamisation of his country then he would have targeted Islamic fundamentalists and not innocent ethnic Christian Europeans. Instead he targeted his left-wing Norwegian political elite which is extreme right-wing politics and not faith/historical based, as with true Templar’s.
This is all obviously speculation about how Breivik was born and baptized to become a political terrorist and it’s only the Norwegian investigators who know whether or not these bits are true or false, this is just thoughts and opinions surrounding views on Breivik.
I would safely say that at some point in the time frame from 2002 - 2011 it was his Serbian paramilitary contacts rooted in Liberia in 2002 who were the ones that organised his terrorist training in Belarus that’s why they take a prominent position within the manifesto. Their finger prints are all over Breivik so it’s safe to assume they wanted their voices to be heard too, within the whole scope of Breivik’s acts. His acts were used for maximum exposure by all those concerned which included the attempt by others connected to him, to have me framed, silenced, imprisoned, discredited and my reputation ruined. I would imagine his English ‘mentor’ would have been more of the business financial side of whatever brought them together, as the Serbians were fighting a war in Liberia and the English man was sitting comfortably in London with a diary of contacts and financial/political backers to support the Serbs campaign.
It would be safe to say that whoever was involved with Breivik and any activities that could be deemed sensitive i.e the English ‘mentor’, would have taken the upmost precaution to cover his/their tracks after the 2002 meeting, literally ceasing all contact with each other for a period of time, with them both going their separate ways walking separate paths only meeting on several occasions over the years for an update on life’s happenings. But you can never fully 100% cover your tracks because you have to take into account factors outside of your control, and even mistakes that you never think will come back to bite you, so I am sure there are tracks to find somewhere over the 10 year period.
We have no idea who was at that first meeting in London or the type of people they are, their background, or what their lives are all about, but we can safely say they were all highish level people with money, involved in politics foreign and domestic and linked somehow to Serbians, possibly via the Balkan war and then the Liberian civil war.
Arms trading.
I wonder who was on the MI5 radar in the UK for supplying arms to Serbians in Liberia in 2002, or on the UN list of known arms smugglers trading in Liberia that can be linked back to London. I cannot imagine it being more than a handful of people.
How the connections were made amongst the group are unknown and how they all came together is unknown, it’s all speculation because only those present know the truth, but I should think they are sweating right about now, or the ones who can be exposed at least because one of their group did not become the martyr he wished for and is now sitting alive in police custody under intense scrutiny (I would have water-boarded him by now). With investigators all over the world now trying to get to the bottom of this act of extreme right-wing political terrorism so as to prevent another bloody atrocity somewhere in the world, and find out the groups political agenda, although Breivik & Co have spelled it out in the manifesto. Unless of course the Norwegian investigators stick with the line that Anders Breivik was a lone wolf radicalised and trained in his bedroom watching youtube videos and reading blogs who then exploded and became a well trained terrorist and mass murderer of children on their summer camp because of their political persuasion.
I would say that an inexperienced 22 year old like Anders Breivik made many mistakes before July 22nd 2011, and now it’s a case of the Norwegian police joining the dots to form the bigger picture (conspiracy) and other peoples involvement with him.
What we do know for a fact is that for some reason over the last few years Anders Breivik has been immersed in the European/American anti-jihad movement. After many years apart, with them walking their own paths in their own Countries, did he and his English ‘mentor’ come back together again over a common more recent political cause possibly pre 2007, under a different political climate and discuss their future agenda in this new era as false Knights?
It was probably at this point that everything made sense to Breivik and that is why he was willing to commit his acts in the name of the bigger cause that his English ‘mentor’ is involved in, but also not forgetting his Serbian brothers in arms who helped train him. Look at the manifesto to see the bigger cause (I haven’t read it). The key to Breivik’s act is someone lodging in his psyche that he will go down in history as the one who started “their” war “A European declaration of Independence” based primarily on his fellow countryman Fraudman’s political ideological writings, culminating they believe, in upwards of 1 million ethnic Christian Europeans being murdered through political terrorism before “2083”. Under the right conditions it was easy to get Breivik to believe in his own immortality and place within history, so as to go out and commit his act of terrorism and mass murder. The only thing to stop this now is for the conspirators and their agenda to be exposed to the public which nips their terrorist campaign in the bud and sends a clear message out to the world.
Unless of course this is all sanctioned on some very high level and we will never know the full truth and the Norwegians will state “Lone wolf” and more terrorists will follow Breivik’s lead based upon the “2083” manifesto.
Breivik also had good friends amongst the Russian community in Sweden.
I wonder whether Breivik and his English ‘mentor’ ever met in Sweden as a neutral country.
How did Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake get contacts directly into the British and Swedish governments?
With regards to Fraudman, how coincidental is it that an online writer about extreme right-wing politics hailed as the dark prophet of Norway amongst a small group of influential ideological writers in the online Western anti-jihad movement was from the same Country as Breivik? That link is way too suspicious just like the link with his father, and then you look at all of the people surrounding Fraudman which gives a clearer picture and shows that someone/or more, amongst Fraudman’s supporters is linked directly to Breivik.
Up pops Alan Lake & Co who also had reason to frame me as being the English mentor to remove me from being a threat to their life long political agenda that pulls in lots of money from around the world for their present political cause and gains them influential friends from around the world to climb the political social ladder. Is that reason and motive enough to frame me if they could? Only ALL circumstantial evidence points to Ayling/Lake, and he has a well documented base of supporters and financial donors throughout Europe and the US in the public domain, who are supporting his present grass roots political campaign which fits in with the English ‘mentor’ role. He is currently the mentor behind the EDL’s leader Irish tommy boy, raising funds for their mutual extreme right-wing cause in the UK and potentially throughout Europe, and there is no greater proof of this fact than tommy boy has gone from a nervous little boy in 2009 – 2010 reading from a bit of paper wearing a mask on stage to someone who can now actually speak in public, although you cannot believe one word that comes out of his mouth because he is a pathological liar.
All of my closest people who have been with me throughout my dealings with the EDL state exactly the same “he has been coached”, and low and behold Alan Lake is behind him in every way, with tommy boy even doing Masonic signs in some of his fund raising videos, so the question is; who recruited him into Freemasonry or taught him the hand signals?
Has to be Alan Ayling/Lake, there is no other possible conclusion which then takes you back to Breivik in 2002 who was also recruited into a form of Freemasonry whilst in London and assigned an English mentor.
Also in line with a wider political agenda based upon Breivik’s acts, Irish tommy boy threatened the UK live on BBC news with a bombing campaign if his EDL were not listened too. That is the modus operandi of a terrorist campaign and in this instance based around Breivik’s terrorist acts, even Fraudman is now back out pushing the Breivik line in the public domain.
These are just my thoughts surrounding the pieces of information that are in the public domain, with everything written supposition based upon facts, certain parts of Breivik’s manifesto, and my own opinion.
We don’t know anything yet about anything other than Breivik was definitely in Liberia in 2002 and his father was a London diplomat, everything else is just opinion surrounding these facts. Also that Breivik named his manifesto after his fellow countryman Fraudman, mentioning him 111 times inside.
London is central to Breivik before and after his actions on july 22nd 2011 and what a coincidence that his father was the Norwegian diplomat to London.
Its not rocket science…
I wonder what Fraudman’s passport turns up when looking at how many times he travelled to the UK, or how many times he met with those surrounding Alan Lake & Co in mainland Europe at Stop the Islamisation conferences including in Sweden and Norway? We know he was in London at the EDL demo with Ayling/Lake & Co whilst Geert Wilders was being entertained in the House of Lords by Lord Pearson. Although Geert Wilders from the very outset has always refused to endorse the EDL and if I am right, has publicly criticised them for wanting to jump on his bandwagon. He is a true European political figure with his own voice about the concerns befalling his country and the rest of Europe who does not need to be tarnished with the support of extremist groups who petrol bomb mosques and spray irrelevant graffiti all over them.
There is never a perfect crime unless Breivik was a lone wolf sitting radicalised in his bedroom thus removing any thought of accomplices in the bigger scheme of things, but travelling to Liberia in 2002 during the civil war there and meeting warlords completely discounts that myth in an instant. It’s just how far are the Norwegians and their allies willing to go to get to the bottom of this, and how much they are going to tell us Joe public.
So there can be no Government coverup with the lone wolf line, because the facts clearly say otherwise, and the people of Norway, Europe and the World following this case will now want to know all of the facts that stem from that publicly known Liberian meeting in 2002 so that we all have a clearer picture of Anders Breivik’s political terrorism/mass murder and who is behind him and with him for our own peace of mind and security.
Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is already talking about wanting to murder me. He is a little snake, who couldn’t punch his way out of a paper bag let alone kill someone that’s why he encourages others to do the job. He wouldn’t know what to do with a knife or a gun if you gave one to him, but he has the connections politically and amongst his extreme right-wing groups that also includes drug dealing Irish IRA gangsters in Luton via tommy boy and the money to pay them. If he was not concerned about anything then why would he be talking about murdering me and why is he not willing to go to Norway without any lawyers present to prove his innocence in the whole affair?
What would a jury think about these points?
Role on the truth behind the conspiracy concerning Anders Breivik the mass murdering political terrorist and their declaration of war against ethnic Christian Europeans in the name of extreme right-wing politics, and my complete exoneration in the whole affair.
Inspiration plausible but not the public/media accusation. Mentor factually impossible, so who is the English ‘mentor’?
Lionheart of England
blog posts
No comments:
Post a Comment