1 April 2008

No more Mosque's says Church leader

Foreword: At last the true leaders of Christs Church in England are standing up for themselves, their Country and for the innocent within society, led by the Bishop Nazir-Ali.

How many Churches are built in Saudi Arabia? None

Yet Saudi Arabia are pouring their oil money into the UK and building Mosque's and exercising their Islamic influence over the running of our Country.

More Mosque's being built means the growth of Islam within Britain and the ultimate consequence that brings which is the Islamification of our Nation.

What this leader has said is the bottom line truth of the matter, the truth that nobody dare believe or speak about because they are scared of being branded racists.

God is our judge, He knows our hearts, our motives and our intent, not those who try labelling us with derogatory names for their own purposes, who do not even know us.

Picture below is of Regents Park, which was once one of London's greatest most beautiful parks, now it has this towering monstrosity overshadowing the beautiful green grass, and if you ever take your children to the play area, you will be the extreme minority and feel like you are in some Moslem Nation, not London, home of the Anglo-Saxon.

What is the consequence of allowing the continual growth and expansion of Islam within the United Kingdom?

Please read: What Moslem population brings

Daily Mail

A leading Christian has called for a ban on building any more mosques in Britain.

And she claimed that Sharia law was inevitable in this country if mosques continue to be built here.

Alison Ruoff, a member of the Bishop of London's Diocesan Council and General Synod, says Muslim nations should stop persecuting Christians and that mosques should not be built here until that happened.

The former magistrate said: "No more mosques in the UK. We are constantly building new mosques, which are paid for by the money that comes from oil states.

"We have only in this country as far as we know, 3.5 to four million Muslims. There are enough mosques for Muslims in this country, they don't need anymore.

"We don't need to have Sharia law which would come with more mosques imposed upon our nation, if we don't watch out, that would happen. If we want to become an Islamic state, this is the way to go.

"You build a mosque and then what happens? You have Muslim people moving into that area, all the shops will then become Islamic, all the housing will then become Islamic and as the Bishop of Rochester has so wisely pointed out, that will be a no go area for anyone else.

"They will bring in Islamic law. We cannot allow that to happen."

Mrs Ruoff, who lives in Waltham Cross, north east London, told Premier Christian Radio: "We are still a Christian country, we need to hold on to that.

"If we don't watch out, we will become an Islamic state. It's that serious."

Contine reading:
No more Mosque's

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

You are a brave man, Lionheart, especially with how you infiltrated the ISM.

Keep up the good work.

Joanne said...

Mrs. Ruoff is a good woman of strong faith and fibre. I'm sure the onslaught of threats from 'peaceful' Muslims will be coming her way, if they haven't already.

I cannot believe mosques are allowed to call their members to prayers in Britain.

Joanne said...

http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/

"Austrians Demonstrate Against Lisbon in Vienna

Vienna: At least 10,000 demand a referendum on the Lisbon Treaty
by ESW

A demonstration comprising people from all walks of life, from all political parties (except the Greens), from young to old, convened in front of the famous Staatsoper (State Opera) in the center of Vienna to demonstrate against the ratification of the Lisbon Treaty in the Austrian Parliament, which will occur on April 9, 2008 without holding a referendum."

They got 10,000 people out, you'd think the city of London could easily muster up a few hundred thousand.

"Because our politicians are afraid that we will not decide to get rid of democracy, they do not risk a referendum, and thus abolish democracy without our approval." by Professor Aubauer

Doesn't this sound familiar - the same thing the government in Britain is doing. Traitors, the lot of them.

Lionheart said...

Thank you Mini14...

‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men/women do nothing’

And yes Mrs Ruoff is a good woman, something Great Britain and the Christian faith which is the the foundation of the fabric of our society needs.

She has now shown where she stands, along with Bishop Nazir.

It is only with the likes of these leaders standing up will there be change.

The future we are walking towards is counting on the actions and decisions of those who are living in the now.

Anonymous said...

lol, ridiculous scaremongering motivated by envy.

it's not muslims' fault that no new large churches are being built and existing ones are being sold for redevelopment into flats - even if christians decided to build a mega church in britain, who on earth would attend? hehe, you silly sheep.

Anonymous said...

Some people here are a hate monger. Or why do they sneer at discussion?
Fact; in Christian Britain, mosques can be built easily.
Fact; in Muslim Saudi Arabia, no churches can be built at all. No Christian chapel is allowed, not even in a foreign countries Embassy.
Some writers here obviously are unaware how new churches are packed to the roof every week in Britain. It is the old industrial town churches and remote country churches that are losing their members.
Much of this is due to the liberal and socialist policies of education by a corrupting government inspired by Marxist hippy ideals of the 60's.
That time will soon be outplayed and new values established.
Freedom of religion may not get the same support in an ever worsening world politic.
Some writers here, though hateful of the dire predictions of Lionheart, may be soon be proved wrong if just one of the predictions talked about here are successful.
Where will we all stand if and when a "Dirty bomb" make part of our great Capital uninhabitable?
Or the next Islamic suicide bomber kills hundreds on public transport or thousands at an airport or shopping centre. We all know these things are being planned, that is why the government employ many thousands of secret service officers to monitor what is happening.(Hi there, I know you are reading this!)
It is the responsibility of moderates to police their radical brothers, because if they succeed just once, that will be enough for the last of our enjoyable personal freedoms to be removed.
Which is just what the radicals want, as they will then be able to call for an open war against the British people of all other races and beliefs than their own.
There is a rule of life, that is that, just when you think things are progressing one way, then a sudden reversal takes place.
Some people call it "Sod's Law," some call it "Bastard's Law," whatever you call it, it takes away the pride of the arrogant and the distorted vision of the self-deceived.
Humility is the only defence against it.

Anonymous said...

the only churches in britain that are even halfway packed are those with black congregations.

but you'd probably class them seperately from true brits right? why else would you make an irrelevant point about churches in saudi arabia - most of the muslims living in britain are legally british and/or born here you clown.

those who call for unnecessary humility are in effect calling for non-whites/muslims to be second-class citizens constantly having to apologise for being born here.

excuse me if i don't bow down so you can step on my neck - this racist clap trap is the source of the current problems and defintely not the cure.

Lionheart said...

I think you will find that Islam's racist supremacist ideology is the problem.

And ignorant fools like you who deny that truth...

Anonymous said...

All premium land should be saved for natives.

Gutter dwellers, welfare refuse, who can build their Mosques in the gutter where they reside.

They are demonic phylum, backward pedaling evolutionary chains, depicted as the baboon like demons who artfully adorn the darkest places in Medieval Churches.

The Mosques in the nice part of town should be bulldozed at once. Their intrusion was obviously built on the backs of native labor.

Clean air, fresh greenery of a peaceful western landscape is our privelege, their upkeep, alone our burden; what do desert trash, Narobian dirt farmers know about our land? Their very footsteps on our soil constitute rape and destruction.

Anonymous said...

Lionheart is a drug-raver clubber, who douces himself with watermellon aftershave from "the blacks in the jacks".

That is his western civilization.

Muslims are the mean looking chaps on the other side of the dance floor ruining his extasy induced "chilax".

It's defcon 3, a brutal dance off could break out any second. Western civilization is on the line!

Anonymous said...

So here we see the true nature of those that call this blog racist.
Provocateurs.
A British Muslim who is so bored he spends time to slag down any comment he disagrees with.
The relevance of there being no Churches in Saudi Arabia is this.
British Muslims want to install a supremacist alien Sharia law system in Britain. They use Saudi money to build their new places of worship, and fund terrorism at the same time.
Why? Because they believe in the establishment of the world wide "Caliphate" or Islamic Kingdom as Lionheart describes it.
To do this all means are considered legal, because their religious orators proclaim that non-Muslims are unclean, "kafir," a very insulting word.
These people say out loud in public, that only Muslims are innocent and therefore it is permitted to commit what is called terrorism.
This is all done in the name of the "Ummah" the "brotherhood" of the Islamic people.
Well surprise, surprise, the dirty kafirs get upset about people wanting to blow up subway trains.
The government and police want to arrest and imprison the people who plan terrorist outrages, and so the Ummah is being picked on and humiliated?
What a twisted logic.
That is just plainly ridiculous.
If you call yourself a British born Muslim, then that term holds two conditions, yes you are Muslim, and in our democratic "free" country you are not arrested or imprisoned for that, unless you commit or plan a terrorist crime., but firstly you are British.
That means you uphold the British law and behave accordingly.
If not, you reject your Britishness and maybe would be better off taking residence in a happier place thanthis has proved to be.
Just like so many British whites who go to live in Australia or the USA.
Now wouldn't we all be happier if we lived where society was what we approved of?
To try to use violence to achieve political ends (even in the name of religion, like the IRA did,) will get you into trouble and mess up life for everyone else.
Sure you couldn't help being born here no more that the children of the Irish or Welsh or whatever. Many of the Irish have gone home to Irelnd now the Poles are here. That's a fact of life.
By the way, I'm proud to be a Paddy.
Have you seen many Welsh people lately?
They have gone elsewhere because they perceive it better for themselves.
Nobody forces us to live where we are unhappy, only economic circumstance.
So some don't like the British involvement in Iraq, no, but we are all happy to buy the petrol that has secured us, and drive around in nice cars, built buy Germans and Japanese, and heat our homes with Russian gas?
Thats how life is now we have so much population.
How many think about overpopulation as they have another child? What about that kids future?
Personally I remember a time when the only foreigners in England in any numbers were the Scots Irish and Welsh, and a much better place it was.
Mo gun crime , no kids stabbing each other or clubbing down old people for drug money.
This has all come about since our foolish goverments have allowed free settlement of so many aliens into Britain.
One day multi culturalism will be seen as the mistake it has proved to be.
Sadly it will be at great cost to civil life.
If you look realistically at this blog, you will see that it is mainly taken from National news reports, so how come it is considered racist?
If the blogger expresses his own point of view that's up to him, and it's up to the reader to use sane judgement to see it in context.
I am sure we have all seen the content of the violent anti-Western blogs and the horrible and indeed wicked violence they promote.
No doubt some cheer at what they see, but I hope they are confident that their God will approve of what they support.
In each person, is planted a seed of conscience, an instinct of what is right or wrong, and we do not need to be directed by those that interpret dusty words into violent exhortations against one faction or another. These things should belongs to the past, but we all know that the past can be re-visited.
One last word, has there ever been a case where newspapers boast about violence in military adventures?
If I recall it was the press that has highlighted the very small number of cases where British soldiers have deviated from the very strict rules of engagement.
So you don't limke the Brits in Afghanistan.
Well funnily enough, given the choice, the Afghans don't seem to like the Taliban either.
And wasn't the liberation of Afghanistan from the Soviets brought about by the West?
And wasn't the greatest dictator of the middle East brought down by the West?
So now we see factional fighting that would have been crushed by Sadaam, well at least they have the freedom to choose peace or war,lets hope we can get our troops out of their when some kind of settlement is secure.

Joanne said...

boredluton - build your mega mosque, but just remember, sheep have a shepherd! Wrap your tiny little brain around that one!

Anonymous said...

Now there's a thought.
neoconsarecommies is none other than.. DUCKIES HERE!
Taa raah!
That took so long to figure out, durrh.
Nice one Ducks, you had us fooled for a few days there.
Was it an April fool?
You are pet meat son!