The public perception of the Breivik case is that he is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one because this is what elements within the Norwegian State who have been in control of the case have wanted the public to believe. They are the elected 'official's' in control of the case so what they say has to be taken as fact irrespective of whether or not it is fact.Our leaders do not lie to us...do they?
They own the media platform and they are the 'officials' in charge so they must be right and what they say must
be true when you see them on TV propagating the 'official' line.Their stated 'official' story is then conveyed to the wider international public through the mainstream media by journalists which then creates the accepted story of the case in the public mind.
Other journalists then jump on the Breivik bandwagon and continue writing their own stories about the case on the basis of the accepted 'official' story they have been told by the first journalists which continues to endorse the 'official' story in the public mind.
This shows you the credibility of the journalists who write the articles, they are nothing more than State lackeys who cannot think for themselves with it being more than their jobs worth to question the 'official' story even when the contradictory evidence is staring them in the face.
Tools of the State working in the State controlled propaganda machine to control the public mind of the masses for their State masters who are the ones in control of the functioning of State and want to subdue the people with their lies from what is hiding behind the real truth.
Then you question why?
Let me give you a very simple example that completely undermines the Norwegian State's 'official' story surrounding Breivik and calls into question the professional integrity of every journalist propagating the Norwegian State controllers 'official' story of the case.
Their names are on their commentary articles of the case endorsing the "solo terrorist" connected to no one line for any future job references, which is good if you want an obedient puppy dog with a writing degree and bad if you want an independent thinker with credibility and professional integrity for your mainstream media platform.
The Norwegian State controlled story is that Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which in the public mind means there is nobody else to look for as part of their wider involvement in the terrorist attacks. In other words the State controllers of the case do not want people to believe there are others involved with him. This means that whoever was involved with Breivik gets away with their complicity in the mass murder of a group of innocent teenagers on their summer camp in Norway and their attempting to frame me as the English 'mentor' behind the crimes.
I wonder what the families of Utoya think about that concerning their children?
That was the 'official' line taken into the court room against Breivik and prosecuted on the basis of in front of the Worlds media which endorsed the Norwegian State's 'official' story surrounding the case. An 'insane' "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was/is the most successful "solo terrorist" of all time in the history of international terrorism.
Jackanory...tell us another story.
That does not hold up against the facts though when you take the time to actually look at the facts.
To prosecute someone in a court of law based upon an 'official' conclusion which is then spread around the Worlds media as fact you have to be 100% certain it is fact. Not we believe or we think based upon inconclusive evidence.
In the trial one of the detectives told the judge that the police investigation into the case is still ongoing with multiple lines of investigation not fully investigated (this was in the middle of the trial).
On that basis how can anyone say for certain (fact) that the 'official' story of Breivik being a "solo terrorist" connected to no one is a fact?
This one example undermines every single article written by any journalist who has propagated the 'official' Norwegian story surrounding Breivik and calls into question their professional journalistic integrity and shows they are nothing more than State lackeys for the State propaganda machine that is used to control public perceptions for their State masters. They are like obedient little dogs eating the crumbs from their masters table (their pay packet) not willing to speak about the real unanswered questions in the case in a real and relevant critical manner for the sake of 'truth & justice' on-behalf of the dead, injured and their families which is what wider civilised society expects from a supposed impartial mainstream media.
To do so challenges Norway's State masters and I have seen no one willing to do that yet which shows that Norway is a carefully concealed AUF Labour Dictatorship. It is not the front men but the power base behind the front men, the front men are just subservient puppets on strings.
The credibility of the 'official' Norwegian police investigation was completely undermined when after 10 months they still had not investigated the Liberia link. It took VG journalists several days to do what they could not do in 10 months.
How can you believe the 'official' Norwegian police conclusion of the story surrounding Breivik that they took into the court room in front of the World's media and be of a sound mind over it on that basis?
You cannot...
And how can the mainstream media feed the minds of their readership which creates public perceptions, with the 'official' conclusion stating it as fact when the Norwegian police in control of the investigation could not even do their jobs properly and have not even finished the investigation?
That is only one massive failure on-behalf of the Norwegian police who were investigating the case and undermines the 'official' Norwegian story surrounding Breivik.
It is like putting a million dollar Ming vase in a box with no base.
This is without even mentioning the charade surrounding the Norwegian State's official mental health case against Breivik that can be read about over the last month or so on this blog. A charade that should now involve a criminal investigation only it was the Norwegian State carrying out the criminality (perverting the course of justice) so they will not investigate themselves and the media will not call it criminality because they are an extension and organ of the State with it more than their jobs worth to do so.
Imagine if they did?
Shock horror...and the bursting of the Norwegian State induced mind bubble the Norwegian public are sitting in with people then starting to awaken to the real truth and what their State masters have been doing and done at the cost of innocent young Norwegian blood.
Any outside observers of the case who knows the fundamental facts would have to agree on these points.
Who wants to publicly say it though?
Instead there is silence in the mainstream media over the real truth behind the cold blooded massacre of a bunch of innocent misguided teenagers on their summer camp in Norway with not even a hint of criticism or questioning of the 'official' story that has more holes in it than a golf course with all of the unanswered questions and evidence disappearing from the public mind into a big Norwegian controlled black hole.
If anyone can tell me I am wrong in my thinking and has a different perspective of the case based upon the simple facts above and the still outstanding evidence then please email me and I will post it here on this blog and give my thoughts to the different perspective.
defenceoftherealm@hush.com
If nobody has a different perspective when looking at the facts then you have to agree that there is substance to what I am saying and my perspective.
Then you have to question the 'official' Norwegian story and those in charge of the whole investigation and ask why the truth is being hidden from the public by a State sanctioned cover-up and white-wash and who has been in control of it.
Mass mind control...
I wonder whether or not hundreds of billions of dollars worth of oil & gas from Norway's territorial waters is motivation enough for some secretive high powered group with financial and political motivations to orchestrate 'Operation Breivik' and the political aftermath?
Asymmetric warfare and State sponsored terrorism.
With the story then fed to the masses as the window dressing of the events being that Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was/is insane after playing computer games in his bedroom who wanted to belong to a group because he was a loner so attached himself to a right-wing ideological movement that he did not have one single physical contact from (if you believe the official line) and then woke up one day and committed his acts in the name of that movement all alone and became the most successful "solo terrorist" of all time in the history of international terrorism.
If you believe that then you are stupid and that is a fact!
Breivik the son of a former government diplomat to London, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Norwegian Ministry of Defence lawyer.
Look at that pedigree.
I will give my very brief hypothesis of what I believe without going into a long winded write up as I have been stating this repetitively for months now with it being completely ignored.
There is whole investigative angle to how I became wrapped up in the case but this has been completely ignored with the door firmly shut on it which begs the question as to why and raises a level of suspicion around the question.
If the investigative angle surrounding me was to be fully investigated and proven to be correct then this would completely shatter the 'official' Norwegian story of Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one because it would prove there were others involved with him and this is what a faction in Norway who are in control of the case do not want to admit to the public which means those who are complicit in the acts get away with their actions and the truth behind the mass murder of a group of innocent misguided teenagers stays covered up.
Then you ask the question as to why?
I have consistently said Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is Breivik's English 'mentor' based upon the facts and he fits the profile exactly.
I believe Ayling must be connected to some secretive group with political and financial motivations based in London England. He does work within the banking center inside the Square Mile after all and it is highly probable just not proven yet that he is an asset or agent of the British Security Services.
So this places him inside a secretive network in London with international contacts because the bank he works for is the EU controlled Bank for Reconstruction and Development.
We know for a fact that he has contacts in the Norwegian and Swedish Governments.
He is also the director behind the English Defence League which has become an extension and tool of the American financed counter-jihad movement so it places him directly in the middle of a right-wing ideological movement. An ideological movement that is directly connected to Breivik and his "2083" manifesto.
The exact movement Breivik professed to be carrying out his actions in the name of.
Breivik was recruited in Norway and sent to London where he was assigned his English 'mentor' in 2002 who I believe is Alan Ayling.
Alan Ayling has stated that he has contacts in the Norwegian Government.
Whoever is in control of the Breivik case in Norway does not want to admit that Breivik is a part of a network which is why they have stuck to their 'official' line since the beginning and have not fully investigated the angle on how I became involved in the case.
To admit he is a part of a network means there is a wider story than the one that has been fed to the public as the 'official' story and includes other peoples involvement in the whole case which includes their complicity in a mass murder of a group of innocent misguided teenagers which would tell it's own story.
If Ayling is the English 'mentor' then he is connected to someone (plural) high level in Norway and also a wider group and chain of command who are ultimately behind 'Operation Breivik' which would explain why there has been a white-wash and cover-up of the whole affair.
All if this information is currently in the big black hole and hidden from the public though.
Alan Ayling given a mickey mouse interview over his role as the possible English 'mentor' because they had no choice but to for protocol. He is embedded in the British State through his contacts and could even be an agent of the State, and he has direct connections into the Norwegian Government. All of this information placed in the context of the whole picture tells a story, a story that has been hidden from the public by the Norwegians in control of the case.
What story would Ayling tell if he was arrested and interrogated and who would he implicate?
blog posts
No comments:
Post a Comment