19 August 2001

Who are we British? Part 2 of 3

Who are we British? Part 2 of 3


:Part 2: Jim Dowson B.Th

In the first part of my paper examining who we are and what made us and just why nationalism has spectacularly failed to engage all but the tiniest proportion of our people despite circumstances that should make nationalism a first choice for millions.

My main proposition was, and is, that patriotic politics (nationalism), has failed miserably because its ethos (real or perceived) is rooted in a European model of racial nationalist expression which is an alien and foreign product and a most un-appealing ideology to us Brits for many reasons, not least of which is its intrinsic rejection of our own rich and ancient Christian heritage (real or perceived).

In the first part of this paper I was deliberately provocative in challenging the ‘nationalist mind-set’ by showing how overwhelmingly their ideas of what constitutes a ‘patriot’ had been rejected for over half a century, but still many nationalist leaders bang the same old busted drum, never attracting, only repelling, fresh generations of our beleaguered people.

Many critics will no doubt immediately brand me a Christian fundamentalist or race traitor with an agenda. Well, this is partly true, but the critics offer very little reasoned, researched or balanced arguments against my points.

Indeed, many nationalists contend that people like me, who use Christian language and references, are hopelessly out of kilter with the mainstream.

These sentiments only reinforce my premise that it is nationalism (especially the more racially vocal type), in its current manifestations, that is out of touch, irrelevant, mysterious and deeply unattractive to most British patriots.

Recently, a respected opinion poll cited that 40% of British children these days do not know the ‘Lord’s Prayer’ as opposed to only 10% not knowing this thirty five years ago.
This interesting news has stirred up church leaders and annoyed many religious people and indeed many nationalists have used this study as ammunition against me and my opinions.

However, let us for a moment ponder these figures: 40% of our kids DON’T know the Lord’s Prayer, but an incredible 60% actually DO KNOW IT!

What percentage of our children, even those from nationalist parents know what the ‘14 words’ stand for, or what ZOG means or what the NWO stands for or what we mean by white racial nationalism?

Right or wrong, these are the facts and we would be foolish in the extreme to ignore such an obvious communal creed and common bond still so vibrant within our young people.

The same study threw up another interesting point: more children NOW think God and religion is important than their parent’s generation, this despite a drop in church attendance over the period.

This is a fascinating snippet of information and needs some very deep thought and consideration.

Could this be a reaction against their parents’ consumer-based lifestyle over the last twenty years?

Could the ‘baby boom’ generations mantra of free love, their replacement of God with consumerism, be coming to an end?

Has a fifty year social anomaly now run its course? Who knows, but I think it is entirely possible.

You see humans, all humans, need something bigger than themselves to ‘buy into’ - the baby boomers merely replaced their forefathers’ ancient stone and stained glassed ‘communal’ landmarks with Bluewater, the Arundale Centre and a thousand other shopping centre temples to the new consumer gods of Asda, Tesco, Next and JJB sports.

The 1940s generation was sold the idea that individualism was the new path to enlightenment and this human salvation could be brought about by embracing the glittering new deities of personal wealth and consumerism.

Also important to this promised route to personal and social Nirvana was the total rejection of the collective and familiar cultural icons and traditional mores that for centuries acted as the glue that held together our once strong communities, extended families and our collective idea of nationhood.

Let me be very clear here: I do not wish to see the nationalist movement become a full on Christian enterprise nor do I think that would work or appeal to the average Brit.

I am however, suggesting that Christianity is so deeply ingrained into the fabric of our society at every level, that we would be foolish to ignore this.

I would go further and say that our brand of Christianity is not just in the fabric of our nation, it is interwoven into every Britons cultural DNA and the collective narrative of our island race.

Cultural markers like the Lord’s Prayer are like ancient echoes that resonate deep within us and around us. Similarly our Christian architecture has shaped what we think of as the quintessential British townscape.

From the lofty parish spires we see in the distance marking out an ancient town or village, seen through the eyes of a hundred generations of our people, to the palace of Westminster, built as a gothic temple as Pugin and Barry re-defined what it was to build in a ‘British style’.

Look around you: nearly all of our Victorian town halls, railway stations and civic buildings are so ecclesiastic in appearance that they confuse many a tourist.

Even the foremost ‘temple’ to Darwinism and secular modernity, the Natural History Museum, was built in the form of a great medieval Christian cathedral.

This is why our historical faith and religious heritage is so terribly important to the idea of ‘Britishness’ and to most Britons.

It is the civic glue that binds us as a people and echoes the voices of our ancestors’ collective experiences down through the millennium and it resides deep within millions of our kinsfolk.

We have nothing else so powerful, so subliminal or so accessible that we can easily access for the benefit of our struggle and for the unification of our people in the dark days that lie ahead of us.

This cultural cement took 1,500 years to set, for fifty years the cultural Marxists have chipped away at it, as have the secular ‘national socialists’, atheist racial purists and the pagan nationalists, but our cultural Christian heritage is a powerful binding agent, not just a superficial veneer of creeds, clergy and buildings.

It is part of our national and personal DNA and can never be fully removed from us.

Indeed, give it the slightest encouragement and it will burst spectacularly into full bloom again.

Or, when faced with a spiritual/political foe such as Islam, our ancient faith, (cultural or personal), shall rise up in a most masculine and aggressive format in defence of the host, the Nation that nurtured and adapted it to our specific requirements as a people.

The faith of our fathers is not dead - it merely sleeps within us and may well be awakened by the invaders ‘Adhan’ call to prayer from the forest of Minarets that now populate our landscape.

It shocks and exasperates me that so many patriots and nationalists fail to recognise or accept this and still continue in their belief that people like me are out of touch.

Please try and find the program “How God Made the English” and you will see what I mean.


History has told us time and again that no secular society has ever succeeded in quashing a people with a deeply held faith, even when in the minority.

This is where the Frankfurt schools ideology has gone wrong.

Yes they managed to secularize almost the entire top tier of our political structures and society.

But they had not, and by their own secularism, could not, ever had envisaged how easily a vibrant, unified faith community like Islam could then take over a society that the Frankfurters had stripped bare of its natural defences.

It is not only us that now lie weak and prostrate, it is the Marxists too, as they will soon find out as Islam rises in the countries that they have left ruined and vulnerable.

However, this disaster may carry the seeds of our own salvation too: if a highly motivated and unified community like Islam can sweep aside the PC and politically effeminate ruling classes so can we.

Indeed Islam may show us the way ahead.

Militant Islam may re-ignite our collective and civic consciousness and notions of nationhood which, in my opinion, can only be found in a shared national, historical Christian context.

In the 2010 census 46 million Britons described themselves as ‘Christian’, and over 5 million get up, dress in their best and make the effort to go to their local Church every Sunday.

To ignore such a committed mass movement and spiritual reality within our own people is national suicide.

After 80 years of internal subversion many church goers are indeed bleeding heart liberals, but the vast majorities are not.

In fact, secular liberalism is far more widespread than Christian liberalism and I suggest that besides the race issue, many nationalists are far more socially liberal than most Christians would dare to be.

The vast majority of Christians in the UK are deeply hostile to Islam, unbridled immigration, the EU, ‘gay rights’, the PC lobby and many other nationalist common causes.

Most are also opposed to thuggish behaviour, divorce, sexual promiscuity, drunkenness, foul language and the football hooligan mentality. These, unfortunately are some of the social ills that have dogged nationalism for years with little or no effort spent in trying to address these issues.

More importantly, Christians, like most fellow Britons are fairly xenophobic, however they are also instinctively anti-racist in the sense that they will broach no discussion on the merits of a man depending on his racial group or skin colour or ethnic identity alone.

We Brits tend to judge a man on who he is, rather than what he is.

Yes, most of us have a moan about the foreigners down the road but our ingrained sense of fair play and personal respect for our fellow man prevents millions from giving perceived blanket racist groups our support.

I cite the NF and BNP as classic examples of this moral and national dichotomy for our people.

Fair play, decency and reasonable tolerance are sacred cows for most Britons, especially Christians, as is their absolute abhorrence of anything that is, or could be classified as belonging to the school of Nazism or Communism.

In fact, to even discuss such things among Christians often results in immediate rejection of the bearer and whatever cause (no matter how noble it may be) he or she may be espousing.

Right or wrong, Frankfurt influenced or not, this is how it is and we do not have another eighty years to re-educate millions of natural patriots on the nuances of racial differences and the mitochondrial markers in the inferior peoples of the world.

Now, I must be brutally honest and up front here: as a patriot whose childhood was deeply rooted in the Orange/Loyalist culture, which is uncompromisingly and fiercely patriotic, I knew virtually no one in our world that liked the BNP or NF.

Yes, some of us , myself included, flirted with so called ‘Nationalism’ of the mainly English BNP/NF variety in our youth, but almost all of us were totally repelled and alienated by the often intense pro-Nazi/white power/ZOG/pagan obsessed ethos of many within the movement.

For a time I lived and worked in London, during which the Brixton riots happened and around then several whites had also been butchered by blacks.

As a committed and heavily involved loyalist my only reference to such massive attacks on a community was to strike back, but all I saw was the natural anger, rage and tribal need to survive being stifled by endless, inane political ramblings every day in the NF’s Pawsons Road HQ or in the Swan pub up the road.

Lots of big talk, intellectual talk, stupid talk, but absolutely no action.

Englishmen and women were dying, our capital city was being destroyed, but the only response from the nationalist leaders were delusional ten hour discussions on ‘white superiority’ and electoral daydreams of securing a modicum of power through the ballot box.

There is nothing superior about a people who refuse to defend themselves or exact retribution from those who would seek to destroy them and their children’s birth right.

The political system was and still is used as a tool to lock up and channel our national outrage and our youthful energies and strength into safe and controlled neutralising political safety nets.

Despite many nationalists now understanding this we yet again we see our youth in the form of the potentially revolutionary EDL now being corralled into the futile political system.

This will neutralise any threat they may have posed and will end in failure just like the NF/BNP before them.

The EDL/BFP will probably be even bigger than their NF/BNP predecessors in order for the state to keep a lid on the increasingly deteriorating ethnic/political situation in Britain.

Alas, it will be nothing more than a state sponsored holding pen and intelligence gathering operation for the best of our young patriots and that is the real tragedy, for this is our last generation before Islamic Armageddon in this Country.

To be completely clear, I personally despise the ideologies and practical applications of much of German National Socialism and I have little time for the real Nazis, but I reserve my real disgust and bitter contempt for the crackpot wannabe Nazi clowns who have caused our noble Cause to be so despised in the eyes of the British public for over sixty years.

It is we British who are a special and ‘chosen people’, not the Germans!
I am no multi-cult ‘civic’ nationalist, I assure you and I care little for the Jews and the state of Israel or their Palestinian foes (a plague on all their houses) but I am also no Nazi apologist, admirer or fan.

We have legions of our own heroes and have no need to go looking for European ones.
Nor am I a blanket racist, I have an affinity with all of mankind but I prefer and wish to preserve my own tribe and nation more than any other factor.

I treat all humans, black, brown, yellow with kindness and respect.

The thought of hating a man just because he is non-white is thankfully, beyond my comprehension.

Neither do I possess any great affinity with foreigners no matter what colour their skin.

Yes, I do understand racial politics and yes, technically I accept that we northern Europeans are all one people and ethnic group, but it’s just too big a concept for me and I fear for most Britons too.

My kinsmen are those of my immediate, tangible tribe, the Scots, the Welsh and the English and to a certain extent the Irish.

The political manifestation of this, our ‘United Kingdom’, is more than enough to have to deal with without daydreaming of a pan-European or worldwide ‘white national identity’.

Let’s be honest: most Scots, Welsh and Ulster patriots harbour to varying degrees a mild hostility or suspicion towards the English.

This ‘soft resentment’ is not in any way hatred, but it is an unspoken (in front of our English comrades) reality that most Celts do their best to mask.

It is not a malignant thing but merely a mechanism of very small nations to resist assimilation into the gigantic neighbour next door.

This is not a sign of a weak union - indeed the Celtic nations of the UK have always had far higher numbers of volunteers when called upon to defend the political entity of the UK and far higher casualty rates.

So our commitment to the union despite our national differences is beyond question and our integrity towards the political idea of a United Kingdom, beyond reproach.
After three hundred years of hard work keeping our own nations together one can see the difficulties in attempting to realise the pipe-dream of white European unity.

In the real world and every decade spent pursuing a united ethno /political pipe dream further enhances the neglect we have shown to building our own indigenous community cohesiveness to the point that we now fail to interact as a community at all in many parts of this country.

Our political focus is, and must be, purely and entirely ‘national’.

Many Britons no longer even know their neighbours. This in turn is facilitating the invaders easy takeover of our land and adding to our peoples’ feelings of isolation and powerlessness that manifests itself in unprecedented ‘white flight’ all over the country.

Who in the world fifty years ago would have believed that in a few decades’ dozens of British towns would have fallen to Bangladeshi and Pakistani invaders?

Who would have even considered that millions, yes millions, of English, Welsh and Scots citizens would have been displaced and put to flight from the streets and towns of their forefathers by hordes of uneducated third world peasants?

And who on earth would have believed that all this could have befallen the British without the threat of gun or bomb?

Nobody in their right mind would have envisaged that the British, in their millions, would have fled the field before firing a single shot in defence of their homes and towns?

This is how weakened we have become, yet those millions who have been driven out of their homes still find the ‘nationalist’ ethos and product so unattractive that they refuse to engage with us.

Surely it is time to rethink our entire approach and attitude if we are ever to dare hope of survival, let alone victory.

It is time for radical thinking and even more radical actions if we are to build any sort of cohesive resistance in the few short remaining years.

My proposition is that we must use those shared cultural experiences and historical frameworks found in abundance within our Christian heritage to unite our people and to provide a ‘broad church’ of consensus and resistance to a threat that is in essence, a religious one: Islam.

To consistently use the race card as a rallying cry has consistently failed, only a fool refuses to learn his lesson and I am no fool.

I once witnessed a discussion between a scientific professor and a lowly salesman - the salesman was trying to convince the boffin that people respond in certain ways dependant of their cultural and collective historical experiences.

The salesman argued that even at a basic level, if something looks exotic or different it will naturally be rejected by people.

The professor strongly disagreed and thought that people these days were so modern and sophisticated that they would embrace the strange, unfamiliar or exotic without question.

So, to settle the matter the salesman took some everyday foods and some odourless food dye and made some green chocolate, red butter and offered it to the academics’ students (who were all ever so sophisticated and devoted to modernity) and the results were interesting.

Not one of the students liked the look of the food and few would even try them.
The ones that did try them, rejected them, despite knowing that the only change was in the colour.

This proved that despite our sophisticated, modern societies, human nature remains the same: we reject out of hand the unfamiliar even when we know it is okay in reality.

Therefore we must package our message in familiar language using recognisable packaging, trusted trademarks and established recognised branding.

I personally can think of no better packaging or branding for our message of National Survival than the plurality of the English (British) Christianity that deeply permeates the spiritual and civic consciousness of our sense of nationhood and ethnicity. Can you?

Still don’t believe me that our entire national ethos and existence is grounded in the firm foundations of masculine Christianity?

Please do something for me that may challenge your thought patterns of what it means to be ‘British’ and especially ‘English’.

Click on the link below and watch the video “How God Made the English”.

Trust me; this video will open your eyes to the true Chosen People….the British people, if you let it!

In part three, the final part of my thesis I will set out how we can survive and the practical social mechanisms we need to put in place to encourage growth and strength in our communities.


Who are we British? Part 1 of 3
Who are we British? Part 3 of 3

No comments: