Imagine if the extreme far-right ideological political side of the European anti-jihad movement of which Lake & Co are all linked, have attempted to frame me with Breiveik?
Following info courtesy of a friend who went through the whole manifesto to see where I could be linked.
The evidence that excludes you as a possible spiritual mentor of Breivik:
1. Breivik was a Freemason:
page 1369 of his Manifesto declares:
"According to the NS movement the Freemasons are a Zionist organisation. Being a Free Mason myself I know that this is not only a false claim but actually quite
ridiculous. The Freemasons is not in any way political (I wish the organisation was, believe me)..."
2. Breivik was not a Christian fundamentalist, not even religious person, as he himself states on the page 1344 of his manifesto.
He is also against religion, which he considers as a pathetic support for weak people only:
"I’m not going to pretend I’m a very religious person as that would be a lie. I’ve always been very pragmatic and influenced by my secular surroundings and environment. In the past, I remember I used to think;
“Religion is a crutch for weak people. What is the point in believing in a higher power if you have confidence in yourself!? Pathetic.” "
3. Fundamentalist Christianity is based on non-violence of Jesus:
Matthew 26:52 "Put your sword back in its place," Jesus said to him, "for all who draw the sword will die by the sword.
4. Breivik followed to the dot the spiritual mentorship of Fjordman:
-(a) Breivik chose for the name of his manifesto the name of Fjordsman's essay "European Declaration of Independence"
- (b) the name of Fjordman appears more than 100 times in the manifesto,while the name of Lionheart or Paul Ray does not appear anywhere in the document.
- (c) the person Breivik speaks about his English connection "Richard the Lionhearted", and notice here the two letters "-ed" at the end of the name. Therefore, as your nickname is Lionheart, and not Lionhearted, and you are not Richard, but Paul, it is absolutely unsubstantial claim that you ever had anything to do with Breivik or his philosophy
- (d) Breivik faithfully followed the ideas of Fjordman, as these quotes from the Manifesto clearly show:
We, the cultural conservative and anti-fascists of Europe must therefore do everything possible to defend democracy and freedom and prevent a fascist dictatorship by seizing power and enforce a harsh but just democracy. This can only be accomplished by overthrowing the current Western European multiculturalist regimes by seizing power through armed resistance and a military coup when the time is right. This is the only way to safeguard democracy long term. Sure, it will be bloody.
Fjordman, from his essay From the death of Multiculturalism:
However, just as Islam isn't the cause of Europe's weakness but rather a secondary infection, ...
“And what country can preserve its liberties, if it's rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.” Thomas Jefferson
In my essay about the retreat of the Western world order, I mentioned the possibility of civil strife in the West caused by runaway immigration. This is no longer just a theoretical possibility.
Perhaps we could derail Eurabia by dismantling the EU? This would require that Europe regain her old, cultural and religious dynamic and repel Islam. Just as Islam isn’t the cause of Europe’s current weakness, but rather a secondary infection,...
Europe lost the cold war due to the fact that we didn't persecute the Marxists after WW2. If we had executed each and every Marxist and banned Marxist doctrines (not only the economical aspects but the cultural as well – internationalism, extreme feminism, extreme egalitarianism, anti-elitism, anti- nationalism) we would not be in the current situation.
Nationalism is the anti-thesis of multiculturalism/internationalism. In order for nationalism to succeed, multiculturalism must be deconstructed and vice versa.
Many Europeans put restraints on themselves because they think it’s still hope; hope to solve our problems democratically. This leads to hesitation and delays them from joining resistance movements. Europeans needs to understand that there is no hope of solving our problems through our elected parliamentarians. The sooner people realise this, the sooner they will be able to contribute to solve our core problems. Our survival depends upon it.
An increasing number of Europeans will learn in the coming two decades that the only realistic approach to saving our identities, cultures, traditions and even nations will be to contribute in various ways in the emerging European Resistance Movements.
7 out of the 8 resistance fronts are non-violent. As of now, in phase 1, most people refrain from reacting through armed resistance since they live in economic prosperity, and to stand up for their ideas would send them into suffering. However, soon enough we will have an economic collapse that will make the current recession look like a picnic. And then, ordinary citizens will face suffering day in and day out. And at that point standing up for their ideas through armed struggle will come at no extra cost.