World War 3 has already begun

World War 3 has begun: Part 2
World War 3 has begun: Part 3
World War 3 has begun: Part 4
World War 3 has begun: Part 5

Head of Norway's PST gone

Dagbladet: Head of PST gone

The foreiger: Top politician says PST director must go

A companion of honour linked to Breivik enquiry

Further reading: EDL backers linked to Breivik enquiry

Turner artist drops far-right aide

Dipesh Gadher

Published: 15 January 2012

One of Britain’s leading artists has accepted his assistant’s resignation after learning that she made a donation to the far-right English Defence League (EDL).

Sir Howard Hodgkin, a Turner prize winner, said it was “impossible” to continue employing Ann Marchini, 62, because he felt the EDL had “despicable and abhorrent” views.

Marchini, a widow, is a member of the British Freedom party (BFP) which was set up by disaffected members of the right-wing British National party. The EDL is considering an alliance with the BFP to enable EDL members to stand as candidates at council elections.

The Sunday Times revealed last month that she had been photographed alongside the EDL’s leader, Stephen Lennon, at a rally and had helped organise a meeting in 2009 between EDL members and so-called “counter-jihad” thinkers in a bid to broaden its appeal.

Last week it emerged that Marchini had been an assistant to Hodgkin, 79, for 17 years. He was awarded the Turner prize in 1985, knighted in 1992 and made a Companion of Honour in 2003.

When approached by The Sunday Times, Hodgkin said Marchini, who worked 1 day a week at his studio, had admitted giving money to the EDL — albeit a small sum, understood to be £50. The artist said in a statement: “I find their views and activities despicable and abhorrent. It was therefore impossible to continue employing her. She tendered her resignation with immediate effect, which I accepted.”

..............................................................

No wonder the little cabal behind the English Defence League leadership are being protected from the Anders Breivik mass murder enquiry if this one link is anything to go by.

The question has got to be; who else is linked to them that goes right to the top, who do not want to be brought out into the public eye through heir association because of how damaging it would be?

Its just what decisions are made at the top with regards all of this.

That little cabal of Ann Marchini and Alan Ayling (aka Alan Lake) & Co set me up with Breivik because I was a threat to their long running political agenda, its just a matter of the Norwegians, hopefully with British backing, proving their complicity (if they are guilty) with Anders Breivik, and there is still one striking question that needs answering that they both knew and withheld from the enquiry at the beginning stages so that I would take the blame for being the English 'mentor': Who is Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How long does it take to find out?

Ann Marchini has worked for this man who walks in the highest realms within our Country, for 17 years, so either he had his head buried deep in the sand over those 17 years or there is some level of complicity.

The story has not finished yet and now the bigger picture is starting to emerge of the people who have reputations to lose, just like me who was an innocent man framed, and one thing is for sure, nobody should be protected from police interrogation when it concerns the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian kids on their summer camp no matter who they are linked too, and I hope that comes from the top down.

Further reading: Alan Lake - Agent/Asset of the State

Breivik's new psychiatric assessment

Further reading: Breivik's flawed report

Daily Telegraph: Breivik's psychiatric report reveals kindergarten prison life

Quote: Dr Randi Rosenqvist linked Breivik's "deviant statements" to his total absorption in a cult-like anti-Islamic movement based largely in the UK.

"I interpret his deviant statements as an expression of an extreme ideology, not as a psychotic view of reality," she writes.

"He has built a lot of his ideology on the British, or rather English, movement, and has not sought contact with Norwegians of the same ideology."

Video: EDL's Irish cult leader 'Tommy'

Further reading: Who is Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Pakistan President fears military coup

Further reading: Wikileaks Pakistani Nuclear terror threat

Further reading: Osama Bin Laden killed inside a Pakistani military town

Further reading: The 'epicentre' of global terrorism

Further reading: 400,000 travel from UK to Pakistan every year

Daily Mail: Pakistan President pleas for British help

Quote: News of the plea for help came after the government fired its defence secretary.
Retired Lt. Gen. Naeem Khalid Lodhi, an army loyalist seen as a bridge between the generals and the civilian government, was dismissed for 'gross misconduct and illegal action' and replaced with a bureaucrat close to Prime Minister Yousuf Reza Gilani, the government said in a statement.
The developments are a sign of near-open conflict between the army and the government.
Such is the weakness of Pakistan's state institutions that leaders have often looked to foreign powers to intervene in domestic affairs. The United States and Gulf nations have in the past been invited to mediate in disputes between the country's competing centres of power.

Video: Nuclear terror - The story of AQ Khan & the Birth of the Islamic bomb

Ex-head of NATO's 2nd-largest army accused of 'forming and directing a terrorist group'

MSNBC News: Former head of Nato army forms terror group

Quote: "The Republic of Turkey's 26th general chief of staff has been remanded in custody for forming and directing a terrorist group," Basbug said as he was lead from the courtroom. "I leave it to the great Turkish nation to judge."
Hundreds of people, including civilians, retired generals and active-duty officers, are already on trial accused of being part of plots that prosecutors say were aimed at destabilizing Turkey and bringing the government down. The military says 58 serving generals or admirals are in jail.

This case above gives a very clear indication that this type of high level subversion within Nation States goes on, with there being many leading military figures involved in this attempted coup to bring down the government of Turkey.

Anders Breivik's terrorist atrocities were an attempt to bring down the ruling Norwegian Labour party government, but the question is; where did the attack come from?

Was it an outside directed attack on Norway, or was it an internal attack just like in Turkey?

Anders Breivik is the son of a former Norwegian government diplomat and step son of a retired Army Major.

If I am right, Breivik's supposed grievence was that the ruling Labour party had been in power for several generations and created the multi-cultural society Norway is today, with the Nation sleep walking into a non-Norwegian Country over another several generations because of the Marxist agenda of the Elite. For whatever reason he targetted the Labour youth camp on Utoya island and murdered the next generation of Norwegian Labour party leaders.

Not everyone wants multi-culturalism forced upon them by their ruling Elite, and here in Norway for reasons unknown at the moment, with only Breivik's words on the matter at this point in time, you have an example of what happens when a Country passes the point of no return, or reaches the point and someone (plural) from the extreme right of the political spectrum attempts to change things.

Multiculturalsim has failed: Sarkozy - Merkel - Cameron

Norway has a population of 5 million so it is only a small Country, and is said to be the 3rd richest Nation on Earth so there is a lot at stake for the King, his ruling government and the future survival of that Country, and we as outsiders do not know the internal politics of the Country that has lead ultimately to Anders Breivik.

In contrast Great Britain has a population of over 66 million and increasing due to immigration, with probably the same amount of foreign moslems in the Country as Norway has as a population.

These are some of the issues we face in Great Britain from our oldest foes who are now aligned with our newest Islamic foe.

Daily Mirror: IRA we could have killed the Queen

Daily Mirror: Prince Williams security breached

At the start of this Breivik saga it emerged that members of an opposing political party in Norway had been recorded at a "Stop the Islamisation of Europe" conference talking about blowing up the government building and targetting specific members of government for assassination.

Those recorded were subsequently arrested during the beginning stages of the Breivik enquiry, but this gives a clear sense of the feelings within the Norwegian political class and the political agenda. Those arrested were all linked to Anders Breivik, either personally or ideologically through the SIO groups.

Talk of murder and assassination by Norwegian politicians linked to Alan Lake, Fraudman, and SION, and then Breivik strikes. Then an attempted white wash of the whole Breivik case by those controlling the enquiry from the top within Norway, purely for political purposes in complete disregard for the memory of the 69 innocent kids murdered on Utoya island.

Who knows how bad things are within Norwegian politics now, who are the controlling forces in the Country, and was Breivik a 'lone wolf' who is "certified by the government" but not by the professionals, or part of a network/group who have attempted a coup in Norway using terrorism, and who now threaten other European Nation States, who we have yet to find out who they are?

I am against the Islamisation of Europe but not at the cost of 69 innocent young Norwegian kids on their summer camp, and anyone who played a part in that is definitely not on the same page as me, which is probably why they wanted to frame me for being Breivik's mentor.

Breivik is not Christian, and he is not a Knights Templar in the true sense of the Order. He is a godless extreme political right-winger masquerading as an angel of light, with no faith based belief system in Jesus Christ the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, who has attempted to wrap up his murderous acts in the name of the Christian faith and Templarism when he is neither - He is the archetypal wolf in sheeps clothing

Whoever is behind Breivik targetted me too so I want to know who it is, and Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, Kinana and Chris Knowles all have an unanswered question for the Breivik enquiry; Who is the real 'Richard the Lionheart' each of them are connected to through Alan Lake?

How long does it take the British police to obtain witness statements from those directly linked to the Breivik enquiry to discover who the real person who uses 'Richard the Lionheart' as his alias online is?

Probably as long as it takes to extradite the son of the coca cola heir in Yemen who murdered Martine Magnussen in London and then flew out of Luton airport to the safety of his fathers wealth and political influence in his homeland. He raped and murdered a Norwegian guest living in our Country and then fled back home as a rapist and murderer, who should be sitting in a British prison just like the Saudi prince who is now in one of our prisons, and not a free man in Yemen: The Queen sorrow over Martine Magnussen

The Arab spring in Yemen will see him face justice one way or another.

Breivik & The Liberia - London connection

The Norwegian police have confirmed that Breivik travelled to Liberia in 2002. They have also released the fact that several of Breivik's friends have confirmed the story of Liberia and 'blood diamonds'.

As far as anyone knows from the information released into the public domain, none of the witnesses spoke about Breivik talking about meeting a Serbian warlord whilst there. They have said that Breivik talked about getting a gun placed to his head and fearing he would be killed as part of a failed deal for diamonds.

Did Breivik get the idea of travelling to the civil war in Liberia in 2002 from his own mind or was he sent there upon invitation for a reason?

If Breivik was told never to tell anyone about his meeting with a Serbian warlord, possibly with a gun to his head as part of the recruitment process, its quite plausible that he would not tell anyone until encouraged to do so i.e the "2083" manifesto which is in-line with what Breivik says was spoken after the London meeting about communication with other members of the group.

The Norwegian police have also confirmed that Breivik was in London in 2002 and 2003, but there is no evidence to say the London meeting took place.

If I am correct (don't know) Breivik travelled to London 2 weeks after his Liberia trip.

What more evidence do the Norwegian police need? Breivik to actually name the people present so they can all be arrested and prove the meeting took place? or those present to come forward?

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

That's not the name of the game and is never going to happen unless you water-board him or pump him with some exotic truth syrum.

Breivik travels to one of the most bloody African civil wars, then 2 weeks later on his return travels to London? Its not rocket science.

Are those 2 trips and their time frame apart coincidences with no meaning, or was their reason, meaning and purpose behind both trips which is in-line with what Breivik states? Thus evidence.

You don't sell rough diamonds in London, and from Breivik's witnesses he never returned with any diamonds (to my knowledge), so why did he travel to London on the back of Liberia if he did not have any purchased rough diamonds?

Obviously another reason for travelling that has nothing to do with rough diamonds.

It is the same Norwegian police statement of no evidence regarding Breivik's Belarus trip. They have confirmed that Breivik travelled to Belarus but say there is no evidence he was paramilitary trained in the Country. They state that he travelled to Belarus to meet a woman he met online, which was obviously a good cover story for him just like the 'blood diamonds'.

The Russians whose intelligence services control that part of the World have released information through the media stating that Breivik travelled to Belarus on the radar and then travelled into the Country off the radar, obviously once he had worked out how to do it. It is stated that the Belarusian Security Services codenamed him the "Viking" after part of his cover story was that he visited the Country to seek out Viking graves there.

Either the Belarusian Security Services have not passed on their files about Breivik to the Norwegian government, thus no evidence of training, or its all a lie about the Belorussians codenaming him the "Viking" and that he was trained there by a former Soviet Colonel who is a Chechen moslem convert.

Where did Breivik get the terrorist idea of targetting children for maximum effect? The only other terrorists I can think of who targetted children were the Chechens in Beslan.

The Norwegian police say that Breivik has not mentioned anything about paramilitary training in Belarus, which if I was sitting in Breivik's seat I would not do either when looking at everything. You never know who else the Belarusian connection has trained as part of Breivik's network/group so why bring suspicion when you do not have to, and he might have been explicitly told not to mention anything about the training camps in Belarus by his trainers. Then its up to others to find out.

Either A) the Norwegian police are stupid in the worlds eyes B) Someone is controlling the Breivik enquiry from the top down, or C) The Norwegian police are acting tactically. I go with B) which is why there has been an attempted white wash of the whole case with the agenda being to make out Breivik was a 'lone wolf' who is now certified, then the public will not want answers on who the group/network with Breivik is because as the "Officials" say "He acted alone", so there is no one else to look for.

Powerful controlling forces seeking to manipulate the worst terrorist atrocity in Europe of the 21st Century for different purposes within Norway.

Or I am wrong and my mind is in the world of conspiracy theories and the 'blood diamond' international jet-setting son of the Norwegian government diplomat to London was radicalised, recruited, trained, and funded whilst watching youtube videos and reading websites and blogs online as part of his psychosis (that he doesn't have) who then went out to commit an act of war in the name of his imaginary friends who call themselves Knights Templars, and left a 1500 page manifesto in the public domain detailing his imaginary world and friends agenda based upon the writings of many main stream commentators.

The story of the lone right-wing crusader...Jackanory.

The official line in Norway that comes from the top down is that none of what Breivik says is true, so the only official diagnosis can be is that he is a paranoid schizophrenic living in his own delusional world. This conflicts with all of the evidence presented to a sane mind though.

Only the Norwegians can know and feel what the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their political ideology feels like on the National psyche. We are outside observers who stand back looking on from afar in solidarity because that was a crime against humanity that nobody can condone, and for me personally, whoever is behind Breivik attacked me that day too, only I survived.

"It is better to make the right friends than the wrong enemies" Lionheart

Romans 8:31 - 39
What, then, shall we say in response to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? ³² He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things? ³³ Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? It is God who justifies. ³⁴ Who then is the one who condemns? No one. Christ Jesus who died—more than that, who was raised to life—is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. ³⁵ Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? ³⁶ As it is written:

“For your sake we face death all day long;
we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”

³⁷ No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. ³⁸ For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, ³⁹ neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Not a single sign of psychosis in Breivik

Aftenposten: Not a single sign of psychosis

Dagbladet: Anders Breivik is not psychotic

Quote from Aftenposten article: Over 80 times Anders Behring Breivik's health condition has been evaluated in psychiatrists and health care in prison. Not a single sign of psychosis or mental instability is detected.

During the nearly four months, the prison doctors, who have long experience with patients with different psychotic disorders and mental disorders, not detected a single sign of serious mental illness.

The trained prison staff employed to deal with prisoners and their needs on a daily basis have officially stated that they see no signs of psychosis in Anders Breivik.

Those designated by the Norwegian State to evaluate Breivik determined in their report that he was a paranoid schizophrenic so legally insane, but there is contention from every quarter about this evaluation because it does not hold up under the light of scrutiny from what most experts in the field of psychiatry can digest from the information in the public domain.

Whose agenda and purposes does it serve certifying Anders Breivik?

The court appointed re-evaluation of the actual report upheld the initial findings but with contention among the ranks. In reality how could those re-evaluating the initial report officially state their colleagues were wrong? That would destroy their professional reputations and careers, so the initial finding was upheld within the field of criminal psychiatry in Norway.

But as time goes by more contradictory and conflicting evidence is emerging.

Breivik is not appealing for a new report now, he will just contest all of the points in a court of law when he goes to trial with experts in the respective fields, and attempt to prove the evaluation over his mental health was wrong and the reasons why it was wrong.

What happens then?

Further reading: Breiviks flawed psychiatric report

Aftenposten: None of Breivik's friends saw psychosis

Breivik's stepfather a retired Army Major

Dagbladet: Breivik's stepfather is a retired Major

The Anders Breivik plot thickens.

The biological son of the Norwegian government diplomat to London, and stepson of a retired Norwegian Army Major turns into a right-wing political terrorist who has declared war against the political left?

The key to understanding the bigger picture and who is involved is establishing who selected Anders Breivik to travel to Liberia in 2002 and how the chain of events occured. Knowing his families diplomatic military background its not hard to understand why a young Anders Breivik was selected and recruited into a right-wing neo-Gladio network/group in 2002 that ended up with the events on July 22nd 2011.

The question is who were the ones who selected him?

One thing is for sure is that for some reason whoever is in control of the Breivik enquiry at the top of the chain in Norway, and the media front controlling public opinion, in my personal opinion have attempted to whitewash the whole event in the public eye by continually claiming that Anders Breivik is a 'lone wolf' nut who is now legally certified, then the full truth can be hidden from reality with a nice clean media story of a certified 'lone wolf' connected to no one with no real reason or motive behind his killings other than his own personal madness brought about by his use of the internet.

You have to be 'mad' yourself to belief that official line and the Norwegians I have spoken too have bought it hook line and sinker because its the official line promoted through the Norwegian mainstream media.

There are still unanswered questions ?

The birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist is pivotal to understanding everything and when I wrote my opinion I only knew about his father being the government diplomat to London, now knowing his stepfather who lived with him at the time when he was 22 - 23 years old in 2002 obviously sheds a different light upon that time frame of history.

What circles was Anders Breivik mixing in? With those he was mixing with knowing his family background.

His stepfather who was a Major in the Army obviously has an excellent understanding of peoples characters and abilities due to the fact that for many years he had many Norwegian soldiers under his command so is military trained to have an eye for peoples strengths, weaknesses and abilities so his opinion holds great weight.

This is his personal opinion about the events of July 22nd 2011, and don't forget this mans professional background and how well he knew Breivik on an intimate personal level.

Quote: Tollefsen thought therefore that Breivik could not possibly have made the bomb that killed eight people in the government building in Oslo itself.

- I thought he had a helper to the bomb because he was not so technical, says Tollefsen.

Make your own mind up...

Chris Knowles linked to Breivik enquiry

(Sunday Times article below)

Foreword: The Norwegian police have now confirmed that Anders Breivik was in London in 2002 and 2003 (Below). This is on top of the confirmation that he was also in Liberia in 2002 during the civil war there (upon invitation from someone), and also that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus.

Anders Breivik was not a 'lone wolf', he was a part of a group/network with Liberia and London being pivotal moments in the birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist.

The only question left that now needs answering is did Alan Ayling/Lake disclose his actual friend 'Richard the Lionheart' in police interview or did he withhold vital information to the Breivik enquiry?

3 witnesses can confirm that Alan Ayling/Lake invited another man to his London flat at the pre-founding EDL meeting who called himself 'Richard the Lionheart'.

Who is this anonymous person whose identity Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, and Kinana all withheld from the enquiry so that I would take the fall and blame for their actions against the Norwegian government and people?

Breivik was recruited in 2002 by a network/group.

Council suspends worker linked to Norway gunman

By Dipesh Gadher

Published: 18 December 2011

A council worker has been suspended following a Sunday Times investigation into a network of far-right groups.

Chris Knowles, who is employed by the children’s services department at Leeds city council, has been questioned over his links to the English Defence League (EDL) and a website featuring anti-Muslim content.

Knowles has been accused by Paul Ray, a former senior EDL figure, of operating under an alias to disguise his controversial views. He has been using the name “Aeneas Lavinium” on Facebook and other websites linked to Anders Breivik, the Norwegian gunman who massacred 69 people in summer.

Last week Oslo police confirmed for the first time that Breivik travelled to Britain at least twice — in May 2002 and December 2003.

The gunman has claimed in his 1,600-page “manifesto” that during a trip to London in 2002 he met an English “mentor” who inducted him into a modern-day version of the Knights Templar Order. Police, however, have no evidence to verify this claim.

Ray says that Knowles attended a meeting in July 2009 at which members of the EDL were introduced to key ideological figures in the so-called “counter-jihad” community.

He was involved at the time with a right-wing organisation called the Centre for Vigilant Freedom (CVF), which used an address in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, for correspondence. Another member of the organisation was Ann Marchini, a buy-to-let property tycoon who was revealed last weekend as an EDL backer.

The CVF is now part of the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) whose website includes many contributions from a writer called “Aeneas”. One article is about Fjordman, an anti-Islam blogger named 111 times by Breivik in his manifesto.

The site also features favourable items on the EDL and a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with an exploding bomb on his head.

When Knowles was asked if he was Aeneas, he said: “I’m not willing to confirm anything.”

Leeds council launched its probe after being shown the ICLA website. A spokeswoman said: “We take the allegations made by The Sunday Times very seriously and a member of staff has been suspended while we undertake a thorough investigation. If there has been any breach of the council’s policies or code of conduct we will take appropriate action.”

Additional reporting: Mark Lewis in Oslo

2 crucial pieces of information

Norwegian police confirm Anders Breivik's trips to Liberia and Belarus.

These 2 key pieces of information that are now in the public domain prove that Ander's Breivik was not a 'lone wolf' as has been consistently spoken through the media, and was, in reality, a part of a neo-Gladio style network.

A 'lone wolf' is radicalised and trained in his bedroom and then goes out on his own under his own inspiration and commits a small terrorist attack in the name of his beliefs, which is the type of people Breivik & Co are hoping to inspire through the "2083" manifesto.

Further reading: Questioning the 'lone wolf' scenario

Breivik was recruited into a group (false Knights Templar's) who financed him, trained him, and then sent him out to declare war on their behalf. This is now proven by the fact that he was in Liberia during the civil war in the Country in 2002, and that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus later on.

What about the London meeting in 2002 and the formation of the false Knights Templar group? Have the Norwegian police confirmed whether or not Breivik was in London when he says he was?

You can safely assume that if Liberia and Belarus are facts, which they are, then London is too.

Who were Ander's Breivik's contacts in the 'group'?

Who is Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How serious is this group that is linked to Serbians soldiers, and do they have access to small scale nuclear weapons to threaten to use as their ultimate deterrent?

Who has a grievance with Norway and was linked to arms smuggling who could have been the bridge between Breivik and Liberia in 2002, and who could possibly be linked to the old style Gladio networks and London?

P.S Dont be too surprised if Fraudman is much more involved with the Norwegian/Mainland European field of operations for individuals in Breivik's false Knights Templar group. He is directly linked to Breivik and to a certain connected clique of ideological inspirations that are linked to all SIO groups and Alan Lake. Also there is too much circumstantial evidence and suspicious behaviour directly linking him.

He hid himself from the world around 2005. WHY?

Is it all coincidence?

Aftenposten: Police confirm Liberia and Belarus link

Further reading: The birth & baptism of Anders Breivik

Who is the real 'Richard the Lionheart'?

Norwegian News: Dagbladet

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'