30 June 2012
The Breivik Conspiracy - Mainstream media confirming my thoughts
Further reading: Eskil Pederesn is not a Utoya survivor
(Bloomberg article below)
Foreword: I found this article on the internet written for Bloomberg which gives an excellent analysis of the political consequences of Breivik's terrorist attacks which confirmed my thoughts about the aftermath within the political arena in Norway, which should give any serious reader and researcher of the events pause for thought.
Further reading: Hidden in plain sight
Was Breivik a "solo terrorist" connected to no one as the Norwegian's in control of the case want the World to believe, or was he a recruited trained asset because of his family pedigree for a secretive group who have/had political and financial motivations?
The Norwegian 'officials' in control of the case are playing the bury your head in the sand game hoping that all of the conflicting evidence to their 'official' story will just disappear and then whoever is behind Breivik for whatever their reasons will get away with their complicity in the events.
I only have my reputation and conscience to think about which is nothing in the scheme of things. The families of the dead and injured have a lot more to think about but none of them are questioning their ruling Government about all of the outstanding evidence that could tell a completely different story to the one fed to the public as the 'official' version of events.
The truth behind Breivik...
There has to be an explanation behind how I ended up being smeared all over the World's news but nobody has given me that explanation yet?
I gave the Norwegian's my 'official' explanation in front of their police 'specialists' but they and the British have refused to investigate it which has its own explanation behind the reasons why because everything has an explanation.
Considering the murder location of one of the most infamous MI6 murders in modern times ended up in Breivik's manifesto which was part of the worst act of political terrorism of the 21st Century and had Serbian finger prints over it you would have thought and hoped that they would want to get to the bottom of the British angle of the Breivik case to either rule out the link to their murdered colleague or explain his murder but to my knowledge all doors have been closed which again has its explanations in the scheme of things.
They must have a dossier on Alan Lake but the question is; Is he one of their own?
I dont care about all those forces out there now wanting to use Breivik's actions to fire up the right-wing Nationalists in Europe to inspire more copycat killers, what I care about it is finding out why Breivik attacked me which is what he did by leveling some blame at my feet for the day after his attacks, and who was ultimately behind him which would explain his reasons for attacking me.
Further reading: You've been framed
Why should they get away with their complicity in the mass murder of a group of innocent misguided teenagers on their summer camp in Norway, and attempting to blame me for it?
All those high factions within the State apparatus in Norway and Britain cannot support and endorse Breivik's crimes, so how long now until the answers are given to the outstanding questions that need answering?
The domino effect and the unraveling of the truth.
Alan Lake the EU banker and director behind the EDL who was interviewed over the possibility of him being the English 'mentor' has links into the Norwegian Government which would fit inline with my belief behind the events which ties in with this Bloomberg article below.
Public opinion would demand a full and thorough transparent investigation of Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake if they knew all of the circumstantial evidence surrounding him, his direct links into Norway and his involvement with the ideological movement that Breivik came from but they have been refused this knowledge because the mainstream media have been completely silent over the matter.
Just imagine if I am right and he is the English 'mentor' what story would that then tell?
There has to be someone sitting in a high place who wants to know whether the whole investigative angle concerning me is right or wrong?
Definitely not the Norwegians in control of the case which then begs the questions as to why?
Because Breivik was a recruited and trained asset which conflicts with their 'official' conclusion of the "solo terrorist" connected to no one they have fed to the public and then the question is; who are the ones behind him?
And why use ex-KGB Soviet trainers and anti-Western Serbians?
................................................
Bloomberg article
Anders Behring Breivik’s efforts to galvanize anti-Islam sentiment in Norway after last month’s hate killings have given the ruling party he sought to destroy its biggest tailwind in more than a decade.
Support for Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s Labor Party, targeted by Breivik in the July 22 bombing and shootings that left 77 dead, soared to more than 40 percent, two polls showed this week. If a vote were held today, that would be the best result since the 1985 election. Approval of Stoltenberg’s handling of the crisis is at more than 90 percent, polls show.
Support for Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s Labor Party, targeted by Breivik in the July 22 bombing and shootings that left 77 dead, soared to more than 40 percent, two polls showed this
“It’s the first time in Norway that the popularity rating of an elected politician is higher than that of the King,” said Frank Aarebrot, a politics professor at the University of Bergen, in a phone interview. Since the attacks, Labor’s policies mean it enjoys “the strongest legitimacy. My guess is that the effect will last a couple of years.”
Breivik’s 1,500-page manifesto, published a few hours before his killing spree, railed against the “Islamization” of Norway and Europe, a trend he said he would try to halt through his terror acts. Yet the anti-immigration Progress Party that Breivik had sought to champion now faces a backlash as a key campaigning point is stigmatized ahead of local elections on Sept. 12. That’s left the group, Parliament’s second-biggest, with an identity crisis.
‘Low Profile’
“They will try to keep a low profile on immigration, immigrants, threats from the Muslims,” Anders Todal Jenssen, a political science professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, said by phone. Without the attacks “they would have focused on immigration as a very important issue,” he said.
Backing for Labor, which was re-elected in 2009 on pledges to improve welfare without raising taxes, surged 11 percentage points in the month through July 30 to 41.7 percent, the highest result since September 1998, according to a Synovate poll. A TNS Gallup poll for TV2 showed a 9.2 point rise in support for Labor to 40.5 percent, a 12-year high. The opposition Conservatives slipped almost five points to 23.7 percent in the Synovate poll, while the Progress Party, of which Breivik was a member from 1999 to 2004, dropped three points to 16.5 percent.
Since the killings, more Norwegians say they now embrace multiculturalism, according to an Aug. 1 InFact AS poll published by Verdens Gang. Twenty-six percent of those questioned said they were more positive toward a multi-ethnic Norway than before the attacks. Nine percent were more negative and 49 percent said they hadn’t changed their opinion.
‘Lost Its Legitimacy’
“The anti-Islam argument has lost its legitimacy,” said Johannes Bergh, a political scientist at the Institute for Social Research in Oslo, in a phone interview. “You can’t make the type of arguments that the Progress Party has been making in terms of Islam being a danger to society or a threat to Norwegian culture. You just can’t say that anymore.”
The prime minister’s party is now poised to win next month’s local elections. Polls before July 22 had shown it was set to lose.
Stoltenberg isn’t the first leader to see his approval ratings rise following attacks against his citizens. Support for former U.S. President George W. Bush jumped to 90 percent after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, according to Gallup. Backing later fell below 30 percent at the end of his second term.
Stoltenberg has won admiration from voters for avoiding traps that risk polarizing the debate in Norway. He has even urged lawmakers and media not to vilify anti-immigration policies.
‘Witch Hunt’
“We should not start a witch hunt against those opinions that we don’t agree with,” he told reporters on Aug. 1.
Bush, by contrast, in 2001 pledged to hunt down those responsible for the September attacks, and said he wanted Osama bin Laden “dead or alive.”
Siv Jensen, who as the leader of Norway’s Progress Party has warned of “sneak-Islamization,” said Breivik’s attacks shouldn’t silence the immigration debate.
“In the time that lies ahead, we need even more freedom of expression,” Jensen said in an Aug. 1 interview. “It is important to me that we all can combine freedom of expression with dignity and I think we will manage that, even if it is a new terrain for us.”
Still, the party may need to modify its tone in the debate, Jensen told reporters this week.
Immigration
“We’ve all changed our behavior and we won’t be the same as before,” Jensen said.
Before Breivik’s attacks, the Progress Party had risen in popularity as voters, like their Nordic peers in Sweden, Denmark and Finland, reacted to a rising intake of immigrants.
Norway received the second-highest number of new asylum- seekers per inhabitant after Sweden last year, according to a survey of 44 industrialized nations by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Non-western immigrants and their children last year accounted for 9.4 percent of Norway’s population. In Germany, non-western immigrants made up 6 percent, data from the national statistics offices of each country show.
Voters upset with this trend should be free to say so, Stoltenberg told reporters on July 27.
“We have to be very clear to distinguish between extreme views, which are completely legal and legitimate,” he said. “What is not legitimate is to try to implement those extreme views by using
violence.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Josiane Kremer in Oslo at jkremer4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tasneem Brogger at tbrogger@bloomberg.net
(Bloomberg article below)Foreword: I found this article on the internet written for Bloomberg which gives an excellent analysis of the political consequences of Breivik's terrorist attacks which confirmed my thoughts about the aftermath within the political arena in Norway, which should give any serious reader and researcher of the events pause for thought.
Further reading: Hidden in plain sight
Was Breivik a "solo terrorist" connected to no one as the Norwegian's in control of the case want the World to believe, or was he a recruited trained asset because of his family pedigree for a secretive group who have/had political and financial motivations?
The Norwegian 'officials' in control of the case are playing the bury your head in the sand game hoping that all of the conflicting evidence to their 'official' story will just disappear and then whoever is behind Breivik for whatever their reasons will get away with their complicity in the events.
I only have my reputation and conscience to think about which is nothing in the scheme of things. The families of the dead and injured have a lot more to think about but none of them are questioning their ruling Government about all of the outstanding evidence that could tell a completely different story to the one fed to the public as the 'official' version of events.
The truth behind Breivik...
There has to be an explanation behind how I ended up being smeared all over the World's news but nobody has given me that explanation yet?
I gave the Norwegian's my 'official' explanation in front of their police 'specialists' but they and the British have refused to investigate it which has its own explanation behind the reasons why because everything has an explanation.
Considering the murder location of one of the most infamous MI6 murders in modern times ended up in Breivik's manifesto which was part of the worst act of political terrorism of the 21st Century and had Serbian finger prints over it you would have thought and hoped that they would want to get to the bottom of the British angle of the Breivik case to either rule out the link to their murdered colleague or explain his murder but to my knowledge all doors have been closed which again has its explanations in the scheme of things.
They must have a dossier on Alan Lake but the question is; Is he one of their own?
I dont care about all those forces out there now wanting to use Breivik's actions to fire up the right-wing Nationalists in Europe to inspire more copycat killers, what I care about it is finding out why Breivik attacked me which is what he did by leveling some blame at my feet for the day after his attacks, and who was ultimately behind him which would explain his reasons for attacking me.
Further reading: You've been framed
Why should they get away with their complicity in the mass murder of a group of innocent misguided teenagers on their summer camp in Norway, and attempting to blame me for it?
All those high factions within the State apparatus in Norway and Britain cannot support and endorse Breivik's crimes, so how long now until the answers are given to the outstanding questions that need answering?
The domino effect and the unraveling of the truth.
Alan Lake the EU banker and director behind the EDL who was interviewed over the possibility of him being the English 'mentor' has links into the Norwegian Government which would fit inline with my belief behind the events which ties in with this Bloomberg article below.
Public opinion would demand a full and thorough transparent investigation of Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake if they knew all of the circumstantial evidence surrounding him, his direct links into Norway and his involvement with the ideological movement that Breivik came from but they have been refused this knowledge because the mainstream media have been completely silent over the matter.
Just imagine if I am right and he is the English 'mentor' what story would that then tell?
There has to be someone sitting in a high place who wants to know whether the whole investigative angle concerning me is right or wrong?
Definitely not the Norwegians in control of the case which then begs the questions as to why?
Because Breivik was a recruited and trained asset which conflicts with their 'official' conclusion of the "solo terrorist" connected to no one they have fed to the public and then the question is; who are the ones behind him?
And why use ex-KGB Soviet trainers and anti-Western Serbians?
................................................
Bloomberg article
Anders Behring Breivik’s efforts to galvanize anti-Islam sentiment in Norway after last month’s hate killings have given the ruling party he sought to destroy its biggest tailwind in more than a decade.
Support for Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s Labor Party, targeted by Breivik in the July 22 bombing and shootings that left 77 dead, soared to more than 40 percent, two polls showed this week. If a vote were held today, that would be the best result since the 1985 election. Approval of Stoltenberg’s handling of the crisis is at more than 90 percent, polls show.
Support for Prime Minister Jens Stoltenberg’s Labor Party, targeted by Breivik in the July 22 bombing and shootings that left 77 dead, soared to more than 40 percent, two polls showed this
“It’s the first time in Norway that the popularity rating of an elected politician is higher than that of the King,” said Frank Aarebrot, a politics professor at the University of Bergen, in a phone interview. Since the attacks, Labor’s policies mean it enjoys “the strongest legitimacy. My guess is that the effect will last a couple of years.”
Breivik’s 1,500-page manifesto, published a few hours before his killing spree, railed against the “Islamization” of Norway and Europe, a trend he said he would try to halt through his terror acts. Yet the anti-immigration Progress Party that Breivik had sought to champion now faces a backlash as a key campaigning point is stigmatized ahead of local elections on Sept. 12. That’s left the group, Parliament’s second-biggest, with an identity crisis.
‘Low Profile’
“They will try to keep a low profile on immigration, immigrants, threats from the Muslims,” Anders Todal Jenssen, a political science professor at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Trondheim, said by phone. Without the attacks “they would have focused on immigration as a very important issue,” he said.
Backing for Labor, which was re-elected in 2009 on pledges to improve welfare without raising taxes, surged 11 percentage points in the month through July 30 to 41.7 percent, the highest result since September 1998, according to a Synovate poll. A TNS Gallup poll for TV2 showed a 9.2 point rise in support for Labor to 40.5 percent, a 12-year high. The opposition Conservatives slipped almost five points to 23.7 percent in the Synovate poll, while the Progress Party, of which Breivik was a member from 1999 to 2004, dropped three points to 16.5 percent.
Since the killings, more Norwegians say they now embrace multiculturalism, according to an Aug. 1 InFact AS poll published by Verdens Gang. Twenty-six percent of those questioned said they were more positive toward a multi-ethnic Norway than before the attacks. Nine percent were more negative and 49 percent said they hadn’t changed their opinion.
‘Lost Its Legitimacy’
“The anti-Islam argument has lost its legitimacy,” said Johannes Bergh, a political scientist at the Institute for Social Research in Oslo, in a phone interview. “You can’t make the type of arguments that the Progress Party has been making in terms of Islam being a danger to society or a threat to Norwegian culture. You just can’t say that anymore.”
The prime minister’s party is now poised to win next month’s local elections. Polls before July 22 had shown it was set to lose.
Stoltenberg isn’t the first leader to see his approval ratings rise following attacks against his citizens. Support for former U.S. President George W. Bush jumped to 90 percent after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, according to Gallup. Backing later fell below 30 percent at the end of his second term.
Stoltenberg has won admiration from voters for avoiding traps that risk polarizing the debate in Norway. He has even urged lawmakers and media not to vilify anti-immigration policies.
‘Witch Hunt’
“We should not start a witch hunt against those opinions that we don’t agree with,” he told reporters on Aug. 1.
Bush, by contrast, in 2001 pledged to hunt down those responsible for the September attacks, and said he wanted Osama bin Laden “dead or alive.”
Siv Jensen, who as the leader of Norway’s Progress Party has warned of “sneak-Islamization,” said Breivik’s attacks shouldn’t silence the immigration debate.
“In the time that lies ahead, we need even more freedom of expression,” Jensen said in an Aug. 1 interview. “It is important to me that we all can combine freedom of expression with dignity and I think we will manage that, even if it is a new terrain for us.”
Still, the party may need to modify its tone in the debate, Jensen told reporters this week.
Immigration
“We’ve all changed our behavior and we won’t be the same as before,” Jensen said.
Before Breivik’s attacks, the Progress Party had risen in popularity as voters, like their Nordic peers in Sweden, Denmark and Finland, reacted to a rising intake of immigrants.
Norway received the second-highest number of new asylum- seekers per inhabitant after Sweden last year, according to a survey of 44 industrialized nations by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Non-western immigrants and their children last year accounted for 9.4 percent of Norway’s population. In Germany, non-western immigrants made up 6 percent, data from the national statistics offices of each country show.
Voters upset with this trend should be free to say so, Stoltenberg told reporters on July 27.
“We have to be very clear to distinguish between extreme views, which are completely legal and legitimate,” he said. “What is not legitimate is to try to implement those extreme views by using
violence.”
To contact the reporter on this story: Josiane Kremer in Oslo at jkremer4@bloomberg.net
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Tasneem Brogger at tbrogger@bloomberg.net
29 June 2012
28 June 2012
Norway attempting to expel its Monarchy
I wonder how this scenario fits in with 'Operation Breivik' and the political consequences felt in the aftermath of the events.
I wonder what Queen Elizabeth the Second's thoughts are about her ruling neighbours current predicament.
The King of Norway should read the book "The Key of David" and align himself with the Lord in these dark tumultuous days because what is appointed by Him cannot be changed by godless men.
VG: Politicians to give King notice of resignation from his position
I wonder what Queen Elizabeth the Second's thoughts are about her ruling neighbours current predicament.
The King of Norway should read the book "The Key of David" and align himself with the Lord in these dark tumultuous days because what is appointed by Him cannot be changed by godless men.
VG: Politicians to give King notice of resignation from his position
27 June 2012
Date for Abu Hamza extradition to USA has been leaked
Date for Abu Hamza extradition to USA has been leakedfor more details if your not news international glenjenvey@aol.com
thanks to all at the FBI in New York for tip off!
25 June 2012
Irish leaders of an English movement
The Irish IRA supporting leaders of the English Defence League who are supported and endorsed by a faction right into the heart of the British Establishment standing behind Alan Lake the point man and trusted employee from within the EU controlled European Bank for Reconstruction & Development.They are leaders of the movement and not the founders.
Remove the Irish leaders of an English street protest movement and that British faction of the American Counter-jihad movement have nothing left in the UK after spending several years financing and endorsing them whilst using the 'useful drunken English idiots' of the EDL to further their political agenda.
I agree with the anti-Jihad anti-Islamisation agenda just not their UK leadership.
I and others have been against these wolves in sheep's clothing for some time which includes Alan Lake because we know how they operate, how their network is set up and how it is contrary to the Loyalist Protestant case upon English shores.
What dictates their actions is different from what dictates our actions...
Second generation Irish IRA supporting Catholics running around the Country directing English followers to
smash the place up, terrorise communities, whilst costing the British tax payer millions and achieving nothing of note in the process whilst standing under the English banner proclaiming a righteous cause.Basterdised English Defence League.
The foreign leadership of this current movement upon English shores had a lot to lose and myself and others were a direct threat to that and then next thing I stand accused of being the 'mentor' behind a mass murderer in Norway that could have turned out very differently than how it did.
You explain to me how and why that happened?
Further reading: Explaining context to second set of psychiatrists
You can see the cabal here: Counter-jihad alliance Stockholm
Funny how all those at the Counter-jihad alliance Stockholm are directly connected to Alan Lake and written about by Breivik himself inside the manifesto, where I am not mentioned once, yet I stood accused in the media because of the name and regalia which are irrelevant to the real reason behind the attacks.
Alan Lake the ideological political extremist who was/is a direct enemy has a friend who he invited to the pre-founding EDL meeting in his London Barbican flat who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' online, he is a few years older than Breivik and was important enough for Lake to invite to that meeting.
Who is he?
Another Breivik?
Breivik claims his English 'mentor' is called 'Richard the Lionheart' and Alan Lake was given a mickey mouse interview over his possible role as the English 'mentor'.
2 + 2 usually = 4
Why has this persons identity been withheld from the public? And why has the knowledge that Alan Lake who was interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' and is directly connected to someone who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' not been reported on in the mainstream media?
Probably because of all of his political and financial connections. How would it look if he is the real English 'mentor' and who could he accuse which would then tell a different story from the 'official' Norwegian one of Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one.
Video: Insight into Gladio
There is silence surrounding such a critical piece of evidence in the on-going investigation, and it is still on-going because the Norwegian police are still trying to locate the English 'mentor' from the manifesto.
How long is it going to be before someone else starts to question this?
Further reading: You've been framed
The power station for the Caliphate has now been turned on
The moslem brotherhood "Project"Frontpage Magazine
One might be led to think that if international law enforcement authorities and Western intelligence agencies had discovered a twenty-year old document revealing a top-secret plan developed by the oldest Islamist organization with one of the most extensive terror networks in the world to launch a program of “cultural invasion” and eventual conquest of the West that virtually mirrors the tactics used by Islamists for more than two decades, that such news would scream from headlines published on the front pages and above the fold of the New York Times, Washington Post, London Times, Le Monde, Bild, and La Repubblica.
If that’s what you might think, you would be wrong.
In fact, such a document was recovered in a raid by Swiss authorities in November 2001, two months after the horror of 9/11. Since that time information about this document, known in counterterrorism circles as “The Project”, and discussion regarding its content has been limited to the top-secret world of Western intelligence communities. Only through the work of an intrepid Swiss journalist, Sylvain Besson of Le Temps, and his book published in October 2005 in France, La conquête de l'Occident: Le projet secret des Islamistes (The Conquest of the West: The Islamists' Secret Project), has information regarding The Project finally been made public. One Western official cited by Besson has described The Project as “a totalitarian ideology of infiltration which represents, in the end, the greatest danger for European societies.”
Now FrontPage readers will be the first to be able to read the complete English translation of The Project.
What Western intelligence authorities know about The Project begins with the raid of a luxurious villa in Campione, Switzerland on November 7, 2001. The target of the raid was Youssef Nada, director of the Al-Taqwa Bank of Lugano, who has had active association with the Muslim Brotherhood for more than 50 years and who admitted to being one of the organization’s international leaders. The Muslim Brotherhood, regarded as the oldest and one of the most important Islamist movements in the world, was founded by Hasan al-Banna in 1928 and dedicated to the credo, “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope.”
The raid was conducted by Swiss law enforcement at the request of the White House in the initial crackdown on terrorist finances in the immediate aftermath of 9/11. US and Swiss investigators had been looking at Al-Taqwa’s involvement in money laundering and funding a wide range of Islamic terrorist groups, including Al-Qaeda, HAMAS (the Palestinian affiliate of the Muslim Brotherhood), the Algerian GIA, and the Tunisian Ennahdah.
Included in the documents seized during the raid of Nada’s Swiss villa was a 14-page plan written in Arabic and dated December 1, 1982, which outlines a 12-point strategy to “establish an Islamic government on earth” – identified as The Project. According to testimony given to Swiss authorities by Nada, the unsigned document was prepared by “Islamic researchers” associated with the Muslim Brotherhood.
What makes The Project so different from the standard “Death of America! Death to Israel!” and “Establish the global caliphate!” Islamist rhetoric is that it represents a flexible, multi-phased, long-term approach to the “cultural invasion” of the West. Calling for the utilization of various tactics, ranging from immigration, infiltration, surveillance, propaganda, protest, deception, political legitimacy and terrorism, The Project has served for more than two decades as the Muslim Brotherhood “master plan”. As can be seen in a number of examples throughout Europe – including the political recognition of parallel Islamist government organizations in Sweden, the recent “cartoon” jihad in Denmark, the Parisian car-burning intifada last November, and the 7/7 terrorist attacks in London – the plan outlined in The Project has been overwhelmingly successful.
Rather than focusing on terrorism as the sole method of group action, as is the case with Al-Qaeda, in perfect postmodern fashion the use of terror falls into a multiplicity of options available to progressively infiltrate, confront, and eventually establish Islamic domination over the West. The following tactics and techniques are among the many recommendations made in The Project:
Continue reading: Moslem brotherhood "Project"
22 June 2012
Operation Weeting
Further reading: Corruption at the MetFurther reading: Bribery detective works inside London bank
From: Glen Jenvey
Date: 18 June 2012 20:09
Subject: Operation Weeting
To: enquiries@ipcc.gsi.gov.uk,
Police complaints
Police officers released my witness statement in a terror related case involving Abu Hamza for cash. I was first shown my witness statement by a reporter who wrote the book called terror tracker (Neil Doyle) who was given the witness statement by Lewis Pather of the News of the World, who was planning to expose police lack of action on Abu Hamza.
Lewis Pather via police officers at Scotland yard paid officers money for the statement. At no time did I give permission to the police or News of the World to have my witness statement. I was promised £10000 by the News of the World for the story which was never printed and I was not paid. I was also promised a % of the profits from the book terror tracker which quotes the statement. I have not been paid for this also. A year after the writer Neil Doyle was given the statement I was given my first look at the statement since it was made to Sgt Durrant of the anti terrorist squad.
Lewis Pather told me later that the News of the Worlds solicitors met with police officers and have a close working relationship with the police? I believe the police leaked this statement, but found out that the story it was going to be used for, would paint the police in a bad light. I was told later that the police leaked other stories to the press in a close working relationship and in effect controlled what was printed. Money would changed hands.
Even MI5 officers sold stories to news international this can be seen by looking at the Times newspaper story records I was also told this by a Sunday times reporter, that David Leppard at the sunday times was the reporter who paid MI5 for story's, by a reporter who now works for the Sunday Mail Abul Taher. He named the reporter who paid MI5 officers who at this time never had a press office. Another reporter told me of a close working relationships with members of the Home office he would have dinners with and paid for stories for the Sun newspaper.
I have not had no reply from Scotland yard into this matter mainly my witness statement being given to reporters before any court case without my permission so Im writing to you and sending a copy to a person I trust as a record of this complaint.
yours faithfully
Glen Jenvey
glenjenvey@aol.com
Further reading: Background story to Abu Hamza's extradition
21 June 2012
Breivik's bomb making skills
Where did Breivik learn his bomb making skills to be able to create a bomb from fertilizer in his farmhouse that was big enough to be able to destroy his Government building?We are led to believe Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who had no physical or mental help in any capacity within the totality of his actions because to state that he did would mean there is a bigger story surrounding him and other people's involvement and it is this that the Norwegian's in control of the case do not want the public to know.
There is no possible way that Breivik made a bomb from fertilizer that was big enough to blow up his Government building without prior training and test detonating of his creation.
As you can see from the picture Breivik did not test detonate any bombs at his farm house due to the fact of how close his neighbours lived.
So what is the explanation behind the bomb?
It is another line of investigation completely dismissed from the public mind because it conflicts with the 'official' story surrounding Breivik of the "solo terrorist" connected to no one.
Further reading: A question of doubt
The Unraveling
If Breivik is part of a neo-Gladio style group who are politically and financially motivated it would explain why there has been a clear high level Government cover-up in Norway.A section from within the political and military infrastructure of the system carrying out a terrorist operation for political purposes (oil & gas) and then covering up their involvement in the event.
Left-wing blaming it on the Right-wing (Gladio)
The cover story for the public mind that has been propagated in the court room by the compliant State prosecutors is that Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was insane after playing computer games in his bedroom which means if you believe their story, that there is no bigger story surrounding him, and nobody else is involved in the event with him.
If you are a serious follower of the case and believe that then you might as well bury your head back in the sand and live out the rest of your life in fantasy land where you belong with the rest of the zombies.
The State prosecutors are just like the Gestapo in Nazi Germany "We were doing what we were told" and they were told the story surrounding Breivik to prosecute on the basis of from people higher up in the system than themselves and they must not deviate from the script they were given because they are State prosecutors. They were chosen for their roles just like the first 2 State sanctioned psychiatrists.
How can you have an 'official' conclusion that you prosecute on the basis of if there is still outstanding evidence and investigative tracks to follow to determine the full truth with which to state an 'official' conclusion from?
That is called 'insanity' or the legal term would be corruption...
The political and military rulers rule the system and they have stated that Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is insane so there is no one else to find and no investigative tracks to follow and if you disagree you are a conspiracy theorist who must be looked upon as 'crazy' and your professional reputation damaged.
They have completely closed the case down and have achieved it by using the mainstream media platform to propagate their lying and misleading 'official' conclusions from.
Breivik has the family background to be a recruited agent into a secretive political military group.
Son of a former government diplomat, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence Lawyer (that tells you all you need to know).
Who went on to become the worst political terrorist in Europe of the 21st Century, and the most successful "solo terrorist" of all time ever in the history of terrorism if you believe the "solo terrorist" connected to no one line.
Those who know anything about Gladio or similar type organisations will know whether or not Breivik fitted the criteria to be a recruited agent and whether or not his actions were in-line with a neo-Gladio style operation.
Neo-Gladio style networks and secretive politically and financially motivated groups are all over Europe including the UK so if Breivik is a part of a secretive group endorsed from higher up within the political military system then this would explain why there has been no real thorough investigation taken place concerning other people's involvement. There is a chain of command from within the political military system and God only knows at this moment in time where that chain of command leads. If one person is directly linked to Breivik then there is an unraveling of the truth and the real finger pointing then begins with the exposure of people who think they are more equal than others and their possible involvement behind Breivik.
Close the case down from the top with the "solo terrorist" connected to no one line supported by psychiatrists and State prosecutors and then everyone is safe because to state anything different threatens the professional reputation of the person in question.
Military General's and MP's are not above the law when 69 innocent Norwegian kids lay dead with many more injured and maimed for life in the name of politics and there mistake was attempting to blame me for being behind Breivik's actions.
They might not have acted themselves but one of their underlings did who has brought them directly into the frame because of his actions towards me. He is the threat to you not me.
Ayling fits the profile of a member of a secretive group with political and financial motivations, he works inside an EU controlled bank, he has been around Europe propagating his right-wing "cultural conservative" message whilst attempting to create a larger Europe wide movement on the back of his directorship of the hijacked English Defence League, and he is linked right up into the British Political Establishment.
What more circumstantial evidence do you need?
And he was given a mickey mouse interview just for protocol over his possible role as the English 'mentor' behind Breivik because of me due to the fact that there was no other explanation of where the accusation that I was behind Breivik could have come.
He also had numerous links into Norway prior to July 22nd 2011 which even possibly includes a link into the current ruling Norwegian Government which would be very incriminating and damaging.
But the Norwegian State political military controllers of the Breivik case state that Breivik is connected to no one which means there is nobody else to look for.
The Norwegian police have stated that the investigation is still ongoing and they have traced everyone mentioned in the manifesto except for the English 'mentor' 'Richard the Lionheart' and a couple of women.
Alan Ayling who fits the profile of the English 'mentor' Breivik met in London in 2002 was given a mickey mouse interview over his possible role and is directly connected to someone who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' online.
Further reading: Who is the real 'Richard the Lionheart'
The Norwegian police say they are still searching for this person.
Ayling and this anonymous person are both from exactly the same ideological network as Breivik.
Reveal this anonymous persons identity and then the unraveling of the truth begins, the truth the Norwegian political military controllers of the Breivik case want hidden from view.
Ayling interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' linked to someone using the alias 'Richard the Lionheart'.
Why has this information not been brought out by now? Obviously because of Ayling's political connections and his/their direct involvement in the whole affair which is in-line with the Norwegian's closing the case down and claiming there is nobody else to look for.
I would hazard a guess that there is a link to this 'Richard the Lionheart' in Breivik's Facebook accounts which is what he has been alluding too, and I reckon this 'Richard the Lionheart' has been a conduit between Ayling and Breivik and directed Breivik to frame me.
We do not know yet though while the evidence is still outstanding.
20 June 2012
19 June 2012
Questioning the Prosecution
Aftenposten: Difficult for us to consider a different realityIt is difficult for the psychiatrists to consider a different reality because if they publicly agree in court that they believe Breivik's group exists and that he did meet people as he claims then how will that look in the media and in the public eye?
Shock horror...
Imagine the consequences for the Norwegian police controlling the case, the Prosecutors now in court and what message that would then send to the Norwegian public and all international observers following the case.
It is impossible for anyone in Norway to claim Breivik is connected to others and that it is not all delusions in his mind because of the wider implications (think about it).
The health professionals have been forced to work around the State's 'official' claims surrounding Breivik even though the police are still investigating the case so should never have made 'official' conclusions in the first place.
The agenda from the very beginning has been to have Breivik written off as a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane' which means someone (plural) on State level has a hand behind the events and in no way wants the real meaning and bigger story behind the events emerging so they have closed the case down and white-washed everything ruling out all other possibilities other than the predetermined one which is Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is insane.
Find his English 'mentor' and then the unraveling of the truth begins.
Quote: We have no methodology to determine whether one person may consider themselves to have met another person, or if he is lying, says Aspaas.
Based upon that statement the second set of psychiatrists cannot rule out the possibility that Breivik did actually meet someone in London in 2002.
It was 10 years ago so the full truth behind that time frame of history is hard for anyone to know for certain other than those involved themselves.
How can the Norwegian police prove beyond doubt that Breivik did not meet his alleged English 'mentor' in London after his trip to Liberia in 2002?
Their claim that he did not centers on the fact that they cannot prove he did so Breivik must be 'insane' and made it all up.
What type of investigative logic is that?
Further reading: Liberia - London connection
Quote: Even the terrorist believes that he is part of a network that has given him the task of writing his manifesto, but prosecutors believe that Knights Templar exist only in Breivik's own imagination.
Is it not suspicious that Breivik bought an expensive pen after his Liberia meeting in 2002 a few days before he landed in London. He then went on to write his now infamous manifesto which is what his actions center around, claiming he was told to write it.
Imagination is one thing and facts are another.
The purchasing of that pen in the context of Breivik writing the manifesto and claiming he was told to write it in 2002 after his Liberia trip points to the fact that he is telling the truth and the pen is a sign for the future (2011) when looking back which he knew would happen.
He has just been told he has to sit down and write a manifesto and the next thing straight after he buys an expensive pen.
What other explanation is there for Breivik the author of the infamous "2083" manifesto purchasing an expensive pen around the time he claims to have been recruited into a secretive group and told to write the manifesto?
Quote: He may have thought he has met some people, and this has gone over into delusions. Or he may have constructed the idea of being in London. There is a wealth of possible interpretations here, said Tørrissen.
What if he did actually meet individuals in London who did give him documents which is in-line with being recruited into a secretive group who are behind the terrorist attacks in Norway.
Is that not another possibility that should not be ruled out without evidence?
The Norwegian police can find no trace of this meeting taking place 10 years ago so deny it ever took place.
Do you really think that after 10 years the Norwegian police would be able to find a trace that this secretive meeting took place in London?
Of course not.
It does not mean it did not take place, it just means the Norwegian police cannot prove it did so instead of leaving the door open by saying we are keeping an open mind they have ruled out the possibility of the meeting taking place and claimed it is part of Breivik's insanity.
Another door shut that should not be shut.
Quote: Prosecutors believe that there are two scenarios of what happened in London: that Breivik lying, or that he imagines that the meeting has taken place.
Considering it was 10 years ago and impossible to say for a fact that it did not take place, should there not be three possible scenarios of what happened in London in 2002 and not only the two the prosecutors state?
Instead the Norwegian police have ruled out that the meeting took place without having any facts to support their assumption. Their facts are they cannot prove it took place which is baseless.
They then claim it is all in Breivik's head which would be supported in the public mind by the 'insane' label that the prosecutors have been pressing for.
Why have the Norwegian police ruled out the possibility that Breivik is telling the truth?
They would never be able to find out for certain after 10 years, the only clues you have are the suspicious traveling arrangements and facts like the pen.
If it is a secretive group versed in the art of espionage behind the terrorist attacks then it is obvious to the simplest of minds that they would have covered their tracks and not left any traces, especially not that could be found 10 years later.
The Norwegian police located Breivik in 2 cafes around the time of the alleged meeting in London but beyond that he disappeared around the time he said the meeting took place.
The evidence points to the fact that Breivik is telling the truth but in my personal opinion the truth has been covered up, up until this moment in time because if Breivik is telling the truth then there are others who can be directly implicated and if they are directly implicated then others can be directly implicated too and the question is how high do the implications go and where does it then lead?
Close the case down and white-wash it and everyone is safe.
The name Knights Templar & Regalia
Using the name Knights Templar and dressing up in the clothes does not mean Breivik is a Knights Templar based upon the historical context that has spanned the ages.Breivik is a proud godless militant Nationalist as you saw in court the first days he appeared who has stated himself that he does not believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, and not a Christian fundamentalist so he is not a true Knights Templar so that means the name Knights Templar and the regalia were used for a specific purpose.
Also his actions were based upon politics and not Holy War.
What specific purpose in the context of the whole case could be the reason behind why Breivik used the name Knights Templar and the regalia to dress his acts up in?
Considering I was singled out the day after his terrorist attacks for arrest with Breivik himself believing someone would be arrested, it is very obvious that the clothes he wrapped up his acts in were designed to frame me for his crimes.
Or was it just all a big coincidence within his imagination?
Who had reason enough and motivation enough to frame me?
Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake.
So not knowing Breivik in any capacity whatsoever it left me with the only logical conclusion and that is that Alan Ayling is Breivik's English 'mentor' and he told Breivik to frame me.
What other explanation behind my involvement in the case do the Norwegian police have?
I am not his inspiration that is Fraudman.
11 months after making that first claim all circumstantial evidence points to the fact that I am completely correct only no thorough police investigation has taken place even though there is factual evidence possibly linking Ayling to Breivik.
Take away the name Knights Templar and the regalia and what you have left is Breivik the militant Nationalist and his 1500 page manifesto that have nothing to do with Christianity, along with me possibly sitting on trial now as the English 'mentor' if Breivik had of been killed after his planned martyrdom mission on July 22nd 2011.
Planned to perfection only they underestimated and even denied the power of the Lord Jesus Christ upon His throne who would not sit back silent when one of his elect is attacked and falsely accused.
The case is not over yet...there is still outstanding evidence and Breivik is still alive.
A neo-Gladio secret group of financially and politically minded people attempting to start a terrorist campaign and new terrorist organisation fits in-line with what Breivik has claimed and the Knights Templar name and regalia is what they have used.
If Ayling is Breivik's English 'mentor' then it killed 2 birds with 1 stone.
'Operation Breivik' did not take account for me in 2002 and it is my belief that the Lord placed me in the middle of it in 2011 for His own reasons which will be explained when this is over.
18 June 2012
Explaining context to second set of psychiatrists
VG: Knight's Templar grew out of Breivik's imaginationQuote: Even when he phoned in to police from Utøya presented Breivik as commander of the anticommunist opposition movement. Agnar Aspaas and Terje Tørrissen believe Breivik is sane, but believes that he has always known that the idea of Knights Templar grew out of his own imagination . - We believe that the testimony in court strengthens this view,
The question is how did the thought Knights Templar end up within Breivik's mind in the first place for it to grow as part of the imagination process into what he then presented to the world?
Did he wake up one day with a bolt of inspiration from no where that grew into what the World now perceives, or was a seed planted by someone for Breivik's imagination to grow?
It did not come from no where so where does the origin of the source lay? What is the explanation behind it?
As they say, his first words were that he was the commander of the anti-communist opposition movement which is Gladio ideology and fits completely in-line with Breivik the son of a Government diplomat, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence lawyer and active Freemason being a recruited agent into a secretive group who have financial and political motivations which is in-line with Breivik's own claims. Definitely not Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was insane after playing computer games in his bedroom as the Norwegian State controllers of the case want the World to believe.
Gladio style networks are all over Europe and are not a figment of the imagination that conspiracy theories are based upon.
Breivik has stated himself that he is part of Gladio but whether he knew their true motivations is questionable at this moment in time.
No one wants to say that on the TV though do they so it is easier for mass public consumption to have Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is insane and then the real truth behind him stays hidden from the public mind.
I wonder what the Utoya families think about that?
Who is Alan Ayling's friend in the Norwegian government?
I will put this into context for the psychiatrists.
In the days after July 22nd 2011 Breivik's imagination was so good that some how all attention was centered on me as being his English 'mentor' he met in London in 2002 because of certain pointers placed within the manifesto, with this accusation then spread around the Worlds news which deflected all attention and blame from the real reason and source behind him and set the media stage for public perceptions.
What are the chances of that being a coincidence?
IMPOSSIBLE!!!
So what is the explanation behind how I ended up accused of being his English 'mentor' due to the parallels (Knights Templar) and pointers Breivik used?
Either he was insane and copied me wanting to highlight my blog or he copied me to set me up for arrest.
If he wanted to highlight my blog then he could have mentioned me within the manifesto like he did everyone else which he did not do, instead he attempted to have me arrested which was a hostile act. He even stated in interview that he believed someone had been arrested because that was obviously part of the plan.
Why would he do that?
Further reading: You've been framed
That is some imagination, to attempt to have someone he does not know arrested as an accomplice to his heinous crimes the day after he is dead from his martyrdom mission don't you think?
So that imagination has reasoning behind it and has a seed and root, the question is where did the seed come from and who watered the root?
I do not know Breivik in any capacity so where did the reasoning come from for him to attempt to have me arrested as an accomplice to his crimes?
Had to come from an external source who planted the seed in his mind and then directed his imagination towards the intended goal.
Who out there had reason and motivation enough and is from the same ideological network as Breivik, was my question when I saw what was happening after I stood accused?
Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake the director behind the EDL which means he is the real English 'mentor' he met in London in 2002 who directed Breivik in the totality of his terrorist acts which included framing me in an attempt to remove me from being a threat to his continued political agenda.
To claim it is all Breivik's imagination meaning their is no reason behind it without placing it into context within the wider framework of the case is "wrong and false" which is probably why the Norwegian's have not wanted my witness statement in court as part of the trial even though they involved me by smearing me all over the World news as the alleged English 'mentor'. They also refuse to fully investigate my angle on the case and have closed all doors on it by claiming Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which in the context of the evidence is laughable only it is not funny but they are sticking to that claim because how would it look now if they did not.
Everything has an explanation so what is the explanation behind Breivik's imagination about the Knights Templar that was so perfect that he successfully framed me? You had better have a good one for when I come for the answer.
Come one...I'm sure psychiatrists are not that stupid.
The general public do not look behind the statement though they just believe there is no meaning to the Knights Templar as it was all his imagination because the psychiatrists say so, which then endorses the "solo terrorist" connected to no one line in the public mind.
It is about time someone challenged these statements on a professional basis in the interest of 'truth & justice'.
The Knights Templar and regalia are just clothes he dressed up in, take them away and you have a godless militant Nationalist and a 1500 page manifesto.
The clothes worked well for framing me though as part of his imagination!
I wonder what Breivik's own explanation is?
You read him some of my writings...
Ominous warning sign
VG: I sat 3 feet from him with a knifeI had a thought and feeling the other week that there was the possibility that someone would attempt to assassinate Breivik because he is a direct threat to those who are behind him whilst he is still alive, that is of course if there are others connected to him as I believe there are, and if there are then they have the ability to carry it out.
I know many in Norway would probably like to see Breivik murdered after what he has done but if he is murdered then he is silenced and then the full truth surrounding him will never be known. As it stands he is still alive so there is the "possibility" that he will talk at some point and then the whole game changes when he implicates people.
I should imagine there are some nervous people out there right now.
His mother is a co-conspirator to his criminal activities so you would have thought a deal would have been done with him for her immunity from prosecution but that seems to have slipped the case just like everything else that could conflict with the 'official' story the Norwegian State wants the World to believe about Breivik that has also slipped the case.
Someone in court room 250 in Norway sat 3 feet from Breivik with a knife today that they had mistakenly taken into the court house.
Take that as a warning...
Imagine if that was someone who wanted to kill Breivik?
There would now be a dead Breivik all over the World news with the most important piece of the mass murder case silenced, never to give up his truth to the World.
First a car crash on his way to court and now a knife in the possession of someone sitting 3 feet away from him.
What next?
How hard would it be to orchestrate an assassination attempt on Breivik's life?
As each day passes if he is connected to someone then he becomes more and more of a threat to them.
17 June 2012
The New Norway PLC
I almost forgot; remember the Russians breaking into Breivik's lawyers home?
What was that all about?
Not knowing anything about Norwegian Russian diplomatic relations I posed a question about it that only other Norwegian politicians or those involved in politics in that Country would know.
Is the current Norwegian Government a pro-Russian Government?
I believe that Russia have a hand behind Breivik on some level for geo-political reasons (oil & gas).
My hypothesis is here: Hidden in plain sight
Call me crazy but that is my belief.
A recent statement from the Norwegian politician Skie Grande at her parties National Executive Committee said all I needed to know to support my belief.
Quote: While the doors of Russia has become more open over the years has been Foreign Minister, we have also gone quieter and quieter in them. It becomes less and less criticism, said Skei Grande in a speech to the party's national executive committee in Halden on Saturday.
- It's a big difference between having a foreign minister that sets values to be the foremost goal, and a foreign minister who is primarily concerned with acquiring new oil contracts, she added.
So the current Norwegian Labour Government who Breivik helped stay in power and who have the potential to stay in power for a lot longer on the back of his actions are more concerned about big business (oil) with Russia than promoting the ideals on the World stage that the International Community have come to know and expect from Norway.
Hundreds of billions of dollars and more in the offing for one of the last and largest natural deposits of oil & gas that both the Russia and Norway governments have a mutual agreement over is the reason.
So rather than the Norwegian Foreign Minister rocking the oil & gas boat and challenging the Russian government on their human rights abuses that are being carried out against anti-Putin activists who are being rounded up, beaten and imprisoned for their dissent that the International Community has come to expect from Norway, there is silence.
Obviously other politicians in Norway see what is happening at the hands of their current ruling Government and how it is damaging the integrity and reputation of their Country in the eyes of others abroad and are starting to publicly comment on it.
The question is; do they believe that Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane' after playing computer games in his bedroom - or - Breivik the son of a former government diplomat, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence Lawyer was a recruited agent into a secretive group with financial and political motivations.
The Norwegian State in control of the Breivik case want the World to believe the former.
Maybe 69 innocent misguided children murdered and many more injured and maimed for life was a price worth paying for the faction behind Breivik who have their eyes on the money in the North sea.
The Norwegian Foreign Secretary who has been accused by a political opponent of being more concerned about the oil & gas business with Russia than criticising it's human rights abuses is tipped to be the next Prime Minister once the present one steps down.
Planned to perfection...
I wonder who could have orchestrated that one?
There are some very powerful people out there with serious political and financial motivations concerning Norway's natural wealth so is it out of the realms of possibility that Breivik has been used by a secretive group for political purposes. He did commit his acts in the name of politics after all.
Now the compliant Norwegian Government oil man is going to be the head of the Country and subservient to his new bigger Russian masters who now own him, and he will have control over the Norwegian State infrastructure to keep the people subdued while the plundering in their backyard takes place right under their noses.
Priceless...
I do not know anything about Norwegian politics so do not know the full political implications of 'Operation Breivik' that is for those who have an insight and understanding of the political landscape of their Country like the Armed Forces and opposition political parties.
I wonder what their political analysis is of Breivik's actions and their long and short term political implications and who benefits from them?
It is taboo to challenge the 'official' story surrounding Breivik though so the public have to just accept the story they have been fed through the media by the 'officials' in Norway via the "secretive group" who are controlling the case because they own and control the State infrastructure.
Further reading: Who is Alan Lake's friend in the Norwegian Government
What was that all about?
Not knowing anything about Norwegian Russian diplomatic relations I posed a question about it that only other Norwegian politicians or those involved in politics in that Country would know.Is the current Norwegian Government a pro-Russian Government?
I believe that Russia have a hand behind Breivik on some level for geo-political reasons (oil & gas).
My hypothesis is here: Hidden in plain sight
Call me crazy but that is my belief.
A recent statement from the Norwegian politician Skie Grande at her parties National Executive Committee said all I needed to know to support my belief.
Quote: While the doors of Russia has become more open over the years has been Foreign Minister, we have also gone quieter and quieter in them. It becomes less and less criticism, said Skei Grande in a speech to the party's national executive committee in Halden on Saturday.
- It's a big difference between having a foreign minister that sets values to be the foremost goal, and a foreign minister who is primarily concerned with acquiring new oil contracts, she added.
So the current Norwegian Labour Government who Breivik helped stay in power and who have the potential to stay in power for a lot longer on the back of his actions are more concerned about big business (oil) with Russia than promoting the ideals on the World stage that the International Community have come to know and expect from Norway.
Hundreds of billions of dollars and more in the offing for one of the last and largest natural deposits of oil & gas that both the Russia and Norway governments have a mutual agreement over is the reason.
So rather than the Norwegian Foreign Minister rocking the oil & gas boat and challenging the Russian government on their human rights abuses that are being carried out against anti-Putin activists who are being rounded up, beaten and imprisoned for their dissent that the International Community has come to expect from Norway, there is silence.
Obviously other politicians in Norway see what is happening at the hands of their current ruling Government and how it is damaging the integrity and reputation of their Country in the eyes of others abroad and are starting to publicly comment on it.
The question is; do they believe that Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane' after playing computer games in his bedroom - or - Breivik the son of a former government diplomat, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence Lawyer was a recruited agent into a secretive group with financial and political motivations.
The Norwegian State in control of the Breivik case want the World to believe the former.
Maybe 69 innocent misguided children murdered and many more injured and maimed for life was a price worth paying for the faction behind Breivik who have their eyes on the money in the North sea.
The Norwegian Foreign Secretary who has been accused by a political opponent of being more concerned about the oil & gas business with Russia than criticising it's human rights abuses is tipped to be the next Prime Minister once the present one steps down.
Planned to perfection...
I wonder who could have orchestrated that one?
There are some very powerful people out there with serious political and financial motivations concerning Norway's natural wealth so is it out of the realms of possibility that Breivik has been used by a secretive group for political purposes. He did commit his acts in the name of politics after all.
Now the compliant Norwegian Government oil man is going to be the head of the Country and subservient to his new bigger Russian masters who now own him, and he will have control over the Norwegian State infrastructure to keep the people subdued while the plundering in their backyard takes place right under their noses.
Priceless...
I do not know anything about Norwegian politics so do not know the full political implications of 'Operation Breivik' that is for those who have an insight and understanding of the political landscape of their Country like the Armed Forces and opposition political parties.
I wonder what their political analysis is of Breivik's actions and their long and short term political implications and who benefits from them?
It is taboo to challenge the 'official' story surrounding Breivik though so the public have to just accept the story they have been fed through the media by the 'officials' in Norway via the "secretive group" who are controlling the case because they own and control the State infrastructure.
Further reading: Who is Alan Lake's friend in the Norwegian Government
A Question of Dr. Husby's Professional reputation
Then you question why he was specifically chosen for his role in the Breivik case along with his colleague who was the former head of the psychiatric commission overseeing the court's proceedings concerning Breivik's state of mind.
Further reading: 12 out of 14 believe he is sane
Dagbladet: Husby's basis for Fritzel's sanity
Measure the below statement concerning Dr. Husby's remote diagnostic of Fritzel with his professional diagnosis of Breivik that no professionals in the field of psychiatry agree with accept his colleague and the criminal psychiatric commission.
Quote: Criminal acts of mental illness is characterized by poor planning, impulse action and violence, stated Husby. Fritzl actions he described him as the opposite-structured, deliberate and methodical.
- He is a pure psychopath, intelligent enough not to show their bad sides all the time. His attacks are planned and systematized over many years. Therefore he can not blame it on mental illness, but must be responsible for their actions as a human being. His lawyer is probably the only one who claims Fritzl is sick, Husby said.
Further reading: Tools of the Norwegian State
Further reading: 12 out of 14 believe he is sane
Dagbladet: Husby's basis for Fritzel's sanity
Measure the below statement concerning Dr. Husby's remote diagnostic of Fritzel with his professional diagnosis of Breivik that no professionals in the field of psychiatry agree with accept his colleague and the criminal psychiatric commission.
Quote: Criminal acts of mental illness is characterized by poor planning, impulse action and violence, stated Husby. Fritzl actions he described him as the opposite-structured, deliberate and methodical.
- He is a pure psychopath, intelligent enough not to show their bad sides all the time. His attacks are planned and systematized over many years. Therefore he can not blame it on mental illness, but must be responsible for their actions as a human being. His lawyer is probably the only one who claims Fritzl is sick, Husby said.
Further reading: Tools of the Norwegian State
15 June 2012
You've been Framed
BlottR: English commander told me to act nowIf you take away the name Knights Templar and the regalia that Breivik used what do you have left?
Breivik a self professing militant Nationalist and a 1500 page manifesto that he claims was the sole purpose of his attack on Utoya island, which was to maximise its publicity.
A militant Nationalist is not a Christian fundamentalist and Knights Templar's are all Christian fundamentalists, meaning they have accepted Jesus Christ as their Lord and personal Saviour and the fundamentals of the Christian message is what they are sworn to propagate and uphold.
So Breivik is dressed in clothes that do not belong to him which makes him a wolf in sheeps clothing but it served a purpose.
Why is Breivik dressed in clothes that do not belong to him?
The clothes along with certain intelligent pointers within the manifesto along with claims of more cells ready to strike worked very well in framing me as being the English 'mentor' he speaks of in the manifesto.
If I was his alleged English 'mentor' he speaks of then why would he single me out for arrest the day after his attacks?
If I was his English 'mentor' then that was not a very nice thing to do to me was it?
Even the simplest can understand that point.
The clothes detract from the real reason behind his attacks which is the manifesto and I am not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere, with nothing I have ever written inside it's pages.
His life long work that he sacrificed his life for (the manifesto) contains the writings of people I detest with there being a public record of this prior to July 22nd 2011.
So is it not a bit suspicious that most of the people he applauds within his manifesto as his heroes and ideological people to follow are the people I have had a long running public contention with yet I was the one who stood accused of being his English 'mentor' which could have turned out very badly for me?
Breivik was no friend of mine and his actions in apportioning blame up me show you that.
So why did he do it?
I was not his inspiration that is Fraudman, the only reason behind him involving me was to have me arrested which is why he believed someone would be arrested in the days after the event.
He knew and expected because it was part of the plan.
A militant Nationalist dressing up in the clothes of Templarism and then apportioning blame was a hostile act.
Who is involved in his ideological World and had very real reason and motive to attack me by using Breivik so as to remove me from being a threat?
The only person is Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake who is the director behind the hijacked EDL who has a political agenda in the UK and throughout Europe and is connected to a group of financially and politically influential people. He also worked as a trusted employee within the EU controlled bank "The European Bank of Reconstruction and Development" in the Square Mile London.
(Why was an employee in such a prestigious bank running around directing the EDL in the UK?)
It is too long to explain the reasons and motives now but the Norwegian police have my witness statement along with several journalists who also have my explanation about this and it cannot be disputed.
There has to be real reason and motive behind the claim of being framed to uphold under scrutiny and there is real reason and motive on Alan Ayling's behalf.
There is no one else out there who fits the whole profile other than him.
After 10 months of making that first claim all circumstantial evidence points to my claim being 100% correct only no action has been taken.
Why not?
In a murder investigation the police have a prime suspect because all circumstantial evidence points to the fact that the person in question is the person responsible, and there is a whole body of circumstantial evidence pointing to the fact that Alan Ayling is the English 'mentor' behind Breivik.
There comes a point when all circumstantial evidence proves beyond doubt.
Are they just waiting for the direct link or have they refused to investigate this credible line of enquiry for reasons unknown to intimate followers of this case?
Alan Ayling has been interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' and he is directly connected to someone who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart' online, and Breivik claims he was mentored by someone who used the code name 'Richard the Lionheart'.
Is that not a credible piece of evidence still missing from the Breivik enquiry?
The Norwegian police in control of the Breivik investigation up to this point have closed all doors on the enquiry by claiming that they have concluded that Breivik is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which means there is no one else to look for.
They have completely ruled out the whole investigative angle on how I became involved in the case because it conflicts with their 'official' conclusion.
How is that in the interest of 'truth & justice' when 69 innocent misguided kids lay dead with many more injured and maimed for life, along with me being blamed for it with them doing absolutely nothing to rectify that?
No matter how hard it is for small narrow minded people to believe, it is my belief that Breivik the militant Nationalist framed me by using the Templar ideology and iconography to wrap his acts up in to apportion blame so as to remove me from being a threat to the ideological movement him and his English 'mentor' belongs too. I could have ended up doing a very long prison sentence if things had of turned out differently for me which I believe was the intention.
(The whole purpose of his acts was to highlight his manifesto and everything else was secondary.)
Again; why would he do that?
The only one linked to his ideological network who had reason and motive was Alan Ayling because I have never had any type of communication with Breivik in my life, so why would he attack me in such a serious way and who had reason to attack me?
Breivik must have had his own reason and motive which means he must be directly linked to Ayling which would make Ayling' his real English 'mentor'.
Thought and Deed...
Small narrow minded people who do not know the facts of the case scoff at the thought of me being framed because it does not fit their pre-concieved ideas of the events that have happened but who is right and who is wrong?
The one who bases their opinion on no knowledge, just their empty belief based upon newspaper reports that never tell you the real facts behind the story or the one who basis his opinion on intimate knowledge?
So before you scoff at something you know nothing about you should wait for time to take it's natural course and then take the pompous position or be humble enough to accept your mistake.
The Breivik enquiry is still ongoing and Breivik is still alive so the story has not concluded yet, and when it has concluded the full truth will be known and I am either completely right or completely wrong.
No middle ground...
Take away the name Knights Templar and you are left with a small secretive group who had a young willing recruited idealistic Breivik in 2002 who is the son of a former government diplomat to London, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence lawyer who was willing to carry out his deeds for whatever the real reasons behind him are.
Breivik was an active Freemason too.
The other thing about the manifesto which is central to Breivik's reasoning is that most of the people Breivik applauds as being the people to follow are anti-Christian. Why would a Knights Templar commit his acts in the name of Templarism frame a brother for being behind him and then direct followers to read writings of anti-Christian writers who actively despise the Christian message and those who uphold it in their lives.
Breivik is a godless militant Nationalist who had an agenda with his controller which has nothing to do with Knights Templar's or Templarism.
The name and the clothes served a purpose but the real reason is the contents of the manifesto and the attempt to start a wider terrorist organisation based upon his actions. Framing me helped his real English 'mentor' because it was only a matter of time and Ayling is central to a right-wing political movement out there along with whatever we don't know that is happening behind closed doors amongst influential politically and financially motivated people he is connected to.
Further reading: Time frame to terrorist attack
Norwegian Government to re-evaluate Utoya
Dagbladet: Justice Minister to re-evaluate UtoyaQuote: Police acquitted himself - but the investigation is not sufficient, according to the Justice Minister.
Quite right...
Just like the Norwegian Police have concluded that Breivik the son of a former Government diplomat to London, step son of an Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence lawyer is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which is the story the professionals in Norway have had to work with even though the police are still investigating credible leads to determine whether this really is the case or not.
What police force in the World concludes on an investigation that is then taken to the court room even though they have not fully investigated the case to rule out all possibilities so as to be 100% certain of their 'official' conclusion?
Either someone at the "very top" of the Norwegian police who has been orchestrating the case from behind the scenes needs sacking or the Norwegian police academy needs to update it's training manuals on how to properly conclude an investigation ready for the court room.
The Norwegian Justice Minister wants to re-evaluate the police response to the Utoya island attack but what are the chances of the island being attacked a second time?
She wants to be investigating why the PST did not do their job properly and check on Breivik when they were told to do so by their Customs department which might possibly have averted the events of July 22nd 2011 in Norway.
The one time we know of that Breivik hit the Security Apparatus radar and it was completely ignored by the Security Services charged with the National Security of Norway. The result was 'Operation Breivik' mission accomplished with 69 innocent misguided young kids murdered with many more injured and maimed for life in the name of politics.
You can only hope for Norway's sake that the new head of the PST goes back to the drawing board with the whole National Security infrastructure she has inherited so that something like Breivik cannot happen again and that when her subordinates are told to do something as part of their job description that they actually do it.