Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mother's home whilst playing computer games who became the most successful "solo terrorist" of all time in the history of international terrorism.
Breivik the son of a Government diplomat, step son of an Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence Lawyer being a recruited agent into a secretive group with political and financial motivations and trained for July 22nd 2011?
Which is more believable? Watch the video and draw a conclusion...
The Norwegian State controllers of the Breivik script would like you to believe the former and they have successfully used the media to secure this story in the minds of the public so far by covering up the truth, but for me based upon the evidence the second is far more likely and there is still outstanding evidence.
Why has the outstanding evidence not been revealed to the public?
What would the identities of Alan Ayling's (Alan Lake) friends 'Richard the Lionheart' and the one from Norway who lost friends at both Utoya island and the government quarter in Oslo tell us? How incriminating would this evidence be?
Further reading: Hidden in plain sight (the Russian angle)