Judge's summing up about Breivik's contacts

What are the chances of Breivik the international jetsetting political terrorist who committed the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century not meeting any like minded militant Nationalists or neo-nazis over the course of 10 years stretching back to his mysterious Liberia London trips?

He does have an extensive historical travelling itinerary over that period.

The name Knights Templar is just the name used by the group to wrap up their group and potential terrorist campaign in, which is a textbook copy of Al Qaeda as any military intelligence analysts who have studied the rise of Al Qaeda in the internet age can see.

Take that away and you have a small ideological group of extreme militant Nationalists more than likely controlled at the top by foreign agents intent on starting a new leaderless terrorist group to bring down NATO governments using the legitimate grievances of the political right-wing i.e immigration, multiculturalism and Islamisation with which to inspire homegrown followers to follow in the footsteps and carry out 'lone wolf' attacks against their respective Governments.

Breivik actively sought out physical contact with individuals, had over 600 contacts on Facebook, is said to have attended 2 EDL demonstrations, yet the Norwegian State in control of the case want the World to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to

The judge commented rightly "on the basis of the evidence", as a judge that is what she had to work with in summing up.

Who can put any trust in the evidence presented to the court by the Norwegian police?

There is still outstanding evidence in the case.

How can the Norwegian police confirm whether or not Breivik did meet people in London in 2002 which was 10 years ago, if they could not even trace Alpha Kallom who was an actual tangible physical person who the newspaper VG tracked down in 6 days?

On that basis how can you have any confidence in their 'official' conclusion and evidence presented in court?

Further reading: The eye of the storm - The investigation

French terrorist was not a 'lone wolf'

This guy killed a few people, look at the size and scope of Breivik and we are meant to believe Breivik was a 'lone wolf' connected to no one.

Aftenposten

March this year killed Mohamed Merah (24) three Jewish children, a rabbi and three soldiers in the city of Toulouse in France.

Finally, Toulouse-terrorist he shot and killed by police as he threw himself out of the house where he had barricaded himself in.

He has been described as a "lone wolf."

But according to the French newspaper Le Monde , there is much to suggest that Merah not work alone. The newspaper has received access to confidential papers from the French intelligence agency DCRI, according to the BBC.

Called to over 20 countries

BBC correspondent Christian Fraser in Paris says the documents, which Le Monde has gained access to, draw a picture of another picture Merah than the French intelligence tried to draw early in the investigation.

The prepared Merah as a criminal as "radicalized himself".

But according to documents Merah had taken more than 1,800 calls to over 180 different contacts in 20 countries, including Egypt, Morocco, Kenya, Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia, Butane and Britain.

Continue reading: French terrorist not a 'lone wolf'

'Operation Breivik' Part 1: From Russia with Love

Someone now holds the trump card in the Breivik case which determines whether or not my hypothesis about who was behind him and involved with him is correct, and that is the still publicly unknown evidence that surrounds Alan Lake and his Counter-jihad clique in the UK which was the ideological movement Breivik came from as outlined in the “2083” manifesto.

Further reading: The eye of the storm

I am willing to accept I am wrong on presentation of the evidence, and until that time my hypothesis is open to speculation based upon the factual evidence that is publicly known, and the still publicly unknown missing evidence in the case.

I believe ‘Operation Breivik’ was ultimately a Russian operation and I give my reason and motive supported by the facts here: The new Arctic war-zone

If I am right then how do you relate that story to the masses, and what about the implications for international relations, and for the Norwegian people as a whole who were inflicted with this savagery against a group of their innocent misguided youth on an isolated summer camp island in the name of politics?

Is it better for all concerned to hide the truth but know behind closed doors who was ultimately behind the worst massacre and act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century?

I wonder what the families of the dead and injured in Norway think about that question as they seek truth & justice for their dead and injured children.

What implications would it have for Norwegian society and their political/military position in the World if I am correct?

Straight after ‘Operation Breivik’ a Norwegian General was elevated to the
top position within NATO’s Syria mission which was a clear signal from NATO. A conflict that now sees NATO lined up against Russia, not to mention the escalating Iran situation here either.

Would such an act of State sanctioned terrorism like ‘Operation Breivik’ by a foreign power not be an act of aggression and War against Norway’s Sovereignty and by default an act of aggression and War against the NATO Alliance?

That has very serious ramifications if correct which is why ‘Operation Breivik’ was so carefully concealed by multiple layers. Call it “smoke and mirrors” in the World of international espionage, although those within that World can read between the lines, which would mean that carrying out an attack against Norway was deemed an acceptable step by those behind it, thus directly challenging by-proxy other Government powers (NATO Alliance) which is exactly what the Cold War was all about.

Only this time in the heart of Europe with a planned new terrorist group to bring down NATO governments using homegrown militant Nationalists like Breivik.

What can Norway say or do to their Russian Super Power neighbour? And will a foreign Government declare war upon Russia for carrying out a terrorist attack inside Norway?

A strategic step worth taking by those military strategists and thinkers behind it considering what is at stake in this new Cold War that is taking place in the Northern hemisphere.

Russia under Putin has made this region its No.1 priority.

Sweden have recently stated they would join NATO and defend Norway if attacked by an outside force, so you have to question why they have made such a serious public political statement at this moment in time. Also Russian Generals have just warned Finland in no uncertain terms about joining NATO which shows the escalating political/military tensions in that Northern/Eastern European region. This is on-top of the Cold War scenario taking place in the Arctic Circle between Eastern & Western Super Powers with little Norway (5 million population) in a key strategic position in the middle of the whole scenario, with the Russian military already invading Norwegian airspace and flying regular sorties along their Northern coast.

Government’s of the World who have a vested interest in the Arctic region and have already carried out major military operations there know that what happens politically and militarily over the next 5 to 10 years in this part of the World is crucial as Government powers converge there so you cannot rule out that ‘Operation Breivik’, as a political event, was not a part of a foreign Government’s short to long term strategy for political control and dominance over the region.

Is the ruling AUF-Norwegian Labour party staying in power under Jens Stoltenberg’s leadership in Russia’s short to long term political interests in the region?

That is a question for serious political analysts who know Norwegian and Russian politics, and if the question is yes then that is a tick in the box to support my hypothesis.

Proving Breivik was directly connected to Alan Lake (if it is proven) would be bad enough for the Ruling Political Establishment in Norway, especially on the back of the catastrophic July 22nd Commission report but beyond that if there is a bigger story surrounding him then the potential social and political ramifications that stretch beyond Norway’s borders are in the hands of allot more knowledgeable people than me.

I just want to get to the bottom of the truth behind why I was accused of being the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik, and if proven right then they should be held to account for their complicity in his crimes, and if there is a bigger story surrounding them which I believe there could well be based upon my hypothesis then that is other people’s concern.

You can only wonder whether or not the truth to be known is in the strategic interests of a friendly NATO Government or Allie in the region. One thing is for certain and that is the outstanding evidence surrounding Alan Lake who was interviewed by police over the possibility that he was the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik has not been publicised yet for some reason and someone must now possess this evidence and know how it fits into place or not as the case may be which is the trump card to determine the outcome of this case and potentially Norway’s political future and standing in the World.

Norway cannot escape its position in the World now or its destiny which was, and is, in God’s hands.

Is ‘Operation Breivik’ going to be allowed to be continued to be covered up in Norway by World powers or are they going to force the truth to be known, or atleast several layers of the truth which will then leave enough speculation aimed at the front door of the Kremlin?

Time will tell...

Either the Norwegian and British police have interviewed Lake’s Counter-jihad clique to ascertain the identity of his friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and who is friend in the Norwegian Government is, or they have not. We do not know. And considering the Norwegian police have stated they are still trying to identify the English ‘mentor’ ‘Richard the Lionhearted’ from the “2083” manifesto and have interviewed Alan Lake you would think that knowing this person’s real identity who was invited to the pre-founding English Defence League strategy meeting in Lake’s Barbican flat before the founding of the EDL meeting took place, is an integral part of the on-going police investigation and an important part of the public discourse over the Breivik case. Everyone else’s identity over this case has been in the public domain so why not this still unknown person’s identity?

What would his identity reveal which could be the reason why it has not been revealed yet?

I have only seen one newspaper article admitting this persons existence so why the complete silence about this integral piece of evidence by the mainstream media?

Further reading: Nuclear terrorism in London

The credibility of Keith Wilberg's 'official' conclusion questioned

Police Chief assistant Keith Wilberg is the officer who took center stage in the Breivik trial on-behalf of the Norwegian investigation team charged with investigating Breivik's terrorist attacks.

He officially concluded on-behalf of the 'whole team' in front of the Worlds media that "Breivik acted alone in the entirety of his actions with no physical or mental help" which meant there is no one else to look for and no bigger story surrounding him.

Nice clean 'official' story...

This was then spread around the World's news outlets and set the public perception over 'Operation Breivik'.

I wonder if every Norwegian investigating officer working on the case stands behind that 'official' public statement presented to the World on their behalf?

There is a question and answer for any future anonymous survey for the whole Norwegian investigation team when investigating the credibility of the investigation into 'Operation Breivik'.

I wonder whether or not there are multiple lines of enquiry in the case that were prevented from being followed up because the Police Chief already had the story in mind to be presented to the public concerning Breivik, and to cross the line and publicly challenge this to pursue the line of enquiry in question was more than a mere investigating officers jobs worth, not least having no authority to investigate it anyway?

Officially preventing professional Norwegian investigators from pursuing legitimate lines of enquiry to get to the bottom of the whole truth behind 'Operation Breivik' where 69 innocent Norwegian teenagers were murdered in cold blood with many more injured and maimed for life.

We know for a fact that after 10 months the Norwegian investigators had not investigated the Liberia story, and it took the Norwegian newspaper VG 6 days to track down a witness in the case which happened during the trial, which says all you need to know about the credibility of the investigation and subsequent 'official' conclusion.

We also know that Keith Wilberg publicly stated in court that the police will not be investigating Breivik's Facebook accounts even after Breivik alluded to them finding a link to an accomplice (whether true or not).

This same police spokesman stated the 'official' conclusion in the court room but in a strange twist of conversation to the judge stated that the police investigation was still on-going whilst he was standing there in the court which completely undermined his stated 'official' conclusion in one fail swoop.

It is not like the heads of the Norwegian police have been caught lying to mislead the public and opposition political parties over the case is it, or Government ministers lying to mislead the same target audience to cover up the truth. With more accusations of lies and misleading statements from 'official's' to come I suspect.

Or a completely corrupt and biased State sanctioned psychiatric report endorsed by a criminal State appointed psychiatric commission to secure the insane label on Breivik with which to endorse the "solo terrorist" connected to no one 'official' conclusion for public perceptions.

What if there is a bigger story surrounding 'Operation Breivik' and other people's direct involvement with him but the Norwegian police under the control of their State appointed heads have shut the whole case down and prevented the real truth about Breivik from coming to light as part of a pre-planned agenda controlled from the top.

One question that undermines Keith Wilberg's 'official' conclusion is where did Breivik learn to build bombs, or are we so stupid to just accept the fact that an unskilled bomb maker was capable of building a bomb from scratch on a rented farm with no prior help that was able to completely blow up his Government building killing 8 people and wounding 30 more in the process after downloading a recipe from the internet which was successful on his first attempt?

That means someone helped him and means physical and mental help contrary to the 'official' conclusion.

Further reading: The eye of the storm - The investigation

The test of Norwegian justice

W0rk this one out.

If the Norwegian court passes sentence down on Breivik tomorrow stating that he is criminally insane, which means they accept that he is a psychotic schizophrenic as the first set of State sanctioned psychiatrists concluded contrary to almost all other health professionals in this field, which means he must be sent to a psychiatric hospital under the care of psychiatrists for compulsory treatment. Then the psychiatrists there, if they do not believe he is what the judge has ruled he is do not have to treat him.

Quote: Psychiatry at Regional Security Department Dikemark says it is unthinkable to treat Anders Behring Breivik (33) on the basis of an expert report ordered by the court.

Does that not show there is something fundamentally wrong with the Norwegian justice system?

The judge sitting at the top of the justice chain rules someone is 'insane' in a legal sense because 2 corrupt State psychiatrists say he is but the actual experts in psychiatry who will deal with him on a daily basis disagree and refuse to treat him for psychotic symptoms because they judge him to be sane.

The psychiatrists who will be dealing with Breivik if the judge passes down the insane label have already evaluated him and stated he is not insane.

The only thing the insane label on Breivik does is endorses the Norwegian State's cover-story in the eyes of the public around the World who will not be looking at the underlying issues surrounding the verdict, or the bigger story surrounding the case.

The official Story coming out of Norway and propagated through the World's mainstream media outlets for public perceptions will then be Breivik the lone wolf nut connected to no one who drove himself insane after playing computer games and reading right-wing websites before going out and committing his atrocious acts whilst being psychotic. Sentenced to compulsory psychiatric care by the judges in the trial because he is a raving lunatic (insane) which seals the 'official' version of the story in the mind of the public and then everyone can close this story that is now in their subconscious minds, written and directed for them by the current Norwegian State Apparatus, and not question the truth.

On the other hand if the judge rules that Breivik is 'sane' as almost all professionals believe he is, then the State's case against him is in serious crisis because people are going to start questioning and want answers as to why the 'official's' in Norway in control of the case have been so adamant for nearly a year, even going as far as prosecuting him on this basis in front of the World's media.

It will not look good after the July 22nd Commission report.

Then you question the investigation into Breivik.

Either way tomorrow will tell it's own story and then it is how the international media convey that story to their audience.

VG: We do not have to treat Breivik for mental illness

Aftenposten: Separate diagnosis

Alan Lake - Four Freedoms Community - Breivik

Dagbladet

Dagbladet can today (26.03.2012) reveal that Anders Behring Breivik was inspired by a secretive anti Islamist networks. It terrorist himself admitted in police interviews. The network is called Four Freedoms Community (FFC), an organization with its own website.

The British businessman Alan Lake is behind, and he preaches the organization's message through personal contact, the business card with the code of conduct and his name, and through secret meetings in two churches in London.

Breivik has said in interviews that he has used FFCs websites as inspiration when he wrote his so-called manifesto. Breivik says he saw the page as very interesting, and he still remembers it very well.

Breivik says FFC stands for much of the same organization he claims to be a member of - Knights Templar. The terrorist looks particularly up to FFCs anti-Islamist stance, and that the organization was "indigenous rights."

Breivik confirms the direct, confrontational questions from police interrogation experts that when he answers evasively their questions about the FFC, it may be because he wants to withhold information about it.

After repeated attempts to reach the Lake, got the following sms on mobile phone Dagbladet reporter:

"Why do you support the killing of gays, honor killings, female genital mutilations, attacks on Jews and non-Muslims, rape of youngsters, and Several more atrocities committed by Islamofascists? Why do you support Islamist enablers and radical left wing liberals, who care nothing for human rights and instead focus their hate Wed those who are tryning to protect civilization from these horrors? What kind of coward are you? Are you being paid by Islamists and their enablers two do their dirty work for them? Shame on you! "

The message is probably transmitted via the Internet. The message does not come from any phone number, and the newspaper does not know who the sender.

Whole article: Breivik link to Alan Lake

Dagbladet: Alan Lake interview after police questioning

The Guardian: Alan Lake debates killing David Cameron & Archbishop on FFC

Russian spies in UK at Cold War levels

What do spies do?

Amongst other things they recruit 'agents' of influence.

Would a political dissident and employee within the EU controlled European Bank for Reconstruction & Development that operates in the former Soviet bloc Countries, and has links into the British Government, Swedish Government and Norwegian Government and is now involved in International political activism stretching from the U.S into Europe be a potential target for Russian recruiters?

It is a very complex issue...


Telegraph

Russian spies in UK at Cold War levels

Around 40 Moscow spies are believed to be operating in this country at any one time. Some are involved in traditional state espionage, while others monitor London-based oligarchs or engage in industrial spying for the commercial benefit of Russian firms.

There are fears Russia will ramp up its efforts over the coming months while the UK security services focus on the Olympic Games and the Queen’s Jubilee celebrations.

Britain's close relationship with America is also hugely attractive for Russia who sees it as a “back door” to US intelligence, one expert warned.

Continue reading: Russian spies in UK at Cold war levels


Telegraph

Britain expels Russian spy

William Hague, the Foreign Secretary, said in a written statement that the government had asked the Russian embassy in London withdraw a member of their staff from Britain on December 10.

He said the request was "in response to clear evidence of activities by the Russian intelligence services against UK interests."

"They broke the rules of the game," a security source said. "Once we detected what they were doing we had no other option than to act. It's just not on."

The source said it was a "question of Smiley-esque tradecraft," referring to the character from novels by John le Carre.

"There is a huge Russian intelligence operation in the UK and all over the world which is both active and assertive but in this case they have crossed a line and it needed a response," he added.

Continue reading: Britain expels Russian spy

The secret Arctic war-zone

Today’s Cold War scenario between East & West

I did a little research on the internet about the importance of the area North of Norway around the Barents sea and the Arctic and to my surprise found that unknown to most people this is now a deeply contested region between Eastern & Western Super Powers for the natural energy resources that lay in this area.

Norway is slap bang in the middle of this dispute.

There is no doubt in my mind that ‘Operation Breivik’ was an act of asymmetrical warfare over control and access to this area on Earth that contains up to 15% of all undiscovered oil and up to 30% of natural gas.

America, Canada, the NATO Alliance, Norway and Russia are all involved in controlling and exploiting this untapped region rich in resources, with massive military operations taking place here from all sides as they show their willingness to go to War in this region if need be which means there is a new Cold War scenario now taking place here that most people are completely unaware of.

These are facts.

This means that all things concerning ‘Operation Breivik’ must be sitting on the top table of the NATO Alliance, the American military, the Russian military and the Norwegian military and all other concerned parties with strategic interests in this area because Norway sits in the middle of the whole scenario and has just been inflicted with a horrific terrorist attack which can only mean that at some level it has something to do with rising tensions between Nations in the region.

Unless of course you believe the “solo terrorist” connected to no one line...

The heads of the military know what is going on even if the general public do not. This is a potential flash point for what could lead to a nuclear exchange in the worst case scenario, with Russia already talking about moving some of its nuclear warheads into the region and America talking about placing a missile defence shield there along with cruising the waters in their nuclear submarines. This is why both sides along with joint NATO forces have carried out war-games in the Arctic circle to show their willingness to defend their claim over the area if need be.

Quote: Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev told the Seattle Times in 2008 that "our first and main task is to turn the Arctic into Russia's resource base of the 21st century."

Quote: Just a few hours upon Vladimir Putin’s inauguration ceremony in Kremlin on Monday, the newly elected Russian President passed his first decisions as the country’s leader , putting a focus on development of the Navy in the Arctic and the Far East, Barents Observer informed.

That shows you the importance Russia and Putin’s Government along with the former president Medvedev places upon this region so do not discount anything until all the facts are known.

The question is though; in whose interests was Breivik ultimately working for?

I said before that Breivik is one big cover-story and this just confirms my belief even more.

The Norwegian State have covered up and white-washed the whole case claiming he was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one which is completely contrary to the truth if you know the facts in the case so you have to question why the Norwegian State would want to cover-up the truth surrounding ‘Operation Breivik’?

The only reason they would cover it up is because they are attempting to hide from something which can only mean direct involvement on some level. No matter how hard that is to swallow there is no other explanation for why the Norwegian State would want to cover-up the truth behind the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century that was inflicted inside their Country against a group of innocent misguided Norwegian teenagers on their summer camp.

Those teenagers were expendable to their political masters unlike their protégé Eskil Pedersen who was removed when Breivik arrived because of the long terms plans the AUF-Labour Government have/had with him on the back of the Utoya massacre.

The AUF-Labour poster boy with the Utoya massacre part of his political resume for his future political life.

Then you question why would they be involved in something of this nature inside their Country and then you look for a reason big enough and then the oil & gas situation in Norwegian territorial waters comes into play, along with the Russian angle on the whole affair. Then a little more research brings up the knowledge that there is a new Cold War scenario taking place over a contested region rich in Earths last remaining natural energy resources, and Norway is in the middle of it which makes everything start to fit into place and make a little more sense.

Other Governments of the World with their eyes on Norway and its strategic importance to their own foreign policy know whether or not my claims are true or not, or whether there is substance to them.

This is high politics and high treason, carefully concealed and hard for the public to ever know about because of the consequences on the National psyche, and also because the current Norwegian Government and their State infrastructure controls the leadership platform inside the Country so who is going to hold them to account or publicly accuse them?

They are the masters in Norway, or so they think.

The facts speak for themselves although the mainstream media are not challenging the facts yet because to do so would sound like a conspiracy theorist, although how can facts presented in the right light be looked upon negatively and placed in the category of conspiracy theory.

Jens Stoltenberg has blood on his hands yet still sits at the top of the chain in Norway work that one out, that’s a fact.

The recent July 22nd Commission report was the first step of exposing the current Norwegian Government and their Civil Security Apparatus over the Breivik affair to the general public. Softening their minds and preparing them for the truth that is going to emerge I hope. It showed that either Norway a NATO member present in all conflict zones of the World as part of the Alliance is either a failed State when it comes to its own internal National Security back home or there was a hidden hand at work that allowed ‘Operation Breivik’ to be successful that fateful day in July. Either way Jen Stoltenberg the serving Prime Minister personally has blood on his hands in the whole affair but do you see him making any moves to clean those hands in the eyes of the Norwegian people? Of course not, all that has happened is a sacrificial lamb has been fed to the media wolves to keep them quiet and off of his back and the backs of other Government officials who are culpable for the complete breakdown and failure of the Countries Internal Security on July 22nd 2011.

Breivik was the luckiest man alive in Norway on July 22nd 2011.

The Norwegian State want the World to believe that Breivik the son of a former government diplomat to London, step son of an Army Major and best friend of a Ministry of Defence lawyer was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one who drove himself insane after playing computer games in his bedroom and reading right-wing websites, rather than admit that he was recruited into a secretive group who had/have political and financial motivations inside Norway exactly as he claims.

That is the cover-up and white-wash of the truth that was played out in the Norwegian court room in front of the Worlds media by the State appointed prosecutors and State appointed psychiatrists, endorsed by the completely biased and criminal psychiatric commission.

Both the prosecution case and psychiatric case against Breivik are fundamentally flawed as is shown on the pages of my blog during the trial (April – July), without going into a long explanation here.

The ‘official’ police investigation that concluded that Breivik was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one is fundamentally flawed too, only nobody has questioned this publicly yet by questioning the unanswered questions and contradictory evidence in the case. Nobody has ‘officially’ investigated the police investigation yet either to determine its credibility like what happened with the July 22nd Commission report concerning the failings of the police response to the terrorist attacks.

What will happen if it is proven that Breivik is directly connected to others contrary to what the Norwegian people and World have been told by the Norwegian State for the past year?

The Norwegian Government and their State appointed heads of the police are going to have even more explaining to do to the Norwegian people on the back of the catastrophic July 22nd Commission report, and then you put both together and hold them up and they tell a story or confirm a story.

The truth is in God’s hands...Make no mistake about that.

For ‘Operation Breivik’ to be successful all attention and blame had to be deflected from the real source behind him which is why the story projected to the World is that Breivik is a right-wing militant Nationalist aggrieved about multiculturalism, immigration and Islamisation, with the Norwegian State concluding he was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one. Then there is no one else to look for which could reveal a different story to the one the public have been told about this lone extreme right-wing zealot.

If you look on the internet you come across allot of websites saying that America or Israel were behind Breivik because the ideological movement he came from was the Counter-jihad movement with him quoting and mentioning many prominent American and Israeli writers and thinkers inside his manifesto.

Is that not a good cover story to deflect all attention from the real source behind him and the real reason for his terrorist attacks?

I do not see anyone else claiming Russia is ultimately behind Breivik, only America and Israel.

I presume most of those sites are Russian propaganda tools and agents of influence anyway because everyone knows propaganda is another weapon of warfare and damaging America and Israel’s reputation is in Russia’s strategic interests and part of their foreign policy and considering there is a new Cold War scenario taking place around Norwegian territorial waters it suits Russian interests for America to get the blame for being behind Breivik in Norway because it deflects blame from themselves.

Asymmetric warfare.

It would not be hard for Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ to infiltrate the Counter-jihad movement around 2006 – 2007 and then use Breivik to carry out the attacks in their name thus deflecting blame and attention from anywhere else which is exactly the same tactic that was used on me by involving me at the beginning of this and is the art of espionage. The general public then believes one thing whilst behind the curtain the political results are very different.

This was portrayed as if it was all anti the AUF-Labour Government, only the only ones who benefitted from the attacks were the AUF-Labour Government, and the AUF-Labour Government under Jen Stoltenberg’s Premiership are the ones signing deals with Russia and covering up the truth surrounding ‘Operation Breivik’.

The impartial and truthful July 22nd Commission change this though.

It is in Russia’s long term strategic interests to have the AUF-Labour Government in power for as long as possible considering the gravity of the escalating situation in the Arctic region. In the very worst case scenario you have nuclear warheads going off there, and that is part of the military thinking behind the powers involved in the region, and all forces that have a claim on the territory have already shown their willingness to go to war if need be with the military exercises that have already taken place there.

These are facts.

Norway is in the middle of the situation so is it not better for Russia that the present Norwegian Government who are already singing deals with them are partners in the days ahead, and that they stay in power for aslong as possible?

Who cares about the people or the military, it is the Government power that counts because they control both.

And what better situation than if Russia have already recruited Norwegians inside the political Elite and Security infrastructure in the Country who are more than willing to go along with any future plans that could be in their mutual best interests politically and financially.

Better a small barbarism.

Breivik was recruited in Norway and sent to an anti-Western Serbian war criminal in Liberia who influenced him and indoctrinated him to his way of thinking. He is also said to have been paramilitary trained in Belarus by a group led by a former Soviet Colonel. He had to have learnt his bomb making skills somewhere because he did not learn them on his rented farm so the Belarus link fits unless there is another explanation to where Breivik learned to build a bomb big enough to destroy his Government building?

This says that Breivik was anti-NATO, anti-Western and pro-Russia with him praising Putin inside his manifesto.

All signs point to Russia ultimately being behind Breivik with the light shining on Alan Lake.

Considering Alan Lake worked in the EBRD bank that was working inside the former Soviet bloc it is not beyond the realms of possibility that he was/is a recruited agent of influence on-behalf of Russia working in London and has infiltrated the Counter-jihad movement. He comes from the right walk of life and walks in the right circles to be a potential recruited agent of influence, with contacts in the British Government, Swedish Government and Norwegian Government that are known of.

No matter how farfetched that may seem if you put all of the facts into context it is a very plausible possibility and all in-line with the reality of international espionage that does go on out there in our World today. As I say “plausible possibility”.

The question remains though as to whether or not Lake is Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ and there are still unanswered questions surrounding him to determine whether or not this is the case.

Let’s hope someone wants the truth to be known.

Another Norwegian Government official caught lying

Seems to be a common theme of the Norwegian State apparatus when it comes to the Breivik case. What they say to the media and opposition political parties is completely different from reality.

Creating false perceptions of the truth.

What is that if it is not a State sanctioned cover-up and white-wash of the truth?

When one person lies and misleads the public and opposition political parties it can be construed as a mistake, but when multiple people from the same side of the political divide lie to mislead their audience then you have to take it as a collective effort to cover-up the truth.

VG

Quote: I had to use a lot of energy to get me a realistic picture of the state of the police. Storberget told a completely different reality to us when he met Parliament. When missing never to resources or actions, while the more so that the situation actually was a completely different, says Sandberg. Storberget on the carpet Sandberg says he finds it difficult to understand how Storberget explanations could be so different from the reality he heard from police officers with uniform. - There is only Storberget who can answer.

There is no doubt that the descriptions we have received from the police and Storberget not match those described in the Commission report. - Storberget lied? - I would not say that he lied, but he came with incorrect information. It has been said about the police and emergency government in recent years, in stark contrast to the Gjørv Commission was so clear, says Hareide

Continue reading: Ex-justice Minister lied to parliament

Utoya families speak out - Killgreen must go

This situation says all you need to know about the corruption at the top of the food chain in Norway.

Killgreen was police commissioner for 11 years so had the ultimate responsibility for the Norwegian police infrastructure that was catastrophically exposed in the July 22nd Commission report that has made Norway look like a third World failed State.

Instead of being sacked for negligence and incompetence in office she has been moved up the ladder to a prestigious Government position; the “secretary of the Ministry of Government affairs” that deals with security around Government buildings.

A bit late for that don’t you think?

How can she sit over a completely failed institution of State for 11 years that resulted in the atrocities of July 22nd 2011 being allot worse than they should have been, with a subsequent Commission report placing responsibility firmly at her door, and then be elevated into a prestigious Government position concerning State security?

How does that work out?

What is the story behind this scenario?

She should have been the first out of the door because all failings and refusal to implement changes within the police occurred under her watch. Instead Oystein Maeland was the first to go after he took responsibility for his position in office and resigned which shows the man’s character. The rest of them have no shame or guilt over their incompetence and complicity of the events in July 2011 and are hanging onto their well paid influential positions within Norway at all costs.

These are the controllers of the Norwegian State, the Government and their appointed heads who control the Country.

It is strikingly obvious to anyone that Killgreen should resign or be pushed out of the door by those above her because of her sheer incompetence in office along with ultimate responsibility resting upon her failed leadership of the Norwegian police infrastructure as shown in the July 22nd Commission report, which is why families of Utoya have spoken out against her.

It is basic common sense to most observers that if anyone should take responsibility within the police it is her.

This common sense perspective does not relate to the Norwegian Government though who have stated they have complete confidence in her and her new Government position over State Security.

They have complete confidence in someone who had the ultimate responsibility over the police infrastructure for 11 years that failed the test catastrophically on July 22nd 2011 and exposed the Norwegian police force to the World as a failed State.

Am I missing something?

You can only digest from this situation that Killgreen has served a purpose for someone in Government, which is why she has been elevated into a prestigious Government position and contrary to most people’s common sense which includes the families of Utoya she has the full backing of the Government in the face of the serious Security crisis that she resided over for 11 years and now sits in a higher Government Security position.

The golden handshake for something.

Not being Norwegian I do not know what part she played in the Breivik case, but for there to be a State sanctioned cover-up then there had to be compliant actors within the police dealing with the case and it doesn’t get any higher than Killgreen’s position then and now.

Are her actions on-behalf of the Norwegian Government in the Breivik case the reason why she has the full confidence of the Government and has been elevated to a Government position contrary to common sense?

I cannot see any other reason in the face of the evidence against her.

She gave testimony in Breivik’s trial as can be seen in the picture above so it would be interesting to know what her testimony in court amounted to, what she said and what role she played over the case as a whole.

She is a State actor in this case now under serious suspicion...

Then there might be some answers as to why she has the full confidence of the Norwegian Government in the face of commonsense, and why she was elevated to an even more prestigious Government position even after showing that the management of security is not her forte.

There has to be an explanation behind this injustice, an injustice that even the families of Utoya can clearly see.

A 'voice' in the wilderness of British Nationalism

Website: Britain First

WHO ARE WE BRITISH, WHAT FORCE FASHIONED SUCH A SPECIAL
AND CHOSEN PEOPLE

Jim Dowson B.Th,
Belfast 24/3/2012

Who are we British? Part 1 of 3
Who are we British? Part 2 of 3
Who are we British? Part 3 of 3
Who are we British? All 3 parts

I thought I would post this 3 part thesis which is the spirit and ideology behind the British First movement that is a grass roots campaign & political pressure group set up to defend the history, identity and culture of the British isles.

It is a true 'voice' in the wilderness of the political scenery and landscape within Great Britain from the Nationalist political viewpoint and speaks from the core of what it means to be British.

I agree with people from all different political viewpoints across the whole spectrum like the old Churchillian Boris but believe this 3 part thesis captures the heart & soul of what it means to be British in an age of Globalisation where who we are and where we come from is being slowly and systematically removed from our National psyche and replaced with a new reality where foreign god's now take precedence over our isles along with their foreign customs and ways which are transforming Great Britain into a foreign alien Country to its modern ancestral inhabitants which does not bode well for future generations upon our isles.

Look around you in the towns and cities across the Country and then determine what the future holds for the life of the Nation where your children and grandchildren born or yet to be born will one day reside.

We do not have an ancestral homeland to return to, the British isles is our ancestral homeland so we either accept its transformation into a foreign alien Country ruled by foreign god's or we defend our identity and culture in the face of the dark cloud that now engulfs the land and stop its advancement before it is too late.

This is the reality we now face.

Are we beyond the point of no return or is there still time?

The people behind the English Defence League

Further reading: Explaining context to 2nd set of psychiatrists


Booklet: The people behind the English Defence League

For any followers or researchers of the Breivik case and the Counter-jihad movement, the BNP's Nick Griffin has just released an in-depth factual booklet in a cohesive narrative showing who the people behind the EDL really are.

Irrespective of your thoughts about Nick Griffin or the BNP this is a very timely piece of work and fits into place with the overall Breivik case and the ongoing police investigation which is why I am posting it here for people to read as part of the discourse of the case.

When I was interviewed by Norwegian investigators over the false accusation that I was Anders Breivik's English 'mentor' I stated that it was my belief that the motive behind attempting to frame me was that I was a direct threat to the political agenda of Alan Lake and his Counter-jihad clique which meant that one of them from among them must be directly connected to Breivik because I had never heard of him before July 22nd 2011. There was no other explanation for why he attempted to frame me after his planned suicide mission than this. The only person I could see who it could possibly be was Alan Lake and I stated that at the very beginning and now all circumstantial evidence proves that to be correct and there is still outstanding evidence that has not been brought forward yet that could prove beyond doubt that Lake is directly connected to Breivik.

That political agenda and that clique are all covered in this booklet, and 2 of them over the past 2 weeks have been sacked from their longstanding respective jobs (Chris Knowles & Alan Lake) after a 7 month internal investigation by their employers.

The Counter-jihad movement (not anti-jihad) emanating out of America was based solely online as an intellectual front against the global Jihad until the English Defence League came on the scene. It was me who brought the ideological side of the Counter-jihad in the UK together with the people on the street because I was involved with both parties and was present at the first street protests so I do know what I am talking about when it concerns this group and the formation of the English Defence League.

Video: Luton protest promo

Newspaper: St George's day Luton

Video: UPL Luton protest promo

Video: First ever EDL promo video

Video: First ever EDL interview

After sitting back and watching what this group were doing to the movement and some good and decent people within the movement by way of smearing their reputations, assassinating their characters, attempting to threaten and intimidate them including myself, action was finally taken in attempt to reclaim the EDL from the leadership and place it in the hands of the people who made the EDL what it was, which was the rank and file English/British members who were there for the right reasons unlike the leadership.

This was unsuccessful because I was not in the Country and resulted in a very serious crime being committed against my family by "Tommy" & Uncle Kev the wanna be police commissioner but no action was taken by the British police against them.

Due to the fact that many people were on the streets because of my work at the beginning to get the movement off the ground which resulted in me leaving the UK I felt responsible to expose the leadership for who they are and what their motives really were which is what I did, as can be seen on my youtube channel.

I am an English Protestant Loyalist.

This resulted in me becoming a pariah in the Counter-jihad movement and making myself some high profile enemies from within the movement because I came out against all those high profile Counter-jihad supporters and endorsers of "Tommy" & Uncle Kev's leadership of the EDL, revealing the truth about them which was damaging their credibility in the eyes of anyone outside of the movement.

Then next thing Breivik who comes from within their ideological movement bursts onto the World stage committing his terrorist attacks in the name of the Counter-jihad movement and I then stand accused in the media of being the man behind him, who inspired him to commit his acts which deflected all blame and attention from anyone else and could have turned out very differently for me than what it did. Remember, my work on this blog is not mentioned inside the manifesto anywhere, only those who I had come out against because of their support of the EDL leadership of "Tommy" & Uncle Kevin.

Get the picture?

The Norwegian police have my full witness statement covering the facts surrounding my belief, and this piece of work from Nick Griffin concerning the EDL and the Nationalist movement in the UK gives an insight into the political agenda I said was the motive behind them framing me so as to remove me from being a direct threat to that continued agenda, and the people involved with that political agenda in the UK.

The circumstantial evidence points to Alan Lake & Co and there is factual evidence that has not been brought to light yet.

Why has this evidence not been brought to light to determine whether or not what I am saying is right or wrong?

Alan Lake is directly connected to someone who calls himself 'Richard the Lionheart', a military professor who was present at the founding EDL meeting, and other people with high level connections into the British Government and House of Lords.

I thought we are all equal before the law in a Democracy.

Look at what Breivik did. If others are involved with him then should they not also be held to account for the sake of all those who are dead now, their families left behind and the ones injured and scarred for life.

Or is Alan Lake and his cabal somehow above the law?

Seems like it to me...

I wonder how much longer we have to wait?

Breivik is due for sentencing next week and this outstanding evidence could determine the outcome.

Further reading: EDL & Street politics

Further reading: Time frame to terror attacks

Also when reading this remember that when the Norwegian Defence League was first set up and Breivik was a member, the leadership of the online Facebook group was using the identity of a dead man from West Virginia's profile as admin of the group.

What is the explanation behind that?