Bribery detective works for a leading bank

Daily Mail: Bribery detective works for RBS

Anti-corruption officer arrested last week for corruption at the heart of the Metropolitan police works inside a bank.

This all has to do with pressure put on the British media by Met officers not to report on criminal cases (one in question) due to large personal financial payments received.

Makes a little more sense why Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake has been protected from the Breivik enquiry and any serious media exposure when he works in another high profile bank operating out of London, an EU operated bank at that.

All these links to banks in London, a murdered MI6 officer, a mass murder of innocent kids in Norway and a massive Norwegian oil & gas deal with Russia worth hundreds of billions of dollars, amongst other things.

Further reading: Lake's international bank

Russian - Norwegian Oil & Gas deal

Aftenposten: Norwegian - Russian deal on shaky ground

Russia's Putin and the head of Norway's oil & gas industry yesterday in Moscow.

Is it all a big coincidence?

Asymmetric warfare in the age of international oil and gas crisis.

It all makes sense to me now and I have the explanation and understanding that makes it complete to me.

There are different layers to Breivik with different people's involvement, all for different reasons that dovetail with one another, but one hand behind them all with the biggest reason being big money - Hundreds of Billions of Dollars

Is that worth setting up a long term project for?

Breivik was the brainwashed pawn and made the whole thing on his level be about "right wing politics" that deflects all attention from the real higher source and reason behind him and his political terrorist attacks.

The Norwegian State want the world to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one because if he is connected to someone then there is a trail back to those who are involved for whatever reason and those in control of the Breivik enquiry do not want that which is why there is a cover-up of the truth.

My full explanation coming soon.

Norwegian psychiatry having its own mental breakdown

It is taboo to criticise the State’s case against Breivik in Norway even in the face of overwhelming evidence and this saga now being played out in the court room over the psychiatric reports tells a very clear story.

It is a wonder how there has not been some type of higher intervention for the sake of the ‘rule of law’ in Norway, instead everyone involved are trying to play the situation down and play it cool when anyone from the outside who knows the facts can clearly see what is happening which is a travesty of justice.

The first psychiatric report carried out on Breivik concluded that he was a paranoid schizophrenic who was psychotic at the time of his actions.

This was in-part based upon the fact that Breivik claimed he was connected to other people as part of a group/network.

The Norwegian police at the time of the first report did not believe this and told the psychiatrists that they had finished this line of enquiry and they were satisfied he was totally alone in the entirety of his actions.

So in Breivik’s first report any talk of other people’s involvement was classed as delusions of a paranoid mind, thus schizophrenic in the eyes of his Dr’s.

3 weeks before trial it emerged that the police had lied to the first set of psychiatrists 6 months before and they had not finished this line of enquiry when they said they had which meant they were not satisfied he was totally alone. This means the first psychiatric report is an unsafe report because it was founded upon critical misleading information which the psychiatrists used to form the fundamental basis of their diagnosis.

It should be thrown out of the court on that one point alone.

The second serious flaw that the report was built around was Breivik’s mother’s opinion of her son.

She made some allegations to the first set of psychiatrists that made Breivik look insane, along with actually claiming in a round a bout way that he was insane.

The time period she talks about her son’s mental state of mind it emerged that she had laundered through her own bank accounts over $600,000 from Breivik’s network of offshore international banks that is said to be the proceeds of an online fake diploma operation but in all likelihood is the financing of international terrorism.

From a legal point of view should the opinion of a co-conspirator to a crime be used to form the basis of an ‘official’ report over someone’s mental state of mind?

That is another fundamental flaw in the first psychiatric report.

Anyone reading this knows that based upon those 2 points above the first psychiatric report carried out on Breivik is an unsafe report and has no legal grounds to even be in the courts proceedings any more.

The psychiatric commission overseeing Breivik’s trial do not think so, on the contrary they believe the first report is stronger than the second report.

They have not made one criticism of the first psychiatric report even though they know it is an unsafe report and even go as far as promoting it as taking precedence over the second report that came to a completely contradictory conclusion about Breivik’s state of mind which they keep undermining in the media for the purpose of influencing the mind of the public to the end result they want.

Call it conditioning of the masses through their control of the ‘official’ case.

All leading professionals in the field of psychiatry in Norway do not believe in the authority of the first psychiatric report or its diagnosis, with their being mumblings from certain quarters of the commission now being on a suicide path with its actions.

I don’t know about a suicide path, it is criminal in nature and should be fully investigated!

The Norwegian State in no way want Breivik to be declared sane because that would contradict the end result they want which is Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one who is insane, and mean that anyone intimately involved with him and his crimes would escape justice.

This is called a State sanctioned cover-up of the truth then you question the reasons.

If he is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one then those behind him who attempted to frame me to be their fall guy get away with their actions on an ‘official’ basis along with their complicity to Breivik’s crimes.

How is that justice?

Then ask yourself why the Norwegian State would want to cover up the whole case and white-wash it?

That was my big question until it was revealed to me.

What is now playing out in the court room over the 2 psychiatric reports clearly shows there is a State hand at work controlling the psychiatric commission proving that it is not an impartial legal proceeding that you would expect in a Democracy to any international observers following the case.

The first State sanctioned psychiatric report has been cleared by the commission with absolutely no criticisms even though it is fundamentally flawed and is being guarded as the State’s authority and case against Breivik because they need the ‘insane’ label on him to complete the cover-up. The second psychiatric report that was undertaken on behalf of many of the families of Utoya and many leading professionals in the field of psychiatry in Norway who criticised the prognosis of the first report is being heavily criticised and undermined through the media by the commission overseeing the trial.

The second report has no such legal fundamental flaws as the first report but is the one being challenged by the commission and the first is legally fundamentally flawed and it has not been challenged once.

It is as clear as day if you are willing to admit to yourself that something untoward is going on in Norway.

You can call it a conspiracy theory to think that there is something very wrong happening in Norway and in this instance over the 2 psychiatric reports, but go look at the evidence in the embedded links, draw your own conclusion from them and form your own opinion about what is happening.

You do not need a degree in law to see the first report is flawed.

If you agree that the first report is fundamentally flawed then you have to accept that something that breaks the ‘rule of law’ in a Democracy is happening in Norway by those who control the State apparatus so as to cover-up the real truth behind Breivik the worst mass murderer in Europe of the 21st Century who carried out his acts in the name of politics because of his controllers.

I do not support Breivik or defend him but if the Norwegian State secure the "solo terrorist" who is 'insane' label on Breivik it means that his controllers get away with their actions not just against me but also everyone else effected by the events of July 22nd 2011 in Norway, endorsed by the current Norwegian State apparatus who are attempting to cover-up the truth from the public.

Dagbladet: We stand in wonder

VG: Breivik's Facebook accounts

A question for perspectives

Update 25/05: Russian Norwegian oil deal in crisis

The Security surrounding Utoya island was not stepped up in-light of the Government building bombing in Oslo, only the Leader and Deputy leader of the Government's youth wing were removed from the summer camp to safety before Breivik arrived, leaving the rest of the innocent kids trapped on the island with Breivik hunting them down for execution whilst dressed as a police man in what he called a coup de tat as part of a Norwegian anti-communist resistance movement he says he belongs to.

Further reading: Norwegian prosecutors in denial

Further reading: Breivik admits Gladio

Video: Gladio & 'Operation Breivik'

BBC News: Russian - Norway oil deal

More proof of a Norwegian Government cover-up

There can be no doubt now about what is going on in Norway and I have what I believe is the understanding and explanation of the whole thing now which will be explained in my next post.

There are 2 clear components to the Norwegian State's case against Breivik and the end result they want which is Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane'. Then the real truth behind Breivik is covered up from the public and those other people with a hand in the events of July 22nd 2011 walk free from their crimes.

The first is the PST's prosecution script against Breivik that the Prosecutors are presenting in the court room and the second is the first psychiatric report.

Both of these on behalf of the State are fundamentally flawed when you look at them properly in context of the evidence yet the Norwegian Government controlled State apparatus refuse to admit this in the eyes of the public and are sticking to their 'official' script even though it is full of holes that any outside observer can see.

Even though the first psychiatric report is fundamentally flawed and has no legal grounds to even be in the court room, the psychiatric commission charged with overseeing the case are continually undermining the second report with not one word said against the first State sanctioned report.

This can only mean that just like the prosecutors are puppets on strings for their State masters, the actor's on the commission are the same when the second report has no fundamental flaws and the first is built around fundamental flaws yet they criticise the second and ignore the first which can only mean one thing and that is they are working towards the same Norwegian State sanctioned script as the prosecutors and want the 'insane' label on Breivik.

That is taboo to think or say though.

They cannot now turn around and say anything else just like the State prosecutors, they are all trapped in their State sanctioned lies in front of the Worlds media.

If the Norwegian Armed Forces check the political background of everyone overseeing the State's case against Breivik I am pretty sure that you will find that they are all State appointed and part of the Labour Government infrastructure of the Country which is why they are all involved in the cover-up of the case whether they realise it or not.

They are all doing what they are told by their political masters!

They are all signing from the same hymn sheet handed down to them from above even though everyone with a brain can now see what is going on and it is a case of corruption of the very worst kind in the scheme of the whole thing.

Call it a conspiracy theory but it is built upon very clear evidence which tells the story on its own, and at the heart of this is the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian children on their summer camp with many more wounded for life.

Norway is ruled by a Marxist Dictatorship and not a Democracy which means they control the infrastructure of the Country and have their carefully selected and appointed people in positions of power over all institutions and organs of State that go towards the running of the Country.

This is very clear now with the Breivik case and the subsequent attempted cover-up.

People will say why and for what reason, which will be explained next time, but one thing I will say is who has the biggest oil and gas contracts with Norway the 3rd richest Nation on Earth and would want to make sure this Marxist Labour Government stayed in power for the next 20 years in the age of international oil and gas crisis?

I am sure the current Norwegian Government wants to stay in power too over their control of the infrastructure of the Country that has taken them many years to take a hold of.

Those kids of Utoya were expendable to their political masters and their long term political project but their Youth leader and Deputy leader were not because these protege's are seen as future heir's of the Labour leadership throne which is why they were removed from Utoya before Breivik unleashed his carnage that day.

It all fits into place now...

The Norwegian military should expel that Government on-behalf of the King if this is proven (all State actors in this case being Labour government activists) and they should have support from the international community in the process. This is exactly what the Arab spring is all about when there are Dictatorships abusing their power over the people who want Democracy and this with Norway is in Northern Europe with the head of the UN mission in Syria a Norwegian General.

VG: The Forensic commission

Quote: It's getting hard to find people who support Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim conclusions about paranoid schizophrenia. (The first report)

Just Psychiatry Terje Tørrissen and Agnar Aspaas found no evidence that Anders Breivik Behring is paranoid schizophrenic. did not psychiatric nurses or doctors at Ila Prison countries that received Breivik 22 July last year and has had regular supervision of him. Or the experienced psychiatrist right Randi Rosenqvist evaluating Breivik and wrote three reports about him on behalf of Ila.

Professor of Psychiatry, Einar Kringlen, who first supported the conclusions of the first report before he had seen Breivik, has been reversed. Henning Værøy, one of the most widely used legal psychiatrists, sees no signs of psychosis . Psychiatrist Find Skårderud recently told NRK that the discussion could be almost called off; Breivik is clearly not paranoid schizophrenic

Aftenposten: A deliberate bone hook

Quote: The forensic commission is doing its best to undermine the recent psychiatric report's credibility.(second report)

In November came the report that psychiatrists Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim declared that Anders Breivik Behring was criminally irresponsible (first report). From the beginning created the debate, but the forensic commission was not in doubt: The report was approved without objection - and without a single additional question.

Since then a whole bunch of psychiatrists contributed criticism. Most killing is a professor of psychiatry Sigmund Karterud been. In a VG interview he says in plain language that the Commission is about to lose all credibility.

And it does not stop there: It was a mistake made by Husby and Sørheim the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenic, and it was a mistake made by the Commission to approve this erroneous conclusion. A conclusion that is now "limits to professional suicide."

You mean that is a professor Karterud.

Dagbladet: The first report is stronger

Quote: The first report, from psychiatrists Torgeir Husby and Synne Sørheim, the answer was "no substantial remarks."

Corruption at the Met

Guardian: Met's anti-corruption allegations

Quote: On Tuesday, the Commons home affairs select committee was told by a lawyer involved in the case that invoices showed about £20,000 of potential payments to police officers in what amounted to an undetected case of "apparent corruption right at the heart of Scotland Yard".

In recent weeks, as the Guardian investigated the allegations, the Met has sought to discourage the paper from publishing details about the case. But , after MPs heard the evidence, the Met dropped its previous insistence that there was "evidence that casts doubt on the credibility" of the allegations.

A police source with knowledge of the investigation, which has been ongoing since October, said developments over the last 24 hours had now led police to take the allegations more seriously.

Is this what has been happening with Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake considering all evidence points to the fact that he is Breivik's English 'mentor' but no newspaper has carried out a thorough expose detailing all of the links for the public yet.

He is connected to people right up into the heart of the British Establishment and works for the EU bank so it would not be surprising that there are people out there who do not want this information about Alan Ayling and his extra curricula political activities in the public domain because of people's reputations.

They do not care about the young people who are dead now after the events in Norway last year, they just care about themselves and their reputations and have the money and political influence to 'pervert the course of justice' to protect themselves.

Further reading: Alan Lake's bank

Norwegian Armed Forces getting involved

Dagbladet: Breivik

Quote: The indictment against Anders Breivik Behring is designed in that he is insane. Armed Forces want to change this, but then it could be proved that the first report based on an erroneous basis, says legal commentator Egeland.

I dont know whether the google translate is correct but if it is it looks like the Norwegian Armed Forces are stepping in to the legal case against Breivik which in the scheme of things is the right thing to do now considering there is a State sanctioned cover-up of the truth taking place.

All the unanswered questions that completely contradict the Norwegian State script writers case surrounding Breivik.

As the quote states the case against Breivik is designed to enforce the 'insane' label on him rather than allow the 'rule of law' take it's natural course through the judicial process which is the usual and normal workings inside a Democracy.

If this does not happen then the Country cannot claim to be a Democracy and is nothing more than a Dictatorship with the rulers abusing their power over those they rule over for their own purposes and in this case white-washing the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian children for political purposes.

Breivik is guilty of his crimes against humanity that saw him target a group of innocent children in the name of right-wing politics and he should be punished with the full force of the law for the crimes he has committed but to refuse he is connected to anyone means that I was not set up to be the fall guy for the events that day by others, and I was.

All evidence proves my Norwegian Police witness statement to be correct only the Norwegian State script writers who are in control of the State's case against Breivik disagree and claim he is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one which means those who set me up get away with it.

You must be mad to think Breivik the son of the Norwegian diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mother's home who carried out the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century calling it a coup de tat.

Not only that but he was also an avid international traveler which shatters that illusion in the eyes of anyone with half a brain, only the Norwegian script writers do not think so and discount everything because it goes against the story they want the public to believe.

The 'insane' label would make it seem convincing in the eyes of the public though who do not know the full facts to the case, and would mean the real truth behind Breivik and those connected to him would be hidden behind closed doors by the political rulers of Norway.

And those who set me up would get away with their actions towards me, along with their complicity in Breiviks atrocities.

How is that justice?

You ask any lawyer with some 'balls' willing to speak in the interest of the integrity of the 'rule of law' whether or not Breivik's first psychiatric report has any legal basis to be in the courts proceedings when you look at some of the key points it was created upon that the psychiatrists then passed their clinical position over and place that in the Norwegian newspapers for the public to read.

To criticise the integrity of the first psychiatric report does not mean you support Breivik it means you are passing a professional opinion on a legal question irrespective of the case.

I am not a lawyer and it is blatantly obvious to me.

If from a legal stand point it has no basis to be in the court room then why have the judges not thrown it out?

Is that not criminal in nature and intent from a legal standpoint for it to still be there if it has no legal basis to be there?

The whole thing stinks!

It is about time 'truth & justice' prevailed...

Aftenposten: Got the court to laugh

Alan Lake's international Bank

Times of Malta: EBRD's 1 billion for Arab democracies

It was reported in yesterday’s paper that the bank Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake works for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development has set up offices in many of the Islamic Countries where there has been an Arab spring with 1 billion investment now going into those Countries.

That’s a serious bank and not your local high street Barclays.

Alan Ayling is not just floor staff in the bank either he is a trusted manager working overseeing the Oracle database.

The bank has a political mandate in the Countries it works in and is run by the European Union with a new British President just being instilled who takes over from a German. This move instilling a British President goes against the usual order of things because it was said that due to the fact that the banks headquarters are in London there would not be a British President.

I wonder why the change of heart.

The good thing is, is that the new head is a top civil servant in the justice ministry which might mean he will get to the bottom of Ayling and the extra curricula political activities he was involved in whilst working for the bank and reveal the information needed for the Breivik enquiry.

It all makes a little more sense now and shows why Ayling has been shielded from the Breivik enquiry and gives an insight into the types of high level European connections aside from his known British connections he has who I am sure have been supporting and endorsing his extra curricula political activities.

How damaging would it be for the reputation of the bank if it was proven that Ayling is the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik the mass murdering political terrorist who murdered a load of children in the name of right-wing politics?

Is that enough for ‘dark forces’ to attempt to influence and close down the investigation on all levels, not only that there is the possibility that there are forces from within working alongside him so are acting in their own interests too but that’s just speculation.

A secretive funny hand shake group of politically minded people working in banks or involved with the banks.

Who knows what has been going on inside their world of money, politics, espionage and foreign Countries over the years? You can see what Ayling has been doing for the past few years whilst working inside the bank though because it is all over the internet.

Preaching his right wing politics around Europe and being the director behind the hijacked English Defence League and attempting to create a Europe wide movement on the back of it which you would have thought conflicted with his day job in the EBRD bank.

You cannot say MI5 or MI6 do not know all of this so the question is whether or not he is an agent or asset of the State which could be another reason why he has been protected from the enquiry because how would that then look if he is the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik and is a British agent?

He also has contacts in the Swedish Government and Norwegian Government, so you can see that his influence stretches beyond the EU bank that he works for and into international politics which is in-line with the mandate of the bank.

I reckon his ego has turned into megalomania now though because of what he has been involved in, the people he has been involved with, and that is what is now going to be his downfall, along with attempting to accuse one of God’s anointed for his evil.

There is no doubt in my mind that he is Breivik’s English ‘mentor’, I knew from the very beginning once God had shown me what was going on, and now all evidence proves that claim to be completely correct. He fits the picture and profile perfectly, only no action has been taken against him yet which can only mean he has people higher than him who are supporting him and endorsing him who are able to influence the ‘rule of law’ which would fit in-line with Breivik’s claim of being part of a neo-Gladio group sanctioned by someone (plural) somewhere.

The head of the British police has stated that MI6 are not above the law so that means that Ayling is not above the law either so his friend ‘Richard the Lionhearts’ identity will have to be revealed.

Breivik’s preparations countdown for his July 22nd 2011 attacks is in the exact same time frame as the founding of the English Defence League where Ayling and the anonymous ‘Richard the Lionheart’ were both present and integral.

A targeted terrorist attack against a group of innocent kids in Norway on their summer camp who were trapped on an island with the attempted blame then placed upon me to remove the threat to his continued political agenda and for a nice clean media story in the aftermath to deflect all attention from the real source of the attacks, and then the subsequent Norwegian Government cover-up.

The cover-up is all on the highest levels which means the fraternities all know the real truth behind this and view those dead innocent children and their families with contempt, along with myself who they tried to blame for being behind the atrocity.

The biggest mistake that was an act of God is the ‘Richard the Lionheart’ link who is directly connected to Ayling and has yet to be revealed to the public so as to be able to be understood in context within the whole Breivik case and prove that Ayling is behind Breivik and that there is a much larger conspiracy behind the Norwegian ‘official’ claim of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one.

A neo-Gladio attack, with the son of a Norwegian foreign diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major recruited for the job.

3 independent witnesses other than Ayling and an email prove this persons existence so the British police and Norwegian police have no alternative but to reveal his identity to the public following the case.

They have not done this yet in the interest of ‘truth & justice’.

The worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century and this persons identity is now crucial to understanding the whole case which is in the interest of ‘truth & justice’ against those evil forces in high places who think they are more equal than others and can get away with their heinous crimes. If the public knew this information that is missing from the enquiry they would expect it to be revealed by their ‘rulers’ but the British media have been completely silent about this information and it is only the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet who have reported on this persons existence along with the Norwegian polices confirmation of his existence.

But we still do not know who he is and Breivik has claimed he had an English ‘mentor’ called ‘Richard the Lionheart' which fits in with who wrote or edited the “2083” manifesto in perfect English and why it is an integral piece of evidence to the whole case.

Along the way over the past 10 months waiting and trying to prove my innocence and that Ayling was behind this there have been several questions that I had to form the pieces of the puzzle in my mind.

One was how could Ayling be linked to Serbia and the Balkans and for months it was the biggest missing piece of the puzzle until it was revealed where he worked. As soon as I looked at the banks website I saw Serbia and the Balkans which was the missing link between Ayling and Serbians and confirmed to me without doubt that he was the English ‘mentor’ behind Breivik.

The other question at the beginning of the case was why was the murder location of the MI6 agent Gareth Williams in Breivik’s manifesto.

A top code breakers murder location inside an embedded code inside a manifesto linked to the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century.

That is enough to raise suspicions.

Why would the murder location be in there if it is, other than those who were behind the murder placing it in there as a finger print?

This is all obviously speculation because nothing is definite.

So I believe Ayling is behind Breivik which would mean that he is also connected in someway to whoever killed Gareth Williams if that is why his murder location is in the manifesto.

It was said at the beginning of the Gareth Williams case that he was following Russian mafia money around Europe, and in the days preceding his murder there was a Russian diplomatic car seen in his street that was out of place.

The Russians are very open about killing people like with their nuclear terrorism in London; they do not hide from their actions so you could say a finger print in the Breivik case is befitting if it is the case.

This obviously made me question a possible link between Ayling and Russians. I did not think too much beyond surface thoughts because nothing was confirmed or proven so was just in the back of my mind.

Then yesterday when I read about Ayling’s bank it showed that his bank has been operating for many years in the former Soviet block and Russia which possibly confirms the Russian link if that is who had a hand in the murder of Gareth Williams and placed his murder location in the manifesto. It would also confirm the link between Breivik's paramilitary training in Belarus by a group run by a former Soviet Colonel and other Russians.

Nobody knows yet though.

I am sure that Ayling has Russian contacts through his banking day job considering the bank has operated in Russia and the former Soviet block for many years, and he is a known political activist who fantasises about murdering political and religious leaders so there is a correlation.

It would be interesting to know whether he is an agent or asset of the State?

William Hague the Foreign Secretary has closed down the Gareth Williams case citing it is in the interests of National Security which is the legal term for a Government minister ‘perverting the course of justice’ when there is an investigation into the murder of a British citizen who was working for the Security Services that ended up in his murder by someone who obviously saw him as a threat due to his work for Queen & Country.

What was his work and why prevent the British police from investigating this line of enquiry?

The missing link would be whether or not Ayling’s bank came up in any of Mr. William’s Echelon work following Russian money if that is what he was doing. This would then be the direct link and prove that whoever was behind his murder had a hand in ‘Operation Breivik’ and was directly linked to Ayling.

This is all obviously speculation but as part of Gareth Williams murder investigation it is a question that needs answering considering his murder location is quite possibly an embedded code location within Breivik’s manifesto, even if to just disprove it as a conspiracy theory.

William Hague has prevented this from happening though.

It is a historic fact in the world of international espionage that double agents recruited and working on behalf of foreign powers for financial and political gain murder loyal spies or reveal their identities to others for assassination because of their work, so this is not out of the realms of possibility and is a real question for the family as part of the investigation into the murder of their son and brother.

The ‘Powers’ that be have tried white washing Gareth Williams murder by trying to disprove it was murder and discrediting his reputation as if his untimely death was the result of a sex game that went wrong. I cannot see how placing yourself inside a small bag and locking it with no air is a sex game. The thing with this though is that the murder scene was completely wiped of finger prints and evidence meaning a 3rd party must have been there and involved at the time of his death.

Why wipe the place clean other than to destroy evidence and cover your tracks which means murder?

The bag Gareth Williams body was found in was a North Face bag.

Might just be a coincidence but what Country is facing the UK if you go North i.e North Face?

Ayling and his associates intimately involved in his political activities spanning the time frame of the EDL and Breivik’s countdown for his terrorist attacks are linked to the highest realms of the British Establishment which is obviously why Ayling’s friends identity has not been revealed yet.

What will it reveal when it is?

Time will tell as it is a question that needs answering!

p.s To save time Breivik should be offered a deal for his mother's immunity from prosecution and then everyone can see what is right and what is wrong and how it all fits together from Breivik's own mouth.

Shock horror...the Norwegian script writers do not want that though because how would that then make them look and the script they have been playing too?

But it is a situation that they cannot get out of which needs addressing one way or another in the interest of 'truth & justice' over the events of July 22nd 2011 in Norway.

Norwegian Prosecutors in denial

Dagbladet: No weaknesses in the investigation

The Norwegian State Prosecutors have stated that the loose ends in their ‘official’ line of Breivik the “solo terrorist” who is connected to no one are insignificant and do not change their ‘official’ line.

The Norwegian State Prosecutors are nothing more than puppets on strings who are propagating the ‘official’ script that has been handed down to them from above.

They are the front-line ‘official’ face of the Norwegian State and case against Breivik and what else can they say?

Nothing because how would that look if they did?

They have no alternative now but to stick to their ‘official’ line and try to dismiss everything that contradicts it.

I in no way support Breivik or defend Breivik, not only because of what he did on July 22nd 2011 which was a crime against humanity but because he along with others attempted to frame me for the crimes he committed that could have resulted in a very long prison sentence for me. If the Norwegian State stick to their ‘official’ claim of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one then those behind him who crafted the script to frame me will not only get away with their actions towards me but also their complicity in the cold blooded murder of all those children of Utoya and that is not in the interests of ‘truth & justice’ which transcends politics.

What is your personal opinion about that?

The funny thing is, is that all of those unanswered questions that still linger in the case that they believe are insignificant actually change the whole story surrounding Breivik and completely contradicts their ‘official’ line.

Just like the second psychiatric report completely contradicts the first State sanctioned report.

The first report has more holes in it than a tea bag and was built around lies, half truths and statements from people complicit in Breivik’s crimes, and all leading psychiatric professionals dealing with Breivik on a daily basis also contradicted the first State sanctioned report.

To deny that report and its authority goes against the outcome the Norwegian ‘official’s want so even though it is completely flawed and has no basis to even be in the court room. They are still standing by it which is a joke in the eyes of anyone with any knowledge of law (or maybe it's me who is wrong).

That should tell you all you need to know and form a good basis with which to judge everything else upon.

The Norwegian State Prosecutors cannot now turn around and say they have been completely wrong with their ‘official’ line for the past 10 months and admit that there is a bigger story surrounding Breivik and other people’s involvement because how would that then look?

Not very good…Then the questions would come as to why and how.

Call it a National crisis because what would the Norwegian people think about being lied to over something of such gravity and magnitude by their Government and what would the future implications be?

Especially not now they are in the court room propagating their ‘official’ script in front of the Worlds media with not just the Norwegians following the events but the whole World now with their eyes on Norway because of the sickening nature of what Breivik did.

They have no alternative but to try and dismiss the loose ends and unanswered questions because the truth about them would completely contradict their ‘official’ script and create the crisis.

They are the ‘official’s who are conducting the enquiry so their ‘official’ line must be true is what most people would expect; only that is not the case here.

When those who make the law, break the law, in the name of the law, then there is no law.

There is either a Government cover-up of the truth, there has been a successful coup in Norway or the PST and Police with all of their experience, knowledge and resources might as well be a bunch of aliens from outer space living on earth with no understanding or concept of human life with which to draw an investigative conclusion from, that’s how bad it now looks in the eyes of those who have a grasp of the evidence (in my opinion anyway).

I personally will rule out the 3rd choice because I have met some of them and they seemed pretty normal to me.

The only conclusion with the ‘official’ script is that there is a high level Government cover-up of the truth or there has been a successful coup, there is no other alternative.

That is taboo to think and say though!

To now turn around and admit that they are wrong and Breivik is connected to a network who recruited him, brainwashed him, trained him, and financed him completely goes against the ‘official’ line which goes against the script writers from above.

This is just the simple fact of the matter now.

Makes you wonder how stupid or how desperate those script writers are to have thought that they could get away with their ‘official’ lies when all those young innocent children lay dead, where ‘truth & justice’ is the only recompense for their untimely murders.

Breivik cannot get out of his situation but why should those behind him who sent him to commit his acts get away with their actions?

Protected by the Norwegian State apparatus.

Don’t forget either that the ruling Government removed their protégé’s from Utoya before Breivik arrived to unleash his carnage against the innocent kids on the island that day without even attempting to secure the place just in case something did happen, which it did.

Very suspicious that they were removed and the rest left to their fate that day (in my mind anyway).

The Norwegian police have a detailed witness statement from me after a voluntary 3 days and 15 hours interview due to the fact that I was set up to be the alleged English ‘mentor’ Breivik speaks of in his manifesto.

All evidence now proves my hypothesis to be completely right only no action has been taken.

My hypothesis goes against their ‘official’ script.

Here is a short list of the unanswered questions that completely contradict the ‘official’ line and would change everything.

1.) Who is Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’?

The head of the British police said recently that MI6 are not above the law over the murder of Gareth Williams whose possible murder location turned up in Breivik’s manifesto.

That means that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is not above the law and he has already been interviewed about his possible role as the English ‘mentor’ so it will be very telling to see whether or not he revealed this persons identity in interview. If not why not?

All the British police have to do is arrest and interrogate Ann Marchini and Kinana to prove this persons existence.

Has this happened yet? If not why not if no one is above the law?

Breivik said his English ‘mentor’ was called ‘Richard the Lionheart’ so this question is integral to the whole case.

Why has this person not been traced and revealed to the public yet?

2.) The Norwegian State Prosecutors claim that Breivik was a complete failure and high school drop out, so how did he write a 1500 page manifesto in perfect English that no high school drop out would ever be able to accomplish, especially a Norwegian one?

This means someone else wrote the manifesto, or at least edited it for him which by default means someone else is directly linked to him that can only be his real English ‘mentor’ seen as though its written in perfect English.

3.) The Norwegian police have still not had access to Breivik’s Facebook accounts to prove or disprove Breivik’s claim of them possibly finding a link to the network/group he says he is connected to.

Completely flawed ‘official’ line until they are checked.

4.) Did Breivik really make $600,000 from fake diplomas online or was this the financing of international terrorism from external sources. Living in the computer age and Breivik claiming it was an online operation then there will be an electronic trail.

5.) Where did Breivik learn his bomb making skills?

Or are we to believe he created his bomb that was successful first go that destroyed his Government building and killed 8 people from an online internet recipe?

6.) Did Breivik attend paramilitary training camps in Belarus as has been stated from sources inside the Country?

This would explain where he learned his bomb making skills and mean he is part of a network.

7.) Did Breivik meet a Serbian war criminal in Liberia?

8.) Has Breivik been offered a deal for his innocent mother’s immunity from prosecution?

That one question would solve everything in an instant.

There are other unanswered questions that need answering that are a little more complex these are just the easiest to ask off of the top of my head.

I pretty much know the answer to each of these questions in my own mind and it tells a completely different story than the ‘official’ story the Norwegian State script writers have written for the Breivik case.

I only have my reputation to defend in all of this because there is no way I want on my conscience or reputation in the eyes of others that I was behind Breivik. The families of the dead have the memory of their loved ones to think about.

As I said, this transcends politics when a bunch of innocent kids were butchered and maimed for life on a summer camp in the name of politics, and those behind it should be held to account in the eyes of the law which is Democracy in action.

We live in the 21st Century not the Middle Ages where Western societies are supposed to be civilised and a State sanctioned cover-up of the massacre of a group of innocent young kids on their summer camp is in no way civilised.

It means the Governers view the governed with contempt and scorn, acting without any moral obligation to those they are supposed to be serving and as one of the governed I take offence to that, especially when all those innocent children lay dead and their grieving families have lost the ones they love never to experience that human love again and someone (plural) attempted to blame me for it.

How dare they!

It’s about time other people with a ‘voice’ in Norway started asking these questions and challenging the ‘official’ line, unless they have all been brainwashed to believe the lies they are being told as truth and believe the ‘official’ line.

The one question I have been waiting for that has still not arrived in 6 months is; who is Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’?

This will answer everything and is the reason why it has not been revealed because it would shatter the Norwegian State sanctioned script.

How much longer till the bigger script writers intervene with the truth for the sake of justice for all those who are now dead.

These questions cannot be ignored, especially the ‘Richard the Lionheart’ one because it is integral to the whole case and is the reason why I ended up in the middle of the case in the first place, and it is not that hard to find out even though those who hold the information are surrounded with high raking people from within the British Establishment.

In my opinion if it is found out that the Norwegian Government have carried out a State sanctioned cover-up then the King of Norway should enact whatever law he can within his Kingdom and dissolve his Government and hold independent elections just like with the Arab spring we are supporting around the World as our efforts to spread Democracy in other Countries.

History recounts times like these and today is no different when looking back in 100 or more years.

When you look at the facts, who wants to be governed by political rulers who can carry out such things against the people they are supposed to be serving.

If they can do this then they can do anything with the contempt that they have for the people.

What will the Norwegian people think about their Government when they find out they have been lied to with a State sanctioned cover up of the truth behind Breivik for whatever reasons it has been carried out.

The only question now is whether or not the media powers are going to allow the Norwegian people to know and hear the truth that challenges the 'official' line.

Or whether at the 12th hour the ‘Powers’ that be in Norway who have been writing the Breivik script now do a complete U-turn in the case and admit they have been wrong all along, publicly apologise for their mistakes and tell the public the truth behind Breivik and hold others to account, namely his real English ‘mentor’.

That is ‘truth & justice’ and confirms the bigger conspiracy involving other people that is being hidden from view for reasons unknown yet other than the fact that they are standing in positions where they think they are untouchable.

Breivik was not a fly by night hood from the streets unknown to anyone within the Norwegian establishment; he comes from the political military class in Norway with his father a foreign diplomat and his step father an Army Major, and he carried out what he called a coup de tat in the name of politics.

But the ‘Powers’ that be in Norway controlling the State script want the world to believe Breivik was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one and if they can secure the insane label then it all fits together nicely for mass public consumption with the real source behind Breivik getting away with their actions along with their reasons.

Breivik was specifically recruited for his role because of his family background that’s just blatantly obvious to anyone with a brain when put into context with all of the other evidence. Only the Norwegian PST & Police script writers seem not to think so and have written a completely contradictory script that makes them look like actors from a Monty Python sketch only it’s not funny in the slightest when they are supposed to be professionals serving the public in Norway.

When those who make the law break the law in the name of the law then there is no law.

Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one

Norway's PST & Police from the VERY beginning have stated that Breivik the son of the former Government diplomat to the UK and step son of an Army Major was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one.

Even though he traveled the world extensively over the 10 year period he claims he was first recruited, and had Facebook accounts with up to 8,000 like-minded friends. The Norwegian police have still not had access to his old accounts even though they make official statements, with Breivik himself saying they will find a link in the accounts.

This 'official' line has not changed from day one with the attempt to reinforce this claim in the eyes of the public by certifying him as 'insane' through the first psyche report which worked well for public perceptions for 7 months until the second report was carried out that conflicted with the first report.

That is one point of contention that is now playing out in the court room.

There are many unanswered questions in the case which should mean that no 'official' statement should be made until they have been thoroughly investigated and proven or dissproven but that has not happened with the 'official's' making their 'official' statements about the case.

The only conclusion is that there is a Government cover-up of the truth with their "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is insane label, who was radicalised, recruited, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mothers home.

The son of a Government diplomat and step son or an Army Major carried out the worst terrorist attack in Europe of the 21st Century and called it a coup de tat and dressed it up in Freemasonary and Templar clothes which you can be sure his family ties are both a part of which is why Breivik was recruited.

War within the Norwegian fraternity...at the cost of 69 kids slaughtered with many more injured and a subsequent high level Government cover-up.

The 'Powers' that be want the world to believe Breivik was a "solo terrorist" connected to no one.

Why?

The families of the dead should be asking these questions as they have the 'voices' to be heard unless they believe the 'official' line they are being told.

The above graph gives a simple outline of some unanswered questions that need answering and if they are not answered then you can draw your own conclusions.

The most important piece of information to me and the wider case is who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is? This I am sure would answer a lot of questions with much falling into place when he is known, only there is a refusal to reveal this persons identity.

Why?

The British Police should know who he is and located him by now, so why has his identity not been revealed?

This piece of information is an act of God in the whole case because He knew what was coming so revealed the information and links because He is the Almighty, the Alpha and Omega who knows all things and reveals all things to His people.

Breivik's mother is a co-conspirator to her sons crimes so Breivik should be offered a deal for her immunity or she should be charged for her crimes but this has not happened.

Why?

There is talk of Breivik being paramilitary trained in Belarus, which would explain how he was able to build a bomb covertly on his farm that was capable of blowing up his Government building.

Further reading: Unraveling Breiviks Belarus connection

The group who it is said trained Breivik are linked to Russian money which might explain why the murder scene of Gareth Williams the murdered MI6 agent ended up inside the manifesto because at the beginning stages of his murder enquiry there was talk of him working as part of Echelon tracing the Russin mafia's money into Europe.

The banking angle of the enquiry brings Alan Lake into the equation because he works inside the prestigious European Bank for Reconstruction & Development that is directly linked to Serbia and the Balkans. He is also business partners with people working in other prestigious banks and high ranking people in British society.

We all know the Russian infiltration of British high society.

Breivik transferred money to Liberia through a bank that sounds like a smaller branch of Lake's bigger bank.

All evidence clearly points to the fact that Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is Breivik's English 'mentor' but no action has been taken against him.

Why?

Their agenda was to frame me for Breivik as being the man behind him who inspired him on the internet as part of his psychosis in his bedroom, only that did not go to plan. If it had of gone to plan then nobody would be asking these questions with the media satisfied with the 'official' line, and I would have been smeared much more than I was as the alleged English 'mentor' all over the world news and would be looking at a lengthy prison sentence with those who set this up having a nice clean cover story for the media.

Thank God I stood accused at the beginning because people are listening to my point of view and nobody should get away with massacring a bunch of innocent unarmed kids in the name of politics, and that includes all those people intricately involved with Breivik and his crimes.

It's about time some answers were given to these unanswered questions and the trail leading to those script writers at the top in Norway who are complicit in the high level sanctioned cover-up were revealed so they can be held to account for their actions against the Norwegian people.

This goes beyond politics to basic humanity we all have irrespective of our political or religious beliefs.

The blood of the children of Utoya demands it, and I am sure the general public would agree with that point when those in 'Power' abuse that power they have been 'gifted', against those on whose behalf they are supposed to be serving.

unless we are all expendable cattle in the eyes of our masters?

You decide on that point...

It would not surprise me if Breivik is knocked off soon because he is the only one who can reveal the identity of those people behind him and their agenda because he holds the knowledge in his mind. This is why his sanity should be tested to see whether or not his mothers liberty means more to him than the identity of his accomplices.

Breivik's prison transport was involved in a collision on the way to court the other day which makes you wonder whether or not that was a dry run to test the security. I am sure there are many high ranking people who want him dead now because he threatens their safety and liberty, and they have the 'Power' to act against him dependent upon how safe he is in custody from them.

Time will tell...

He was their sacrificial pawn, but at this moment in time he has changed the game and is now more powerful than all of those directly connected to him, who placed him where he know sits.

I reckon he would offer them up for his mother and the path of redemption before the Lord because I do not believe he is insane and he has had a lot of time to think about everything. It's just if someone gets to him first to remove the threat to themselves.

The head of the police in Britain should reveal who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is due to the fact it is the British angle of the case and nobody in Government should be allowed to prevent it, and anyone in Government who attempts to prevent it should be held to account for 'perverting the course of justice'. This is just the fact of the matter now that there is no way round, and anyone following the case will want to know this persons identity and why it has not been revealed yet. Look at what happened to me at the beginning!

As has been said recently, MI6 are not above the law.

In Norway the head of the PST or Police should offer Breivik the deal for his mothers immunity from prosecution and then see how the script those script writers wrote looks in light of the evidence from Breivik himself. I am sure many dots will be able to be joined that will expose the script writers and call their integrity into question.

Jesus is Lord over the whole Earth and all powers are subject to Him so it is only a matter of time until the truth is pulled out into the light, so those bigger script writers should start thinking about how to write the truth about this case to the general public.

Some more questions for Norway's PST and Police

Seems there is a bit more steam left in the tank.

VG: Norway's PST's report on Knights Templar network

Quote: Behring Anders Breivik (33) claims "Knights Templar" made a full background check before being included. Police do not believe it.

In an analysis report says the police that if the Knights Templar are - and have the resources Breivik outlines - they would probably not chosen him. "If the founders of the Knights Templar carried out investigations of Breivik in 2002, they would have found that he had no sodium, the he had not been in the military, that he had worked as a telemarketer for six years, he had started three companies, all with deficit, and that had been taken by police for graffiti and driving while intoxicated, "the report said. breivik claims Knights Templar emphasized the extremely gifted individuals when they recruited people. Police believe it rhymes well with Breivik's CV at the time.

Breivik was not recruited by the historical Order of Knights Templar, he was recruited by a political group of right wingers as part of a neo-Gladio style network.

They have wrapped up Breivik and his/their political agenda against Left-wing Marxists in the clothes of Templarism in an attempt to gain wider support because the old style neo-nazi ideology would never be acceptable to mainstream right wing politics.

Breivik admits himself that he is a part of the Gladio network that has been around since the Second World War and carried out more than 50 terrorist attacks in that time span.

The people who recruited Breivik were not looking for someone with the ability to make money through business or someone with an upstanding reputation like the Norwegian police think they were. They were looking for someone who they could trust, and considering Breivik's family background that they had access to because they are part of the intelligence community he came to the top of the list.

Father was a diplomat to the UK so there is the connection to the London Gladio grouping, and his step father was a former Army Major.

Breivik came from the right family stock in the eyes of others...He could be trusted because he had a lot to live up to with the right brainwashing.

The people behind Breivik have all the money they need, look at the links into international banks, so Breivik was not recruited for his business skills, although he raised $600,000 from somewhere so he could not have been that stupid unless it was the financing of international terrorism from external sources.

Quote: Progress was to recognize Kosovo as an independent state, and supported the NATO bombing of Serbia. According to Breivik's explanation was bombing one of the main reasons why the Knights Templar was re-established in 2002.

This brings in the Serbian angle to the neo-Gladio network and the reason why a small European group with a larger supporting group came together with a mutual political agenda, with Breivik recruited as an integral part of that agenda that resulted in July 22nd 2011.

That means there are other Breivik’s out there as part of the same network.

The group is not a Knights Templar group in the real sense of the Order, they are a group of politically minded people dressing themselves up in the clothes of the Knights Templar (in my opinion).

They are a neo-Gladio group which is extreme right/left politics formed to influence the political debate through terrorism in whatever Countries they are operating in.

Wikipedia: Operation Gladio

Quote: Brevik has changed the explanation from the Knights Templar was a pan-European organization with at least 25 -30 members to be a network consisting of six persons.

It does not take 25 – 30 members to create Breivik and the aftermath which is laid down in the “2083” manifesto and accompanying video. All it takes is a small group with wider political support. They want to start a terrorist campaign along the same lines as Al Qaeda with real solo terrorists rising up and committing right-wing political terrorist acts.

It only took a small group to create the English Defence League with Alan Lake who I believe is Breivik’s real English ‘mentor’ involved, so numbers are irrelevant. Someone’s actions and the right propaganda exactly like ‘Operation Breivik’ can create a much larger movement than the original fewwho started it which is exactly what ‘Operation Breivik’ is all about when you look at the whole thing.

The 25 – 30 claim was Breivik’s pompous claims to bolster the image of ‘his’ attempt to create a much larger organisation in the eyes of others, but under intense questioning the truth was revealed and that in reality it is really a small group of intelligent individuals which is in-line with being a neo-Gladio group where secrecy is paramount so small cells of politically/financially influential people are essential for secrecy, with Breivik being a part of the cell operating out of London.

Who helped create the picture perfect English “2083” manifesto is Breivik is a “solo terrorist” connected to no one?

Quote: Breivik had economic motives for their trips to Liberia, Lithuania and Estonia. At the same time it can not be refuted that Breivik may have met a Serb in Liberia, three people in London in 2002 and people in Lithuania and Estonia in 2004. police are clear in their report that they have no faith in the organization Breivik talking about are .

People are leaving Lithuania and Estonia for greener European pastures because of the economic situation in those Countries so why would Breivik's trips there be for economic reasons?

That does not add up.

You have to look at all the historical evidence in light of the events of July 22nd and the PST’s conclusion does not sit right in the scheme of things but that is their logic because they have a script they are working with that was created by someone (plural) and involved me only my part did not go to plan (explained later).

Just because they say they do not believe something is true does not mean it is not true, it just means they have no evidence either way to confirm or deny so the statement should be they are keeping an open mind until all evidence is gathered to see how it fits together or doesn’t fit together.

It fits together for me when looking at the evidence: Breivik’s bomb making skills

Further reading: Breivik’s Liberia London connection

Further reading: Some questions for the prosecution

Quote: "Since the terrorist attack on 22 July saw the police main goal was to uncover whether there are assistants to Breivik and cell 2 or 3 exists. As of 9 april, there is no information indicating that "

Further reading: A Question of doubt

Have the 3 points covered in this post been completely and thoroughly ruled out, meaning there is evidence to the contrary or are they open ended points with no firm conclusion other than the PST or Police saying they do not believe there are others involved even without evidence to state that as a fact?

Quote:"Police Security Service since July 22 priority to work with the possibility that Breivik has held an organizational affiliation and that the Knights Templar is an international organization. PST has found that the Knights Templar exist in the form Breivik says

It is not a Knights Templar Order it is a neo-Gladio style group dressed up in the clothes of Templarism.

The script for Breivik was written from the very beginning and that script has been to have Breivik labelled as a "solo terrorist" linked to no one who is insane and was radicalised, recruited, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mothers home because beyond that script there are people in high places hiding from the truth.

Based upon all of the evidence that script is in tatters and whoever wrote it should be held to account because they are complicit in a cover-up of the truth when there are 77 people now dead, with 69 of them innocent kids on their summer camp, with many more injured for life because of Breivik's actions as part of a planned coup de tat.

Nice how the leader and deputy leader were removed before Breivik arrived on Utoya island don’t you think?

They almost got away with it with me being arrested and locked up as his inspiration which would have made it a nice clean story only I have been allowed to defend myself and show my truth to those who want to read it.

I was their fall guy for a nice clean media story which if you look back to the beginning you will see very clearly in the media where the journalists tried to fit me into the box written for me in the Breivik script with their smears, lies and half truths...Only I never fell because Jesus Christ is holding my arms and feet and I stand on truth in righteousness in this and have done since the beginning.

Now let others judge what is truth and what is falsehood as people look for the truth behind Breivik.

Quote: You have made a conclusion based on that since you have not arrested anyone else, or located on other so can not Knights Templar exist. If you use that logic, it existed still does not know prior to 22 July, he pointed out already during the first week of the trial.

Further reading: Norwegian Police logic

If the Norwegian Police or PST really want to get to the bottom of the truth then they should offer Breivik's mother a deal for her immunity from prosecution for laundering $600,000 through her bank accounts for her son then they can start joining some of the dots together. It is said that the money was from Breivik selling fake diploma's but my money is on it being for the financing of international terrorism from external sources. Either way there is no way out because it is the proceeds of crime which is a criminal offence so the Norwegian people will expect her to be arrested.

She has been given protection by the State up to this point in time, protection not afforded to the children of Utoya on July 22nd 2011 who are now dead or injured.

If Breivik does a deal for his mothers immunity it is going to shatter that State script that has been written for the public which is probably why no action has been taken against her up to this point in time.

They should also reveal who Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart' is and see how this fits into the picture seen as though its integral to the investigation.

I wonder how things are going to look when these 2 points are addressed?

A question for Norway's PST & Police

Who taught Breivik how to construct a bomb capable of destroying his Government building which killed 8 people in the process?

Or do you want the public to believe Breivik constructed it from an internet recipe on his farm and it worked perfectly first go?

If someone taught him how to construct the bomb at another location then he is connected to a network and part of that network wrote me into their script that the 'Powers that be' are refusing to admit exists.

I am quite sure that not all the PST or Police working on the case believe what is being handed down to the media as fact in this case, because if they did it would mean they are all as stupid and ignorant as each other and that is not the case. Those at the very top are controlling the script and what is fed to the public as fact so as to create the perception they want in the public eye, for their own reasons.

That is called a Dictatorship and not a Democracy, unless its been a well planned successful coup only there are now many unanswered questions that conflict with their 'official' line.

Breivik the son of a former Norwegian Government diplomat to London and step son of an Army Major. If that does not raise suspicions in your mind in the scheme of things then nothing will.

Also the banking area of investigation and how that links in with Alan Lake.

Further reading: Breivik's bomb

Further reading: Alan lake some food for thought