Showing posts with label witnesses. Show all posts
Showing posts with label witnesses. Show all posts
30 November 2014
29 December 2007
Paulo Rebelo - Some questions!
There is a large portion of the worlds population who have been watching this tragic case unfold concerning an innocent little girl who was stolen from her bed whilst on holiday in Portugal with her parents.
The chief suspect in the abduction of the little girl is Robert Murat who has given Portuguese police a false alibi about his movements on the night in question which is supported by his elderly mother, even though there are 8 witnesses to say he is lying compared to his one witness, his mother who is also lying to cover for her son.
Who do you think a jury would believe?
The two more witnesses whose identities and stories have just been released into the public domain, are not witnesses who have just come forward after 8 months of watching the media coverage of this case, these two people both gave detailed statements to Leicetershire police in May after returning from their holiday in Portugal, approximately a week after the night Madeline was abducted.
Their information has now been released into the public domain because the Portuguese police investigating this crime have done absolutely nothing about their evidence even though what they saw makes them 'star witnesses' and sheds light onto the events of the night in question because they were there with eyes observing their surroundings in the time frame of history that Madeline McCann was abducted.
There is no literal evidence yet linking anyone to any crime, but there are witnesses whose perceptions help paint a picture of events for us to drawn a conclusion from.
8 different sets of eyes observing the same person in the vicinity of a crime scene during the course of the evening of the night in question is pretty damning evidence do you not think?
What they viewed is factual evidence because their eyese saw it and their brains saved the information!
You can try to discount several of the witnesses as unreliable but out of 8 witnesses you have to be utterly stupid to try and discount your clients guilt Mr Pagarete, do you not agree?
Is it not now your responsibility to limit the damage to your client and his mother Mr Pagarete, meaning the charges they are now going to face over this crime and negotiating a deal so that the truth will be told, if not and you would happily go to trial on behalf of your client Robert Murat even though there are 8 witnesses against you, does this not call into question your suitability as a lawyer?
Robert Murat is sticking to his story though that he was at home with his elderly mother all night.
We know for a fact that Robert Murat has access to inside information relating to this crime because he worked as a translator for the police at the beginning stages of the investigation, he has worked with the Portuguese police before and he has friends on the inside of this investigation.
There comes a point though when the whole world will say "Come on, what are you playing at?", and people of great influence will hold those in charge of this investigation to account in view of the whole world so that justice will prevail.
There is an innocent little girl missing and her innocent parents being blamed when you have this man who is chief suspect in this crime lying to the police - Why am I a nobody from nowhere having to write my thoughts down because of such an injustice?
I stand in the knowledge that if I can see it, and am speaking it then the Living God can see it too, and I rest assured in the fact that He knows more than me and will make sure that justice and mercy will prevail.
These two new witnesses have stated that they saw two men in an apartment that overlooked the swimming pool on the night Madeline was abducted, they believed this apartment was empty because the shutters were down (you can tell if an apartment is empty or not).
Ideal location to survey the families with children in the complex without being seen dont you think?
The only thing is, is that one of the people who was seen in the empty apartment is not your master criminal so went out onto the balcony to smoke and was thankfully spotted.
This puts two people acting suspiciously in the vicinity of the crime scene on the night in question.
The whole world who are watching this case unfold would like to know that these questions have been answered, because once the worlds eyes look into this investigation they are real questions that any investigator should have answered now they have arisen.
Portugal is a part of the EU so there will be eyes being brought to bear upon this case, with the truth being brought out into the light, rather than hidden under the carpet of reality by the corrupt Portuguese Establishment!
Was this apartment empty on the night in question?
Who owned the apartment?
Did Robert Murat or anyone who is associated with him have access to this apartment considering him and his girlfriend both work within the property industry in the Algarve?
Cant be too hard can it to answer those questions if you have not already.
If you have, good, if you haven't then shows more incompetence and you should hurry up and do it because EU eyes will be coming down upon you at some point in the future.
The chief suspect in the abduction of the little girl is Robert Murat who has given Portuguese police a false alibi about his movements on the night in question which is supported by his elderly mother, even though there are 8 witnesses to say he is lying compared to his one witness, his mother who is also lying to cover for her son.
Who do you think a jury would believe?
The two more witnesses whose identities and stories have just been released into the public domain, are not witnesses who have just come forward after 8 months of watching the media coverage of this case, these two people both gave detailed statements to Leicetershire police in May after returning from their holiday in Portugal, approximately a week after the night Madeline was abducted.
Their information has now been released into the public domain because the Portuguese police investigating this crime have done absolutely nothing about their evidence even though what they saw makes them 'star witnesses' and sheds light onto the events of the night in question because they were there with eyes observing their surroundings in the time frame of history that Madeline McCann was abducted.
There is no literal evidence yet linking anyone to any crime, but there are witnesses whose perceptions help paint a picture of events for us to drawn a conclusion from.
8 different sets of eyes observing the same person in the vicinity of a crime scene during the course of the evening of the night in question is pretty damning evidence do you not think?
What they viewed is factual evidence because their eyese saw it and their brains saved the information!
You can try to discount several of the witnesses as unreliable but out of 8 witnesses you have to be utterly stupid to try and discount your clients guilt Mr Pagarete, do you not agree?
Is it not now your responsibility to limit the damage to your client and his mother Mr Pagarete, meaning the charges they are now going to face over this crime and negotiating a deal so that the truth will be told, if not and you would happily go to trial on behalf of your client Robert Murat even though there are 8 witnesses against you, does this not call into question your suitability as a lawyer?
Robert Murat is sticking to his story though that he was at home with his elderly mother all night.
We know for a fact that Robert Murat has access to inside information relating to this crime because he worked as a translator for the police at the beginning stages of the investigation, he has worked with the Portuguese police before and he has friends on the inside of this investigation.
There comes a point though when the whole world will say "Come on, what are you playing at?", and people of great influence will hold those in charge of this investigation to account in view of the whole world so that justice will prevail.
There is an innocent little girl missing and her innocent parents being blamed when you have this man who is chief suspect in this crime lying to the police - Why am I a nobody from nowhere having to write my thoughts down because of such an injustice?
I stand in the knowledge that if I can see it, and am speaking it then the Living God can see it too, and I rest assured in the fact that He knows more than me and will make sure that justice and mercy will prevail.
These two new witnesses have stated that they saw two men in an apartment that overlooked the swimming pool on the night Madeline was abducted, they believed this apartment was empty because the shutters were down (you can tell if an apartment is empty or not).
Ideal location to survey the families with children in the complex without being seen dont you think?
The only thing is, is that one of the people who was seen in the empty apartment is not your master criminal so went out onto the balcony to smoke and was thankfully spotted.
This puts two people acting suspiciously in the vicinity of the crime scene on the night in question.
The whole world who are watching this case unfold would like to know that these questions have been answered, because once the worlds eyes look into this investigation they are real questions that any investigator should have answered now they have arisen.
Portugal is a part of the EU so there will be eyes being brought to bear upon this case, with the truth being brought out into the light, rather than hidden under the carpet of reality by the corrupt Portuguese Establishment!
Was this apartment empty on the night in question?
Who owned the apartment?
Did Robert Murat or anyone who is associated with him have access to this apartment considering him and his girlfriend both work within the property industry in the Algarve?
Cant be too hard can it to answer those questions if you have not already.
If you have, good, if you haven't then shows more incompetence and you should hurry up and do it because EU eyes will be coming down upon you at some point in the future.
28 December 2007
Robert Murat - The poisonous spider caught in his own web
2 more credible witnesses have come forward to say that they saw Robert Murat on the night Madeline was abducted, this puts the number of independent witnesses who say they saw him on the night in question to 8.How can he escape justice now and why has he and his mother not been interrogated yet to find out why he lied to Portuguese police about his movements?
He has placed his elderly mother in the position of 'perverting the course of justice', which is a charge punishable by a lengthy prison term of which Mother Murat would never see the light of day again if charged.
Is it about time Robert Murat told the truth for the sake of his mother?
If not lock her up and throw away the key so that justice will be served on those who are complicit in the abduction of an innocent little 4 year old girl whilst she slept innocently in her bed.
Nothing more abhorrent.
I watched the sky news documentary on this case and a local witness stated that there was no way Robert Murat was in the area on the night in question because all of the locals were searching and never saw him, and that it was only 3 people who did see him, accusing 3 of the Tapas 9 of lying, this adds another 5 independent witnesses to the Tapas 3.
How stupid is the local woman who supported Robert Murat on the Sky news documentary, how will she feel for the rest of her life when she supported this man on camera? She stated that many locals were out searching the night Madeline was abducted and none of them saw him, were all of the locals looking for Madeline at or outside her apartment all night or were they looking in the local community no where near the apartment?
Robert Murat was not standing outside the complex all night with a sign around his neck, he was there and gone during the course of the evening hoping no one would see him.
I doubt any local who knew Murat spent any time near the complex that night, Robert Murat was not out in the local town searching, he was seen loitering around the vicinity of the complex, were none of the locals went, so it is quite obvious that no locals saw him on the night in question, the ones to see him were those on holiday in the complex and those who worked in the complex.
Helped support the Sky new documentary makers theory of the parents guilt though for the world to watch dont you think - Those terrible lying Tapas 3, lying for the parents to cover up their crime
Trial by media and Sky news' guilt.
The Sky news documentary was another poor piece of journalism that inadvertently laid blame at the parents feet again, those who made it believe the parents are guilty so used this documentary to state that fact and then showed it to the world - Using this case for their own ends
I hope that once this is ended if there are any grounds for the McCann family to su that they will, for the sake of their daughter.
We await the next bit of news stating that Robert Murat has been arrested.
If you ask my opinion, the ex husband of Murat's girlfriend is the one to crack out of that group.
Daily Mail: 2 more witnesses
Further reading: Dumb and Dumber
Further reading: Dumb, Dumber & Off the scale Dumb
Further reading: Madeline McCann - Coincidence's
Further reading: Robert Murat & his Mother - The noose around their...
Further reading: Robert Murat - Running scared
Further reading: Mother Murat – Perverting the course of Justice
Further reading: Robert Murat - A profile
Further reading: Michaela Walczuch - The Questions
Further reading: Portuguese police - The historic mistake
Further reading: The unpluggable hole in Murat's alibi
Further reading: Portuguese immunity - Robert Murat
Further reading: Madeline McCann - Photo's say a thousand words
Further reading: Portuguese police - The historic mistake
Further reading: The unpluggable hole in Murat's alibi
Further reading: Portuguese immunity - Robert Murat
Further reading: Madeline McCann - Photo's say a thousand words
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
blog posts
