British exports under threat

Further reading: My role as a spy in London

By Glen Jenvey Reporting from London exclusive for asian tribune

Shariah4India run by a man called Mizanur Rahman AKA Abu Barra who say’s ‘’its alright to kill the Queen’’ http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=4b5_1239147887 lost the UK for its insult to India a several billion pound defence deal ,this was one of the world's biggest defence deals lost because MI5 and the Police can’t crack down on Al-qaeda inside the UK.

The French firm Dassault has emerged as the best bid for a $10bn (£6.3bn) contract to supply India jet fighters a personal friend of mine who I’m still in contact with who spoke for some time to me about the contract said at one time India was looking into buying British military equipment.

I advised him to look at other countries as well as the UK stopped supplying spare parts to Sri Lanka during the war due to LTTE pressure put on government ministers and the Sri Lankan Government was forced to go to eastern europe for new weapons arranged by my old boss chris who became second in charge of the NIBS for the whole of Sri Lanka.

One of my personal friends I have spoken with on the matter is: LT. GEN. SUDHIR SHARMA Retired from the Indian Army in the year 2008, after four decades of an illustrious and brilliant career of selfless service to the nation .

During his career he has seen active service in India and other countries and has held very critical and challenging appointments in higher echelons of defence management, including a diplomatic assignment in London as the Defence Attaché’ of India where I would have dinner with him or he would come down to me in Salisbury Wiltshire.

He commanded the largest operational force in the world and led the logistics and administration of the 1.3 million strong Indian Army in his last assignment before retirement.

General Sharma, an acknowledged expert relating to national security and anti terrorism matters is very highly regarded in the defence arena, wherein his exemplary leadership and astute strategic thinking has earned him many prestigious awards and commendations, including one for gallantry .He has been felicitated with awards by the Presidents of India on two occasions for his leadership and devotion to the country.

He was one person insulted by the British police failure to act on terrorists supporting al-qaeda and Kashmiri terrorist based in London.I would sit chatting in his office about the links for hours and via email.

The current deputy head of the Indian military intelligence who name i’m not allowed to disclose told me we have the greatest respect for the British People and Armed services and the Queen the head of the commonwealth,but when you look at the security nightmare we all face in this global war on terrorism, how can the UK expect us to share information or trust so called partners who allow open insults and threats to our security.

He went on to say look at London only this week with flags of the LTTE and 1500 terrorist supporters insulting a guest of the Queen this would not be allowed in India the LTTE are still a ban international terrorist group, the LTTE is the only separatist militant organization to assassinate two world leaders, Sri Lankan President Ranasinghe Premadasa in 1993 and former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi in 1991 .But the British police allowed this demonstration to take place are they RACISTS towards our leaders? do their corrupt press rule their country? and make government laws and policies this was a insult.

It’s quite clear the British government policy on terrorism is far from clear for the police to act ,that’s down to poor leadership from the top.MI5 is a wash of experts with no vision or common sense in my view but yes it was interesting how the British media insulted the Sri Lankan president. many years ago the police would not act on another terror cell in London http://www.cbsnews.com/2100-18563_162-636344.html

This is when another personal friend of mine the Russian military attache who was a fsb officers helped me expose Hamza with other diplomats . He also told me inside the Russian Embassy that Moscow had a problem with Nazi gangs on the streets? so to cure the problem the order was given for the army to dress in civilian clothes and attack them. the gangs soon went away,

This story i once told to Patrick Mercer MP over lunch at st john’s chapel near westminster a place his parents got married at, with a reporter Russell mere for the Sunday People a British newspaper ,But added that the EDL A peaceful demostration group should be allowed to address the Al-qaeda problem the next time they insult the public. Patrick felt it was a good idea even as an MP and he was a senior Government minister in the cabinet , I know you would see no terrorist group based in the country like we are all seeing hushed up by a D notice (a british government reporting ban) .

Is the UK exporting terrorism and hatred yes! But it is sure not exporting planes to India.!

Shariah4India http://www.anjemchoudary.com/press-releases/the-shariah-4-hind-campaign-will-continue-until-islam-rules-in-dia Is a Racist site towards other faiths and linked to other radicals ,if members of the Police or public wish to ask why they have put British jobs on the line please call.

Sheikh Omar Bakri Muhammad – Founder of Al-Muhajiroun, Islamic Scholar & expert in Islamic movements – 00961 70957759

Anjem Choudary – Lecturer in Shari’ah & Manager of the Shari’ah Court of the UK – 0044 7956 600 569

Abu Baraa – Lecturer in Shari’ah & Chairman of Shari’ah4Hind – 0044 7856 827 605

Abu Rumaysah – Islamic Activist & Spokesman for Shari’ah4Hind & Former Hindu – 0044 7956 041 034

Sane or Insane Norwegian Government have already determined

VG: Secret hospital for Breivik

Quote: For the first time the government has now confirmed that Breivik's future address is Ila, whatever the outcome of the trial. - We are building a high-security psychiatric hospital in-Ila. Preparations are in full swing, but it remains a formal approval of the hospital of the Health Directorate, said Robin Koss (AP), State Secretary in the Ministry of Health, told VG Nett.

In complete secrecy from the Norwegian public their Government have been building a special hospital psychiatric wing for Breivik where they say that he will be placed whether found 'sane' or 'insane'.

Is that part of the Democratic process?

Breivik should be punished for his heinous crimes that were a crime against humanity but how can the Norwegian Government dictate where he spends the rest of his life which is supposed to be down to the justice system and is the whole point of the trial and the case being played out in front of the Worlds media that will determine whether he is 'sane' or 'insane'.

Is it a kangaroo court for the media and public?

The Norwegian Government have completely over-ruled the 'rule of law' and Democratic process.

Can they do that?

"When those who make the law break the law in the name of the law then there is no law."

The Norwegian Government cover-up is becoming much more clearer now.

Further reading: The "secret" group

Daily Telegraph's Freudian slip

Daily Telegraph: Atleast 100 people support Breivik

I was reading the Telegraph article about people supporting Breivik and came across the journalists Freudian slip in his article. It should say that Breivik detonated his bomb in the government quarters of Oslo, instead it says Moscow.

Maybe the government quarters of Oslo are more like Moscow now so it is quite a fitting Freudian slip, especially if the current Norwegian AUF Labour government plc is nice and tightly tucked up bed with their new bigger Russian owners in Moscow.

Other people know the answer to that question, I am just speculating from my view point...

I wonder what the Norwegian people would think if they knew that they were now controlled by-proxy by Russia through their democraticly elected AUF Labour Government, (helped along by 'Operation Breivik') if that is what is happening?

Control the government and you control the Country which includes access to the black gold in the North sea.

'Operation Breivik' worked well for someone (plural)?

Breivik possibly trained by former KGB agents and an ex-Soviet Colonel in Belarus after possibly teaming up with anti-Nato anti-Western Serbians via Liberia who taught him the art of terrorism and political science.

But the current Norwegian State controllers of the Breivik script deny he is connected to anyone and want the whole World to believe he woke up one day after a 5 year schizophrenic episode that nobody saw and then carried out his terrorist attacks without being trained anywhere that made him the most successful "solo terrorist" of all time, whilst psychotic, for no other reason than his right-wing beliefs that emanate from minor experiences growing up.

Then nobody will look at the bigger picture that surrounds him.

Breivik the son of a former Norwegian government diplomat to London, step son of a former Norwegian Army Major and best friend of a Norwegian Ministry of Defence Lawyer connected to no one?

They control the 'official' script and they control the media so the World has to believe what they are told through the media from inside Norway concerning Breivik even if it is a lie to cover-up the real truth.

Further reading: Hidden in plain sight

Russia warns Finland over Nato membership

VG: Russia warns Finland

Maybe the Scandinavian Countries is where a New Cold War is now being played out in today's changing geo-political World with emerging Nations aligning themselves or carrying out asymmetric warfare in the age of oil & gas crisis as we enter the downward slope after the peak of Earth's natural deposits of oil.

Norway is critical for Russian interests in the Scandinavian Countries and has been in negotiations for almost 20 years for access to Norway's last deposits of natural oil & gas.

Is the AUF Labour Government a pro-Russian Government?

The Norwegian's know how close to the mark I am on that one.

'Operation Breivik' could quite possibly mean a pro-Russian AUF Labour Government for another 20 years which suits both parties as they exploit the Norwegian people's inherited natural wealth, with a select few at the top making billions from the deal.

Further reading: Danish Professor sent to prison for espionage

Further reading: Hidden in plain sight

A voice or reason in the midst of insanity

Dagbladet: Judgement possibly adjourned till August 24th

It does not look like it is going to be a Norwegian State sanctioned "full house" over their attempted cover-up of the real truth behind Breivik. They have those who have been in control of the police investigation for the past 10 months which includes the PST, they have their willing State prosecutors propagating the police's 'official' conclusion in the court room, and they have the psychiatric commission now endorsing the first flawed State sanctioned psychiatric report. All controlled by the AUF Labour Government "secret group" directing the proceedings towards their intended goals which is completely against the expected transparency of the Democratic process we expect within a European Democracy.

It leaves no other explanation other than a high level Government sanctioned cover-up of the truth.

The Norwegian judges obviously do not want any accusations leveled at them that reflects on their legal institution which could bring the whole Norwegian justice system into disrepute more than it is already (in my opinion) so are taking the wise and necessary step of prolonging Breivik's judgement day when they have to pass their sentence on him of 'sane' or 'insane' in front of the Worlds media which means prison or life on a mental ward.

Considering the investigation into Breivik is still ongoing now while you are reading this even though the present State script controlled by those State elements above have determined he is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one who is 'insane' which is a paradox in itself, it would not look good for the court to pass sentence on him on that basis only for the ongoing police investigation to reveal the first State script was completely wrong and that Breivik was actually connected to people.

It is the difference between passing the sentence of 'sane' or 'insane'.

To pass sentence now only to be shown at a later date that the sentence was wrong would completely destroy the integrity and impartiality of the court in the eyes of everyone, so taking the step of leaving sentencing to possibly 8 weeks away gives the new investigation team enough time to fully investigate the remaining unanswered questions and lines of enquiry which could completely change everything and contradict the long standing 'official' story surrounding Breivik the so called "solo terrorist" connected to no one and implicate others in his atrocities.

Thus he would then be judged 'sane'.

Time will tell...

Getting to the bottom of the truth behind the cold blooded murder of a group of innocent Norwegian children on their summer camp in the name of politics has got to come far above protecting the reputations of people who are servants of the people and not the other way around. Reputations can be rebuilt over a life time where as the dead are gone forever so all that is left is their memory and their memory deserves that the whole truth be known as to why they were taken from this life in such a barbaric way at such an early age.

Nothing less should be expected by the families and those in whom the families place their trust in.

Was Breivik the son of a former Government diplomat to London, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a lawyer from the Ministry of Defence a "solo terrorist" connected to nobody who is 'insane', so there is no explanation behind his acts or is he a recruited agent, enlisted into a secret influential group who have an political agenda in Norway and beyond.

This is the question.

The present Norwegian State actors controlling the Breivik script want the World to believe he is a "solo terrorist" connected to no one, where as I disagree with that based upon the evidence.

My belief is in a stronger position than their belief because there are still unanswered questions and lines of investigation that need to be fully examined as part of the still ongoing investigation which could completely contradict their belief.

They are at the end of the road with their belief and are now propagating it in the court room in front of the Worlds media even though the police investigation is still ongoing behind the scenes - The Paradox

The present State actors controlled by the "secret group" have ruled out any other possibilities and made their decelerations through the media as part of their trial by media to secure the verdict they want in the eyes and minds of the public.

How will it look if they are wrong?

What will the eventual outcome be?

Breivik cannot get out of the punishment for his crimes whether 'sane' or 'insane', but this is about much more than that now, and if there were others involved with him then they should be held to account for their complicity and not be protected by the current Norwegian State apparatus for reasons unknown at this moment in time.

I have my own reasons and motivations for wanting to get to the bottom of the truth that encompasses the memory of the young people who lost their lives at the hands of Breivik on July 22nd 2011 and whoever he is involved with.

Hopefully the high level international observers watching this case unfold will have their eyes personally on the final stages of the Norwegian police investigation to make sure there is impartiality and neutrality in the eyes of everyone for the sake of Democracy that we are so proudly attempting to promote in the Arab World so there can be no claims of a State sanctioned cover-up that we lesser mere mortals have no ability to stop if that is what is actually happening.

Hopefully there will be a department in the UN overseeing this too, seen as though the one in the Hague has done absolutely nothing to make sure 'truth & justice' prevails in Norway.

Any Norwegian police investigation team has to be completely different from the one that has come to the current 'official' conclusion about Breivik otherwise they are going to come to exactly the same conclusion which is not impartiality or transparency and will always leave the accusation of a continued cover-up if they do come to the same conclusion.

Considering this is all about politics the police investigation team tasked with investigating the final lines of enquiry should be endorsed by all of the opposition political parties in Norway which is impartiality and is different from having a "secret group" controlling everything from behind the scenes outside of the legal Democratic process which is criminal in nature.

But they are above and beyond the law because they are Norway's political rulers and above suspicion and criticism because they have committed their acts in the name of Utoya..

Then nobody can complain at the final Norwegian police's investigative conclusion whatever professional conclusion they come too.

In my personal opinion anyway, as someone who wants to see 'truth & justice' prevail which is in stark contrast to what is currently happening in Norway.

The Norwegian police say there are 3 witnesses still not identified from the manifesto, 2 women and Breivik's alleged English 'mentor' 'Richard the Lionheart'.

This means that everyone else inside the manifesto has been identified and are real human beings so there is no reason to doubt that 'Richard the Lionheart' is a real human being too so needs to be identified as a critical piece of evidence.

If this person is eventually identified it will completely contradict the current Norwegian State claim of Breivik having no physical or mental help behind his attacks.

Hopefully the British Security Services will assist an impartial Norwegian police investigation into Alan Ayling and his known friend 'Richard the Lionheart' and their mutual associates.

Further reading: Questions surrounding Alan Lake

There are many more unanswered questions like where did Breivik learn his bomb making skills, did he attend training camps in Belarus etc which would mean he had physical help, but one questions stands out to me at this moment in time that hopefully the American Security Services could help an impartial Norwegian police investigation out with and that is whether or not the Norwegian who sent Pamella Geller an email was Breivik or someone else. This would confirm or deny Breivik's claim of there being other cells in Norway ready to strike.

Further reading: Breivik or another Norwegian nut

Some questions surrounding Alan Lake

(Click image to enlarge)

Alan Lake director behind the hijacked English Defence League, real name Alan Ayling who works for the prestigious EU controlled European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (that is linked to Russia and the Balkans) as his day job was interviewed by the British police under observation of the Norwegians over his possible role as the English 'mentor' behind Breivik.

So there is a legal witness statement in the Breivik case files concerning his interview.

The most important question is; who is his friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

Considering Breivik claims to have been mentored by someone using the codename 'Richard the Lionheart' and Ayling who was interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' has a friend involved in the same right-wing political movement in the UK using that name, and the Norwegian police have said they are still looking to uncover the identity of this person from Breivik's manifesto, it is a crucial and critical question that still needs answering as part of the still on-going investigation.

Also what is the full background of his Norwegian secretary?

The Norwegian press did a good job locating Alpha Kallon, better than the Norwegian police themselves, so it will be interesting to see whether or not they report on Alan Ayling and his Norwegian connections in their newspapers considering he had a mickey mouse interview over his possible involvement in the events in their Country, he has direct Norwegian connections, and he is linked to someone calling himself 'Richard the Lionheart'.

The Norwegian police have said they are still looking to uncover this persons identity so it is a relevant piece of information.

Who knows what the background of his connections would reveal.

This question is another key question; who is his friend in the Norwegian Government? (check image above)

Hopefully that question is answered in the Breivik case files?

If not why not?

Probably because those behind Breivik do not want the full truth to be known and linking Ayling to members of the Norwegian AUF would be extremely damaging for all concerned, which is why he has been shielded from the investigation.

The old Norwegian State sanctioned police investigation team should be sacked and replaced with an impartial team endorsed by all political parties in Norway in the interest of neutrality. A team that wants to do its job properly and get to the bottom of the full truth in the interest of 'truth & justice' and not be used as a political tool for political purposes by a "secret group" when many innocent Norwegian children lay dead with many more maimed and injured for life in the name of politics.

Possible English 'mentor' linked to members of the ruling Labour party.

I wonder which Norwegian newspaper or foreign media outlet is going to scoop that one and shatter the global perception created by the current Norwegian State apparatus in their trial by media to secure the story they want the World to believe?

Connect Alan Ayling and then where in Norway does it lead because he has publicly stated he has friends in the political scene in Norway, just like he has friends in the political scene in Sweden.

Considering those who died on July 22nd 2011 were all Norwegian Labour party members apart from the innocent bystanders at the Government building, Ayling's friend has to be a member of the Norwegian Labour party to have lost friends at both sites.

That is just basic logic...

So who is the person he mentions in his public statement over the events in Norway?

Alan Ayling who is directly involved in extreme right-wing politics being directly linked to those involved in left-wing politics in Norway, if it is correct.

How would that look?

Hopefully the families of Utoya along with their legal representatives will press the Norwegian police for the answer to these questions that are crucial to knowing the full truth behind their children's cold blooded murders in the name of politics, even if to just disprove this line of investigation that is still open.

I was accused of being the English 'mentor' and have absolutely no connections in Norway, Alan Ayling was given a mickey mouse interview over his possible role as the English 'mentor' and he has connections possibly right into the ruling Government which needs to be confirmed or denied.

I hope that the international observers following the case will want to know the answer to these questions too, in the interest of 'truth & justice' for those innocent Norwegian children murdered in the name of politics.

Correcting terrorism expert Peter Neumann

Dagbladet: Peter Neumann

Quote: Peter Neumann, one of Europe's leading authorities on radicalization and terrorism and the founder and head of the International Centre for the Study of Radicalisation at King's College London, is in Oslo.

Either Dagbladet have misreported Mr. Neumann or he does not know what he is talking about concerning the case in question and uses his credentials to pass statements in the media about terrorism cases that are completely false and misleading.

He is the expert because look at his credentials, so he must be right is most people's perception.

He has used the case of the British Islamic fundamentalist Roshonara Choudry to compare her with Breivik as a "solo terrorist" radicalised through Youtube.

Firstly Roshonara Choudary carried out an attempted murder of 1 British MP. Breivik blew up his Government building killing 8, then went to an island and massacred nearly 100 innocent children and left a 1500 page manifesto in the public domain that he had been writing for almost 10 years all in one day.

There is not much comparison there.

Quote: A girl from London, Roshonara Choudry, looked at a number of extreme Youtube videos, so armed with a knife and went to the British MP Stephen Timms and stabbed him nearly to death in 2010. After it became part of the videos that had radicalized her removed, he said.

This statement by Mr. Neumann makes it look like Miss Choudry was an archetypal 'lone wolf' who had no contact with anyone and was just radicalised online from watching Youtube videos (of course she watched them), became inspired and then went out and attempted to murder a British MP based solely on being radicalised through Youtube without having any direct communication with anyone who could have encouraged her which is completely false and misleading.

A British ideological Al Qaeda member Bilal Ahmed had been commanding followers of the Jihad in the UK to kill British MP's as part of their Holy War, and it was due to this command by Ahmed that Choudry went out to commit her terrorist act.

(Glenn Jenvey broke the story and passed me the inside info before any newspapers picked up on it).

She was also in direct communication with other supporters and followers of the Jihad via extreme Jihadi forums which is where she was recruited and radicalised to go out and commit her acts upon someone else's command.

She was not a 'lone wolf' connected to no one who woke up one day after being inspired by watching Youtube videos to go out and attempt to kill a British MP as the newspaper would lead you to believe if you did not know the facts.

She was connected to an ideological movement and was acting on instructions by other members of that ideological movement.

That is in no way a 'lone wolf' connected to no one inspired solely through Youtube without any direct involvement by a third party as Mr. Neumann would like you to believe so as to fit Breivik and her in the same box. It is completely false and misleading.

Bilal Ahmed is now serving 12 years for his 'incitement to murder' as part of the Choudry case.

The reason I know about this case is the fact that Bilal Ahmed was investigated as part of the same enquiry he received 12 years for, for his 'incitement to murder me'.

2 days after standing accused of being Breivik's English 'mentor' I received a call from West Midlands Police notifying me that Ahmed had just been sentenced to 12 years and that his incitement to murder me was investigated as part of the same enquiry only they did not need to prosecute him for it because they had him for the attempted murder of Stephen Timm's MP linked to Roshonara Choudry.

Peter Neumann should reconsider his statement to Dagbladet and amend it considering his professional reputation is on the line seen as though he has passed a professional opinion on such a large international terrorism case that reflects upon the organisation he set up that almost certainly gets large amounts of Government funding to report on international terrorism for the Government.

It does not look very good does it?

His view about Breivik being a "solo terrorist" inspired only be the internet based upon his bogus example of Choudry that was taken from wikipedia is seriously questionable too.

But he is the professional, look at his credentials...

The Secret Norwegian Labour party July 22nd group

Aftenposten: Secret 22nd July group

A "secret group" of Norwegian Labour party members holding high positions within Norway led by the party Secretary was set up in the aftermath of July 22nd to direct proceedings towards their intended goals. Interfering with the Norwegian police's official role along with the health care professionals charged with overseeing Breivik.

All high ranking Norwegian Labour party stooges in positions of power over the Breivik case.

Surprise surprise they never took minutes of their group discussions either so there is absolutely no trace of this groups intentions, so they operated in complete secrecy.

That is probably why you have a complete white-wash and cover-up of the truth surrounding Breivik with the Norwegian police's 'official' conclusion of Breivik the "solo terrorist" connected to no one, accompanied with a bogus and flawed psychiatric report that seeks to endorse this claim in the public eye with the 'insane' label which was written by 2 State appointed psychiatrists along with the psychiatric commission doing its utmost to now secure this label on Breivik by undermining the second impartial psychiatric report that was carried out on-behalf of the families of Utoya and other leading health care professionals who criticised the findings of the first report.

What more proof do you want of a Norwegian Government cover-up of the truth?

This political group was set up outside the boundaries of the normal and current Norwegian State apparatus that should operate with transparency before the Norwegian people and worked completely independently from the State.

A politically motivated "secret group"...

All opposition political parties in Norway should start exposing the blatant inconsistencies in their ruling Government and start holding them to account in the media now that there is World wide media attention surrounding the events of July 22nd 2011 and the subsequent trial that is now underway.

There must be a host of international observers watching the proceedings with interest so legitimate voices of discontent will be heard I should imagine.

There should be UN observers brought in on the case considering it was a politically motivated massacre of a bunch of innocent children, then let them come to an impartial conclusion concerning Breivik and any other people's involvement with him.

Further reading: Breivik is one big cover-story

Breivik is one big cover-story

Update: The Secret July 22nd group

Further reading: Hidden in plain sight

To challenge the ‘official’ story surrounding Breivik in no way means supporting him of defending him it is a matter of getting to the bottom of the ‘truth’ in the interest of ‘justice’ in the case, and truth and justice for me means getting to the bottom of who set me up to be the fall guy for events in Norway, and for the families of Utoya it is about getting to the bottom of the full truth behind their children’s cold blooded murders in the name of politics.

Which one below is more believable?

Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one who was recruited, radicalised, trained and financed from the confines of his bedroom in his mother’s home whilst playing computer games who went out and committed the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century whilst leaving behind a terror manual in perfect English for any followers to copy in the name of his right-wing politics, with there still evidence not yet fully investigated to support this ‘official’ claim that could disprove this claim.

Or

Breivik the son of a former Government diplomat, step son of an Army Major and best friend of a lawyer from the Norwegian Ministry of Defence being a recruited agent into a secretive group who had a political agenda in Norway which is in-line with Breivik’s own story behind his actions with the evidence not yet investigated possibly confirming this.

As all evidence stands I go with the latter which is contradictory to the Norwegian State’s ‘official’ opinion which is the former.

Which do you choose?

The Norwegian State are now fighting tooth and nail to secure the ‘insane’ label on Breivik which would make their ‘official’ story sound more convincing to the public. The only thing with this though is that pretty much everyone except the State actors attempting to secure the ‘insane’ label on Breivik have not seen any signs of mental illness in him.

I find it amazing that after 33 years if Breivik was a schizophrenic as the first State sanctioned report claims then he had not one single schizophrenic or psychotic episode in his life prior to July 22nd 2011 that resulted in hospitalisation. Nobody who ever encountered him saw anything out of the ordinary in his mental state of mind, even his local Freemason lodge who accepted him into their fraternity.

Any abnormalities in his normal behaviour quoted from friends was down to his planning for July 22nd 2011.

Yet we are to believe from the Norwegian State that he is a schizophrenic and was psychotic at the time of his terrorist attacks.

If Breivik woke up one day and committed acts of violence for no reason and motive other than it was all in his head with no explanation then the ‘insane’ label would fit him perfectly.

This is not what happened, Breivik planned his terrorist attacks over a lengthy period of time as the evidence shows and he has logical reason and justification for them within the framework of his stated beliefs. Beliefs that are held by a large number of people all over the world, but who would not commit the terrorist acts he committed.

Part of Breivik’s ideology comes from an ideological movement that has many influential leading political and military figures attached to it.

Are they all ‘insane’?

So the ‘insane’ label does not fit the person in my personal opinion, just like the ‘official’ story surrounding Breivik does not fit the evidence.

You decide for yourself what you think.

Is it out of the realms of possibility that Breivik was recruited by a well connected group of individuals in Norway because of his family background, who assigned him his English ‘mentor’ specifically to prepare him for a terrorist attack in Norway that would result in pre-planned political results that were in the benefit of the group?

Norway is the 3rd richest Nation on Earth and has one of the last and largest remaining natural oil & gas deposits in the World.

Could this be motivation enough for a secretive group to plan ‘Operation Breivik’ along with the large amount of money that is at stake?

Hundreds of billions of dollars and more.

Is it beyond the realms of possibility that Russia had a hand on some level behind ‘Operation Breivik’ considering they have been in negotiations for almost 20 years with the Norwegians over access to the oil & gas deposits in Norway’s territorial waters?

Further reading: Hidden in plain sight

If Breivik was a “solo terrorist” connected to no one who is ‘insane’ like the ‘official’s’ in Norway want the world to believe then no because there is no bigger story surrounding Breivik and its cased closed.

But if Breivik the son of a former Government diplomat, step son of a former Army Major and best friend of a lawyer from the Norwegian Ministry of Defence was a recruited agent then the answer is yes and the case is still open.

You make your own mind up on that one like I have.

It was revealed in the newspapers last week that a Professor in Denmark has just been sent to prison for espionage on-behalf of Russia so Russian influence in the Scandinavian Countries cannot be ruled out. They carry out espionage in America and the UK so why not Norway where they have a vested oil & gas interest which is in-line with their long term National interests.

If Breivik was a recruited agent, recruited into a pre-planned political agenda, it would mean that his recruiters knew the long term plan and the goal. The intelligent minds behind such acts which are in-line with espionage just like the Professor who has been sent to prison in Denmark.

Someone had to just guide Breivik along until the right time.

There was a lot in the Norwegian media last week concerning the Norwegian police’s ‘official’ story surrounding Breivik and his cover stories based upon police witness testimonies given to the court.

A cover story is exactly that, a story to cover up something else to hide all traces of the truth.

If Breivik was a recruited agent enlisted by a secretive group to carry out his terrorist attacks for political purposes then his recruiters would have been well versed in the art of espionage and covert secret service work.

They would have trained their recruit to the best of their ability for the end result they wanted.

Any secret service agent working in the field now on-behalf of their Government as you are reading this is living and operating undercover and has his/her cover stories in place, it’s the first and most basic ‘law’ of espionage.

A foreign power does not know the spy is a spy, that’s just basic logic, they believe they are something completely different because of the cover-story.

It covers-up the truth.

A cover story has to be as real to life as humanly possible because if they are ever found out then their cover-story has to hold up under scrutiny otherwise it could cost them their lives.

So those well versed in espionage know their art very well and pass that knowledge on to their recruits.

A lot of emphasis has been put on Breivik’s Liberia trip for blood diamonds which he says was a cover-story, but the Norwegian police who have conducted the investigation so far do not believe him because all of the traceable evidence shows that he was intimately actively involved in working out the diamond business.

If Breivik was told by his recruiters to create the blood diamond story as his cover-story then they would have advised him to do the research necessary so that if he was exposed during the course of the 10 year planning stage behind July 22nd 2001 then he had his cover-story in place.

The blood diamond cover-story running alongside the real under cover reason for his Liberia trip.

A cover-story is not a cover-story unless you actually know what you are talking about and there are provable links.

The Norwegian police do not understand this logic though because it conflicts with their ‘official’ story surrounding Breivik because they cannot find any evidence to the contrary.

The whole reason of a cover-story.

Because they cannot find the evidence does not mean it is not real it just means they cannot find the evidence which is why the cover-story was created in the first place and is the first rule when trying to cover your tracks. Hide the truth.

You have to look at everything in light of Breivik’s acts on July 22nd 2011.

If Breivik was a recruited agent would his recruiters not have educated him in the art of espionage?

Breivik’s cover-story worked well because now when the Norwegian police look back because of his terrorist acts they cannot see anything other than his cover-story and it deflects all attention from the truth and real reason he has said he was in Liberia during the civil war there.

The art of espionage…

The Norwegian police also believe the real reason behind Breivik’s trips to certain Countries (cant remember which) where he opened up bank accounts was solely for opening up the bank accounts for his fake diploma scam where as Breivik says he met people connected to the network he is connected to.

Is this another cover-story behind the real reason he was there in the Country?

He had to have a reason for being there other than meeting war criminals or former Soviet KGB agents from Far West LCC if this is what he really did.

The Norwegian police believe that the bank accounts were opened up as part of Breivik’s online diploma scam.

Was this scam a cover-story for his group to send him money?

They could not just send hundreds of thousands of dollars to him so had to have an alternate way of sending him the money. They would have had to have taught him the art of international money funneling too which is probably why he opened up 13 accounts in 7 different Countries.

If he was in one of those Countries to meet a member of the network then why not use opening up the bank account as a cover-story thus killing 2 birds with one stone?

If so it worked well just like with the Liberia cover-story because the Norwegian police have formed their ‘official’ conclusion on this basis.

Also if the bank accounts were for his online diploma scam then why open bank accounts in his own name in foreign Countries and then wash the money through his own mother’s accounts if he was trying to disguise his tracks?

That does not seem very logical.

The Norwegian police believe the $600,000 he washed through his mother’s accounts probably came from the online scam which is not definitely and leaves an air of doubt.

Either it was or it wasn’t which is it?

Considering they know who made the fake diploma’s it only takes the simplest mathematical skills to add up whether it was or not.

2 + 2 = 4

Was money funneled to Breivik through those international accounts he was also using for his online scam from members of his group or was the $600,000 all from selling fake diploma’s?

$600,000 is an awful lot of money to earn from an online fake diploma scam if you ask me.

Who taught Breivik the failed business man and high school drop out the art of international banking where he then went on to make $600,000?

Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake who I believe is the real English ‘mentor’ works inside the prestigious European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and has multiple money funneling companies located around the World.

I believe that washing the money through his mother’s accounts was one of his biggest mistakes if not the only mistake he made. One of those times where you do something then think in hindsight “why did I do that”.

His mother is now a co-conspirator to his acts which places him in a dilemma if the Norwegian police used this piece of evidence in the right way, only they do not know what they are doing which is why they have not cracked him.

I don’t think they want to crack him anyway because to crack him would shatter their ‘official’ story that is being propagated in front of the World’s media by the State prosecutors, supported by the State sanctioned psychiatric report and endorsed by the psychiatric commission and would reveal the bigger story surrounding him that they do not want revealing because of what it means.

A serious dilemma.

Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one who is ‘insane’ means there is no bigger story surrounding him and it is this that the Norwegian State are fighting tooth and nail to secure contrary to ‘truth & justice’ that you would expect when 69 innocent Norwegian children lay dead with many more maimed and injured for life.

There should be UN observers on this one considering it was a massacre of innocent children in the name of politics, and then maybe ‘truth & justice’ would prevail.

The other piece of evidence that emerged was the fact that Breivik bought an expensive pen when he was on his way to London in 2002 directly after his Liberia trip.

Is it a coincidence that Breivik bought an “expensive” pen which signifies what he was about to sit down and do?

Write a 1500 page manifesto on-behalf of the group he is connected to.

Call it a finger print when looking back which I think is what those involved in this type of activity like to do as a little calling card, a little like the murder location of the MI6 agent turning up in Breivik’s manifesto.

A top British code breakers murder location turns up inside an embedded code inside a manifesto linked to the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century where nobody can find any other meaning behind the 46 embedded locations.

Espionage…

The whole police investigation surrounding Breivik is completely undermined and there are still unanswered questions that could completely contradict their ‘official’ story and shatter the illusion of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one that is currently being played out in court room 250 in Norway.

There are 2 points I will highlight why the police investigation is completely undermined which means the families of Utoya should have absolutely no confidence in the police investigation into Breivik whatsoever.

Firstly after 10 months and an extensive ‘official’ police investigation they could not trace Breivik’s diamond contact Alpha Kallon.

Within a few days investigating the newspapers Dagbladet and VG both interviewed the man in question at his home in America.

If they could find such a crucial witness integral to the whole investigation in a few days then what have the Norwegian police been doing for 10 months on an ‘official’ Norwegian basis over the worst crime to have been inflicted upon their Country since the Second World War?

Alpha Kallon is not going to now turn around and talk about Serbian war criminals, Breivik only met him for diamonds and that is all he will know.

The other point is the fact that the lead detective has ruled out looking for evidence in Breivik’s Facebook accounts even though Breivik has stated they will find a link to prove the existence of the group he says he is connected to.

Considering Facebook is integral to the new social media everyone uses you would have thought it would have been one of the first places they checked but after 10 months they still have not checked and do not intend checking even after Breivik’s claim.

How can the families of Utoya place any confidence in the current Norwegian police investigation into their children’s murders by Breivik and the ‘official’ story surrounding him when this evidence clearly shows they have not done their jobs properly.

You could say they do not want to find anyone else connected to Breivik for some reason which is why they have not gone searching which means they are never going to find any evidence that anyone else is connected to him.

They do not want to.

They just want the World to believe Breivik was an ‘insane’ “solo terrorist” connected to no one.

With regards to me, the Norwegian police smeared me all over the World news at the beginning stages because it suited their “solo terrorist” connected to no one line who was inspired on the internet by me.

They did not even have the professional courtesy of making contact with me before smearing me all over the World news.

It took me ringing up the investigation and inviting myself for an interview after their smears against me all over the World news.

If I had not take the step then they probably would not have taken the step to invite me for questioning because in my opinion they already had their pre-planned script of Breivik the “solo terrorist” connected to no one line which you can read in all the first reports coming out of Norway over the case that has not changed since.

Even before any investigation took place they made their claims of Breivik being a “solo terrorist” connected to no one, so is it not a little suspicious that 10 months on that line has not changed a single inch and they have not carried out the simplest of investigation of credible leads that could contradict this ‘official’ claim.

The political ruling class of Norway are obviously not spending all their National wealth on National Security and Policing.

They are probably spending it on securing their future control over that National wealth and placing their stooges in all positions of power to make sure that happens, which includes their stooges involved with the Breivik case who have carried out a successful white-wash and cover-up of the whole thing in their trial by media to secure the “solo terrorist” connected to no one who is ‘insane’ label for the benefit of the trusting unsuspecting public who believe what they are told by the ‘official’s’ in charge of their Country.

If the Norwegian police cannot do their job properly which has clearly been shown then how can anyone have any confidence in their ‘official’ conclusion that is being propagated in the court room now in front of the World’s media? An ‘official’ conclusion that is fundamentally flawed because there are still major questions that need answering and a police investigation that has done absolutely no real investigative work to uncover the group they deny exists.

2 Norwegian newspapers did a better job in a matter or days than the police in 10 months.

What hope have the families of Utoya of getting to the bottom of the truth behind Breivik when these are the ones in charge of getting to the bottom of the truth and what hope have I of getting to the truth on an ‘official’ basis of who set me up to be the fall guy for the events in Norway last year when lines of investigation have not been investigated.

It is about time international observers were brought in to oversee the abuse of power in Norway considering at the heart of it is a political mass murder of a group of innocent children in what is said to be a European Democracy that possibly has far wider implications.

Is this not why there is a Norwegian General UN observer is in Syria?

He should be sorting out his own Country before trying to sort out Democracy in other Countries.

The Norwegian police have said that they have still not located ‘Richard the Lionheart’ from within the manifesto.

I gave a detailed 3 day 15 hour interview about my beliefs concerning this person and how I ended up framed as the fall guy.

I stated Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake was behind Breivik.

Is it a coincidence that Alan Ayling has a friend called ‘Richard the Lionheart’?

Is it not about time this persons identity was revealed to the Breivik enquiry in the interest of ‘truth & justice’ to see if it fits or not?

If after 10 months the Norwegian police could not find Alpha Kallon then what hope is there of them finding this person even though there is a traceable link through people to his real identity.

My guess is they have not even bothered!

The families of Utoya should ask them.

Alan Ayling was interviewed as the possible English ‘mentor’ so this information is critical to the whole enquiry especially after the Norwegian police have said they are still looking for this person as part of the still ongoing investigation.

Have they found him yet? If not why not, when they have had 6 months to do so and it is very simple to do.

Did Ayling mention him in police interview?

Breivik says he had an English ‘mentor’ called ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and there is a man who uses the alias ‘Richard the Lionheart’ online who is directly connected to Alan Ayling who was interviewed as being the possible English ‘mentor’.

Someone edited Breivik’s manifesto into picture perfect English.

Why has this mans identity not been revealed?

Probably because the Norwegian’s in control of the Breivik script do not want it revealing because of what it could mean.

The unraveling of the truth behind Breivik and other people’s involvement which would shatter their long standing ‘official’ story surrounding Breivik the son of a former Government diplomat, step son of a former an Army Major and best friend of a lawyer from the Ministry of Defence who is an ‘insane’ “solo terrorist” connected to no one.

The Norwegian police have admitted this persons existence.

Who is Alan Ayling’s Norwegian secretary too and who are his friends in the Norwegian Government?

Those international observers should be pressing for this evidence to be presented now considering it is critical and vital to the whole Breivik case, or do not propagate the lies of being concerned about the young people who lost their lives that day for “political purposes”.

The other key piece of evidence is whether or not Breivik was trained in Belarus by the former Soviet Colonel from Far West LCC.

This would explain where he learnt his bomb making skills that did not come from him learning on his rented farm and mean he is connected to a network/group which shatters the ‘official’ “solo terrorist” connected to no one line.

Breivik had his cover-stories for Belarus which was for his girlfriend and visiting Viking graves, but opposition leaders in Belarus connected to the intelligence services of that country have stated he was there for other reasons, namely paramilitary training in camps run by the Colonel which would fit in with where he learned his bomb making skills.

Until the unanswered questions are answered there should be no ‘official’ conclusion on Breivik.

One of the top Norwegian police investigators giving evidence said “The only place this is real is in Breivik’s head” which endorsed the ‘insane’ label they want to place on him.

He wants to go back to the Norwegian police academy and learn how to do his job properly before passing comments like that in a court room when his officers have not done their jobs properly.

They have created their ‘official’ conclusion on Breivik’s cover-stories because that is the only evidence they can find, and have dismissed all other possibilities.

Breivik who carried out the worst act of political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century was not going to leave any evidence that could be found without a thorough and extensive investigation now was he, especially not if he was trained by people versed in the art of espionage who knew exactly what they were doing with him.

The Norwegian police do not want to believe this though.

Eskil Pedersen is not a Utoya survivor

Do not be mistaken.

Eskil Pedersen is not a Utoya survivor he was protected by his political masters that day when they called him and removed him from the island before Breivik arrived to unleash his carnage against all the innocent kids left behind to fend for themselves.

His political masters did not secure the island for the children's protection they just removed their protege.

Now he can jump on the Utoya survivor bandwagon for political purposes which in my opinion was the whole purpose behind saving him from Utoya that day.

That is taboo to think and say though!

As he says himself "I think I acted as people do in such situations. Mon acting on instinct. I did as I was told and went on board the boat, based on the information I had at that time, the Pedersen previously said in an interview with the BBC."

Further reading: Hidden in plain sight

What Ever I did For The Sri Lankan Military And Diplomats I Can Live With And Would Shake The Hands Of Any Ex-LTTE Wanting Peace

Columbo Tribune: Glen Jenvey

The shooting and bombing in Norway can only be described as an act of pure evil ! not many would say any thing in defence of the terror brought to streets of the capital Oslo killing eight people and injuring 209 and the killing 69 people and wounding 33 others at an island youth camp run by the ruling Labour Party

The leftwing political press as normal are looking to blame someone? Their target in the British press has been Paul Ray, who has been blamed for his blog as the person who inspired Anders Behring Breivik this is untrue , Paul who I know personally has no links other than the use of some British historical words like lionheart http://lionheartuk.blogspot.co.uk/ (which is the name of his blog) and his use of crusader wording was also used by George Bush.

Paul’s words about Crusaders was in fact part of British and European history taught in most English schools, so it shows how small minded the media are to follow a blog of a owner whose main mission from the start before he was attacked by the international media was in fact Islamic terrorism based in his home town Luton UK.

But the Government of Norway has double standards, not known to many readers in the UK and the west After the failed South African peace talks were set up between the Sri Lankan government and the LTTE a banned terrorist group in most western countries ,like Al-qaida is today still operates in the UK and other European countries , The peace talks went from South Africa before they started to Norway at the request of the LTTE.

Norway’s role in the talks was disgusting they took the side of the terrorists the LTTE with gifts being given by the Tamil Tigers to the Norwegian government team, By Velupillai Pirapaharan (the Bin Laden of Sri Lanka) giving gold medals and other bribes to the Norway government team while the Tamil people were starving.

While on video just down the road Velupillai Pirapaharan was executing Tamils with their hands tied behind their backs with a massive hand made pistol while his victims were tied to wooden stakes, all filmed on video tapes released to the tamil community in Europe to raise funds.(copies of the videos were given to the Sri Lankan high commission in London by me.)

During the whole peace talks Norway accused Sri Lanka of war crimes using their links to human rights organisations in the west and the media.If you have ever been to the beautiful island of Sri Lanka you will see it needed good military intelligence and the right leader to stop the killing of not a 100 or so people which the western media called Norway’s 9/11 ,but in fact thousands (100000 at least) Norway messed Sri Lanka about so much that when the new government came into power it had no choice but to bring an end to the war no right minded person wanted, and the present government leader defended its people (which includes Tamils) and smashed the Tigers to bits.

Norway and other western governments complained as normal with the British media going one step above all international media with channel 4’s documentary claiming war crimes on Velupillai Pirapaharan’s son being shot at close range. If the programme knew anything about the terrorist organisation and other members of the one day research a story press teams in the UK , they would know that the Tamil Tigers are infamous for a suicide capsual hung around their necks incase they are caught they can commit suicide. Velupillai Pirapaharan’s son like the one who went to university in northern ireland under the protect of the IRA, had body guards who would kill the child to stop him falling into the hands of the Sri Lankan troops. It just shows how low the advisers of channel 4’s documentary are to use a few photo’s without knowing even how Velupillai Pirapaharan’s security teams worked.

It is called brain washing the western public to keep a few leftie experts at human rights organisations in a job and the funds flowing in. What Sri Lanka needs is for people to help rebuild the country after years of civil war, not western media and political leaders who are a wash of terrorist organisations in their own country undermining a true great president Mahinda Rajapakse . Don’t be brainwashed by Norway and other western governments who have never met the Tamil Tigers and heard and watched how they tricked the poor Tamil people into giving money for protection like Al-qaida do today ,stealing Red Cross emergency food aid,demanding money for even postal letters from europe and America and Canada. Killing Tamil political party members who did not agree with them .

But most of all Norway like the NIBS (national intelligence bureau of Sri Lanka) knew the LTTE had no wish for peace, but Norway like the UK and many other western countries thinks in their wisdom that having all the worlds banned terrorist organisations based in their countries as refugees status and its leadership and political wings meeting with western political leaders that it will be an unofficial peace treaty between the western government and terrorists ,in hope they will not turn on them? Look what happen in New York 9/11 the lead hijacker was at one time based in Germany, with a email account with a British web site based in America called http://azzam.com/

Norway I feel sorry for you ,but don’t insult people who are poor trying to rebuild their country they are a proud nation with many people in their security services, that go into terrorist organisations in person risking their lives not sat at a computer looking for terrorists links , a very British taught service looking at how proud they are in the senior officers mess in Buller Road ,which has photos of every head of the police and Army dating back to the days British ruled Sri Lanka. Sat in there you have to hold a high rank yourself or be part of a secret war the public media and political leaders never see until you retire, but even the last head of state who lost her eye in a suicide attack knows of me as most of her army intelligence from London came from me.

And when I started working for India a few years back they said the same over Kashmir the funds were coming from America’s new partner Pakistan and the west where the Military attache’ told me inside the Indian high commission London with the retired Deputy head of the Indian army that ‘’Bin Laden was in Pakistan’’, it was no point in telling the British police or FBI as they just don’t listen like they never over Abu Hamza . So Bin Laden lived for a few years more! Free next to the Pakistani army, I thought the British might wonder why I opened a website called Pakistan-army-isi-.com ? But they still did not click. Maybe the Brigadier and the General passed on the info to America in the end I will never know and don’t care as the reward for justice never paid a penny to me or neil doyle Terror-Base-UK over Abu Hamza, so why give free info to the Fed’s who government and media insult Sri Lanka a poor country who has won peace for all its people. As a British Tamil I would love to help rebuild this commonwealth country, and say what ever I did for the Sri Lankan military and Diplomats I can live with and would shake the hands of any ex- LTTE wanting peace for the Tamil people and the whole of the nation.