Daily Mail: Hunting the Taliban in the footsteps of Winston Churchill: On lawless battlefields nothing has changed in a century (Except we have Al Qaeda and the Taliban supporters and trained fighters now in our own country plotting terrorist attacks against our society.)
Luton 2009: Al Qaeda enclave
Click link: Daily Mail article
blog posts
20 comments:
Interesting.
I wonder though - how many times has Churchill turned over in his graves over the leftist antics of his son?
Churchill's words are spot on for today. The only difference is now instead of appeasers you have an entire media government complex that is traitorous. Your elites want to destroy Great Britain and they are using unlimited muslim immigration do it. All you have to do is look around you. Look at the reception the troops got as they marched through Luton, watch the undercover mosque expose by channel 4. The islamis going marching in the streets, "British police go to hell", "democracy go to hell", "death to those that insult islam" and on and on. " I saw a survey that said 40% of British muslims want shariah law in the UK and 32% said that Western civilization is decadent and muslims should try to bring it down. Did they emigrate to the UK because they could not practice shariah law in their home country? Could they not find an islamic country to emigrate to that practices shariah law? Why emigrate to a decadent Western country with values you hate and practices a religion you hate (Christianity)? They came as part of a stealth jihad......not really so stealthy any more, it doesn't have to be. The islamis are helped by your ruling elites because basically your ruling elites subscribe to a multi-culti philosophy that presumes Western Civilization in general and Britain in particular to be evil and the only way to change it is to water it down or destroy it by importing a 7th century beheading culture.
As I live in the U.S. I really don't know much about Churchill's son but he reminds me of Ariana Huffington. When it was "cool" to be a conservative in America and she thought she could be the wife of a U.S. senator, she was conservative. Her husband lost the election and Ariana realized that the center of media power was on the left. So to stay on the stage, be interviewed on TV shows and most importantly avoid being banished by the so called main stream media she went to where the power was, the left. So now she is a big time lefty. That is the only way she could get the publicity she craved and avoid descending into obscurity. This type of person has no real convictions, they just want to be a celebrity.
I find it abhorent that a socalled religion such as islam and their moslems communities managed to spread so much fear and so much disgusting protectionism that denied other disadvantaged nonbelievers to advance via fair means in the world. Those deceitful islamic women and those deceitful islamic men don't deserve any special privileges.WLIL
All I can say is Glen Jenvey wouldn't agree with Churchill, or should I say "Glen aka omar hamza Jenvey" as we now know him.
What's this about leftist antics of Churchill's son? Sir Winston had only one son, Randolph. He died in 1968 just three years after his father and he was not noted for left-wing views. If you mean a grandson, which one?
Hank, you wrote: "Your elites want to destroy Great Britain and they are using unlimited muslim immigration do it." I agree that the elites are traitorous, but Great Britain has proceeded a long way down the path of destruction as a result of socialist policies that use taxpayers' money to subsidise, and therefore encourage, family breakdown. Mr Justice Coleridge said recently that families are the cells which make up the body of society. Destroy the family and society will go with it; Islam would be doing no more than delivering the coup de grace.
Compare our stats for premarital sex, abortions, divorce, single-parent families with 50 years ago - who could disagree with Muslims who say that Western society is decadent? If we are to survive then we must reverse the policies that have fuelled this immorality, as well as deal with militant Islam. It is a formidable task, but not yet too late.
Gospeller
Why don't those moslems stay put in their own decadent islamic society/country of origin?
The West don't need the islamic interference or decadent islamic culture.
WLIL
Anon,
They came to Britain because there are no countries where they can practice their religion of islam. Saudi Arabia, that isn't a muslim cuntry is it? How about Syria, Eqypt, Iraq ... no I don't think they are muslim either. Jordon, not muslim either. You see, they have no safe place to go. They came to Britain to because it is a free country where they can practice their religion as well as take the country over. And get paid to do it, the Britains being so generous with the dole..... but you keep working, somebody has to pay the bill. BTW, if you don't like it they will slice your head off.
Beginner's Guide To The Counter Jihad
And besides of the obvious Western countries generous charitable handouts to foreigners(which is very rare in predominantly islamic countries) and the easy lifesyle and modern convenience of the West, one of the reasons those moslems flocked to the West is due to Western countries ability to control its own decadence(without any force or threat) whereas most predominantly islamic/asian countries failed to control islamic ills, failed to address or control islamic decadence.
WLIL
Hey WLIL: Western decadence *is* out of control if you look at the rates of teenage pregnancy, divorce, abortion etc. This is *my* civilisation and I love it not hate it, but I grieve for it because it is committing cultural suicide.
Gospeller
Gospeller, there are many types of hidden decadence that has gone unreported in the islamic/asian world. For instances, extreme social and economic disparities/inequality, the instances of bigamies, extreme opulence of the elite/ruling class, violence and crime rates, brutal abortion, hidden immorality, illegitimacies, extreme filth, extreme insolence, neglect of children or elderly people or disadvantaged adults and mismanagement are most probably much much more scandalous and decadent in the islamic/asian/eastern/black culture, if you have done an honest indepth research and comparison.
WLIL
WLIL: I said that Western decadence was out of control. That means I am comparing Western family breakdown stats today with a couple of generations ago - not with Islam.
God (whose scriptures are the Holy Bible) has permitted the Islamic way of life to carry on for centuries. We can point to cruelties and unhappinesses in that way of life, but it has not collapsed under the weight of its own sins as Western Civilisation looks set to do.
Repentance begins at home.
Gospeller
Gospeller, what I am trying to say is that, we in the Western free world don't need the bad influence of the islamic culture (to bring further collapse) to our Western Civilisation.
Much of the islamic world had obviously collapsed in its own sin a long time ago,(but were propped up by Western Civilisation) which you may not aware of.
Just look at their widespread violence(which is another form of decadence)of the Iraqi, Iranian, Palestinian and their inability to rule without tyranny. We don't need their islamic tyrannical way of life in the West.
WLIL
WLIL: totally agree that the West is better off without Islam.
What do you mean by saying that "much of the islamic world had obviously collapsed in its own sin a long time ago,(but were propped up by Western Civilisation)" please?
Gospeller
I mean the islamic world were and is presently propped up by Western Civilisation via western developed infrastructure. It is obvious that much of the islamic world had advanced via western advanced technology and collapsed due to islamic poor governance, islamic avarice, islamic inhumanity, islamic rigidity, islamic enslavement culture, etc.
WLIL
WLIL,
I agree that, because we pay some Islamic lands for oil, those lands have been able to buy Western expertise and technology. Whatever my personal feelings, that was a choice of Jehovah God and in him I trust.
Gospeller
They are not really islamic lands, given the fact that islam is only a socalled religion (that comes after Judaism and Christianity) and is not a race. Nomadic migrants who converted to islam or any religion, voluntarily or involuntariy or due to pressure, uncontrolled greed, force, violence, lust for power, political convenience or ignorance are merely converts. They have no right to claim that any land is an islamic land just because they stick a mosque there.
While black people may have a right to claim that Africa belongs to their black race, islamic people who cling to their socalled religion (for power/control) stand on shaky ground with their claim.
Anyway, it is ridiculous that the West having to pay for the oil when it is the West/Western expertise who did all the initial hard work of funding, finding and extracting the oil. WLIL
WLIL: As far as I am concerned the whole earth belongs to Jehovah, because He made it. He gives parts of it to certain peoples for certain durations, and those choices are his.
By "Islamic lands" I mean simply lands where Islam has more power over people than anything else does. Jehovah (not Allah!) has given oil-rich lands to Islam, and I do not think we should simply invade the oilfields, which is the only alternative I see. Unless He tells us directly to do that, in the way He did the Israelites in some of their battles, then we must accept His choice to do as He wills with His creation, and obey the instruction set given to the church in the New Testament.
Gospeller
Most islamic communities has not been able to sustain or advance itself within its own islamic system and had been parasiting on other more economically viable system or other more open system that are nontotalitarian.
They may have power over their own islamic people, but they don't have power over us, nonbelievers. Africa too have alot of oil rich lands, it is just that "islamic land" was given too much publicity and too much western aid which the islamic people seems to gloat about it.
It is right that we pay them for oil at a rate negotiated between us and them, but the giving of aid at governmental level is always wrong whatever the cause. That is taxpayers' money and acts of charity are supposed to be voluntary.
Gospeller
Post a Comment