what can only be described as a disgusting and sorry example of a British man. He has worked his way into journalism, has written an article for the Times magazine about what is happening in Luton, and in the process has used British people who are standing up for themselves, their community and their country as nothing more than fodder to court favour with his Liberal and Moslem friends.I can imagine him now, sitting around all smug with his friends, gloating over his article that has made it into the Times magazine, and how he had defended the ethnic minority Islamic community as a champion of the Liberal cause, against the facist right wing.
His article stenches of the white Liberal upper class who know absolutely nothing about the reality of life on the streets of Britain where these Islamic ghettos now reside. They listen to what the so-called poor down-trodden Moslems tell them and then beat the English community up with their words, and create false realities in minds of people who read their rubbish.
Article: Fear & Hatred on the streets of Luton
After you have read the article, you will see based on this journalist's written account, that the ones 'promoting the hatred' are the 'white' people, and the ones who are in fear are the 'Moslems'.
Liberal propoganda for the masses that is based upon distorted half truths.
The false upside-down world of Liberal Britain that the gullible masses now live in.
If you trace everything that is written about the 'white' community here in this article back to their roots you will find that what is happening now is a reaction to Islamic hatred and violence in Luton, not the other way around. However, when the pen is in the hands of these diseased, upper-class Liberals they do not want to know the truth, all they care about is beating lower-class English people up to reinforce their misguided ideal of British society upon their readers.
They live in cloud cuckoo land, and are going to be brought back down to earth, and into the real world soon enough.
His upper-class Liberal view is that the lower-class white community are all racists, even though I am not a racist, and those involved with UPL including 'Mikey Birch' are not racists, but this journalist doesnt care, he just wants his Liberal anti-white, pro-Moslem, racist, story for the Times magazine, and doesnt care what he writes about people so long as it is in line with the Liberal world view according to .
He makes mention of me as being a 'would be organiser' and then goes on to ridicule me about my Christian stance on Al Qaeda's Holy War against, not just my country, but our Western world. As a Christian, I do have history to look back on to understand, relate with, and make sense of what is unfolding around me now in the 21st Century in relation to Islam's religious Jihad. Islamic terror, hatred and Holy War is nothing new, and if it had not been for the Crusades then the freedom we enjoy in Europe would have gone long ago and we would now be living supressed under sharia law, in an Islamic State.
Throughout the article he does not make mention once about Moslems like Sayful Islam being a part of the continuation of 1400 years of Jihad, just that I believe I am re-fighting the Crusades.
What am I supposed to do, just sit back and watch while Al Qaeda supporters take over my community, kill and destroy my friends, and endanger the next generation?
My community is rooted in Christian and Royal history, and is now being desecrated by Moslems from Bury Park, Luton, which is an Al Qaeda stronghold as per the ex-Defence Secretary's recent statement: Al Qaeda enclaves
He calls me a 'white man' in a derogatory racist term, as if being a 'white man' makes me a racist. What has the colour of my skin got to do with anything anyway? If he had have used the term 'black man' in the same terms then there would be uproar now, with him being labelled as racist himself, but because I am white it is acceptable to use that as some form of label over me, to re-inforce this journalists racist slant on his piece.
I will be checking now to see if there are legal implications to using this term in such a racist manner against me, because if I was a black man and the colour of my skin was used against me, there is a race industry to turn to to support me, so why should it be any different for me in my Country because I am a white man?
Racism cuts both ways if you hadn't noticed?
Quote: there was supposedly a campaign by Muslim extremists to intimidate black and white people out of their homes in Bury Park (this, in fact, turned out to be a succession of stone-throwing incidents by a lone Pakistani youth with a psychiatric illness)
Here are the news reports speaking to the residents from Luton who had their windows smashed on several occasions, and which includes an elderly couple who now live with their whole house boarded up.
You tell me if this was little more than a lone stone thrower? Which then begs the question; why did this journalist lie and make out this targetted campaign against innocent non-Moslems was little more than a lone, crazed, stone thrower.
I wonder who put him up to this anti-white, pro-Moslem, racist article?
Video 1: Ethnic cleansing in Luton
Video 2: Ethnic cleansing in Luton
Throughout this piece, you will see that the journalist has a serious bias against white people. He wants to categorise us all as BNP and NF, and would rather lend his journalistic platform to promote and support Sayful Islam and his extremist group rather than telling the truth about the fear and hatred in Luton. The whole body of his article is pro Sayful Islam propoganda, with not one bad word said against him. You would think they were both friends after reading this article, and that Sayful Islam's group are not a danger or threat to our Christian, Western society.
Sayful Islam's group, led by Omar Bakri, is linked to every single suicide bombing that has been carried out by Moslems who have been born in Britain, but this article does not point that fact out for people.
I wonder when the truth is going to be told about the English community's reaction to Islamic hatred and violence on the streets of Luton, and not this anti-white, pro-Moslem, racist propoganda?
Video: Sayful Islam's group Al Majhiroun
Further reading: Winston Smithy
Update: Comment taken from comments section
Thank you Anonymous for posting this relevant factual piece of information.
Posted this some time ago but thought it was worth posting again as is relevant to ths story.
U.K. Government: Islamic Propaganda.
Statements [1] and [2] below are taken from a U. K. Government document - Published 21 October 2005.
Reporting Diversity is a new, practical guide for journalists to help them report fairly on matters of faith, race, and cohesion and to do so without giving needless offence. It has been produced by the Media Trust and the Society of Editors with support from the Home Office.
"How journalists can contribute to community cohesion"
Section [1] basically advises journalists that any one who opposes Islamic extremists should be portrayed by the media as racist and accused of hiding behind a cloak of respectability while Section [2] advises journalists to conceal the statements and actions of Islamic extremists from the public.
The document also contains threats of criminal prosecution in the event of a media group or journalist that has been deemed not to have acted in the interests of "community cohesion".
“A journalist will be guilty of an offence if he or she intends to stir up racial hatred or, having regard to all the circumstances, racial hatred is likely to be stirred up by what is published.”
[1] Expose and counter racist propaganda. Bigots who hide behind a cloak of respectability can be the most damaging. Make sure they are always drawn into the open and their words never go unchallenged.
[2] Take care in reporting extremists. Generally quote people who are representative. Be wary of those with views that might make good copy but to most people seem extreme. Though it is sometimes essential to quote such extremists, be sure to place their views in the context of the numbers they might represent. Be aware of creating negative images. Minorities carry the burden of being different. Don’t make them synonymous with the things that worry everyone, like terrorism, subjugation of women, forced marriage, illegal immigration, fraudulent benefits claims and cruel animal slaughter. Few are.
The good thing about a poncy lefty article in the Times is that it is speaking totally to the converted.
ReplyDeleteNobody important will read it. It is therapy for the middle class to shore up the views they already hold
Those in positions of authority are not doing their job, only in protecting it.
ReplyDeleteThey have created a multi-cultural society in which every minority is equal and opportunity is open to all regardless of colour. In reality this is not the case higher up in society you go as it is still predominately white. This is not to say that colour prevents one from getting these jobs. A lot of white folk can't get these jobs. It it down to where you come from, the school you went to and who you know. This is not evoking class envy, only telling the truth.
For these people to justify this hypocrisy and to keep their position they defend multi-culturalism with a rabid ferocity as proof that they represent the interests of multi-cultural Britain. They do not care about the innocent folk who are affected by the negative impact of multi-culturalism as witnessed in places like Luton, Bradford and many part of the North of England.
I'm afraid nothing is going to change as long of the Etonians and those of the 'Bullingdon Club' stay in charge of this country.
The Times magazine must be desperate for copy, the word choices of this article are hyperbole and stereotypical and are obviously employed to distract from the fact that it is a badly written article.
ReplyDeleteI have yet to read this article but I can say I know exactly how it will run.
ReplyDeleteYour summary is an accurate appraisal of the stupidity of these "would-be journalists" who can hardly string a few words together.
You put them to shame, Lionheart.
Your work is based on research and observation.
Their work is based on pre-conceived notions, aquired at University, on the laps of biased Marxist lecturers whose only gift to their students is their own distorted and mangled view of the world.
Years have gone by since I became very much aware that the greatest danger to the democratic West was none other than what we now know as Leftwing Fascism.George Orwell, a fervent Communist in his youth, was one of the first of his kind to see through that ideology and warned about its evils and dangers in his books "1984" and "Animal Farm"
ReplyDeleteThe weird conglomeration of
'ideologies" which calls itself Socialist, is enamoured of every form of dictatorship from the National Socialist Party in Germany to the Communist regimes of the USSR, China, Vietnam, Cambodia up to Cuba and now Chavez's Venezuela. And last but not least, they admire and assist dictatorial Islamic theocracies, Islamic Imperialism and Arab/
palestinian (and other Moslem) Terrorist groups.
Leftwing Fascists absolutely adore every type of terrorism as long as it's nurtured by the Left or initiated by the world's worst terror-mongers ever..Islamic fundamentalism - from Ayattolah Khomeini to Adolph Arafat to the Taliban to Al Qaeda.
The only entities they hate so much they would willingly hand them over to the Jihadists to be lynched, decapitated, torn to pieces, blown to smithereens, burnt to ashes, and all the other techniques used by Islamists and their Leftwing Fascist comrades...
are western democracies which reject these ideologies and/or fight physically against them..or individuals who have the guts to stand up to them and to call a spade a spade (e.g. Geert Wilders, Glen Jenvey, US 'conservative'
media, e.g. FoxNews esp. Hannity, O'Reilly, Glenn Beck, and their contributors many of whom are conservative Jews(some were originally Democrats but grew up and were horrified at what they saw that party had become...even before the advent of St. Obama, e.g. Bernie Goldberg, Dick Morris, Charles Krauthammer, David Hirsh!)
But we have yet to see such media(or political) types stepping forth and speaking up in, and for, Britain.
Luckily England has Lionheart..but it must be a lonely place for him.
One can only hope that it won't take too long before some clear-minded journalists, politicians and others will wake up and have the courage to speak out and join forces with Lionheart.
That day may not be far off.
The fact that anti-British attacks on British patriotism by anti-British Leftwing Fascists is increasing, is a sign that they are feeling the pinch.
They are beginning to panic that the British 'worm' is turning. So they hit out as hard, and as often, at those they fear trying to nip the probel in the bud.
That is the first (positive) sign that the victims of the Fascist Left's venomous derision, lies, libels and defamations will Overcome All their obstacles and be victorious.
Let's just hope it won't take too long, break too many hearts or, God forbid, destroy too many lives.
Anonymous Lady
Lionheart,
ReplyDeleteI couldn't find your email address but I was going to point this article out to you.
You've also got a mention in my blog when I covered this truly despicable article in the Times. It has to be one of the most prejudiced article I've read.
have a read here
Keep up the work Lionheart. It's a slog but we'll get there. Remember they will try to sully and lambaste you. This is what the media does or anyone who finds that you're getting too close to the truth.
Look at the victory for Wilders in the Netherlands? He will start clamping down on Islam. It will spread throughout Europe. Victory is in our sights, but much has to be done before we get there.
The Times article really is a laughable attack on you Lionheart. I wouldn't be bothered. All publicity whether good or bad is still publicity and so use it in your favour.
The Destruction of Britain
Winston the Smithy...how correct you are, Geert Wilders is indeed an inspiration...I cannot but agree with everything he says.
ReplyDeleteGood luck Lionheart.
(this, in fact, turned out to be a succession of stone-throwing incidents by a lone Pakistani youth with a psychiatric illness)
ReplyDeleteThis quote in itself is almost an exact reversal of the one Hitler used for the burning of the reichstaag. This shows this "journalist" to be nothing more than a pathetic individual who is indeed prepared to write anything for the sake of his career. However many lives it costs. I suspect his hatred is of the white "lower classes". That makes him a snob. I also suspect the only Muslims he ever comes across are the champagne socialist variety. People like this will be remembered with disgust when the body count is finally in. They will be remembered as the ones who promoted a fascist ideology and the murder and oppression of millions. Of course that history may well be written by Islam. They will of course remember them as Islamic heroes, who assisted in the overthrow of the West.
The bit about the bacon made me chuckle.
ReplyDeletePosted this some time ago but thought it was worth posting again as is relevant to ths story.
ReplyDeleteU.K. Government: Islamic Propaganda.
Statements [1] and [2] below are taken from a U. K. Government document - Published 21 October 2005.
Reporting Diversity is a new, practical guide for journalists to help them report fairly on matters of faith, race, and cohesion and to do so without giving needless offence. It has been produced by the Media Trust and the Society of Editors with support from the Home Office.
"How journalists can contribute to community cohesion"
Section [1] basically advises journalists that any one who opposes Islamic extremists should be portrayed by the media as racist and accused of hiding behind a cloak of respectability while Section [2] advises journalists to conceal the statements and actions of Islamic extremists from the public.
The document also contains threats of criminal prosecution in the event of a media group or journalist that has been deemed not to have acted in the interests of "community cohesion".
“A journalist will be guilty of an offence if he or she intends to stir up racial hatred or, having regard to all the circumstances, racial hatred is likely to be stirred up by what is published.”
[1] Expose and counter racist propaganda. Bigots who hide behind a cloak of respectability can be the most damaging. Make sure they are always drawn into the open and their words never go unchallenged.
[2] Take care in reporting extremists. Generally quote people who are representative. Be wary of those with views that might make good copy but to most people seem extreme. Though it is sometimes essential to quote such extremists, be sure to place their views in the context of the numbers they might represent. Be aware of creating negative images. Minorities carry the burden of being different. Don’t make them synonymous with the things that worry everyone, like terrorism, subjugation of women, forced marriage, illegal immigration, fraudulent benefits claims and cruel animal slaughter. Few are.
Sorry but I'm still chuckling at the bacon throwing reported in the article.
ReplyDeleteThe police seem to be hunting the guy that threw it as if he was a terrorist. Which is ironic since he was throwing it at terrorists.
It seems to me that some friendly British humour such as tossing bacon would actually do a lot to calm the situation down although I'm sure at some point the police would end up stopping and searching anyone suspected of carrying an "offensive pork product". Hopefully sausages don't get banned from Luton town centre.
What is the point of having a government that seems to encourage the social evil of islamification and one that did not do anything to stop the evil of islamification or one that failed to warn us about the evil of islamification at the early stage.
ReplyDeleteWLIL