Breivik & Lake - The common theme

Leaked psyche report: Translated excerpts

Further reading: Experts challenge insanity

Quote: Breivik changes between referring to himself as 'I' and 'we' - that is to say, he speaks of himself in plural. The psychiatrists speculate that he might have experienced hallucinations, and that some of the people he claims to have met do not exist outside his mind. They cannot confirm this, and it's hard to judge how credible that theory is based on the summary of a report.

If you go with the official line of Breivik the 'lone wolf' political terrorist who was recruited, radicalised, and trained in bomb making and executions in his bedroom whilst watching youtube videos and reading blogs and websites, and was able to blow up his government building killing 8 and then execute 69 kids in cold blood then any talk of 'I' and 'We' are hallucinations in his own mind.

How could the State appointed psychiatrists come to any other conclusion?

I was told in police interview by Detective inspector "bleep" "bleep", that Anders Breivik did travel to Liberia in 2002 which means there are other people involved with him which means that he is a part of a network, so his 'I's and 'We's are not hallucinations.

Are there any other hallucination points within the psychological assessment? We don't know yet because the full report is not in the public domain. If not and the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenic is based upon his 'I's and 'We's it is flawed and wrong.

Agreed, what Anders Breivik did was beyond what any normal person would do, but that is the whole nature of political terrorism.

In his mind he has reason and justification, justification based upon other peoples views that agree with his own, which is thought and deed - Political ideology & Political terrorism

You can scour his past history to find out why Anders Breivik did what he did, but that only shows the reason why he was susceptible and willing to go that one step further than anyone else, and the reason why he was recruited by his controllers to be a political terrorist. That does not explain why he committed his acts, they can only be understood by looking at his reason and justification.

If he was delusional then he would have no reason or justification, it would all be nonsense that couldn't be understood or explained.

He has stated that he has an English 'mentor' who is the one who brainwashed him with his/their vision for a future terrorist campaign and how they envision the future playing out, with their eyes on future events and not present events which is why Breivik talks about his actions making sense in the future.

It is the Norwegian polices job to decide whether or not this English 'mentor' really exists and if so who is he?

It is my belief that his English 'mentor' is Alan Lake. It is the Norwegian police's job to decide whether or not that is the case or not, and whether or not there is any evidence that points to this fact or not.

You cannot believe one word that comes out of his mouth because he is a proven liar, so the question is; why is he consistently lying?

Any journalists who have an in-depth knowledge of the case will be able to determine whether or not there is cause for suspicion based upon his thoughts and ideas in interview.

I would just like to point out a few glaring examples that show that he and Breivik think the same and use common terms between themselves. This is what would happen between a political mentorship, thoughts, ideas and words would rub off because they both have the same agenda.

Breivik callously executed 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because they were left-wing ideologically, stating they were going to be the next generation of Norwegian leaders. This was an easy target for him, because executing the Norwegian Prime minister and other top Government officials was practically impossible. Executing the Government was his ideal target though.

Alan Lake wrote about his vision of executing the British Government because of their actions that he deemed detrimental to British society.

So he and Breivik think alike here. Just like Breivik, Lake drew up a list of traitors who should be executed.

Further reading: Lakes 'Final Solution'

Alan Lake seems to have a fetish/fantasy within his mind of 'executing' people, which if he was Breivik's 'mentor' would obviously rub off on a susceptible Breivik. I have not read Breivik's manifesto so do not know whether or not he uses the term 'execution' inside its pages, but whether or not he has, he did 'execute' who he perceived to be the enemy on Utoya island which is in-line with Alan Lakes thought processes.

You cannot escape Alan Lakes mental fascination with 'executing' people because it is a common theme with him when he is interviewed. First in the Swedish documentary that was aired on Norwegian TV where he talks about 'executing' moslems, a little like Hitler cleaning the Fatherland of Jews, and then more recently in the interview with Dagbladet where he once again reveals his warped fascination with executing people. Not forgetting his 'Final Solution' where he fantasises about executing high level UK Government targets that is in-line with Breivik's ideology and actions.

For most people there is a time and a place for such talk, if at all, and definitely not when being interviewed about his possible involvement with the execution of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp, but the time and place didn't matter to him.

Not only this, it has also been revealed that he has been talking/fantasising about murdering me, who was firstly falsely accused of being Anders Breivik's English 'mentor'.

I am assuming that most people would think like I think, and think that such talk is very strange and not common place amongst the general population, especially in the context of the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century.

Murder and execution in his mind and direct ideological/physical links to Anders Breivik himself.

If the Norwegian police accept there is a network behind Breivik then they must accept there is an English 'mentor'.

Only time will tell now but there are many more ideological psychological links to be revealed.

And on another note, I was threatened again tonight by someone from the Luton EDL linked to Yaxley/Tommy so someone obviously doesnt like something that is going on.

Alan Lake & The Oxymoron

Dagbladet: Alan Lake interview

Google: Translator

The thing when someone lies is that under scrutiny and in the face of facts those lies are exposed for what they are which is the case with Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake.

So what is he hiding from to be lying?

Firstly for any criminal psychologists or psychiatrists reading this, what professional definition or term would you give for a person who claims to feel flattered at the fact that he has been interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' and inspiration behind the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik who callously murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp?

An act that Lake claimed was "the chickens coming home to roost on Norway".

Quote: I find it flattering that they think I'm so important and regard me as a kind of expert witness, says Alan Lake.

Obviously he has no mental grasp of the gravity of the whole situation he is in, and reviles in the position.

I personally found the position to be abhorrent.

Lake claims that if sat with Breivik he would break down his arguments and show Breivik that he could not even defend his argument which is a complete oxymoron when looked at in context.

This is a man who has publicly stated on Swedish TV that he would execute moslems, a little like Hitler executing Jews in Germany to rid the Fatherland, and who has been the directing force behind the English Defence League, and you only have to do a little search on the internet to see the counter claims of the EDL under his directorship and mentoring of "tommy" based upon the evidence in the public domain.

Video: Alan Lake - Breivik & Norwegian TV

In this Dagbladet interview he again talks of executing people and gives his rationale behind Breivik which could have been a motivational force behind why Breivik willingly committed his terrorist acts because based upon Lakes belief Breivik could be out in 10 - 15 years to start a new life.

Imagine rationalising that in Breivik's mind and then releasing him to commit his terrorist atrocity?

Quote: I believe that anyone who has committed more than two murders should be executed. I will not hide who I am. I am a conservative of the old school. Police said it was hard to shoot someone who stands with his hands in the air. I would have shot anyway, because he could have had a bomb on him. Breivik knew he would be shot if he surrendered. He also knew that he would get a trial with full media coverage. In your world know Breivik that he will get a maximum of 10-15 years in prison, not much at his age. He will get a new life.
In my world he would have been a short trial, and so have been executed.

Parts of the above statement would have been integral to Breivik's thinking when committing his terrorist act. He called his operation a martyrdom operation because he believed he would be shot by the police after committing his crimes and if not he would be arrested and then get a show trial which is happening now with the prospect of a short prison sentence which is inline with Alan Lakes thinking that is contrary to Norwegian public opinion.

You have to ask yourself what goes through this mans mind on a normal day if he is willing to openly talk like this in media interview in relation to his possible involvement in the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century?

Murder and executing people? doesn't sound good from where I am sitting reading it.

Whats the psychoanalysis of that?

Kind of draws a psychological parallel with Breivik who went out and executed people, and not only that he has openly talked about executing Government leaders because of their actions which is what Breivik attempted to do, but failed, so killed a load of kids instead and said "I did so, to kill the next generation of leaders", which was obviously easier for him to do.

Also this man has been integral to an extreme political right-wing form of anti-jihad throughout Europe that is directly connected to Anders Breivik, so what goes on out of sight and mind behind closed doors with his most intimate colleagues if he talks about murder and executing people openly to journalists?

What is his real agenda and ultimate goal within his political field of which he is very active?

He claims he is an "old school conservative" which is probably a little wink to his political supporters, although I would say the Iron Lady Baroness Margaret Thatcher is an "old school conservative" and she would find his words and deeds abhorrent too which is why Capital Punishment was abolished but that's a different debate and not one to be had in context with Anders Breivik.

The glaring oxymoron which was Lakes defence was that he would have rubbished Breivik's arguments so he couldnt be the mentor (which everyone would agree is an oxymoron in the eyes of anyone who has been following Lake over the past few years because their ideas, arguments and murderous intent are exactly the same).

Breivik's arguments for why he committed his terrorist acts were based upon his fellow countryman Fraudman's extensive writings, along with many other mainstream commentators directly linked to Lake himself, so are they not both singing from exactly the same hymn sheet?

The manifesto is named after one of Fraudman's essays "A European Declaration of Independence" and he is mentioned 111 times inside the manifesto.

Fraudman is the ideological extreme right-wing and Breivik the terrorist right-wing which go hand in hand for a political terrorist campaign.

Lake promoted Fraudman in interview and tells people they should read his writings which is exactly the same as what Anders Breivik did with the "2083" manifesto, just in a different context but part of the same context.

The Oxymoron of Lakes public defence.

The good thing that can be taken from this interview is that Lake already has in his mind the length of prison sentence he can receive for his involvement with Breivik.

Quote: You can keep me collectively responsible for what ABB did and imprison me for five or ten years. And you know what, for me it's okay.

Whats the psychoanalysis of that statement?

Already working out in his mind the length of prison sentence...

Further reading: The folly of Alan Lake

Delusion or Reality

Dagbladet: Delusional

Further reading: Fraudman in court

Further reading: Fraudman not happy about court summons
(cant stand by his words, hence Fraudman)

Much of the perception of the psychiatrists who have evaluated Breivik that is in the news papers is that he is delusional and detached from reality by believing that Norway and much of the West is in a state of civil war. Those psychiatrists should read Fraudman’s essays to see where Breivik gets his perception from and then determine Fraudman’s state of mind based upon these same evaluation points. The "2083" manifesto is named after one of Fruadman's essay's "A European Declaration of Independence" and he is mentioned by Breivik 111 times inside the pages of the manifesto, so can be construed as Breivik's ideological inspiration.

It is a common theme amongst many within the Western anti-jihad movement that we are in a state of low level civil war with the ‘ummah’ living in our countries conducting Jihad against wider kuffar society based upon the Islamic teaching of Dar-al Harb and Dar al-Islam, and their daily actions against us non-moslems. Just do a little scan of the anti-jihad forums or Facebook and you will see for yourself.

Dar al-Harb and Darl al-Islam is an Islamic theological fact that you cannot understand of believe because you are not moslem.

With no understanding of Islamic theology or the ideology of the anti-jihad movement then for a white middle class liberal psychiatrist Breivik’s perception is delusional because it is alien to their normal reality. Who is right and who is wrong?

The one with no knowledge and understanding or the one with the knowledge and understanding?

I could give as many examples you need based upon public facts of the threat to modern British society by Islamic fundamentalists to support Breivik’s claim. We have a prison system over-flowing with moslem terrorists who intended to murder and main innocent British citizens as a part of their political Islamic campaign to force Britain to bow down to Islamic supremacy through terrorism so that they can enforce sharia law upon the population.

Video: Undercover mosque

For some reason (the police to find out) Anders Breivik committed his political terrorist act based upon the thoughts and opinions of many main stream commentators. He took the first violent step which can be understood in context of the totality of the larger picture.

If the psychiatrists draw their conclusions based upon the official lie of ‘lone wolf’ then it is a flawed psychiatric report.

Who did Anders Breivik travel and meet in Liberia in 2002 where “Operation Breivik” began? And was Anders Breivik in London that same year as he claims, at what he calls the founding of a false Knights Templar group where he was assigned his English 'mentor'?

We know these are a fact so contradict the official line of the ‘lone wolf’ scenario and proves there is a network involved with, and behind, Anders Breivik.

If the Norwegians admit that there is a network then it means that they will have to hunt that network down as part of the criminal process and bring them to justice, just like with President Bush and President Obama who hunted down Bin Laden and the other Al Qaeda terrorists who were behind the 9/11 attack on America and brought them to justice. The question is; does the old Viking Nation have the stomach and the courage to go after those behind Breivik and bring them to justice? Are they humble enough to now do a u-turn and state that Breivik was part of a network?

Initial perceptions say no which is why there has been a white-wash and attempted cover up of the truth with the official line being Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ nut and is now certified as being ‘insane’, so no need to look anywhere else for anyone.

Why has there been no public statement detailing who Breivik met in Liberia in 2002 for the Norwegian people?

To do so would shatter the official line in the public’s perception because they would see there was someone behind him.

Other parts of the report talk of Breivik’s perception, of being a part of a Knighthood, a Knight and a hero of the Norwegian people with so much love for them which is part of the reason why he committed his acts.

If Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ then this can be construed as delusional because it is all a figment of his own imagination. If not and Breivik was recruited and indoctrinated by an individual/group into a mutual extreme political ideological agenda who have the same ideas and beliefs as himself then his thoughts are rooted externally from his own mind so are not figments of his own imagination, and thus his own delusions.

Breivik’s reality is then part of an external reality with there being others of the same mind as Breivik himself, with much of what Breivik believes and shares being what he was told as an individual and part of the wider groups beliefs and ideas.

They brainwashed a willing Breivik with his grandiose ideas, with his words and deeds on July 22nd being the fulfillment of what he was told by them. Breivik now believes it because he achieved it, even if the white middle class liberal psychiatrists who are toeing the official line do not, because he knows his accomplices are still in the outside world and they share exactly the same beliefs as he.

Who is delusional and who has no knowledge or understanding of the truth?

Maybe me, but it’s my thoughts and perceptions, and as I stood accused of being his English ‘mentor’ ill add them to the discourse for the sake of the 69 innocence murdered by him on Utoya island.

"Operation Breivik" & Project Gladio

(Gladio video documentary below)

Project Gladio was set up after World War II to prevent a communist invasion and takeover of Europe.

It is comprised of secret agents willing and able to subvert their own governments by conducting terrorist campaigns against their own people which includes mass murder. It is primarily made up of extreme political right-wing thinkers and terrorists who know no bounds when it comes to their political agenda.

I wonder what mindset "an old school conservative" who constantly talks about murder and executing people would come under?

Was Ander's Breivik recruited in 2002 to a neo-Gladio style network?

Government agencies around the world will know whether or not "Operation Breivik" has the hallmarks of a Gladio style operation.

To say that Breivik was a 'lone wolf' defies belief based upon the facts because the anchor point that cannot be disputed was his trip to Liberia and then London in 2002 where he says that he was recruited into their network. Nobody would travel to the blood thirsty murderous civil war in Liberia in 2002 of which President Charles Taylor rightly or wrongly is now sitting in the Hague charged with crimes against humanity unless they were invited there by someone important who could guarantee their safety. Must have been someone very serious and credible for a young Anders Breivik to trust them enough to go there, and how was the link between the 2 made?

Breivik was not a member of the Foreign Legion or any other such military group that is operating throughout Africa so would know how to conduct himself alone in an African war zone, he was an impressionable intelligent young man, and son of the Norwegian diplomat to London.

This is where "Operation Breivik" began and culminated in July 22nd 2011

To say 'lone wolf' defies the facts but is easy for mass consumption rather than to tell people the truth, which is now in-line with his 'inasnity' label.

A 'lone wolf' nut and everyone can go back to sleep rather than face reality and the bigger picture.

Government coverup by not telling people the facts because to do so the 'aware ones' would draw their own conclusions which differ from the 'official' line. Thankfully I know different because I was roped into this by someone for some reason and the Norwegian police told me that Breivik & Liberia was a fact.

Breivik's methodology, ideology and reasoning are all grounded in reality with his own eccentricity added in for good measure based upon his own minds understanding and coming to terms with his reality and role in the right-wing terrorist network he is involved with. He was a recruited and trained agent by them. Everything he says is grounded in facts that can be explained in the context of the bigger picture if you accept that there is a bigger picture. To deny the bigger picture relegates Breivik to a delusional 'lone wolf' nut recruited, radicalised and trained in bomb making and assassination through youtube, blogs and websites.

If I did not know Liberia was a fact then I would agree with the 'lone wolf' nut, but that conflicts with my truth.

9 years planning, 3 years preparing and then successfully achieving his groups goals that is all based in logic when you look at it, is amazing for a paranoid delusional 'insane' man who even now is looking at things logically and how he can continue his personal agenda in-line with the bigger agenda he has started.

He knows what most do not, that he still has people in the outside world to carry on their mutual goals so conducts himself from that basis.

Anders Breivik is the willing sacrificial pawn to declare war against Left-wing Marxists on-behalf of the covert network who are extreme Right-wing political activists and want to topple the controlling dominant Left. Exactly what Gladio style operations are all about and the reason why he has his grandiose complex. He is their perfect Knight, the leader who they puffed up as part of his indoctrination process as being a hero of the Norwegian people and right-wing who shoved it in the face of the Left, and has left his war manual for his global right-wing audience to follow - Pretty amazing for someone the medical profession in Norway has deemed 'insane'

Who else is there in the world today like Ander's Breivik? That is why he is unique in every way and should be understood in that context, and Breivik believes in it all which is his and their reality. Might not be your reality but who is right you or him?

What is very telling is that when Breivik phoned the police to give himself up, he did not say "I am Knights Templar Breivik" he said "I am Anders Breivik of the Norwegin anti-communist resistance movement".

Gladio was set up specifically to fight communism which is what Breivik believes he is doing. It was only after this that he then brings in the Knights Templar cloak. A cloak that this group wants to dress up their terrorist campaign in because it is more fitting ideologically for a wider modern extreme-right wing audience when faced with the new threat of Islamisation on top of communism.

Round 2 has been designed for the UK which is why the EDL has been so prominent to "Operation Breivik" because there you have an extreme right-wing organisation from which to recruit willing agents from, all dressed up in Knights Templar iconography, who are nothing more than right-wingers (wolves) in sheeps clothing.

This new political extreme far-right group wants to use Templarism to wrap their campaign up in and Breivik and the EDL are proof of this point. Real Templarism is faith based and not political based. Faith is above, politics is below, God is above and the devil is below, that's why Breivik murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their Left-wing ideas.

Communism was the first and foremost goal of Gladio and it is right-wing v left-wing which is in-line with Breivik's words and deeds.

Gladio also has its agents within Freemasonary as the video below shows which is another clear indicator of "Operation Breivik".

In my personal opinion based upon the evidence this was a neo-Gladio style operation with a network of agents behind Anders Breivik, its just who are those agents and how high up the chain does it ultimately go?

The Norwegians obviously don't want to go there that's why there is a State white-wash and cover-up going on.

Maybe we will never know, but if enough credible people call into question the 'official' line which is contrary to the facts, then it cannot be swept under the carpet out of sight and mind, then the majority can form their own opinions.

First and foremost those murdered young kids were somebodies children, grandchildren, brothers and sisters, regardless of their political persuasion, and that mass execution of innocence was a crime against humanity because it went beyond what is humanly acceptable for the majority of the civilised world. As an 'insane' man, Anders Breivik gave his logical explanation of why he committed that mass murder that can be understood in light of the bigger picture no matter how repulsive it was/is, that is the nature of Breivik & Co.

No matter how uncomfortable it might be for those in authority over this case sitting in their nice cosy jobs with nice big pay packets at the end of the month they do not want to lose so they can continue bringing up their children and grandchildren, the memory of the dead 69 innocence of Utoya deserve the whole truth to be told by all those employed to get to the bottom of the truth of "Operation Breivik" because they are no longer here to call for it, and maybe another neo-Gladio style operation by this network will be averted.

Either I am right or I am wrong here, but I am wiling to share my view for that 69 and risk my own life in pursuit of the truth because someone pulled me into this by blaming me for being behind Breivik.

Philippians 1:21 For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.

In part 2 of the video you have the links to the former Yugoslavia and Balkans.

Is Breivik Sane or Insane?

The Foreigner: Uncertainty & Criticism

Further reading: Ideology wrapped up in a straightjacket

There is much contention over the diagnosis of Anders Breivik being ‘insane’ by many leading psychiatrists, although they state that they cannot fully determine a proper prognosis without reading the full psychiatric report.

There are also calls from within Norway for a second evaluation because many in the field of psychiatry in the Country say the label does not fit the person or the crime.

I have my own experience of a flawed psychiatric report that I will come to in a minute which proves that not all evaluations are right, with even leading psychiatrists stating that their field is not an absolute when it comes to determining someone’s state of mind.

Sometimes it is a clear cut case though and others it is open to speculation that gets some sort of label because it has to have one from the "specialists".

If a psychiatrist is evaluating the person with a lack of knowledge and experience base with which to understand the mind-set of the person in front of them then their evaluation will be flawed and biased towards their way of thinking.

Lack of knowledge and experience means lack of understanding which means a flawed evaluation, unless a clear cut case.

I am sure not one of those Dr’s evaluating Breivik thinks like Breivik thinks, so his mindset is totally alien to theirs so he must be mad (mine proves this point), they just have to give him a label that best suits the way he thinks, and in this case ‘paranoid schizophrenia’.

Paranoid schizophrenia to think like all of those mainstream commentators who he quotes in the manifesto.

There must be many millions of paranoid schizophrenics out there now who think like Breivik, but would not dream of committing a horrific terrorist act like his to get their point across. That’s the difference between extreme right-wing/left-wing politics and extreme right-wing/left-wing political terrorism.

One has the ideological justification and the other pursues violent means to further those ideas.

Breivik & Fraudman

Out of that team of psychiatrists evaluating Breivik was there one or more who understands the thinking and logic behind extreme right-wing political terrorism or right-wing political thinking when it comes to immigration, Islamisation, Jihad, Marxism?

If not then how can they understand the way Breivik thinks and judge accordingly?

Out of that team of psychiatrists evaluating Breivik was there one or more who understands the thinking and logic behind neo-nazi philosophy?

If not then how can they understand where some of Breivik’s ideas come from that are in-line with the world wide neo-nazi movement.

After all, Breivik does believe he is the leader of a new extreme right-wing movement that many neo-nazis agree with, has written a 1500 page manifesto detailing his reasons and justification and there are many on a more wider basis than just the neo-nazis who are now ideologically aligned to him, his ideas and his ways.

He is a new Hitler archetype and from what I can tell, much of his thinking is based around this type of philosophy and ideas, helped along most probably by his English ‘mentor’ through the brain-washing process he has undergone to believe in himself and their mutual agenda.

This is not a run of the mill situation, it is unique in scale and scope so hard for any psychiatrist to give a proper evaluation unless it is a clear cut case of delusional madness, especially ones with no knowledge or experience base of the facts that Breivik has in his mind. This does not seem to be clear cut case of delusional madness though because there is much contention in this particular medical field over the psychological evaluation of Breivik although no one knows the full facts yet.

We obviously don’t know the full details of the report and how delusional he is perceived from those who were evaluating him, but from the outside Breivik seems sane, with reason and logic behind his actions, just with different ideas and beliefs from the mainstream majority, just like moslem extremists who we say are a minority compared to the majority, and officialdom does not label them as ‘insane’, they are labeled as criminals and terrorists.

He has declared a right-wing terrorist war against Marxists governments based around his actions and the “2083” manifesto, and how many people have done that recently other than Osama Bin Laden who declared a terrorist war against the West, with many millions heeding the call, based upon 9/11 etc and his extensive fatwa’s justifying the war?

Time will tell with Breivik.

The only good thing about labeling him ‘insane’ is that he will undergo compulsory treatment which will allow the Dr’s to get to the bottom of everything with regards to “Anders Breivik” and anyone else who is associated with him.

The most ‘insane’ act Breivik did was murdering 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because to most people that cannot be justified under any circumstances, but there are many acts that happen in the world that the mainstream majority could never justify, even committed by some of our elected World leaders.

What determines madness if it is not clear cut?

A Dr’s report because they have the initials after their name so they must be right?

How horrific what Breivik did on Utoya island is to most people, and although we do not want to admit it, there was logic and reasoning behind his actions that he has explained. It in no way justifies it, but its his logical explanation.

Are not the actions of someone who is insane illogical?

That act was a criminally culpable act and not the act of someone who is ‘insane’ and didn’t know what he was doing. It was well thought out and planned in his mind so shows criminal culpability.

It’s the propaganda and ideology that has deemed him ‘insane’ and not his actions.

Maybe another report should be undertaken on the basis that the English ‘mentor’ is real and that Breivik’s mind was filled with this persons vision and Breivik was central to that vision (the pawn), then the delusion he is said to be suffering has a source separate to Breivik himself, it is a part of a much bigger extreme right-wing agenda involving other people so fits into place logically in the bigger scheme of things.

The official line is ‘lone wolf’ so that psychological evaluation will also be flawed on this point too because it’s all a creation in Breivik’s own head, so delusional. But what if it is not all a creation in his own head and there are other people involved just as he says? That shines a completely different light on everything and explains alot.

He does say his English ‘mentor’ wrote about the perfect Knight, and now Breivik claims to be that perfect Knight, so that thinking has a different source than from inside his own mind, and now Breivik believes he has attained that position because his ‘mentor’ explained it to him, he did what he did, and now he is the poster boy of the extreme far-right for all others to follow and emulate, thus the perfect Knight in their eyes, who is waging a war against Marxists with Islam and moslems for decoration purposes and justification.

For Breivik it all started in Liberia in 2002 during the Civil war in the Country and then London that same year which are both factual points. To believe ‘lone wolf’ is like believing in the tooth fairy.

It depends on whether or not after nearly 5 months of the official ‘lone wolf’ line, the Norwegians can publicly do a u-turn and admit that Breivik is a part of a bigger network. There are calls for the head of their PST to stand down because of failings in this case and I am sure this point must come into that equation and reasoning because nobody likes to admit they have made mistakes but with overwhelming evidence to the contrary it’s a case of reputation on the PST and not an individual’s job position even if they are the boss.

Further reading: PST Director must go

I wonder who will be the first to agree publicly that this is not a ‘lone wolf’ scenario?

Or is that taboo in Norway?

Breivik might have been alone on the day and that’s about it, beyond that all evidence clearly shows a much bigger agenda involving more people that dates back to 2002.

With regards to my psychiatrist report which enables me to give an opinion on this based upon it, the last time I was in prison in 1998, the prison psychiatrist did an evaluation on me and stated that I had had a psychotic breakdown.

With out going into the full details of what happened to me, I had what is described as a ‘religious experience’ where God revealed Himself to me before I ended up in prison. I could not deny my experience which formed the basis of my new knowledge of the world around me, and I embraced Christianity as the truth because of my experience.

I was born again.

If you are reading this and do not believe in God then this is alien to you, so in your mind I must be mad, but it doesn’t mean I am mad it just means I have a knowledge and experience base that you do not have which determines my belief which is different from yours.

Who is right and who is wrong?

They once believed the world was flat until someone gained the knowledge and experience to show a different belief.

Because someone does not believe something doesn’t mean they are right and you are wrong, it just means you have a different point of view based upon your own knowledge and experience base. It’s only the narrow minded people who refuse to listen to other points of view with an open mind because they believe their truth is the only truth and everyone else is wrong whose views differ from their own.

The psychiatrist who evaluated me was an atheist so what was his report going to say when sitting with someone who had just had a Christian religious experience?

Not rocket science…

He reported that I had had a psychotic breakdown.

How could an atheist psychiatrist who refused to believe that my knowledge and experience base even existed, write in his report that I had a Christian conversion experience say ‘hallelujah’ and wish me well in my new found faith as a Christian? Of course he couldn’t, and he had to put a label on the report so his atheist mind labeled it what he did ‘psychotic breakdown’.

He did not believe in Christianity or the reality of an Almighty God because he had no knowledge or experience base – He was/is an atheist.

Was his report right or wrong?

I was incensed by it so wrote a letter to the judge to counter his labeling of me pointing out my facts that differed from his facts, and as the court asks people to swear on the Bible every time they give evidence I hope the judge listened with an open mind otherwise all courts are sham.

Since my conversion my whole life has changed and I have never been in trouble with the police again, except for a thought crime for sharing my truth with others, whereas before that time I was a young thug criminal in and out of prison every year from the age of 16.

My life proves that that Dr’s report was wrong and I could give at least 50 people who would agree that that Dr’s report was wrong because they share the same truth as me and know me personally.

The moral of the story, can Breivik’s psychiatric report be wrong or are the psychiatrists always right because they have the initials after their name?

Time will now tell…but there is already disagreement in Norway so Breivik cannot be that ‘insane’ that some psychiatrists refuse to accept the prognosis based upon the evidence.

Britain & Iranian ties are no more

Further reading: Norway closes its Iranian Embassy

Further reading: Bomb blast at Iranian nuclear facility

Iranian Freedom Institute
And
Confederation of Iranian Students
Press Release

Basiji-led Attack on the British Embassy in Tehran

As the U.S. and its European allies begin to impose effective sanctions on the Islamic Republic, the western democracies should anticipate that the regime will initiate more of these fully-authorized, staged incidents under the guise of a student movement. The so-called students, of course, are plain-clothed basiji following orders from the regime. Even Moussa Ghornani, a member of the legal committee of the Iranian Parliament, admitted unwittingly in a statement that “the students who entered the British Embassy yesterday were members of one of the official and effective organizations within the regime.” The basiji “students” published an announcement in the Raja News (the official news agency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) that railed against the government of Britain because “this evil government had the audacity to sanction our Central Bank.”

The western democracies should take this incident as evidence that the recently imposed sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) have infuriated the regime. And for good reason. The CBI sanctions will disrupt the smooth flow of revenue to the regime that is essential to pay its loyalists, the basiji, and the Revolutionary Guard Corps leadership. The Iranian Freedom Institute (IFI) and the Confederation of Iranian Students (CIS) applauded the imposition of CBI sanctions noting that this is a major step in the right direction.

Contrary to the regime’s propaganda, the Iranian freedom student movement believes the regime has lost its legitimacy and has called repeatedly for its removal. The western democracies should not be misled by the regime’s subterfuge. The Iranian freedom student movement seeks a free, democratic and secular Iran. The Confederation of Iranian Students, in particular, has been at the forefront of this fight for basic human rights and freedoms that the Iranian people desperately seek. Be clear on this point. The Iranian regime, not the average Iranian citizen, is affected by the CBI sanctions and only the imposition of oil sanctions would have a decisive impact on the Islamic Republic.

IFI and CIS believe that the imposition of oil sanctions against the Islamic Republic will cut off the life blood of the regime – the revenue essential to meet the payrolls of its domestic security forces, the basiji and the Revolutionary Guard Corps leadership. The oil sanctions report prepared by the CIS presents a detailed analysis showing how a carefully developed and implemented plan, coordinated closely with the Saudi government, would cripple the Iranian regime and avoid shocking the international oil markets during the current period of international financial turmoil. In this regard, IFI and CIS strongly support French President Sarcozy’s call for international sanctions on the Iranian regime’s oil exports, and will continue their efforts to encourage the U.S. Congress to adopt bipartisan legislation toward that end.

Breivik’s flawed psychiatric report

The Guardian: Breivik's hatred does not come from a delusional mind

For the majority of people within civilized society Breivik’s terrorist atrocity is viewed as the actions of someone who is ‘insane’ because how could someone callously murder 69 innocent kids on a summer camp in cold blood whilst dressed as a policeman. So the psychiatric report condemning him to stand trial as someone who is ‘insane’ doesn’t come as a surprise to many people. The thing with it though is that it was a premeditated, well planned act of political terrorism which puts it in a completely different context than just the actions of someone who has gone out mentally disturbed and killed someone, it is a context that Norwegians have never experienced before in modern times, if at all.

There are other plots of terrorism within their country but none have been successful like Breivik’s so the culprits have never been psychoanalysed by psychiatrists like he has, which means unless there are some glaring examples of pure insanity within his interviews, then their knowledge and experience base is flawed which will in turn mean their assessment is flawed.

Insanity is the only explanation then.

Some key points of why they have deemed him insane are because of his grandiose complex of believing he is going to be the savior of Norwegian people, and that he is the most perfect Knight since the Second World War.

If you put those points into context of everything then they are rational points from Breivik based upon the facts.

There is an extreme right-wing movement within Norway and across Europe that Breivik was a part of, and he has logically taken their thoughts and ideas to the next level. Are they ‘insane’ to think like Breivik thinks, or have they just not crossed the line into political terrorism to get their point across?

Many of the thoughts and ideas that Breivik had came primarily from the Norwegian writer Fraudman, who was mentioned 111 times inside the manifesto, although he now wants to disassociate himself from the man whom his words inspired.

Could Breivik believe he is going to be the savior of Norwegian people by committing his terrorist acts based upon Fraudman’s writings? The prosecutors will have to work that one out, which will make Fraudman culpable.

The ideological network.

If so then that point is not a case for insanity unless Fraudman is deemed insane too, as Breivik is only taking the next logical step within the extreme political right-wing mindset, as he was encouraged to do.

Political terrorism always has rational sane justification, we might not want to accept it or believe it, but we cannot deny it which makes those who commit these acts, terrorists and criminals in the eyes of the criminal justice system, who are locked up for the safety and security of wider civil society, and not people who are ‘insane’ and sent to a mental institute.

It’s criminally sane in that context. Someone who wakes up one day delusional and kills someone is ‘insane’, but Breivik spent 9 years planning and 3 years preparing for his political terrorist attack which makes insanity quite hard to accept or believe. Psychiatrists who live in their cosy little bubbles un-affected by the ills of modern society have no experience or understanding of Breivik’s World view so have no other rational explanation than “he’s insane and delusional to think how he thinks” because its completely contrary to how they think, but there are many who think the same as Breivik, and who have the same World view as he.

Are they all ‘insane’ or just have a different view point of the world than the psychiatrists?

Breivik has a 1500 page manifesto detailing the work of many mainstream right-wing commentators that justifies why he committed his terrorist acts.

You might not want to believe their World view point because it conflicts with yours, but that doesn’t mean they are insane, it just means they have a different knowledge and experience base that has formed their World view point, and there are many millions around the world who agree with many of their points of view.

The gravity and scope of Breivik’s actions are beyond what most people would deem acceptable when looking at a group conducting a terrorist campaign, but this was Breivik’s & Co’s decision, based around their own reasoning, to maximize everything including the subsequent media attention which in turn re-enforced the importance of the “2083” manual that has now been left in the public domain. This atrocity was a tactical decision by Breivik and whoever is associated with him and he himself gives the reasons why which are rational reasons within their mindset, and agreed by many.

Premeditated, well thought out, and successful.

I personally do not believe that killing 69 innocent kids on a summer camp can ever be justified under any circumstances, regardless of their political beliefs, where as the government building in my mind, based upon other terrorist groups actions, could be viewed by some as a tactical target by a terrorist group wanting to wage a political war against their ruling class and government to get their message across.

That is the nature of Breivik & Co.

His grandiose view of himself in my opinion comes from the successful brainwashing of his English ‘mentor’, unless you stick with the official line of ‘lone wolf’ radicalised and trained online through youtube and websites, although that scenario does not hold up under real scrutiny because amongst other things Breivik was invited to Liberia in 2002 during the Civil War in the Country, and was then in London of that same year supposedly at the forming of a secretive false Knights Templar group which are both anchor points and clearly show there is a group behind Breivik and that he is not a ‘lone wolf’.

He is working within a bigger agenda which is set out in the “2083” manifesto.

That being the case, someone painted a picture in Breivik’s mind that he believed which resulted in him willingly committing his terrorist acts in-line with their mutual agenda.

Painting the picture in his mind of he, Breivik, being the first person to start the war to topple Left-wing governments based upon their groups agenda, and how he was going to be viewed as a hero after time because of his actions (starting the war), along with the knowledge he already had about the people he was involved with, it’s easy to see his puffed up ego of his self importance after successfully pulling of his terrorist atrocity.

The worlds eyes are now on Breivik, he has made his mark, issued their statement, left a manifesto for those who agree with him to follow, potentially started a Europe wide terrorist campaign to topple left-wing governments, and gone down in history.

His grandiose complex obviously comes from all of this.

Everything before and after put into context within Breivik’s mind with his knowledge and experience base, and after achieving the first major attack as a "Declaration of War", he then believed everything he had been told by his English ‘mentor’ about him being the savior because it was now a reality to him, he had achieved their mutual goal after 9 years planning and 3 years preparing, and he has been open to explain the truth so that others understand him in context when they look back.

Premeditated, well thought out, and successful, with Breivik now believing in his own importance in the scale of things based upon what his ‘mentor’ told him. Just like moslem suicide bombers who believe the lies they are told by their recruiters as part of the brain-washing process that leads to them blowing themselves up.

His belief that he is the perfect Knight is in-line with the brainwashing by his ‘mentor’ because Breivik states that his ‘mentor’ described the perfect Knight to him which was all a part of his brainwashing process. The ‘mentor’ painted the picture of Breivik being that perfect Knight after he committed his acts which Breivik believed and sought to attain, which is why he now believes it and claims it. His ‘mentor’ told him so, and his ‘mentor’ is still in the outside world to continue their mutual agenda, so it’s true to him.

Unless he is a ‘lone wolf’ then it is all delusional, but he was in Liberia in 2002 during the Civil war in the Country after being invited there by someone who recruited him?

To say he is the most perfect Knight since the Second World War means there must have been a perfect Knight in the Second World War and that can only mean Adolf Hitler who also claimed himself to be a Knight and arose to one of the most prominent positions in World history. This is all in-line with neo-nazi ideology which obviously forms the core basis of the group behind Breiviks ideology, and Breivik himself, which is why he also talks of forming a Norwegian breeding programme.

Breivik is not a Knight’s Templar in its true form, he is a charlatan, a wolf in sheeps clothing because no Knight who has his core belief based upon the Bible and teachings of Jesus would go out and kill nearly 100 innocent kids in the name of right-wing politics. He is a fraud, driven by a devil.

In the manifesto he even decries Christians as being weak minded, needing something to believe in, which is an affront to all true Knights Templar’s around the world.

You can imagine that after committing a horrendous mass murder that goes beyond the realms of mainstream societies sanity and then spending 12 weeks in solitary confinement to come to terms with what he had just done and the subsequent lengthy police interrogations would have taken a toll on his mind so that would bring doubt over its legality if there were points of contention he could explain away sanely, unless there is very clear cut cases of delusion, but Breivik has his anchor points that's why he has been clear and consistent throughout since July 22nd, from what we can glean via his lawyer from the media anyway.

And there are many who justify his acts and agree with him.

We have to wait now for more disclosure of his psychiatric report to see whether or not he really is ‘criminally insane’, so cannot be held to account for his actions.

Unless the real English ‘mentor’ is arrested which proves the above points, and there must be real speculation about the existence of this ‘mentor’ which is why I was interviewed, with it spread across the worlds news that it was me.

The psychiatrists are stuck between a "rock & a hard place" if they are to stick to the official line of 'lone wolf' because everything Breivik says has to be delusional if that is the case, thus 'criminally insane' and delusional.

“One persons madness is another person’s reality”

Breivik's ultimate humiliation: Insane

"One persons madness is another persons reality"

Daily Mail: Breivik 'insane'

The Foreigner: Nobody happy with the 'insanity' label

The Norwegian psychiatrists have concluded that Anders Breivik was psychotic when he committed his extreme right-wing terrorist atrocity on July 22nd so he will not stand trial under normal criminal conditions. He will be standing accused as a 'mad man' who is 'insane' so will be sent to a mental institute after sentencing to undergo State controlled psychiatric treatment rather than become a part of the Norwegian prison population.

That is the ultimate humiliation for him after 9 years planning and 3 years preparing for his atrocity, although you could argue, how could someone who is 'insane' pull of such a spectacular act of murderous right-wing terrorism, with a 1500 page manifesto detailing the writings of many mainstream commentators to back up and justify his actions?

Seems very sane to me.

Doesn't say much for the Norwegian mental health service who did not detect this 'mad man' in their midst, who went on to successfully conduct the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century as an act of extreme right-wing terrorism based upon his fellow countryman Fraudman's essays.

I wonder whether Fraudman will now be sectioned under the Norwegian mental health act as Breivik's terrorist atrocity were a continuation of Fraudman's inspirational writings (what do they contain)? That is of course, unless Fraudman is directly linked to Breivik so will face criminal charges instead, as part of a wider conspiracy. He was in direct email communication with him after all, in the panic he did hide his computer when the police came looking for him, he quite possibly attended the same EDL demo as him in London, and he is directly connected to many of the ideological influences linked to Breivik which could also be Alan Lake.

The good thing about sentencing Breivik to State controlled psychiatric treatment is that the Norwegians will be able to legally pump him with mind altering drugs to try and balance his 'insane' mind out, which might result in the full truth behind everything coming to light, especially if some of those drugs have some type of effect where the persons is induced to speak the truth as part of the healing process.

Until he is certified by the courts there are restraints on what the Norwegians can legally do to obtain the truth, but once sectioned they have a duty to wider Norwegian society to try and rehabilitate Anders Breivik which would mean pumping him with some exotic mind altering substances to help his mind come back into the real world where he realises that murdering 69 innocent kids on their summer camp is beyond normal human behaviour, even for a terrorist (although some gloat over the acts). Unless your a Chechen moslem of course, who committed a similar terrorist act against a school full of children in Beslan.

Also under these State sanctioned conditions they can fully analyse his 'mind-set' so as to be able to understand what makes him tick and what motivated him to commit his acts, so as to be able to gain a clearer picture and understanding of the threat now posed to Norway's National Security from internal and external forces in relation to domestic politics.

Breivik has been very clear as to why he committed his acts, and it is to do with politics and he is only one of many who think and feel like him. Just look at the EDL leader Yaxley/Tommy's comments to Breivik's actions to prove that point: Breivik dared to come forward with his opinions

Placing Breivik in the general prison population would eventually result in him being murdered by someone who wanted to gain the status and reputation of being the person who did the Norwegian people a favour by killing him, so a mental institute is probably the best and safest place all round for him, and realistically they can keep him a lot longer than the 21 years maximum sentence he could have received if he had of been deemed sane by the psychiatrists.

One part I read which was one of the reasons why they deemed him insane was that he talked of setting up a Norwegian breeding programme. That idea comes straight from Hitler himself who did actually set up an Aryan breeding programme in Germany during the Second World War, and there are many who still idolise Hitler and seek to emulate him and his agenda today, so this from Breivik could be from the Nazi influence he has received over the course of his 9 years planning whilst educating himself on the European right-wing scene.

Are all those neo-nazis out there insane like Breivik? are they Breivik's in the making?

Video: German language neo-nazis in Germany

Yep...I reckon, and that was the whole purpose of Breivik and his acts, to gather all those ideologically aligned to him and his 'makers' based upon his actions and the "2083" manifesto so as to wage a leaderless extreme right-wing war against the left taken directly from Osama Bin Laden's terrorist manual of how to start a war in the 21st Century - The global reach of the internet that beams live and direct into peoples bedrooms across the four corners of the world 24/7.

Anders Breivik is the poster boy, although the 'insanity' label will definitely stop some of those weak minded on the edge of crossing over into that world from now doing so, because weakness does not mean a lack of intelligence or intellect.

How many Breivik followers are there out there now, who agree with him and are reading his extreme right-wing terrorist manual/Declaration of War?

In a population of 6.5 billion I would say there are quite a few, its just who goes from the ideological stage into the operational stage.

There have even been European MP's who have supported Breivik and his right-wing ideas, are they insane like Breivik?

We obviously do not know the full scope of the psychiatric report so cannot give any opinions on any key points as to why they have deemed him 'insane', but one thing is for sure, there are many people out there on the extreme right who agree with Breivik and his actions, who will take up his/their mutual cause, with Denmark, Sweden, Russia and other Countries already talking about Breivik inspired attacks.

You could say that he did a good job achieving what he wanted to achieve as someone who is 'insane', with people already following in his footsteps.

"One persons madness is another persons reality"

Awakening - A new generation - AOTK

Egypt - Pro Al Qaeda preaching in Tahrir square

Further reading: Islamic fundamentalists poised to take-over Egypt

'Iran strike aftermath couldn't be as bad as nuclear Iran'

Jerusalem Post

Former Mossad head Danny Yatom says Israel can't afford to wonder if Tehran "will go crazy and throw a bomb on us," says "painful" IDF response would stop rocket fire from Hezbollah and Hamas.

The outcome of a strike on Iran's nuclear sites, no matter how destructive, can never be as bad for Israel as an Iran armed with nuclear weapons, former Mossad chief Danny Yatom said on Wednesday at a security conference at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University.

Yatom took up a position that is diametrically opposed to that of former Mossad head Meir Dagan, who sparked significant controversy by stating earlier this year that an attack on Iran would be a foolish move that would lead to a war with an unknown outcome.

Continue reading: Jerusalem Post

Further reading: (2007) The Future Equilibrium of Planet Earth

Breivik secretly filmed in court

(0.55)