An open letter to members of the National Black Police Association

I am writing this letter watching on from afar as we the general public observe through the media the very public attempt to execute the head of your Police force Sir Ian Blair by what can only be described as a group of bloody thirsty wolves who are seeking a very public coup over one of the Nations main institutions too which you belong and serve the people of this Country in.

You only have to look at the background to this group of wolves to see that it is not a group that should be followed and supported. Each of them are seeking their own gain out of this attempted coup which is money and the public execution of the Top of the Countries Police force, and are seeking to use you in the process as the heavy cavalry behind them.

If you cannot see that then you are blind and stupid and shouldn’t be working in the Police force in the first place.

Tarique Ghaffur has risen over the years working within the Police force to the third most senior position which in anyone’s book is good going for any officer let alone an ethnic minority officer in what this group is calling a racist organisation. This position which reflects his ability isn’t good enough for him and because he has not been promoted beyond it where he personally believes he should be he is now throwing the racism card in the face of those leaders who have supported his career and helped him rise through the ranks, and claiming millions in compensation in the process.

Talk about biting the hand that has fed you and supported you but I suppose you should not expect anything less from a wolf, a natural wild beast.

Commander Ali Dizaei as head of your organisation who has had his own conflicts within the British Police force has come out in support of Tarique Ghaffur claim of racism and the potential compensation claim they are aiming for.

You know your own Commanders story better than anyone else and I wonder how he has ended up as the head of your organisation due to it?

I am sure that many if not most are thinking the exact same thing.

Yasmin Rehman a has also came out in support of Tarique Ghaffur after he emerged into the public eye claiming racism with her own claim of racism and the subsequent compensation claim that comes with it which has bolstered the potential coup at the top.

Then the M.P Keith Vaz entered the proceedings to add weight behind the charges against Sir Ian Blair.

A considerable force to try and topple the Head of your organisation do you not think?

They have also enlisted the crooked con man Dr Shahrokh Mireskandari to represent them in the legal proceedings who each of them know personally on an intimate level, even to the point of breaking British law on his behalf of which you are the upholders.

Why would you even want to entertain the thought of supporting such a corrupt ungrateful group of wolves who are in this for their own personal and political gain, and wanting to use you in the process to achieve it?

Commander Ali Dizaei is talking about using you to march on our streets to demonstrate against Sir Ian Blair and calling for a boycott of recruiting ethnic minority Police officers. The only ones who will lose out if they choose that approach are the stupid ones who agree to it because they will stay unemployed when they could be working in one of the Worlds leading 21st Centuries police forces.

Doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see that Commander Ali Dizaei is trying to use his position over you for his own personal gain does it?

When I read the news about this matter it abhors me that he is head of the Black Police Association and keeps saying as such and using this as his beating stick because he is not black he is Asian.

He is tarring ever fine black officer with his brush and if you look at this group they are all Asian not black so why is he using the black card?

Through this he is forcing each and everyone of you into his defence whether you like it or not and I expect the overwhelming majority of you do not like it.

This same Asian Commander at the NPBA called for officers to vote in favour of positively discriminating within the Police force in favour of ethnic minority officers because of the colour of your skin. How can that be right, shouldn’t the job go to the man with the ability not the man with a different colour skin, isn’t that racist? And you cannot say that skin colour prevents a man from rising through the ranks because there are good high ranking black Police officers and many rising through the ranks based on their ability not their skin colour, and look at Tarique Ghaffur for example of an Asian officer who rose to No.3 in the force.

The race card is a very useful and powerful tool in the hands of people who cannot get their own way in today’s society I hope you agree.

Following the news the past few years we see the lengths Sir Ian Blair has gone too to rid the Police force of racism even to the point of declaring it institutionally racist after the Stephen Lawrence enquiry and putting in place measures to counteract that and change it.

I should think that any ethic minority Police officers who might read this would have to agree that they enjoy their day job and the colleagues they work with no matter what the colour of their skin otherwise they wouldn’t still be there. Of course there are exceptions and there are measures in place to tackle those exceptions that arise.

It is very easy now to cry racism and the whole world comes down upon those who the charges are leveled at. Why do you think this group of wolves are using the race card? The most effective and powerful legal weapon there is now for ethnic minority people in today’s Britain to get what they want.

In my personal opinion when looking at this situation it is a group of Moslems who have joined forces seeking this coup for political and personal gain and they are forcing all black officers into the coup because Commander Ali Dizaei is the head of your organisation who isn’t even black.

Something a little wrong there don’t you think?

So in signing off I would just like to say ‘Why would you want to enter into this groups attempted coup and march on the streets?’ and ‘Why would people not want to join the Police force because Commander Ali Dizaei says they shouldn’t because he is involved in his own personal war against the force?’

Who does he think he is?

I know that any Moslem officers who may get to read this will reject everything because in their eyes they have to support their Moslem brothers and sisters no matter what because of what their religion teaches them so they will march and boycott but who cares really.

Isnt it time you removed these wolves from amongst you and put some men of integrity in their place who have the respect of everyone to lead you forward and defend your rights.

It doesn’t take a brain scientist from amongst you to organise your own coup within your organisation to get your house in order by removing these people from their positions over you does it.

I know for a fact that the majority of your members know that Sir Ian Blair is not a racist so these charges are false, so if they are false then you have to look beyond what are the mechanics at play here.

Regards

Israel: Hadrians curse

http://cfoic.net/addpages.jsp?pageID=138

Hadrian's Curse
By: Tsafrir Renon

The following article was written by a friend of mine, Tsafrir Ronen, who has been working tirelessly to bring the truth about the Jewish claim to the Land of Israel to both Israeli and international audiences. The information contained in this article is critical for an understanding of the Arab claims against Israel and their ultimate goal in creating the fiction of Palestinian nationalism. J.

Sondra Baras
Director, Israel Office
CFOIC Heartland

Summary

Almost 2,000 years ago, the Roman Emperor Hadrian cursed the Jewish People and decreed that Judea should be henceforth called "Palestine" after the Philistines, an ancient enemy of Israel that had disappeared from the world’s stage more than 600
years earlier. It was his final twist of the knife and legacy after wars,massacres, persecutions, and exiles that had largely extinguished the Jewish presence from Judea. Today, the modern enemies of a resurrected Jewish Nation have dusted off Hadrian's curse and are attempting to pull off a monumental theft: the Arab world have reincarnated "Palestine" to steal Israel's heritage and the Land of the Jewish People.

"Hadrian's Curse" will expose the BIG lie of the "Palestinian cause" in a full-length 120-minute documentary.

The film will document that there never was a "Palestinian" people, The world has
become so accustomed to the "truth" of the "Palestinian" perversion of history and
work backwards, exposing recent claims and acts whose absurdity and villainy shock uninformed observers. When Arafat declared: "Our nation is the Arabic nation that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea and beyond it", it turns out that Arafat's nation already stretches over an area larger than all of Europe.

This is the twisted story of one of the biggest, most remarkable fraud in history. It is such a successful fabrication that many otherwise informed people have been duped and mislead. This propaganda has become a powerful weapon used Israel’s enemies, the Arabs, to try to conquer Eretz Yisrael without firing a shot, without an army, tanks or jets.

The Jewish People eventually bested Hadrian. They returned to their land and re-established sovereignty over it. They rebuilt Jerusalem as their capital and resettled desolate Judea. They did all this only to now confront the reincarnated curse of Hadrian in the guise of Arabs renaming themselves "Palestinians" and claiming all the ancient Land as their own. As explained in the Film, many Israelis and lovers of Zion have accepted this misnaming and misidentification. Hadrian’s ancient curse now threatens Israel’s very existence.

Israel’s success and endurance and the world’s hope for peace in the 21st century, demands that the deceit and danger of a Palestinian state must be exposed and
avoided. It is our fervent hope that "Hadrian's Curse" will expose the historical truth.

Part I - The Secret All the Arabs Know

At the Annapolis Conference, George Bush spoke about his vision regarding the virtues of two nations for two peoples.

One of those peoples has a clear identity – the Jewish People. Yet it would be interesting to know the identity of that second people: Already in 1977, one of
the central spokesman of that "second people", a member of P.L.O. leadership, Zahir Muhsein, the leader of the al-Sa'iqa Organization, revealed the truth in an interview to the Dutch newspaper Trouw:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct 'Palestinian people' to oppose Zionism for tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa. While as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

Are you in shock? If the Palestinian People does not exist, what does exist? Arabs
who live in Eretz Yisrael and who have disguised themselves as "Palestinians"
for fraudulent purposes. "Only a means for continuing our struggle against the State of Israel," in Muhsein's words. A fraud so successful that even George Bush can be found seeking a state for that fraud!

Do you think Zahir Muhsein is alone? This transparent fraud about the so-called
existence of Palestine is revealed to us by all the Arabs' leaders:

In 1974, the late Syrian President, Hafez al-Assad, declared: "It would be fitting for us to mention to the responsible Israeli authorities that we view Palestine not
just as an inseparable part of the Arab nation, but as a part of Southern Syria."
In 1987, he reiterated himself at a conference in Amman, "A country named'Palestine' has never existed." Jordanian King Hussein responded, "The appearance of the national Palestinian persona serves as a response to Israel's claim that Palestine is Jewish."

Yet the prize goes to Arafat who in 1970, with candid simplicity, told the reporter
Orianna Palazzi: "The question of borders doesn't interest us…From the Arab standpoint, we mustn't talk about borders. Palestine is nothing but a drop in an enormous ocean. Our nation is the Arabic nation that stretches from the Atlantic Ocean to the Red Sea and beyond it…..The P.L.O. is fighting Israel in the name
of Pan-Arabism. What you call "Jordan" is nothing more than Palestine."

Such revelations are an eye-opener for anyone who has not understood until today the masked-ball being run by the Arabs: The true meaning of Arafat's words that "Palestine is Jordan," is that for the Arabic people, living under the "Pan-Arab" umbrella, in addition to over twenty Arabic countries, there is already a country called Jordan that was established by the British for the Arabs on 77% of the Land of Israel, promised to the Jewish People by the League of Nations in 1922.

Anywhere else on earth, could an additional country would be established for a people that already has twenty-one countries?

All the same, there is nothing like the testimony of the founder of the P.L.O. himself, Ahmed Shukari. Already in 1956 he proclaimed from the podium of the U.N., as the Arab League's ambassador there, that "such a creature as Palestine does not
exist at all. This land is nothing but the southern portion of Greater Syria…"

And if Ahmed Shukari says that Palestine does not exist at all, the logical inference is that "Palestinians" do not exist at all either. That same Shukari was born of a Turkish mother in Lebanon, was himself a Jordanian lawyer, served as the ambassador of Syria to the U.N., the ambassador of the Arab League to the U.N., and the ambassador of Saudi Arabia to the U.N. In 1964, after this talented actor who changed loyalties like a chameleon was fired by the Saudis, Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser hired him to found the "Palestine Liberation Organization", the P.L.O., an organization dedicated to the liberation of a country that in his own words did not exist at all.

All the prominent spokesman of that poor, homeless "people" say openly: The Arabs
who live in Eretz Yisrael are precisely the same Arabs who live in Syria, Jordan
or Lebanon. They are not a separate country, but a fragment of the enormous Arab nation divided amongst many Arab countries. In their identity they are Arabs and the invention of Palestine is just a transparent bluff: "a means for continuing our struggle against the State of Israel for our Arab unity".

Can any testimony be better than that of the Arabs themselves, exposing the lies and deception involved in Palestine's creation?

Yet the most compelling argument for the idea that the "Palestinian People" is a
fraudulent invention, and that the Arabs are all one people, was expounded by none
other than Mr. Husseini, head of the Supreme Arab Committee, to the U.N. special committee that was deliberating on Eretz Yisrael in 1947:

"An additional consideration of great importance for the Arab world is racial uniformity. The Arabs lived in a broad expanse stretching from the Mediterranean Sea to the Indian Ocean. They spoke one language,and shared a common history, tradition and aspirations. Their unity was the solid foundation for peace in one of the most central and sensitive regions in the world. For that reason, it does not make sense that the United Nations should facilitate the establishment of a foreign entity within that well-rooted unity."

Indeed, Mr. Husseini is correct. His declaration before the investigative committee of the United Nations exposes the simple fact that there is no "Palestinian" language and no unique "Palestinian" culture. The Palestinians are Arabs, and they
cannot be set apart from the Jordanians, Syrians, Lebanese, Iraqis, etc.

Remove from the argument the lies and untruths and you reveal that the conflict is
taking place between the Arabic, Muslim empire of twenty-one states and the Jewish People, claiming their right to their one and only historic homeland, consisting of less than one fifth of a percent of the lands under Arab control.

This is the twisted story of the biggest, most unprecedented fraud in history.
It involves such a successful bluff that many people have no doubt about its veracity. This propaganda has become a powerful weapon by which means Israel's enemies, the Arabs, are trying to conquer Eretz Yisrael without firing a shot, without an army, tanks or jets.

Part II - The Arabs' Ultimate Goal

Following the Six Day War, the Arab countries, defeated by a small county determined
to survive, understood that Israel would be impossible to beat militarily. They understood that the Israeli Samson would be possible to beat only by way of the cunning of the Philistine Delilah.

And that's what happened…. No longer would there be cries firing up the masses to genocide, but rather, sophistication…A melody carefully aimed at the delicate western ear. The Arabs discovered that from a propaganda standpoint, it was easier to convince world public opinion of the rights of the poor, small, deprived "Palestinian People" to its own state, than to justify the demand of the enormous Arab empire for an addition of territory from a tiny country fighting for its life.

The Palestinian People is a fabrication invented with aforethought as a psychological weapon of Arab countries defeated in battle, a "Trojan Horse"
for conquering Eretz Yisrael, as Feisel Husseini said after the Oslo Accords.

So was born the worldwide propaganda campaign that turned matters on their head.
The Israeli "David" against the Arab "Goliath" was transformed, by way of sophisticated propaganda, into the Israeli "Goliath" oppressing the Palestinian "David". The object of this propaganda is to blot out and forge the name and identity of the ancient, Biblical Eretz Yisrael, and to transform it into the land of "the Palestinian People" fabricated by Arab propaganda.

By such means did their false propaganda gain such a strong foothold in the media
and the bastions of liberalism that no one has paid any attention to the simple truths spoken openly by Zahir Muhsein, Assad, Shukari, King Hussein or Arafat.

By means of brainwashing, fabrications, lies, falsification, and taking advantage of the world's ignorance and the international media's superficiality, a process
has been taking place in broad daylight, for several dozen years already, of counterfeiting and blotting out history. And just as Goebbels and Hitler, the arch propagandists of the 20th century said derisively, the bigger the lie, the more people will believe in it.

Fulfilling the demands of the Palestinian lie, will put an end to the identity of Eretz Yisrael. Following the loss of the Land's identity, will come the loss of our right to the land. For, if there are "Palestinians", that implies that there is also a land called Palestine, and if there is a Palestine… then there is no Eretz Yisrael.

The most terrible part is that large sectors of Israel, itself, have already fallen
into the Arab propaganda trap. It is they who are opening the door to the Trojan horse that will destroy the identity of Eretz Yisrael.

This is a war that is not being waged by means of weapons and armies, or over physical territory. It is being waged on the battlefields of awareness of the Land's identity. The Roman name "Philistia" was a fiction invented by the Roman emperor Hadrian after the Bar Kochba Revolt in 135 C.E., a fiction of Hadrian then, and a fiction of the Arabs today, to the same degree.

It is a fabrication that represents no people, not then and not today. It is a sophisticated fiction invented for one purpose and one purpose alone, to wipe
out a land's identity. If the land is called Palestine, then the Jewish people are occupiers. If the land is called Eretz Yisrael, then the Arabs are occupiers.

This is the essence of the Arab propaganda war, which is intended to steal the identity of Eretz Yisrael and to transform it into Palestine, and by such means to turn the Jewish people into occupiers of Eretz Yisrael. That's the whole story.

Now it's already clear. The Palestinian identity is tactical, artificial and temporary. It is just a tool in the pan-Arab struggle against Israel. The amazing thing is that it's all out in the open. Section 12 of the Palestinian charter summarizes the idea of this temporary identity, by stating that:

"The Palestinian people believes in Arab unification. It believes that in order to fulfill its task towards achieving this goal, it must, at this stage of its national struggle, preserve all the components of its Palestinian personality, and it must increase awareness of its existence, and reject all plans liable to weaken it or make it disappear."

Is there another people in the world that writes in its charter of self-definition the expression "at this stage"? And what will be in the next stage? Obviously, after conquering Israel, the territory will be divided up between Arab countries, and those Arab countries themselves will throw Palestine into the wastebasket of history.

As Arafat said, the Palestinian people are a fiction. The same is true regarding
the Jordanian people and all the other Arabic speaking peoples in the Middle East.
These are not peoples with separate identities, but part of the great Arab nation.
Only that has a true identity. By their self-definition, they cannot be divided up into a number of peoples with individual identities. Rather, they constitute one nation consisting of many states, as Arafat himself said to Arianna Palazzi in an incautious moment.

For the sophisticated Saudis, with their Saudi Peace Plan, it is clear that its purpose is not to actualize the rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination, for no such people exists. They conceal the truth that the great Arab nation has already actualized its right to self-determination by establishing a large number of countries, one of which extends over about 78% of the area of mandatory Eretz Yisrael. For the Arabs, exploding with laughter over the foolishness of the West, it is clear that if an additional Arab state arises in the western portion of Eretz Yisrael, that will not serve the right of self-determination, but the demand of imperial conquest of all Eretz Yisrael by the Arab nation. Is George Bush dragging Israel to its destruction?

The Palestinian fabrication is exposed precisely when we listen to authentic Arab
voices. The prominent Arab historian, Dr. Philip Hitti, who expressed himself at the Anglo-American commission of inquiry in the State Department building in 1947, said as follows: "Sir, Palestine never existed throughout history. Absolutely not!"

Moreover, Professor Juhan Hazam, in his testimony before that same commission,
added:"Before 1917, when Balfour made his declaration, there had never been a Palestinian question, and there was no Palestine as a political or geographic unit."

Also a local Arab leader, Abd al-Mahdi, testified before the Peal Commission in 1937
as follows: "There is no such land. Palestine is a term invented by the Zionists. There is no Palestine in the Bible. Our land was for hundreds of years a part
of Syria."

Indeed, this is a picture of the real situation in 1918 and at the start of the British conquest of Eretz Yisrael…

Were there any trace of truth to the claim regarding the historicity of a Palestinian People, we should certainly have expected to find mention of it in the history books and encyclopedias, as well as in archaeological research.

Part III- Will Israel finish Hadrian's Work?

Thus, the way to Palestinian Hell was paved with the good intentions of Christian Zionists like Lord Balfour, the British foreign secretary. In the Balfour declaration, and by the decree of the Mandate, they decided, based on historic rights, to grant Eretz Yisrael to the Jewish people. Yet they called it Hadrian's Roman name, Palestine, which had originally had the precise intention of blotting it off the map.

From that moment on, the way was prepared for the birth of the Palestinian fiction.

The name Palestine, by which the British accidentally called the land, bore the seeds of destruction of the Palestinian bluff, as if the entire Land was the stolen property of the Palestinian people, an ancient, rooted people, thousands of years old. This was such an incredible but successful fabrication that large portions of Israeli society fell into its snare. In the report presented in 1938 to the League of Nations, the British made it very clear: "The name 'Palestine' is not a country but a geographic region.'"

No one could have imagined in 1917, at the time of the Balfour declaration during WWI, that anyone would use the name Palestine to create a monstrous, hostile, false identity, for propaganda purposes, and would engrave on their flag the destruction of Israel.

The reporter and writer Joan Peters, in her book From Time Immemorial, writes,
"The one and only identity never adopted [by the inhabitants of Eretz Yisrael] before 1967 was that of 'Palestinian Arab'."

The Palestinian lie was not hatched by any land or any people, but by a map, a map drawn by two European colonial ministers, an Englishman, Herman Sykes, and a Frenchman, George Picot, and on the map was written… "Palestine". It was clear to
the British that Palestine as a sovereign political unit had never existed. No
nation had ever borne its name. No people had ever prayed for its welfare.
It was a name that hadn't existed at all for 1300 years, ironically, precisely when Muslim empires were dominant. "Palestine" was a Roman political fabrication that had faded and disappeared together with the empire that had created it.

The Land regained independence only when the name "Eretz Yisrael" [the Land of Israel], the name in the hearts of the first Zionists, was restored to it. Had not this identity been preserved by the Jewish People, and had it not been preserved in the hearts of the Christian Bible-loving nations who made up the League of
Nations, the national rebirth of the Jewish People might never have taken place.

This is the substance of the war being waged on millions of television screens throughout the world. It is being waged over the identity of Eretz Yisrael. It is being waged by means of all the media, and it seems as though the Arabs have the upper hand, while Israel leaves an impression of impotence, of not yet having even identified the battlefield on which its fate will be sealed.

While Israel prepares jets and tanks for a military struggle, Israel's enemies are preparing their weapons for the final battle, for sticking the last dagger into the back of a State of Israel that does not understand and is not even ready for this battle. Unless Israel prepares for this battle, comes to an understanding of its complexity and frees itself from the false terminologies and constant brainwashing, Israel will be defeated and its land will be irrevocably taken from it.

Will Israel, which valiantly vanquished all the Arab armies when they attacked it also know how to face this propaganda attack that is threatening to destroy it?

It would seem as though the battle is already decided. The Arab propaganda has already penetrated the nervous system and destroyed the immune system that defended the Jewish People for 2000 years, with even the Israeli Prime Minister and Foreign Minister saying that "Israel's interest is to establish a Palestinian state"…

In other words, what they want is for the Bible to be rewritten and for King David's land of the Bible to become the land of Goliath the Philistine.

Could anything be more insane? Is there another nation on earth that behaves this way?

Is it possible that Israel will be beaten without a single shot being fired, simply handing over their land to a wretched fabrication, a coarse, primitive, charlatan canard, a deception that conceals the destruction that the Arabs are preparing for Israel? Could Israel's leaders be too blind to see the danger looming of the Land's Jewish identity being lost? Will precisely the vision of the prophets, fulfilled with the establishment of the State of Israel, bring with it the destruction of the identity of the Jewish People's land, and lead to its exchange for the false identity of Hadrian – Palestine?

When lies are repeated many times, they become true. Such a lie is the fabrication regarding the existence of a historic Palestinian identity. That false identity, which began with Hadrian's curse and that was revived by Lord Balfour, has become a first rate propaganda tool. It became that the moment the Arabs understood the potential of destroying the identity of Eretz Yisrael, and with it the identity of the People of Israel, whose name bears the stamp of ownership of the Land.

The struggle against Israel was the glue that bound the Arab world, otherwise sunken in endless internal quarrels. The Arabs' aim in fabricating Palestine was not to build a nation but to annihilate a nation. Yet to conceal that plan, they invented the plan of "phases". The first phase is the invention of a "Palestinian People." The second phase is the liquidation of Israel, weakened and wearied after Oslo.

By such means did the Arabs conceal their genocidal intent with a "new tool", in the words of Zahir Muhsein, for conquering Eretz Yisrael without firing a shot.

All of these lies and falsehoods, this whole "costume ball" is being marketed by the media, which is turning out to be an obsessive collaborator with the biggest lie on earth.

Precisely this Hadrian understood. That's why he chose the name Palestine.

Precisely this is understood as well by Hadrian's heirs – the Arab propagandists who through their use of this false name sever the historic tie between the People and the Land of Israel. Without doing that, it would be impossible to use the word "conquest" – could a people be considered the conqueror of its own land?

The question Israel faces is this: Will the Jews forego the name and the identity of their Biblical land? Will the Christian world agree to concede on the identity of the cradle of western civilization, the holy land, Eretz Yisrael?

It's the twist of fate that for all this to happen, the Jews had to vanquish Hadrian completely, return to their land, establish sovereignty, resurrect the Hebrew language, establish a mighty army, industry, the best agriculture on earth, hi- tech, culture, song, dance, reestablish a nation, rebuild Jerusalem as their
capital and settle every town and village that Hadrian destroyed. Could we have possibly come full circle? Will Hadrian's curse, which didn't succeed for 1800 year, precisely when Israel was in exile from their land, succeed just now, with Israel's return? Will it be precisely the Israeli government that will resurrect Hadrian's curse, previously lost in the depths of forgetfulness?

Today, 1800 years later, an Israeli Prime Minister is calling for fulfilling what Hadrian failed to do – the erasure of Eretz Yisrael and the establishment of Palestine.

The Emperor Hadrian is smiling from the grave.

The writer, a Former member of the secular Kibbutz “Ein Charod” is a media personality, serves in an elite army unit [Sayeret Matkal] and was one of the founders of the “Nahalal Forum on Behalf of the Entire Eretz Yisrael”. He is presently preparing a documentary film on the Arab Palestine myth called : Hadrian's Curse

Response to Salma Yaqoob

Response to Salma Yaqoob
by Lionheartuk

Who are we British? Part 3 of 3

Who are we British? Part 3 of 3

WHO ARE WE BRITISH, WHAT FORCE FASHIONED SUCH A SPECIAL AND CHOSEN PEOPLE

:Part 3: Jim Dowson B.Th

Jesus said, “Greater love hath no man than this that a man lay down his life for his friends”. John 15:13

I stand by the above statement and my friends are my Nation and people, some with faith and some with none, I make NO distinction and by deed I have in the past and will continue in the future to serve my people without any consideration of what they believe or don’t believe. With this reality in mind I invite you to read on..

In the first 2 parts of this three part thesis I had argued that our Christian heritage (not necessarily living) has been fundamental to what we call ‘The British’ our worldview, our internal outlook, indeed I suggested that the very concept of Britannia was, in the modern term ,1600 until 1900 forged by the Christian faith and our sense of unity and community and was until very recently, sustained and nourished by our national faith. This is NOT in any way an abandonment of our rich ancient, pre-history cultural legacy. As an Ulster Scot whose main families have lived within the same square mile town land for almost 400 years since returning to our homeland during the plantation. Indeed as an Ulster/Scot or Ulaid my family have lived within a 50 mile radius for the last 5000 years.

Nowhere in Europe will you find a more ancient, less diluted tribe than here, my wife, daughter-in-law and son-in-law all share multiple clan names with my own family. On the road where I live we have 4 ancient ceremonial mounds and a huge standing stone and a few miles away we have a much larger ancient ceremonial site that most families visit regularly with their kids to tell tales of the great battles for Ulster against the Gaelic men of Ireland. Even today you can see the mighty Setanta, (Cuchulainn), hero of Ulster depicted on the banners of our loyalist marching and deeply Christian orders.

The continuity is real and present for me and millions of Celts and unlike many in nationalist circles on the mainland we have no tension between our ancient non-Christian tribal heroes and our Christian present. Unlike many of my critics I have regularly and publically carried aloft the banners of our ancient folk heroes and fastidiously educate my children in the ancient ways of my people and our folklore and special places. Normally we do this on a Sunday after church!

So, like millions more here, I am totally relaxed with the present and ancient and we treat the task of keeping alive our tribal identity far more serious than many I have met in nationalist circles, many of whom talk a lot but build very little even through their own family, communal or wider social circles. To these people I say “don’t tell me what I am doing wrong, show me what you have done right”

Like most of my kin, my siblings and I were raised on tales of Tuatha De’ Danann, Queen Medb, King Arthur, Merlin and much more, (including Arthurs quest for Christ’s Holy Grail). I have a living and still very much present relationship with my ancient ancestors and in Ireland that connection is no airy fairy, dreamy, festival based historical spectacle; Oh no, it is real, on-going and ever present within the communities. Who actually knows the religious practices of my ancestors whose bones lay in the fields all around me and are still very much a part of our society here? I don’t but it is not that important to the on-going cultural narrative of my ancient relatives.

So, just because I promote the faith that my blood and tribe has adhered to for 1,500 years does NOT mean I reject our ancient forefathers or their/my myths and legends. Indeed, unlike the rest of transient Britain, here in ‘Ireland’ we have a much stronger living and unbroken connection to our ancestors than in most other places. I believe that now in many parts of Britain people only possess an historical or intellectual acknowledgement of who they might be and therefore are inclined to cling onto or are attracted to, so-called paganism as a mechanism to connect to the ancestors who went before them or to provide them with a sense of historical belonging.

This is an admirable quest in principle, but it a mechanism I and millions of my fellow tribesmen have simply no need of as we already have that strong and unbroken link to the ancient. Nevertheless, to seek re-connection is worthy and of great importance in the struggle to unite our people in order to fight and survive the onslaught of the Islamic invaders. I think we can achieve this separate from imbibing a mystical collection of religious beliefs that have been out of our national and collective memories for almost 1,600 years.

Here in Celtic Ireland or in Gaelic Scotland, few need this surrogate pagan connection because our link to the ancients has never been broken and is still a vibrant part of who we are today. This is not to claim cultural superiority but merely to explain a reality that exists. On my mother’s knee I learnt of Nelson, Wallace, Clive, Cuchulainn, St Patrick, the Kingdom of Dalriada and the heroes of the British Empire, all explained in unbroken breath as a living narrative of my tribe and the unified nation we now owe allegiance to.

Today I fear, few can say the same. This may be the reason I have little or no interest in Pan European Nationalism, Where would I find the room in an already full repository of cultural identity and faith, why would I wish to?

My cultural and ancient ties run deep, my Celtic heritage is brim full and ever living so I have little need of searching for an identity anchor. I, like millions of Scots/Irish, know exactly who we are and where we came from, not just in an intellectual way but in an everyday real and living sense (clan enmity still exists in Scotland and the Ulster conflict has much more to do with tribal identity than it has with religion) This may explain some important differences between me and many of my detractors.

I have the great blessing to live in a society where we take for granted our tribal stability and ancient ties and therefore are very relaxed and confident about our identity. Many without this understandably are prone to lash out at what they wrongly perceive as a betrayal of the ‘old ways’ of our peoples, but without themselves having in any real sense, a current living connection with any facet of the ancient blood or continuity of tribal identity, other than as a bi-product of a political ideology.

Words are fine but look at the reality. Today my tribe, firmly rooted in our ancient past but now deeply Christian and ferociously patriotic (and racially aware) regularly puts 100,000 marching tribesmen in military formation onto the streets of Ulster (that’s 5 million in English population terms), often in violent defiance of the authorities. On some occasions we have up to 300,000 on the streets across our land, that’s one in three of all males. Can you imagine such power harnessed and then unleashed by English nationalists?

So before you dismiss me and my world, think on and imagine if Nationalists in Britain could muster 5,000,000 or even 15,000,000 men, marching in military formation and willing to die rather than even be re-routed let alone banned? At present in Britain we could barely muster a few thousand between all the nationalist groups combined and even then it would more resemble a gang of unruly football hooligans than a civilian militia of determined patriots. I know England isn’t Ulster but unless she learns Ulster’s lessons and pretty damned quick, our children will perish and the black flag of Islam will fly from every public building in THEIR acquired land.

Britain’s isolation and state of constant war with continental Europe was borne out of our religious separation from them at the Reformation and gave us a sense of ’ourselves alone’ a uniqueness, even a national sense of superiority over our European neighbours who still clung to the old religion of the stifling Middle Ages.

Think of Elizabeth I’s Tilbury speech, think of Nelsons motivations and prayers.

Think also of our empire building and the nations that were spawned from these shores, America, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Rhodesia, and South Africa and their religious identity. Why us, what made the British so different from all others? To the racial purists I caution against citing genetic superiority, could we really be that THAT superior to the Swedes or Danes or Norwegians or Germans?

NO, I don’t think so. Most scholars, religious or secular agree that wherever WE Britons went, we took our sense of being special and chosen with us as well as our blueprint for commerce, law, civil governance and lofty ideals of building a righteous and prosperous society. Some scholars think this a bad thing, some think it good, but all agree that the vein that ran through the entire package of what it meant to be British was our commitment to our faith and our desire to share our ‘superior’ form of religion, civic governance and the ‘work ethic’ not only with the savages but with those of the ‘old world’ Much of the time we were often in fierce competition with the old Christian world mainly dominated by Spain and France. Politics back then was religion and religion was politics, nearly every decision was subject to or the result of religious considerations.

The world of secular politics is a relatively new phenomenon and in reality totally bogus. Think of George Bush, Reagan, Thatcher, Paisley, McGuiness and Blair to name but a few high profile leaders, unpalatable to most but all driven in policy by their religious commitment and world view. Even in the EU, Prodi, and many of the top commissioners including the Bank appointed Italian premier are Church educated and hold top positions in European religious orders. The naive idea of separating religion from politics is ludicrous. If a man is a deeply committed Christian/Jew/ Muslim his thinking will be massively shaped by this worldview into every aspect of his career, decision making and policy. Just imagine if Jim Dowson was a government minister or councillor? Take my point.

One only has to explore by study the evangelical zeal of many (if not most) of our past elder statesmen, prime ministers, military heroes and explorers to see clearly how utterly intertwined our sense of national pride and identity was fused with our religion. As a nation, our special, isolated Christian faith bound us together against the world up until very recently. Religion has been described as a power beyond ourselves which makes for righteousness. Look at Nelson for example: The great assertion which lies at the root of Christianity is that "behind all the changes and chances of this mortal life is God, and it is our duty to obey Him, to fear Him, and to love Him." NELSON

Nelson was a parson's son. He prayed morning and evening and wrote special prayers in his log when about to engage the enemy in battle. To him England’s war against Napoleon was a holy war. "God and my country" were his passion.

He would say, “I will do my best, and hope that God Almighty will go with me." When his ship was damaged in the Gulf of Lyons he was gratefully humble and said: “Firmly I believe that it was the Almighty's goodness - to check my consummate vanity. I believe that it has made me a better officer, as I feel confident that it has made me a better man.” Just before Trafalgar an officer surprised Nelson in his cabin as he was writing his last prayer – for England and humanity.

“May the great God whom I worship grant to my country, and for the benefit of Europe in general, a great and glorious victory; and may no misconduct in anyone tarnish it; and may humanity after victory be the predominant feature in the British Fleet! For myself ...I commit my life to Him Who made me, and may His blessing light upon my endeavours for serving my country faithfully. To Him I resign myself and the just cause entrusted to me to defend. Amen. Amen. Amen.”

Nelson dies in the moment of victory, repeating to himself his vindication: "Thank God, I have done my duty!" What a man, what a hero, what a Stout British National Christian Patriot!

Today only a fool would say that it is a vibrant, living faith that binds us, indeed we are undone on a communal and national level so it is self-evident that the glue (whatever you think it was) has dissolved and we as a people are now disparate and isolated from any notion of social oneness or national unity in any real or tangible sense. However, there are still occasions when the fumes of our past rock solid cohesiveness and sense of ‘oneness’ can be inhaled by our people in a very ‘British ‘sense.

Just look at how Royal events, be they weddings, funerals, trooping of the colours or a jubilee bring out millions onto the Mall and achieve the highest TV ratings of all and spawn tens of thousands of street parties and celebrations across the land. Remembrance Day also involves millions in a national act of collective reflection in 50,000 churches and war memorials across the nation. Victory celebrations like VE day, VJ day and the Falklands also bring out millions of Brits onto the streets in a brief patriotic display of ‘oneness’. . Imagine if nationalism could but harness 10% of this we would sweep away the whole rotten edifice of the EU and Islam in a few months.

Other Christian events, less obviously but no less unifying for the ‘British’ like Christmas and Easter also provide well-loved vehicles for nation unity and participation. On a smaller community level, weddings baptisms and funerals often provide the only opportunity for a family or community to interact in these increasingly socially isolated times Sporting events also bring out a sort of national pride, albeit rather parochial and crude.

I would ask the reader to look at the mechanics and rituals surrounding and underpinning all of these major national events! An outsider from Mars would be given the impression that this nation and her people were religious fanatics when faced with the pomp and circumstance of our main cultural events, most of which start or finish in a church or are smothered in rich Christian language, paraphernalia and clergy.

Many of us Brits are so used to seeing our big events or are that busy participating in them that we are no longer cognisant of their presence, but I say, look again my friend and look well. For it is only when something becomes so totally ingrained does it become invisible and this I submit, is the case with many, if not most of our people and their relationship with Christianity in the context of involvement in our national events. A strong but subconscious awareness of the Church however, remove it or attack it and a whirlwind is unleashed, likewise harness this social reality correctly and a tornado will rip through this land uprooting all foreign palms and strange fruit that now grow in Albion’s fertile soil.

Let us be clear here, I am not advocating the promotion of any kind of religious revival, indeed it is my opinion that this side of a war, such a thing would not be possible or desirable. I merely point out that our existing deep rooted Christian heritage has in the past, and now to a lesser more cultural extent, still acts as a national form of unifying glue that cements our many competing factions and ideologies and identities together as one nation and one people.

To be extra clear when I say Christian heritage I refer to its by-products mentioned above, I do not necessarily refer to an ecclesiastical or real and personal commitment to the faith. This is a point many fail to see or are unable to discern, and interpreted as a valid intellectual nationalist position despite it being so glaringly obvious by the above events that it spawns and their popularity among our peoples, even today. Surely it is folly for the 5 million who attend church weekly, the millions who have been in the scouts, boys brigade, girl guides and the other tens of millions who consider themselves in some way connected to Christianity to be ‘overlooked’ or ignored and even ridiculed by many in the British nationalist movement?

It is akin to a mosquito ignoring an elephant; it means little to the great beast but renders the mosquito weak and doomed to an emaciated death. In Europe many of the fantastically successful nationalist parties are drawing their disproportionate strength from their Christian host; their lifeblood is being veraciously sucked up and transferred into political success on the back of the ancient Christian heritage that provides a unifying framework.

All across Europe nationalism is being fed and promoted by the local churches and historical links to Christianity yet many clever British nationalists are totally blind to this and have no idea of the massive Christian/nationalist hook up going on. Look at Belgium, Hungary, Russia, Bulgaria, Romania, Poland etc, etc, etc. It may be downplayed for expediency but I have been and seen the political youth camps in Europe and the Ukraine, they are run and administered by the churches and the local branch set ups are often working in, or out of church owned premises.

The upsurge in successful nationalist organizations is inextricably linked to their Christian heritage in Europe. Only where the church has been replaced with ideology has the movement by in large, stagnated and became a caricature of an ‘earlier national socialist time’. Plenty of noisy presence lacking any real support or any vestige of power or people appeals in any significant way.

It is clear that a significant number of nationalists are completely out of kilter with the average patriotic man and woman on the street in Britain. Yes, this may be because “they are all brainwashed zombies” as my nationalist purist friends repeatedly tell me, maybe, but never the less we must work with what we have and to alienate 95% of those who consider themselves to be proud Brits is almost masochistic, even sadistic and incredibly restrictive to the building of an integrated, united and common cause movement that can fight and win!

Let me grasp the nettle here and risk being the new hate figure for the purists. Many, if not most nationalists that I speak to currently in the movement i.e., BNP/NF/BPP (or ex) are wedded to ideals that are totally repellent to most people who are proud to be British. The promotion of paganism, the ridicule of Christianity, the hatred of national icons like the Queen, Churchill, Cromwell and many more who are beloved of our people is a complete turn off to most, as has been proved over the last 60 years. Also, The fixation with race, not the problems that racial immigration brings, but with skin tone no matter where the people reside and a whole other raft of self-isolating hobby horses like ZOG, the Bilderbergers, Zionist bankers and an ever increasing plethora of other conspiracies have reduced our appeal to numbers that could easily fit in a decent sized community hall.

Let us be very, very clear here, like the great boxer Ali, I too am a solid racialist and I am no Zionist and yes, I do believe there is a N.W.O reality and that the EU is but one dimension to this evil, but to dwell on these deeply misunderstood and people repelling subjects while also chasing further millions away by the anti-Christian, anti ww2- Churchill iconology and anti-Royal creeds that run so deep within branches of the nationalist movement leaves us where we are now…nowhere, powerless, marginalized and ignored by the vast majority who are themselves ‘patriotic’ Britons. The fact is, most British patriotic citizens love much of what nationalists hate! There is no future in such folly for the ‘nationalist’ movement, NONE WHATSOEVER!

Sadly, I have reason to believe by the blatant and consistent self-destructive behaviour among nationalists, we have now self-selected ourselves to the position where many are simply so cranky and ‘far out’ that reasoned debate and cerebral considerations is almost pointless with many. Some openly use German icons or link to 1930’s National Socialism on their webs and blogs and even the more ‘intellectual’ among our ranks are swept into the so called ‘new’ right-wing think tanks. These self-aggrandising talking shops are where self-proclaimed intellectual giants still churn out (albeit in a far more cognisant way) the same old ‘Blood and soil’, national socialist, pagan folklore ridden, Germanic in flavour, toxic material that landed us in political obscurity and national disdain in the first place. Yet they keep talking, and the British people keep walking…. AWAY!

The proclamations and lofty speeches from the rights so-called, ‘intellectual elite’ is not even propaganda, as propaganda at least tries to induce converts to join the cause. The stuff they peddle repels all but the paid up NS nationalists anyway and merely serves to reinforce the opinions of a few purists in their own political conceit and self-deception. More drivel, more hot air, more isolation and ever nearer to our collective national doom.

I am not saying its right, I am not saying it’s wrong but I am saying that, to 99% of the patriotic public it is not only weird and cranky but deeply offensive and contrary to what they hold dear, and right or wrong, ‘them are the potatoes’ as our cousins across the pond say.

However, despite the reality of our near complete failure and lack of impact even at local level some nationalist fight on with their rejected and people repelling ideologies. Like some kind of nihilistic cult hell bent on offending and driving away the greatest number of our people, many within our movement still proclaim publically that which should barely be whispered privately. Do these people get a kick out of being ridiculed or loathed? Are they in competition to see who can be the most socially and politically isolated and despised? If so, there are many contenders within our ranks.

This is not a principled noble stance, its gross self-abuse and plays fast and loose with our children’s future and I for one, am utterly fed up with these people and the nihilistic and the socially putrid message they proclaim to an increasingly hostile British public!

Some say I play this game also? Not so, I am deeply involved with several socially Conservative groups whose memberships and influence far outstretched the BNP at their height, but few within them will come over to our cause because of the reasons I have already laboured upon. These connections together with my entire families integration in the fiercely patriotic Ulster Unionist culture, my wider church involvement and my normal business activities gives me a fairly good handle on what I am talking about and how others, who should be our natural allies, see us and the movement generally.

However, one cannot argue in this, such a troubled arena without offending many, that is a fact. I take no pleasure from this and it does indeed grieve me, but we will be at war soon enough and the avoidance of causing offence is to be truthful, not my primary concern at present. In this I ask your understanding and patience. It is true I see little purpose in pandering to a minute number of nationalist pagans if it means we by doing so we lose far more Christians. Nor do I think we should bend over to the tiny gay nationalist lobby under any circumstances. If we can carry the pagans along, great, but we shouldn’t even contemplate the concept of the ‘pink nationalist ‘lobby being a valid expression or branch of our cause ‘Period’.

Many may indeed dispute the veracity of my interpretations but I caution the reader to weigh up the dissenters personal social standing and current, wider local community involvement before coming to a conclusion. It’s easy to agree with each other, but it’s the millions of directionless and unattached patriots we need to be concerned about. These millions are found among our neighbours and townsfolk. Unlike many of the dreamer’s among the nationalist fraternity, I know my kin, in and out of politics;
I am involved in every facet of my local and wider community. I know my tribe and they know me. Most weekends as many nationalist dream or pontificate in the cyber world, myself and my children are marching with thousands of our fellow patriotic tribesmen bound together by BOTH ancient ancestral blood ties and our communal Christian heritage. This is real life for me, day after day, not a nationalist fantasy world that so many of my comrades now seem intent in retreating into (if they ever really came out at all) only daring to ‘fight to the death’ from the warm confines of their homes and wielding nothing more dangerous than a keyboard!

History is a great teacher and in the early days of the Ulster conflict the Provisional IRA did not exist, but the Official IRA did but lost ground and the support of the Church and the people because they openly spouted their well-developed but unpopular Marxist ideology and disdain for the Church, and following a brave but poor defence of their communities in 69 the opportunity to oust them presented itself and the provisionals' were born. No less Marxist in ideology but they were not so vocally anti church and thus gained the support of their church and people and as they say, the rest is history. Today this once small band of geeky, idealistic teenagers jointly runs my country and a quarter of the United Kingdom, and all done in less than 25 years. My joint first minister, Martin McGuiness attends church every single day, a lefty yes, but one who has reconciled his political ideals with the cultural/religious and community reality for most of his people.

I trust most can see my point but in case it’s lost on some it’s this: All ideologies are valid in someone’s eyes but many are not expedient or even acceptable to most. We must harness national icons and cultural landmarks on our communal landscape and use them to our advantage rather than attempt to tear down the very things that our enemies are also trying to destroy. The message many nationalists proclaim is simply too confusing to most. Islam hates the Queen - many nationalists hate the Queen, Islam hates the Christian church - many nationalists have enmity against the church, Islam hates our military icons - many nationalists openly rail against the nations favourite military icons (Churchill), and Islam hates Israel - many nationalists also hate Israel (I personally have no love for Israel before you ask). Can you see a pattern emerging here?

In study after study the academic world has shown that what makes ‘The British Feel British’ are: The Royal Family, WW2, Dunkirk/Spitfires/Churchill and all that, The Christian Church and festivals, Our Xenophobia!, especially against the French and Germans and our public displays of pomp and ceremony. Do many of these resonate with the current crop of ‘Nationalists’??

The ideological arguments that emanate from the lower, middle and upper echelons of the nationalist world in Britain are very interesting, some indeed may be valid but they are akin to a group of penniless, homeless starving men sitting around the dying embers of almost extinguished fire in the dead of winter but rather than seek survival, warmth and nourishment they insist on discussing the intricacies, evils and authors of fractional banking and derivatives! Such a hopelessly deluded band is doomed by the law of natural selection to perish from this earth and with them their lofty ideals. I have no desire to sit pontificating while the fire goes out, waiting for deaths icy grip to carry me off into the inky blackness of the winter’s night of national defeat, assimilation or racial annihilation.

I have been brutally honest in this three part thesis, I have laid bare who I am, where I am coming from and where I believe we should go and unlike many within the movement, I have personal and intimate experience of widespread communal violence, ethnic cleansing of areas, the deaths of defending patriots and the impact of prolonged armed assaults on a society. Every single day of my life I meet and pass the widows and children of patriots who have paid the ultimate sacrifice in defence of my tribe’s homeland. Many if not most of my neighbours have served and lost family members in recent times in the defence of this part of the UK, so the future of England’s struggle in particular is real to me in a very practical and sombre sense. I have little time for fantasist ‘political soldiers’, cranks or blowhards.

Thousands on both sides died here in my lifetime, hundreds of thousands were maimed for life, and these people are my friends and family. They are the general population all around me, even in my small quiet town in a relatively safe area we had 12 locals murdered, dozens more maimed and scores of men imprisoned for daring to fight back. we also had over 400 local men serve with the official defence regiments and police and hundreds further in the ranks of the paramilitary forces and all from a town of 6,000 in a ‘quiet ‘ area of Ulster. Maybe that’s why I have an uncompromising, abrasive persona regarding our national struggle. I have seen and heard it all before and I see too many in our movement content to indulge themselves in pointless fringe political standpoints that almost guarantee our continued isolation from the millions who we need to engage with and who already crave a vehicle to pin their allegiance to. Our people are looking for a movement where honesty, integrity, and decency are paramount but they also want something familiar and recognizable and something that they can easily identify with.

All I suggest is that we could do a lot worse than to play on the national, ancient and cultural icons that the Christian church has provided these last 1,500 years to encompass a sense of our shared communal, historical and national experience, purely as a way to galvanise a significant number of our people into a movement of resistance and ultimately, conflict. It may not be perfect and may only be a part of the answer but I contend that is a far more appealing ideal to millions of British patriots than what we currently offer and have had repeatedly rejected by our kinsmen these last 60 years.

Whatever you make of this thesis remember this: A terrible conflict of unimaginable ferocity and horror is coming, our ruling elite will be with the enemy and the battle ground will be the towns and cities from the Midlands up to Lancashire and west Yorkshire. Millions of ordinary British people will be displaced and hundreds of thousands will perish. Our wives, our daughters, and our sons will die in a Jihad of bombs, bullets and mayhem unleashed from a thousand Mosques across the land. We lost 3,600 here in NI in a tiny population (over 100,000 in an English context) but what has already started on the mainland will be far more brutal and deadly than the Ulster conflict ever was.

No one will escape the carnage, no family will remain unscathed, and the graveside will become a familiar and regular meeting place as we lay to rest those loved ones slain from among our midst by the religious fanatics of an exploding unified Islamic war machine. For them the conflict is all about faith and that is their strength and the power that will launch them upon our children and grandchildren like a medieval whirlwind of death and destruction.

Our forefathers knew only too well this desert wind of death but defeated it on the battle fields of tours, Vienna, Budapest, Valencia and lepanto. Your ancestors and mine crushed the bloody crescent moon under a sea of Holy white banners, with the sacred blood red sign of Christ’s cross emblazoned upon them. It is my personal and deeply held conviction that only when our people, like our fathers before us, raise again the battle standard of the Lamb of God before us, can we be assured of victory over the tens of millions of embedded Islamist Jihadists and their traitor allies here in this country.

Finally, I humbly suggest that far more Britons would rally to the banner of the Cross rather than to the banner of Mosley, Merlin or a German inspired, National Socialism. One thing is for sure, we shall all live or die on the decisions and directions we establish now. There are but a few summers left to us before the dark clouds of Islam’s winter extinguishes the light for many a generation. I truly wish that we could avoid this conflict but it is absolutely inevitable. We are the last of the FREE Britons my friend so choose your path wisely. Your children’s lives do really depend on the actions we take NOW!

Thank you for your patience and forbearance in reading this very lengthy thesis and be assured, whatever happens my household will fight and NEVER surrender, it’s in our blood and after 400 years of almost constant unbroken warfare here , fighting is all we know, let’s hope those on the mainland of Britain are fast learners.

Who are we British? Part 1 of 3
Who are we British? Part 2 of 3

Who are we British? Part 2 of 3

Who are we British? Part 2 of 3

WHO ARE WE BRITISH, WHAT FORCE FASHIONED SUCH A SPECIAL AND CHOSEN PEOPLE

:Part 2: Jim Dowson B.Th

In the first part of my paper examining who we are and what made us and just why nationalism has spectacularly failed to engage all but the tiniest proportion of our people despite circumstances that should make nationalism a first choice for millions.

My main proposition was, and is, that patriotic politics (nationalism), has failed miserably because its ethos (real or perceived) is rooted in a European model of racial nationalist expression which is an alien and foreign product and a most un-appealing ideology to us Brits for many reasons, not least of which is its intrinsic rejection of our own rich and ancient Christian heritage (real or perceived).

In the first part of this paper I was deliberately provocative in challenging the ‘nationalist mind-set’ by showing how overwhelmingly their ideas of what constitutes a ‘patriot’ had been rejected for over half a century, but still many nationalist leaders bang the same old busted drum, never attracting, only repelling, fresh generations of our beleaguered people.

Many critics will no doubt immediately brand me a Christian fundamentalist or race traitor with an agenda. Well, this is partly true, but the critics offer very little reasoned, researched or balanced arguments against my points.

Indeed, many nationalists contend that people like me, who use Christian language and references, are hopelessly out of kilter with the mainstream.

These sentiments only reinforce my premise that it is nationalism (especially the more racially vocal type), in its current manifestations, that is out of touch, irrelevant, mysterious and deeply unattractive to most British patriots.

Recently, a respected opinion poll cited that 40% of British children these days do not know the ‘Lord’s Prayer’ as opposed to only 10% not knowing this thirty five years ago.
This interesting news has stirred up church leaders and annoyed many religious people and indeed many nationalists have used this study as ammunition against me and my opinions.

However, let us for a moment ponder these figures: 40% of our kids DON’T know the Lord’s Prayer, but an incredible 60% actually DO KNOW IT!

What percentage of our children, even those from nationalist parents know what the ‘14 words’ stand for, or what ZOG means or what the NWO stands for or what we mean by white racial nationalism?

Right or wrong, these are the facts and we would be foolish in the extreme to ignore such an obvious communal creed and common bond still so vibrant within our young people.

The same study threw up another interesting point: more children NOW think God and religion is important than their parent’s generation, this despite a drop in church attendance over the period.

This is a fascinating snippet of information and needs some very deep thought and consideration.

Could this be a reaction against their parents’ consumer-based lifestyle over the last twenty years?

Could the ‘baby boom’ generations mantra of free love, their replacement of God with consumerism, be coming to an end?

Has a fifty year social anomaly now run its course? Who knows, but I think it is entirely possible.

You see humans, all humans, need something bigger than themselves to ‘buy into’ - the baby boomers merely replaced their forefathers’ ancient stone and stained glassed ‘communal’ landmarks with Bluewater, the Arundale Centre and a thousand other shopping centre temples to the new consumer gods of Asda, Tesco, Next and JJB sports.

The 1940s generation was sold the idea that individualism was the new path to enlightenment and this human salvation could be brought about by embracing the glittering new deities of personal wealth and consumerism.

Also important to this promised route to personal and social Nirvana was the total rejection of the collective and familiar cultural icons and traditional mores that for centuries acted as the glue that held together our once strong communities, extended families and our collective idea of nationhood.

Let me be very clear here: I do not wish to see the nationalist movement become a full on Christian enterprise nor do I think that would work or appeal to the average Brit.

I am however, suggesting that Christianity is so deeply ingrained into the fabric of our society at every level, that we would be foolish to ignore this.

I would go further and say that our brand of Christianity is not just in the fabric of our nation, it is interwoven into every Britons cultural DNA and the collective narrative of our island race.

Cultural markers like the Lord’s Prayer are like ancient echoes that resonate deep within us and around us. Similarly our Christian architecture has shaped what we think of as the quintessential British townscape.

From the lofty parish spires we see in the distance marking out an ancient town or village, seen through the eyes of a hundred generations of our people, to the palace of Westminster, built as a gothic temple as Pugin and Barry re-defined what it was to build in a ‘British style’.

Look around you: nearly all of our Victorian town halls, railway stations and civic buildings are so ecclesiastic in appearance that they confuse many a tourist.

Even the foremost ‘temple’ to Darwinism and secular modernity, the Natural History Museum, was built in the form of a great medieval Christian cathedral.

This is why our historical faith and religious heritage is so terribly important to the idea of ‘Britishness’ and to most Britons.

It is the civic glue that binds us as a people and echoes the voices of our ancestors’ collective experiences down through the millennium and it resides deep within millions of our kinsfolk.

We have nothing else so powerful, so subliminal or so accessible that we can easily access for the benefit of our struggle and for the unification of our people in the dark days that lie ahead of us.

This cultural cement took 1,500 years to set, for fifty years the cultural Marxists have chipped away at it, as have the secular ‘national socialists’, atheist racial purists and the pagan nationalists, but our cultural Christian heritage is a powerful binding agent, not just a superficial veneer of creeds, clergy and buildings.

It is part of our national and personal DNA and can never be fully removed from us.

Indeed, give it the slightest encouragement and it will burst spectacularly into full bloom again.

Or, when faced with a spiritual/political foe such as Islam, our ancient faith, (cultural or personal), shall rise up in a most masculine and aggressive format in defence of the host, the Nation that nurtured and adapted it to our specific requirements as a people.

The faith of our fathers is not dead - it merely sleeps within us and may well be awakened by the invaders ‘Adhan’ call to prayer from the forest of Minarets that now populate our landscape.

It shocks and exasperates me that so many patriots and nationalists fail to recognise or accept this and still continue in their belief that people like me are out of touch.

Please try and find the program “How God Made the English” and you will see what I mean.

http://www.pixotube.com/how-god-made-the-english-s01e03/

History has told us time and again that no secular society has ever succeeded in quashing a people with a deeply held faith, even when in the minority.

This is where the Frankfurt schools ideology has gone wrong.

Yes they managed to secularize almost the entire top tier of our political structures and society.

But they had not, and by their own secularism, could not, ever had envisaged how easily a vibrant, unified faith community like Islam could then take over a society that the Frankfurters had stripped bare of its natural defences.

It is not only us that now lie weak and prostrate, it is the Marxists too, as they will soon find out as Islam rises in the countries that they have left ruined and vulnerable.

However, this disaster may carry the seeds of our own salvation too: if a highly motivated and unified community like Islam can sweep aside the PC and politically effeminate ruling classes so can we.

Indeed Islam may show us the way ahead.

Militant Islam may re-ignite our collective and civic consciousness and notions of nationhood which, in my opinion, can only be found in a shared national, historical Christian context.

In the 2010 census 46 million Britons described themselves as ‘Christian’, and over 5 million get up, dress in their best and make the effort to go to their local Church every Sunday.

To ignore such a committed mass movement and spiritual reality within our own people is national suicide.

After 80 years of internal subversion many church goers are indeed bleeding heart liberals, but the vast majorities are not.

In fact, secular liberalism is far more widespread than Christian liberalism and I suggest that besides the race issue, many nationalists are far more socially liberal than most Christians would dare to be.

The vast majority of Christians in the UK are deeply hostile to Islam, unbridled immigration, the EU, ‘gay rights’, the PC lobby and many other nationalist common causes.

Most are also opposed to thuggish behaviour, divorce, sexual promiscuity, drunkenness, foul language and the football hooligan mentality. These, unfortunately are some of the social ills that have dogged nationalism for years with little or no effort spent in trying to address these issues.

More importantly, Christians, like most fellow Britons are fairly xenophobic, however they are also instinctively anti-racist in the sense that they will broach no discussion on the merits of a man depending on his racial group or skin colour or ethnic identity alone.

We Brits tend to judge a man on who he is, rather than what he is.

Yes, most of us have a moan about the foreigners down the road but our ingrained sense of fair play and personal respect for our fellow man prevents millions from giving perceived blanket racist groups our support.

I cite the NF and BNP as classic examples of this moral and national dichotomy for our people.

Fair play, decency and reasonable tolerance are sacred cows for most Britons, especially Christians, as is their absolute abhorrence of anything that is, or could be classified as belonging to the school of Nazism or Communism.

In fact, to even discuss such things among Christians often results in immediate rejection of the bearer and whatever cause (no matter how noble it may be) he or she may be espousing.

Right or wrong, Frankfurt influenced or not, this is how it is and we do not have another eighty years to re-educate millions of natural patriots on the nuances of racial differences and the mitochondrial markers in the inferior peoples of the world.

Now, I must be brutally honest and up front here: as a patriot whose childhood was deeply rooted in the Orange/Loyalist culture, which is uncompromisingly and fiercely patriotic, I knew virtually no one in our world that liked the BNP or NF.

Yes, some of us , myself included, flirted with so called ‘Nationalism’ of the mainly English BNP/NF variety in our youth, but almost all of us were totally repelled and alienated by the often intense pro-Nazi/white power/ZOG/pagan obsessed ethos of many within the movement.

For a time I lived and worked in London, during which the Brixton riots happened and around then several whites had also been butchered by blacks.

As a committed and heavily involved loyalist my only reference to such massive attacks on a community was to strike back, but all I saw was the natural anger, rage and tribal need to survive being stifled by endless, inane political ramblings every day in the NF’s Pawsons Road HQ or in the Swan pub up the road.

Lots of big talk, intellectual talk, stupid talk, but absolutely no action.

Englishmen and women were dying, our capital city was being destroyed, but the only response from the nationalist leaders were delusional ten hour discussions on ‘white superiority’ and electoral daydreams of securing a modicum of power through the ballot box.

There is nothing superior about a people who refuse to defend themselves or exact retribution from those who would seek to destroy them and their children’s birth right.

The political system was and still is used as a tool to lock up and channel our national outrage and our youthful energies and strength into safe and controlled neutralising political safety nets.

Despite many nationalists now understanding this we yet again we see our youth in the form of the potentially revolutionary EDL now being corralled into the futile political system.

This will neutralise any threat they may have posed and will end in failure just like the NF/BNP before them.

The EDL/BFP will probably be even bigger than their NF/BNP predecessors in order for the state to keep a lid on the increasingly deteriorating ethnic/political situation in Britain.

Alas, it will be nothing more than a state sponsored holding pen and intelligence gathering operation for the best of our young patriots and that is the real tragedy, for this is our last generation before Islamic Armageddon in this Country.

To be completely clear, I personally despise the ideologies and practical applications of much of German National Socialism and I have little time for the real Nazis, but I reserve my real disgust and bitter contempt for the crackpot wannabe Nazi clowns who have caused our noble Cause to be so despised in the eyes of the British public for over sixty years.

It is we British who are a special and ‘chosen people’, not the Germans!
I am no multi-cult ‘civic’ nationalist, I assure you and I care little for the Jews and the state of Israel or their Palestinian foes (a plague on all their houses) but I am also no Nazi apologist, admirer or fan.

We have legions of our own heroes and have no need to go looking for European ones.
Nor am I a blanket racist, I have an affinity with all of mankind but I prefer and wish to preserve my own tribe and nation more than any other factor.

I treat all humans, black, brown, yellow with kindness and respect.

The thought of hating a man just because he is non-white is thankfully, beyond my comprehension.

Neither do I possess any great affinity with foreigners no matter what colour their skin.

Yes, I do understand racial politics and yes, technically I accept that we northern Europeans are all one people and ethnic group, but it’s just too big a concept for me and I fear for most Britons too.

My kinsmen are those of my immediate, tangible tribe, the Scots, the Welsh and the English and to a certain extent the Irish.

The political manifestation of this, our ‘United Kingdom’, is more than enough to have to deal with without daydreaming of a pan-European or worldwide ‘white national identity’.

Let’s be honest: most Scots, Welsh and Ulster patriots harbour to varying degrees a mild hostility or suspicion towards the English.

This ‘soft resentment’ is not in any way hatred, but it is an unspoken (in front of our English comrades) reality that most Celts do their best to mask.

It is not a malignant thing but merely a mechanism of very small nations to resist assimilation into the gigantic neighbour next door.

This is not a sign of a weak union - indeed the Celtic nations of the UK have always had far higher numbers of volunteers when called upon to defend the political entity of the UK and far higher casualty rates.

So our commitment to the union despite our national differences is beyond question and our integrity towards the political idea of a United Kingdom, beyond reproach.
After three hundred years of hard work keeping our own nations together one can see the difficulties in attempting to realise the pipe-dream of white European unity.

In the real world and every decade spent pursuing a united ethno /political pipe dream further enhances the neglect we have shown to building our own indigenous community cohesiveness to the point that we now fail to interact as a community at all in many parts of this country.

Our political focus is, and must be, purely and entirely ‘national’.

Many Britons no longer even know their neighbours. This in turn is facilitating the invaders easy takeover of our land and adding to our peoples’ feelings of isolation and powerlessness that manifests itself in unprecedented ‘white flight’ all over the country.

Who in the world fifty years ago would have believed that in a few decades’ dozens of British towns would have fallen to Bangladeshi and Pakistani invaders?

Who would have even considered that millions, yes millions, of English, Welsh and Scots citizens would have been displaced and put to flight from the streets and towns of their forefathers by hordes of uneducated third world peasants?

And who on earth would have believed that all this could have befallen the British without the threat of gun or bomb?

Nobody in their right mind would have envisaged that the British, in their millions, would have fled the field before firing a single shot in defence of their homes and towns?

This is how weakened we have become, yet those millions who have been driven out of their homes still find the ‘nationalist’ ethos and product so unattractive that they refuse to engage with us.

Surely it is time to rethink our entire approach and attitude if we are ever to dare hope of survival, let alone victory.

It is time for radical thinking and even more radical actions if we are to build any sort of cohesive resistance in the few short remaining years.

My proposition is that we must use those shared cultural experiences and historical frameworks found in abundance within our Christian heritage to unite our people and to provide a ‘broad church’ of consensus and resistance to a threat that is in essence, a religious one: Islam.

To consistently use the race card as a rallying cry has consistently failed, only a fool refuses to learn his lesson and I am no fool.

I once witnessed a discussion between a scientific professor and a lowly salesman - the salesman was trying to convince the boffin that people respond in certain ways dependant of their cultural and collective historical experiences.

The salesman argued that even at a basic level, if something looks exotic or different it will naturally be rejected by people.

The professor strongly disagreed and thought that people these days were so modern and sophisticated that they would embrace the strange, unfamiliar or exotic without question.

So, to settle the matter the salesman took some everyday foods and some odourless food dye and made some green chocolate, red butter and offered it to the academics’ students (who were all ever so sophisticated and devoted to modernity) and the results were interesting.

Not one of the students liked the look of the food and few would even try them.
The ones that did try them, rejected them, despite knowing that the only change was in the colour.

This proved that despite our sophisticated, modern societies, human nature remains the same: we reject out of hand the unfamiliar even when we know it is okay in reality.

Therefore we must package our message in familiar language using recognisable packaging, trusted trademarks and established recognised branding.

I personally can think of no better packaging or branding for our message of National Survival than the plurality of the English (British) Christianity that deeply permeates the spiritual and civic consciousness of our sense of nationhood and ethnicity. Can you?

Still don’t believe me that our entire national ethos and existence is grounded in the firm foundations of masculine Christianity?

Please do something for me that may challenge your thought patterns of what it means to be ‘British’ and especially ‘English’.

Click on the link below and watch the video “How God Made the English”.

Trust me; this video will open your eyes to the true Chosen People….the British people, if you let it!

In part three, the final part of my thesis I will set out how we can survive and the practical social mechanisms we need to put in place to encourage growth and strength in our communities.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b01dxrdz/How_God_Made_the_English_A_Chosen_People/

Who are we British? Part 1 of 3
Who are we British? Part 3 of 3

Who are we British? Part 1 of 3

Who are we British? Part 1 of 3

WHO ARE WE BRITISH, WHAT FORCE FASHIONED SUCH A SPECIAL AND CHOSEN PEOPLE

:Part 1: Jim Dowson B.Th, Belfast 24/3/2012

Recently I read an article attacking Britain First in general and me in particular. I am sure you can imagine that I am no stranger to criticism, most of which is baseless or from the minds of the seriously disturbed.

However, this latest criticism was different: it was genuine in intent and from someone who was seriously concerned about my personal viewpoints and the “damage” my mindset may do to “his” vision of “nationalism”.

This got me thinking about the whole nationalist “genre”, its monumental failure over the years to engage with the British public in any real or meaningful way and its failure to attract anything more than a miniscule membership base.

We should remember that several ‘pro-life’ groups in this country have paid up memberships of over 40,000, while the BNP at their height never managed to attract more than 14,000 members.

I quote these figures to emphasize the reality that eludes so many nationalists that we are a fringe of a fringe of a rump on the edges of the margins of political or cultural life in this country. Yet many still talk as if nationalism is on the brink of a major breakthrough if only we could rid ourselves of Nick Griffin and a few other cranks. This sentiment is madness.

There are individual church congregations with larger memberships than the BNP. One single church in London has over 20,000 members, with several thousand in attendance every Sunday.

In Belfast, Paul Golding and I attended a church which every week has around 3,000 ‘bums on seats’. Again, I quote these figures to give some perspective to the nationalist dilemma and to introduce some realism to the delusional position of so many good patriots and nationalist stalwarts.

Now I want to return to the criticisms of myself. The basis of my critics prose was the simple proposition that I was clinically insane, mad and un-hinged (a position many would concur with). What was the basis of the diagnosis? My religion and faith. Yes, the critic was convinced of my mental instability because I, like another five million Britons, still attend church once a week (although only 900,000 attend the C of E), pray and read the Bible.

My critic was further appalled by my total and unshakable opposition to slaughtering our next British generation in the womb - yes I am implacably anti-abortion. He was also repelled by my opposition to ‘gay marriage’, homosexual adoption and a few other issues that a generation ago would have been opposed by almost all of our people.

I wonder if my critical friend knows that even if you add together the combined attendance at every football ground in the four divisions in England and those in Scotland, Ulster and Wales, football fans on a Saturday are still outnumbered 5 to 1 by Christians attending church the following day.

In this country, especially in nationalist circles many have the perception that football is so huge that it may provide a great recruiting platform for nationalist groups and that is why the NF, BNP and EDL put so much time into leafleting and selling papers outside football stadiums.

However, the false perception that football is the largest social event where OUR people gather and that the Christian church is tiny, irrelevant and almost defunct has steered the entire movement down a blind alley and resulted in the self imposed ghettoizing of Our Cause and has robbed us of several generations of decent, law abiding, clean living, capable people who would have been very useful to the furthermost of our agenda.

How many times have nationalists targeted Christians as we target football fans? I hear the reader ask, “If the Christians are so numerous and patriotic, where are they then?” A good question and one I can answer from my own personal experience.

When I was 16 I was deeply involved in the loyalist struggle in Ulster. I also flirted with the NF, even spending time at the HQ in Pawsons Rd, after being ejected from college for putting up anti-IRA NF stickers all over the campus (it was a fair cop). However, even as an ‘ultra-patriot’, I found my experience in London with the NF deeply unpleasant and alien to me.

Back then I was an infrequent church goer and had very little active faith if any, but I found that within nationalism then, as now, there was a virulent anti-Christian undertone and many ‘patriots’ were obsessed by a foreign notion of nationalism, i.e. one derived from Europe and Germany in particular (these “British” patriots conveniently ignore the famous saying “National Socialism is not for export.”)
This I found repellant and more than a bit bizarre as even as a youth I fully understood the true notion of ‘Britishness’, the pomp and circumstance, the feeling that we British were a special people and our intrinsic national link especially since the reformation, of nationhood, self-reliance and our Christian heritage.

One just has to observe the opening of Parliament or the opening of a rural council meeting to see that Christian ceremony dominates the proceedings as it does our legal system and just about every institution we claim as ‘quintessentially’ British.
Yet, nationalists are blind, ambivalent or hateful towards these old landmarks that are so deeply entrenched in the British people’s narrative, thus rendering themselves and the nationalist movement a rather exotic, or, at best, a foreign body that is most unappealing to most British people, even at a superficial level.

Even when clever marketing or terrorist events drive large numbers of decent people into our ranks they quickly exit when confronted with the strange fruit of national-socialist hang-ups, cerebral ethno-politics and rabid anti Christian ideology that, unfortunately, one could sell by the pound at most NF, BNP, EDL meetings despite the widespread use of Holy symbols and phrases.

Lately, it looks as if this was changing with the EDL getting more outwardly ‘Christian’ - even Griffin started wearing a cross and demanding crosses on all BNP propaganda.

Sadly, Griffin was only pretending and the EDL/British Freedom types seem more interested in defending Israel than Britain, or running around our town centres boozed up, jumping around like immature oiks chanting football slogans at an increasingly un-phased Muslim population who could, if they wished, wipe the floor with them if it so pleased their Imams.

You see the inescapable truth is simple, Britain, our mindset, our collective memory, our institutions, community customs and our nation’s entire narrative is not just completely intertwined with Christianity but rather we and our ‘Britishness’ are a product of the Christian Faith.

From the opening of a small council meeting to the state opening of Parliament to the naming of a ship, our Christian heritage cocoons the entire proceedings.

Think of when we welcome a child into the family or when we bury our loved ones, our Christian heritage sets the tone for the social interaction and rites of passage. Indeed this heritage is so completely interwoven as to become ‘unnoticed’ by its normality for most people, but none the less, any outside observer sees this thread of Christianity in our national make up as a strong and almost unique feature of ‘The British’.

Remember, we think of our American cousins as a nation deeply influenced by faith, however, the Europeans view us Brits in a similar light yet we fail to see the woods for the trees.

For anyone who is skeptical about how attractive our Christian heritage is to our people, even on a sub-conscious level just look to the largest ‘patriot’ group around at present. The EDL! They absolutely smother their literature in extreme Christian symbolism and icons. From crusader crosses, to knights templar motto’s, all of which permeates this groups web-site, blogs, facebook pages, merchandise and literature.
Unfortunately, I fear these people are insincere in their use (or are being deceived) and have shamefully woven Zionism and multi-culturalism into OUR iconology and ancient identity, this, just like European Nationalism is foreign to us British and will ultimately be their downfall.

Nationalism has never made any significant breakthrough in this country, ever. The NF at its peak could turn out maybe 4,000 on the streets and the BNP mustered half a million votes and 14,000 members, but these are unbelievably low figures considering huge swathes of our country now resemble Bangladesh.

For many years I have been amazed by the delusions of grandeur most nationalists suffer from, an almost manic sense of self importance pervades the entire movement and a fair amount of individuals therein.

Consider these figures against nationalism: the women’s institute has 210,000 paid up members, the Labour Party in 1997 had 405,000 members, the Tories peaked under Thatcher at 3,000,000 and the twitchers charity the RSPB boasts over 1,000,000 paid members including 195,000 youth members.

Many other social groups like the Masons have over 600,000 members in England alone and most depressing of all is the ‘Caravan Club of Britain’ who enjoy a membership of 375,000 households producing an annual turnover in excess of £100 million and employing 800 staff. To be frank, many golf clubs have achieved far larger memberships than any ‘nationalist’ group, until now.

These figures should put a sense of reality to our movement - we are so small it beggars belief, but why? After all we have been pushing our message for decades yet we are smaller than some vintage car clubs.

Well, I know exactly why and I shall say so - someone has to. We are small because our product is an unattractive foreign import, even in what most nationalists would regard as ‘moderate’ manifestations.

Successive nationalist leaders in this country have presented to the great British public an ideology fleshed out in the European theatre which contains ingredients alien to OUR culture and historical collective memory and social experience.

20th century British nationalism has also carried a virulent strain of anti-Christian malevolence. We see this clearly in the nationalist propensity to ridicule the faith of our fathers these 1,500 years in favour of various manifestations and interpretations of Germanic gods, or the pagan beliefs of our people thousands of years previous. Mention Odin, Thor or the Green man at most nationalist meetings and one will quickly be engaged in a friendly conversation. However, spout out the name of Jesus Christ and cries of “Jewish import, foreign, middle eastern rubbish” will soon fill your ears.

I know that devout, church attending Christians are not in the numbers they once enjoyed but most British people are so deeply entwined with cultural Christianity they don’t even know it by large. On the other hand there are still 5 million regular church goers in this country and the cultural Christians number in the tens of millions.

Most Britons may not articulate their ingrained national Christian identity in an outward fashion but we see their position being manifest in their almost unanimous decision to reject our nationalist message in its current and long standing format.
The DNA of English/British Christianity was, and still is, who we are. A man may leave the army after 20 years service and be far away from his discarded uniform but to any observer one can see by his mannerisms, behaviour and walk that ‘he might be out of the army, but the army as never been out of him’. And so it is with us and our Christian social and collective experience. We are what our history has made us and to jettison this will render us irrelevant - just ask the BNP or NF.

From Mosley to Tyndall, Webster to Griffin, all have tried to impose a north European national socialist atheist or (pagan) ideology on the British patriotic constituents within our population with very little success. Even today we British are far more insular, parochial and patriotic than any of our European neighbours yet they have built huge nationalist movements and we, sadly, have utterly failed.

The answer is not to continue on with the failed strategy of trying to import that which works in Europe, the answer lies within us, in our unique cultural and social interaction and collective historical experiences. Our task is to tap into the existing rich cultural DNA that permeates our lives and that includes celebrating/exploiting our Christian heritage and the social markers that regulate our society.

For those who think we have no such things, ponder these social regulators: Christmas, Good Friday, Easter, Saints Days, Pancake Tuesday, All Souls (Halloween), baptisms, christenings, weddings, confirmations, funerals.

To those that doubt the efficacy and near total domination of Christianity on every facet of our society need only look to any state occasion, be it Parliament, the Lords, Royal Weddings/Funerals, Council meetings Military displays especially Remembrance Day and even many sporting events.

All are set within the rich and well practices ceremonies that involve us all in some kind of collective/tribal community action and contemplation.

I suppose what I am alluding to is this: whether you like it or not, most if not all of our private and collective benchmarks in our native life are marked and regulated by centuries old traditions of Christianity. It’s part of our British DNA. On the surface, our taste for religion may ebb and flow but I suggest that scratch a British patriot and his or her Christian identity (spiritual or cultural) will shine through with blinding radiance and be defended with jealous pride.

European patriots have always had to supplement their faith with a political way to manifest their national pride as their majority faith was subservient to a foreign power. However, since the reformation our British nation, patriotic identity and pride have been completely immersed in our peculiar and defiant faith.

Indeed that was what separated us from Europe these last 500 years and was the driving force behind the many conflicts we endured, (although please don’t think for one moment I am being sectarian, (Been there, its not a good place) I am merely trying to explain our peculiar national and historical experience.

Today we live in a new dispensation where particular brands of Christianity are far less important and those of the old European variety need not be kept at bay by ‘Puritan England’, but nonetheless we have been foolish in trying to over-write our own centuries old collective DNA with a European code. It has not, and could not ever have worked, not now, not ever, it’s just not who WE are.

Getting back to the original criticism of me: I stand fast on my sincere beliefs and my opposition of such social cancers as gay marriage, gay adoption and the butchering of the next generation of Brits by abortion. If that repels some nationalists or patriots I make absolutely no concession whatsoever and would challenge them in their claims to love this nation and our people.

I want to help our people survive and to build a better, cleaner, more just society and to that goal I am fully committed. Surviving the coming apocalyptic struggle as an atheistic, gay adopting, child murdering, degenerate nation would be the final insult to our ancestors and long gone heroes. It would be better for such a nation of people to have never existed at all. Even worse and far more unmanly and cowardly would be surviving as a nation of converts to Islam.

Make no mistake, there are many of the ruling elite and sadly many Racial nationalist's who would readily convert but for different reasons. One to retain wealth and influence, and the other for more nefarious reasons.

Several well respected nationalist's have said to me over the years,’ better a surviving white Muslim Britain than no Britain at all’. I utterly and completely reject this abomination and suggest this back up ‘survival strategy’ would weaken our resolve to the point of assured defeat.

I personally have no survival exit strategy and hold fast to the principle: better to fight to the last man, women and child (I say this with 4 bountiful grandchildren in mind) than give up one square inch of OUR country to the Islamic invaders.

Better we are remembered in history as the people who could not be tamed, intimidated or conquered than those who put up a bit of a fight then conformed in order to save our skins.

Because of its evil and suffocating nature and not because of our intolerance we can never compromise with Islam, nor can we ever come to a mutually respectful arrangement in the future, such a temporary solution would always spell the end for us.

This paper is the first of three that I have written in order to try and clarify our current situation. By understanding where we came from it may just be possible to map out the direction of where we should be going to ensure our future generations a secured future.

Who are we British? Part 2 of 3
Who are we British? Part 3 of 3