Lionheart

World War 3 has already begun

2012-01-24T13:18:00.000Z

World War 3 has begun: Part 2
World War 3 has begun: Part 3
World War 3 has begun: Part 4
World War 3 has begun: Part 5

Head of Norway's PST gone

2012-01-18T23:38:00.002Z

Dagbladet: Head of PST gone

The foreiger: Top politician says PST director must go

A companion of honour linked to Breivik enquiry

2012-01-16T22:00:00.007Z

Further reading: EDL backers linked to Breivik enquiry

Turner artist drops far-right aide

Dipesh Gadher

Published: 15 January 2012

One of Britain’s leading artists has accepted his assistant’s resignation after learning that she made a donation to the far-right English Defence League (EDL).

Sir Howard Hodgkin, a Turner prize winner, said it was “impossible” to continue employing Ann Marchini, 62, because he felt the EDL had “despicable and abhorrent” views.

Marchini, a widow, is a member of the British Freedom party (BFP) which was set up by disaffected members of the right-wing British National party. The EDL is considering an alliance with the BFP to enable EDL members to stand as candidates at council elections.

The Sunday Times revealed last month that she had been photographed alongside the EDL’s leader, Stephen Lennon, at a rally and had helped organise a meeting in 2009 between EDL members and so-called “counter-jihad” thinkers in a bid to broaden its appeal.

Last week it emerged that Marchini had been an assistant to Hodgkin, 79, for 17 years. He was awarded the Turner prize in 1985, knighted in 1992 and made a Companion of Honour in 2003.

When approached by The Sunday Times, Hodgkin said Marchini, who worked 1 day a week at his studio, had admitted giving money to the EDL — albeit a small sum, understood to be £50. The artist said in a statement: “I find their views and activities despicable and abhorrent. It was therefore impossible to continue employing her. She tendered her resignation with immediate effect, which I accepted.”

..............................................................

No wonder the little cabal behind the English Defence League leadership are being protected from the Anders Breivik mass murder enquiry if this one link is anything to go by.

The question has got to be; who else is linked to them that goes right to the top, who do not want to be brought out into the public eye through heir association because of how damaging it would be?

Its just what decisions are made at the top with regards all of this.

That little cabal of Ann Marchini and Alan Ayling (aka Alan Lake) & Co set me up with Breivik because I was a threat to their long running political agenda, its just a matter of the Norwegians, hopefully with British backing, proving their complicity (if they are guilty) with Anders Breivik, and there is still one striking question that needs answering that they both knew and withheld from the enquiry at the beginning stages so that I would take the blame for being the English 'mentor': Who is Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How long does it take to find out?

Ann Marchini has worked for this man who walks in the highest realms within our Country, for 17 years, so either he had his head buried deep in the sand over those 17 years or there is some level of complicity.

The story has not finished yet and now the bigger picture is starting to emerge of the people who have reputations to lose, just like me who was an innocent man framed, and one thing is for sure, nobody should be protected from police interrogation when it concerns the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent Norwegian kids on their summer camp no matter who they are linked too, and I hope that comes from the top down.

Further reading: Alan Lake - Agent/Asset of the State

Breivik's new psychiatric assessment

2012-01-16T13:30:00.003Z

Further reading: Breivik's flawed report

Daily Telegraph: Breivik's psychiatric report reveals kindergarten prison life

Quote: Dr Randi Rosenqvist linked Breivik's "deviant statements" to his total absorption in a cult-like anti-Islamic movement based largely in the UK.

"I interpret his deviant statements as an expression of an extreme ideology, not as a psychotic view of reality," she writes.

"He has built a lot of his ideology on the British, or rather English, movement, and has not sought contact with Norwegians of the same ideology."

Video: EDL's Irish cult leader 'Tommy'

Further reading: Who is Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Pakistan President fears military coup

2012-01-14T15:11:00.008Z

Further reading: Wikileaks Pakistani Nuclear terror threat

Further reading: Osama Bin Laden killed inside a Pakistani military town

Further reading: The 'epicentre' of global terrorism

Further reading: 400,000 travel from UK to Pakistan every year

Daily Mail: Pakistan President pleas for British help

Quote: News of the plea for help came after the government fired its defence secretary.
Retired Lt. Gen. Naeem Khalid Lodhi, an army loyalist seen as a bridge between the generals and the civilian government, was dismissed for 'gross misconduct and illegal action' and replaced with a bureaucrat close to Prime Minister Yousuf Reza Gilani, the government said in a statement.
The developments are a sign of near-open conflict between the army and the government.
Such is the weakness of Pakistan's state institutions that leaders have often looked to foreign powers to intervene in domestic affairs. The United States and Gulf nations have in the past been invited to mediate in disputes between the country's competing centres of power.

Video: Nuclear terror - The story of AQ Khan & the Birth of the Islamic bomb

Ex-head of NATO's 2nd-largest army accused of 'forming and directing a terrorist group'

2012-01-09T11:51:00.016Z

MSNBC News: Former head of Nato army forms terror group

Quote: "The Republic of Turkey's 26th general chief of staff has been remanded in custody for forming and directing a terrorist group," Basbug said as he was lead from the courtroom. "I leave it to the great Turkish nation to judge."
Hundreds of people, including civilians, retired generals and active-duty officers, are already on trial accused of being part of plots that prosecutors say were aimed at destabilizing Turkey and bringing the government down. The military says 58 serving generals or admirals are in jail.

This case above gives a very clear indication that this type of high level subversion within Nation States goes on, with there being many leading military figures involved in this attempted coup to bring down the government of Turkey.

Anders Breivik's terrorist atrocities were an attempt to bring down the ruling Norwegian Labour party government, but the question is; where did the attack come from?

Was it an outside directed attack on Norway, or was it an internal attack just like in Turkey?

Anders Breivik is the son of a former Norwegian government diplomat and step son of a retired Army Major.

If I am right, Breivik's supposed grievence was that the ruling Labour party had been in power for several generations and created the multi-cultural society Norway is today, with the Nation sleep walking into a non-Norwegian Country over another several generations because of the Marxist agenda of the Elite. For whatever reason he targetted the Labour youth camp on Utoya island and murdered the next generation of Norwegian Labour party leaders.

Not everyone wants multi-culturalism forced upon them by their ruling Elite, and here in Norway for reasons unknown at the moment, with only Breivik's words on the matter at this point in time, you have an example of what happens when a Country passes the point of no return, or reaches the point and someone (plural) from the extreme right of the political spectrum attempts to change things.

Multiculturalsim has failed: Sarkozy - Merkel - Cameron

Norway has a population of 5 million so it is only a small Country, and is said to be the 3rd richest Nation on Earth so there is a lot at stake for the King, his ruling government and the future survival of that Country, and we as outsiders do not know the internal politics of the Country that has lead ultimately to Anders Breivik.

In contrast Great Britain has a population of over 66 million and increasing due to immigration, with probably the same amount of foreign moslems in the Country as Norway has as a population.

These are some of the issues we face in Great Britain from our oldest foes who are now aligned with our newest Islamic foe.

Daily Mirror: IRA we could have killed the Queen

Daily Mirror: Prince Williams security breached

At the start of this Breivik saga it emerged that members of an opposing political party in Norway had been recorded at a "Stop the Islamisation of Europe" conference talking about blowing up the government building and targetting specific members of government for assassination.

Those recorded were subsequently arrested during the beginning stages of the Breivik enquiry, but this gives a clear sense of the feelings within the Norwegian political class and the political agenda. Those arrested were all linked to Anders Breivik, either personally or ideologically through the SIO groups.

Talk of murder and assassination by Norwegian politicians linked to Alan Lake, Fraudman, and SION, and then Breivik strikes. Then an attempted white wash of the whole Breivik case by those controlling the enquiry from the top within Norway, purely for political purposes in complete disregard for the memory of the 69 innocent kids murdered on Utoya island.

Who knows how bad things are within Norwegian politics now, who are the controlling forces in the Country, and was Breivik a 'lone wolf' who is "certified by the government" but not by the professionals, or part of a network/group who have attempted a coup in Norway using terrorism, and who now threaten other European Nation States, who we have yet to find out who they are?

I am against the Islamisation of Europe but not at the cost of 69 innocent young Norwegian kids on their summer camp, and anyone who played a part in that is definitely not on the same page as me, which is probably why they wanted to frame me for being Breivik's mentor.

Breivik is not Christian, and he is not a Knights Templar in the true sense of the Order. He is a godless extreme political right-winger masquerading as an angel of light, with no faith based belief system in Jesus Christ the King of Kings and Lord of Lords, who has attempted to wrap up his murderous acts in the name of the Christian faith and Templarism when he is neither - He is the archetypal wolf in sheeps clothing

Whoever is behind Breivik targetted me too so I want to know who it is, and Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, Kinana and Chris Knowles all have an unanswered question for the Breivik enquiry; Who is the real 'Richard the Lionheart' each of them are connected to through Alan Lake?

How long does it take the British police to obtain witness statements from those directly linked to the Breivik enquiry to discover who the real person who uses 'Richard the Lionheart' as his alias online is?

Probably as long as it takes to extradite the son of the coca cola heir in Yemen who murdered Martine Magnussen in London and then flew out of Luton airport to the safety of his fathers wealth and political influence in his homeland. He raped and murdered a Norwegian guest living in our Country and then fled back home as a rapist and murderer, who should be sitting in a British prison just like the Saudi prince who is now in one of our prisons, and not a free man in Yemen: The Queen sorrow over Martine Magnussen

The Arab spring in Yemen will see him face justice one way or another.

Breivik & The Liberia - London connection

2012-01-04T22:03:00.005Z

The Norwegian police have confirmed that Breivik travelled to Liberia in 2002. They have also released the fact that several of Breivik's friends have confirmed the story of Liberia and 'blood diamonds'.

As far as anyone knows from the information released into the public domain, none of the witnesses spoke about Breivik talking about meeting a Serbian warlord whilst there. They have said that Breivik talked about getting a gun placed to his head and fearing he would be killed as part of a failed deal for diamonds.

Did Breivik get the idea of travelling to the civil war in Liberia in 2002 from his own mind or was he sent there upon invitation for a reason?

If Breivik was told never to tell anyone about his meeting with a Serbian warlord, possibly with a gun to his head as part of the recruitment process, its quite plausible that he would not tell anyone until encouraged to do so i.e the "2083" manifesto which is in-line with what Breivik says was spoken after the London meeting about communication with other members of the group.

The Norwegian police have also confirmed that Breivik was in London in 2002 and 2003, but there is no evidence to say the London meeting took place.

If I am correct (don't know) Breivik travelled to London 2 weeks after his Liberia trip.

What more evidence do the Norwegian police need? Breivik to actually name the people present so they can all be arrested and prove the meeting took place? or those present to come forward?

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

That's not the name of the game and is never going to happen unless you water-board him or pump him with some exotic truth syrum.

Breivik travels to one of the most bloody African civil wars, then 2 weeks later on his return travels to London? Its not rocket science.

Are those 2 trips and their time frame apart coincidences with no meaning, or was their reason, meaning and purpose behind both trips which is in-line with what Breivik states? Thus evidence.

You don't sell rough diamonds in London, and from Breivik's witnesses he never returned with any diamonds (to my knowledge), so why did he travel to London on the back of Liberia if he did not have any purchased rough diamonds?

Obviously another reason for travelling that has nothing to do with rough diamonds.

It is the same Norwegian police statement of no evidence regarding Breivik's Belarus trip. They have confirmed that Breivik travelled to Belarus but say there is no evidence he was paramilitary trained in the Country. They state that he travelled to Belarus to meet a woman he met online, which was obviously a good cover story for him just like the 'blood diamonds'.

The Russians whose intelligence services control that part of the World have released information through the media stating that Breivik travelled to Belarus on the radar and then travelled into the Country off the radar, obviously once he had worked out how to do it. It is stated that the Belarusian Security Services codenamed him the "Viking" after part of his cover story was that he visited the Country to seek out Viking graves there.

Either the Belarusian Security Services have not passed on their files about Breivik to the Norwegian government, thus no evidence of training, or its all a lie about the Belorussians codenaming him the "Viking" and that he was trained there by a former Soviet Colonel who is a Chechen moslem convert.

Where did Breivik get the terrorist idea of targetting children for maximum effect? The only other terrorists I can think of who targetted children were the Chechens in Beslan.

The Norwegian police say that Breivik has not mentioned anything about paramilitary training in Belarus, which if I was sitting in Breivik's seat I would not do either when looking at everything. You never know who else the Belarusian connection has trained as part of Breivik's network/group so why bring suspicion when you do not have to, and he might have been explicitly told not to mention anything about the training camps in Belarus by his trainers. Then its up to others to find out.

Either A) the Norwegian police are stupid in the worlds eyes B) Someone is controlling the Breivik enquiry from the top down, or C) The Norwegian police are acting tactically. I go with B) which is why there has been an attempted white wash of the whole case with the agenda being to make out Breivik was a 'lone wolf' who is now certified, then the public will not want answers on who the group/network with Breivik is because as the "Officials" say "He acted alone", so there is no one else to look for.

Powerful controlling forces seeking to manipulate the worst terrorist atrocity in Europe of the 21st Century for different purposes within Norway.

Or I am wrong and my mind is in the world of conspiracy theories and the 'blood diamond' international jet-setting son of the Norwegian government diplomat to London was radicalised, recruited, trained, and funded whilst watching youtube videos and reading websites and blogs online as part of his psychosis (that he doesn't have) who then went out to commit an act of war in the name of his imaginary friends who call themselves Knights Templars, and left a 1500 page manifesto in the public domain detailing his imaginary world and friends agenda based upon the writings of many main stream commentators.

The story of the lone right-wing crusader...Jackanory.

The official line in Norway that comes from the top down is that none of what Breivik says is true, so the only official diagnosis can be is that he is a paranoid schizophrenic living in his own delusional world. This conflicts with all of the evidence presented to a sane mind though.

Only the Norwegians can know and feel what the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their political ideology feels like on the National psyche. We are outside observers who stand back looking on from afar in solidarity because that was a crime against humanity that nobody can condone, and for me personally, whoever is behind Breivik attacked me that day too, only I survived.

"It is better to make the right friends than the wrong enemies" Lionheart

Romans 8:31 - 39
What, then, shall we say in response to these things? If God is for us, who can be against us? ³² He who did not spare his own Son, but gave him up for us all—how will he not also, along with him, graciously give us all things? ³³ Who will bring any charge against those whom God has chosen? It is God who justifies. ³⁴ Who then is the one who condemns? No one. Christ Jesus who died—more than that, who was raised to life—is at the right hand of God and is also interceding for us. ³⁵ Who shall separate us from the love of Christ? Shall trouble or hardship or persecution or famine or nakedness or danger or sword? ³⁶ As it is written:

“For your sake we face death all day long;
we are considered as sheep to be slaughtered.”

³⁷ No, in all these things we are more than conquerors through him who loved us. ³⁸ For I am convinced that neither death nor life, neither angels nor demons, neither the present nor the future, nor any powers, ³⁹ neither height nor depth, nor anything else in all creation, will be able to separate us from the love of God that is in Christ Jesus our Lord.

Not a single sign of psychosis in Breivik

2012-01-04T14:02:00.006Z

Aftenposten: Not a single sign of psychosis

Dagbladet: Anders Breivik is not psychotic

Quote from Aftenposten article: Over 80 times Anders Behring Breivik's health condition has been evaluated in psychiatrists and health care in prison. Not a single sign of psychosis or mental instability is detected.

During the nearly four months, the prison doctors, who have long experience with patients with different psychotic disorders and mental disorders, not detected a single sign of serious mental illness.

The trained prison staff employed to deal with prisoners and their needs on a daily basis have officially stated that they see no signs of psychosis in Anders Breivik.

Those designated by the Norwegian State to evaluate Breivik determined in their report that he was a paranoid schizophrenic so legally insane, but there is contention from every quarter about this evaluation because it does not hold up under the light of scrutiny from what most experts in the field of psychiatry can digest from the information in the public domain.

Whose agenda and purposes does it serve certifying Anders Breivik?

The court appointed re-evaluation of the actual report upheld the initial findings but with contention among the ranks. In reality how could those re-evaluating the initial report officially state their colleagues were wrong? That would destroy their professional reputations and careers, so the initial finding was upheld within the field of criminal psychiatry in Norway.

But as time goes by more contradictory and conflicting evidence is emerging.

Breivik is not appealing for a new report now, he will just contest all of the points in a court of law when he goes to trial with experts in the respective fields, and attempt to prove the evaluation over his mental health was wrong and the reasons why it was wrong.

What happens then?

Further reading: Breiviks flawed psychiatric report

Aftenposten: None of Breivik's friends saw psychosis

Breivik's stepfather a retired Army Major

2012-01-01T11:33:00.004Z

Dagbladet: Breivik's stepfather is a retired Major

The Anders Breivik plot thickens.

The biological son of the Norwegian government diplomat to London, and stepson of a retired Norwegian Army Major turns into a right-wing political terrorist who has declared war against the political left?

The key to understanding the bigger picture and who is involved is establishing who selected Anders Breivik to travel to Liberia in 2002 and how the chain of events occured. Knowing his families diplomatic military background its not hard to understand why a young Anders Breivik was selected and recruited into a right-wing neo-Gladio network/group in 2002 that ended up with the events on July 22nd 2011.

The question is who were the ones who selected him?

One thing is for sure is that for some reason whoever is in control of the Breivik enquiry at the top of the chain in Norway, and the media front controlling public opinion, in my personal opinion have attempted to whitewash the whole event in the public eye by continually claiming that Anders Breivik is a 'lone wolf' nut who is now legally certified, then the full truth can be hidden from reality with a nice clean media story of a certified 'lone wolf' connected to no one with no real reason or motive behind his killings other than his own personal madness brought about by his use of the internet.

You have to be 'mad' yourself to belief that official line and the Norwegians I have spoken too have bought it hook line and sinker because its the official line promoted through the Norwegian mainstream media.

There are still unanswered questions ?

The birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist is pivotal to understanding everything and when I wrote my opinion I only knew about his father being the government diplomat to London, now knowing his stepfather who lived with him at the time when he was 22 - 23 years old in 2002 obviously sheds a different light upon that time frame of history.

What circles was Anders Breivik mixing in? With those he was mixing with knowing his family background.

His stepfather who was a Major in the Army obviously has an excellent understanding of peoples characters and abilities due to the fact that for many years he had many Norwegian soldiers under his command so is military trained to have an eye for peoples strengths, weaknesses and abilities so his opinion holds great weight.

This is his personal opinion about the events of July 22nd 2011, and don't forget this mans professional background and how well he knew Breivik on an intimate personal level.

Quote: Tollefsen thought therefore that Breivik could not possibly have made the bomb that killed eight people in the government building in Oslo itself.

- I thought he had a helper to the bomb because he was not so technical, says Tollefsen.

Make your own mind up...

Chris Knowles linked to Breivik enquiry

2011-12-27T22:59:00.011Z

(Sunday Times article below)

Foreword: The Norwegian police have now confirmed that Anders Breivik was in London in 2002 and 2003 (Below). This is on top of the confirmation that he was also in Liberia in 2002 during the civil war there (upon invitation from someone), and also that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus.

Anders Breivik was not a 'lone wolf', he was a part of a group/network with Liberia and London being pivotal moments in the birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist.

The only question left that now needs answering is did Alan Ayling/Lake disclose his actual friend 'Richard the Lionheart' in police interview or did he withhold vital information to the Breivik enquiry?

3 witnesses can confirm that Alan Ayling/Lake invited another man to his London flat at the pre-founding EDL meeting who called himself 'Richard the Lionheart'.

Who is this anonymous person whose identity Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, and Kinana all withheld from the enquiry so that I would take the fall and blame for their actions against the Norwegian government and people?

Breivik was recruited in 2002 by a network/group.

Council suspends worker linked to Norway gunman

By Dipesh Gadher

Published: 18 December 2011

A council worker has been suspended following a Sunday Times investigation into a network of far-right groups.

Chris Knowles, who is employed by the children’s services department at Leeds city council, has been questioned over his links to the English Defence League (EDL) and a website featuring anti-Muslim content.

Knowles has been accused by Paul Ray, a former senior EDL figure, of operating under an alias to disguise his controversial views. He has been using the name “Aeneas Lavinium” on Facebook and other websites linked to Anders Breivik, the Norwegian gunman who massacred 69 people in summer.

Last week Oslo police confirmed for the first time that Breivik travelled to Britain at least twice — in May 2002 and December 2003.

The gunman has claimed in his 1,600-page “manifesto” that during a trip to London in 2002 he met an English “mentor” who inducted him into a modern-day version of the Knights Templar Order. Police, however, have no evidence to verify this claim.

Ray says that Knowles attended a meeting in July 2009 at which members of the EDL were introduced to key ideological figures in the so-called “counter-jihad” community.

He was involved at the time with a right-wing organisation called the Centre for Vigilant Freedom (CVF), which used an address in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, for correspondence. Another member of the organisation was Ann Marchini, a buy-to-let property tycoon who was revealed last weekend as an EDL backer.

The CVF is now part of the International Civil Liberties Alliance (ICLA) whose website includes many contributions from a writer called “Aeneas”. One article is about Fjordman, an anti-Islam blogger named 111 times by Breivik in his manifesto.

The site also features favourable items on the EDL and a cartoon of the Prophet Mohammed with an exploding bomb on his head.

When Knowles was asked if he was Aeneas, he said: “I’m not willing to confirm anything.”

Leeds council launched its probe after being shown the ICLA website. A spokeswoman said: “We take the allegations made by The Sunday Times very seriously and a member of staff has been suspended while we undertake a thorough investigation. If there has been any breach of the council’s policies or code of conduct we will take appropriate action.”

Additional reporting: Mark Lewis in Oslo

2 crucial pieces of information

2011-12-25T16:22:00.018Z

Norwegian police confirm Anders Breivik's trips to Liberia and Belarus.

These 2 key pieces of information that are now in the public domain prove that Ander's Breivik was not a 'lone wolf' as has been consistently spoken through the media, and was, in reality, a part of a neo-Gladio style network.

A 'lone wolf' is radicalised and trained in his bedroom and then goes out on his own under his own inspiration and commits a small terrorist attack in the name of his beliefs, which is the type of people Breivik & Co are hoping to inspire through the "2083" manifesto.

Further reading: Questioning the 'lone wolf' scenario

Breivik was recruited into a group (false Knights Templar's) who financed him, trained him, and then sent him out to declare war on their behalf. This is now proven by the fact that he was in Liberia during the civil war in the Country in 2002, and that he was paramilitary trained in Belarus later on.

What about the London meeting in 2002 and the formation of the false Knights Templar group? Have the Norwegian police confirmed whether or not Breivik was in London when he says he was?

You can safely assume that if Liberia and Belarus are facts, which they are, then London is too.

Who were Ander's Breivik's contacts in the 'group'?

Who is Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'?

How serious is this group that is linked to Serbians soldiers, and do they have access to small scale nuclear weapons to threaten to use as their ultimate deterrent?

Who has a grievance with Norway and was linked to arms smuggling who could have been the bridge between Breivik and Liberia in 2002, and who could possibly be linked to the old style Gladio networks and London?

P.S Dont be too surprised if Fraudman is much more involved with the Norwegian/Mainland European field of operations for individuals in Breivik's false Knights Templar group. He is directly linked to Breivik and to a certain connected clique of ideological inspirations that are linked to all SIO groups and Alan Lake. Also there is too much circumstantial evidence and suspicious behaviour directly linking him.

He hid himself from the world around 2005. WHY?

Is it all coincidence?

Aftenposten: Police confirm Liberia and Belarus link

Further reading: The birth & baptism of Anders Breivik

Who is the real 'Richard the Lionheart'?

2011-12-23T16:48:00.002Z

Norwegian News: Dagbladet

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Speak up for Christianity

2011-12-16T22:19:00.005Z

Quote: ‘I believe the Church of England has a unique opportunity to help shape the future of our communities. But to do so it must keep on the agenda that speaks to the whole country.’

At an event to mark the 400th anniversary of the publication of the King James Bible, he said: ‘We are a Christian country and we should not be afraid to say so.

'The Bible has helped to give Britain a set of values and morals which make Britain what it is today. Values and morals we should actively stand up and defend.

‘Whether you look at the riots last summer, the financial crash and the expenses scandal or the on-going terrorist threat from Islamic fundamentalists around the world, one thing is clear, moral neutrality or passive tolerance just isn’t going to cut it any more.

Continue reading: Speak up for Christianity

Further reading: Christianity the Hope for our Nation

Im done with Breivik & Norway

2011-12-15T23:50:00.009Z

As the Maltese saying goes "Oil always comes to the top in water".

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Further reading: EDL & Street politics

Further reading: In my defence

Breivik: Some intelligent pointers

2011-12-15T21:48:00.008Z

The “2083” manual was written in perfect English and signed by Breivik under his anglicised name. He points to the fact that he has an English ‘mentor’ and he talks glowingly about the EDL inside the manifesto and online. He boasts about the amount of EDL contacts he had on Facebook and he sent his manifesto to a number of EDL members.

Breivik and the network behind him want the next serious extreme right-wing terrorist attack to happen in the UK and it is my opinion that they are hoping to recruit if they have not already done so from within the ranks of the EDL because there is a large number of people sympathetic to their mutual cause and amongst those it is logical to say there are some who would be willing to carry out a large scale terrorist attack similar to Breiviks, it is just a case of finding them.

There must be a recruiter.

There must also be real ‘lone wolfs’ who are inspired by Breivik amongst their social scene.

Breivik went to Liberia in 2002 so who were those involved with him at this time? I believe I know, and I believe they know I know, but that’s for another time: Neo-Gladio

Breivik was in London in 2002 after Liberia and states that he was at a gathering of like minded individuals who called themselves Knights Templar’s which was their ideological founding meeting and fits in with my belief. He also states that he was assigned an English ‘mentor’ who he called ‘Richard the Lionhearted’. It was this man who gave Breivik the idea of the perfect Knight, and now Breivik succeeded in his terrorist atrocity he now claims that false mantle which is in-line with what he was told.

Did this person exist to explain to him about the perfect Knight?

If he travelled to Liberia and was in London that same year then it’s safe to say the person did exist and fits in place with everything else.

Further reading: Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’

Breivik was trying to communicate directly to the UK right-wing scene of which the EDL is the most prominent, so the question is why?

In my opinion it is because that is where his alleged English ‘mentor’ lives (obviously) and is actively involved in the UK right-wing scene of which the EDL is the most prominent, so has his hand on the whole agenda that goes beyond Breivik and Norway, into the Day after Breivik and the next serious attack from those behind this network, which is most likely going to be inside the UK.

Although I do not think things are going to plan as they had hoped at this moment in time.

The EDL was originally made up of many from across the Country involved in the Casual Culture (Football hooliganism), now it is made up of many disaffected young/old people and shunned by much of those with any credibility involved in the Casual Culture because of the disgrace it has become, but Breivik wouldn’t know this because he doesn’t know what goes on within internal streets politics in the UK. His insistence of wearing his Lacoste jumper was because it was a little signal and show of unity to the Casuals still involved with the EDL because the Lacoste label is a part of the culture the same as Stone Island. So Breivik knows what he is doing by insisting on wearing that jumper, he is communicating in his small way to people inside the EDL who support him.

The picture above shows Yaxley/Tommy the leader of the EDL wearing his Lacoste t-shirts.

Yaxley/Tommy has already stated that he agrees with Anders Breivik, and he has also stated on News Night that there will be terrorist attacks within the UK in the next 5 – 10 years. Anders Breivik wrote within his manifesto that there should be similar terrorist attacks to his own every 5 – 12 years.

Yaxley/Tommy is Alan Lake’s EDL puppet.

Yaxley/Tommy also got married a few weeks before the attacks. Was this a case of getting his house in order for when the hurricane came just in case?

Video: Tommy & Breivik

(Continued below)
Fraudman is directly linked to the Breivik enquiry because the manifesto was named after one of his own essays, and he is mentioned 111 times inside its pages. Fraudman has a superiority complex and when the Aftenposten journalist I had met in Malta and given an interview too spoke to him about me he stated “He is a dog that barks and doesn’t bite” in relation to me.

In light of Anders Breivik’s atrocity, probably 7 days after the events, where 69 innocent kids were executed in cold blood, and his direct implication in the ‘whole affair’, what did he mean by saying I am a dog that barks and doesn’t bite?

Was he saying he is a dog that bites?

Sounds like it to me.

If so then he is admitting to being behind Breivik to some degree of complicity because Breivik did what he did on the basis of Fraudman’s writings, thus he is a dog that bites and I am a dog that doesn’t bite because I had nothing to do with it.

Fraudman is directly connected to a specific ideological network who are all linked to Breivik.

I did query this exact quote with the journalist because of what his statement immediately said to me and you can ask the journalist this who I am sure must have thought the same as me.

Fraudman was also in direct email communication with Breivik and tried hiding his computer from the police in a lock-up when he knew they were about to come knocking on his door.

Is that the sign of a guilty complex?

Looks like it to me.

(Continued below)
A few weeks before Breiviks terrorist attacks, Roberta Moore the Brazilian head of the EDL Jewish division warned Pamella Geller and Robert Spencer to cease supporting the movement which they did immediately. The reason cited was that the leadership had been taken over by neo-nazis. The thing with this though is that the people Roberta Moore claims had taken over the movement, which is only really some of the on-line Facebook control and PR to the leadership who are still in place now, had been in place for well over a year before this time, so why did she wait that long before telling anyone to cease supporting the movement when she knew all along about them and had said nothing?

As you can see from the picture above, Roberta Moore was/is very close to Alan Lake.

3 weeks before Breivik strikes and Roberta Moore warns her 2 high profile Jewish colleagues in America who have a lot to lose, to distance themselves from the EDL movement and cease their support which they did immediately.

Coincidence.

This incensed Chris Knowles of Civil Liberties Alliance who had put so much time and effort into the EDL and it forced him/them to draw up a list of high profile signatories for continued endorsement of the EDL in the online anti-jihad community because of the damage to the reputation of the EDL, having 2 of their most high profile supporters publicly distance themselves from the movement. But the schism was there 3 weeks before Breivik struck for all to see.

I had warned many people for a long time about the neo-nazi influence over the leadership of the EDL, even Pamella Geller so to say 3 weeks before Breivik struck that it had been taken over at that point is a complete lie, when it had always been that way but suited peoples agendas at that point.

Roberta Moore has even stated that she knows there are neo-nazis in the EDL but just as long as they keep it private.

Further reading: Roberta Moore

Further reading: EDL Jewish Division endorse Breivik

Breivik - The EDL & Street Politics Part 1

2011-12-13T17:00:00.010Z

I am against the Islamisation of Great Britain which includes the mass building projects of mega mosques all over the country funded much of the time by oil money from Saudi Arabia where there is not one single Church and from other foreign sources wanting to see Islam take its hold over Britain. Also I am against Islamic fundamentalists in government and on the streets who are actively engaged in a cultural war to convert British society into an Islamic State ruled by sharia law.

My position does not entail the cold blooded murder of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp.

From the very beginning of this blog I have put my name and face to my words because I have nothing to hide and I do not fear murder from anyone who wants to kill me. It is the Almighty’s responsibility to watch over that angle of my life and direct my steps because He is the One who called me to serve Him and when He wants me to take my place within His Kingdom then He will call me home.

The anti-Jihad movement should not be in the shadows if all of those who are actively involved in it believe in what they are saying, and if they have something to say then they should not hide from the words that they speak.

But this Ander’s Breivik case has brought the online anti-Jihad world into the mainstream psyche and what do those see that are now looking see other than people hiding from their words and deeds and denying that their words are in-part responsible for Anders Breivik.

I was voluntarily arrested and spent 18 months under arrest because of my words on this blog and was willing to stand in a court of law to defend my position. When Anders Breivik struck and I initially got the blame for being the man behind him I was willing to take responsibility for my words which is why about 48 hours after the event I admitted that the accusations could be right as all I heard was moslems, Islam, Islamisation, immigration Knights Templar etc coming at me from reporters and trying to make sense in the immediate aftermath and blame being leveled at me I owned up to my words and position on this blog.

Then I sat back and thought “no way” my position and anyone following my position on this blog over 5 years would know that I could not possibly have driven someone to execute 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their left wing political ideology. It did not fit me, so I had to sit back and think long and hard about what was going on and the only conclusion I could come up with was that I had been set up to take a fall by someone.

Then I thought to myself who could possibly have done this and wanted to do this and my only conclusion was Alan Lake.

He had reason, motive and means.

Now after 5 months all circumstantial evidence points to him, we don’t know about any factual evidence yet, and all ideological evidence points to him.

Alan Lake and his colleagues wanted rid of me because I was an imminent threat to their long term political agenda that they had been working on for several years so I had to be removed before all their hard work came to nothing with no more political agenda in place using the EDL which would mean back to the drawing board with everything they had already achieved lost, and nothing left in their hands, and then back to the day job.

Part of Alan Lake’s inner circle includes the alias Kinana Nadir and Ann/Gaia and they had factual evidence of a real life ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and not me ‘Lionheart’ yet to my knowledge did not offer this information up to the Breivik mass murder enquiry, instead they were more than happy to see me take the fall as his alleged ‘mentor’ and potentially remove me from being a threat to all their hard work that they would have eventually lost anyway because of their endorsement of the EDL’s leadership of Irish “Tommy” & Uncle Kev.

They had made their bed and had to lay in it with them no matter what the cost.

Further reading: Alan Lakes friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Not a very nice thing for them to do to me was it? And fits in-line with them wanting rid of me for good.

Not a very wise thing for them to do either, withholding critical information from the Breivik mass murder enquiry that is the biggest act of right-wing political terrorism in Europe of the 21st Century which can only mean complicity at some level, either knowingly or unknowingly. That’s a job for the investigators to determine now though.

And what about the reputations of all their high level political contacts they are connected too?

Imagine how damning and damaging it will be for them if I am right and these people did use Breivik, not only to commit a terrorist atrocity in Norway but also attempt to frame me for it.

I know who some of them are and I am sure there are many more we do not know about yet, and all these influential people connected to them on the back of their control over the EDL is more reason to want rid of me because with no hands on a political agenda to raise money and prestige then what use are they walking in high political circles, and what reputations do they then have, when shown for who they are and what they have done to innocent people.

How high their political contacts go we do not know yet, but the Security Services do.

It was only a matter of time for this click, from my point of view, because I could see clearly what was coming their way, and they could too which is why I had to go because it was either me, or them losing all their hard work and future political aspirations that they had worked long and hard on.

I wonder whether they will want to take another pop at me before this is completely over? One thing I do know is that I have been sold out by all institutions of State employed to offer assistance to a citizen in need, and have been left to sit in the middle of all of this whilst faced with a very wealthy and politically connected click of people who want rid of me for good so as to silence me.

The plot gets much thicker and dirtier when you look at the whole truth, and I thank God that we have a just Queen sitting upon the throne who must also look at the concerns of her loyal people when faced with such darkness within her realm that also threatens its ‘peace and security’, and those who have brought shame upon Her Nation in the eyes of others.

That is if the plot to commit cold blooded murder in Norway does actually emanate from Britain, we don’t know yet, but I am certain enough to share my thoughts and opinions and point my finger in Alan Lakes direction and give all of my evidence for others to judge upon.

The integrity of the Queen’s realm will be instilled in others eyes when the truth is told and those responsible for Beivik are brought to justice and any future extreme right-wing terrorist ambitions against the UK thwarted.

To say that Anders Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ who successfully carried out the worst act of political terrorism of the 21st Century defies belief in any intelligent mind, not least because the evidence contradicts that point of view.

Only time will tell now.

Contrary to the lies that are told by the EDL leadership Alan Lake has been the director behind the movement, he has been the point man between all political/ideological individuals who have endorsed the movement. This is proven by Rabbi Shifren himself who is the access for the EDL to large funds from the U.S Teaparty movement: Video – Alan Lake & Breivik

There was a discussion and strategy meeting that took place in Alan Lakes London flat about the way forward with the street protest movement before the actual founding meeting that took place several weeks later in the same London flat.

I have already stated in numerous posts who was present at both meetings.

So Alan Lake was there at the very beginning, and is also the person who for whatever reason set about sowing discord amongst the leadership group on both the ideological/political side and the boots on the ground side to have me removed from having any influence over the EDL movement.

After 2 ½ years the list of high profile anti-jihad figures in the online world has grown and you can see the core supporters on this list here: EDL supporters

This list of influential people was drawn up after Pamella Geller and Robert Spencer publicly removed their support of the EDL after advice from Roberta Moore the Brazilian head of the Jewish Division of the English Defence League. This happened a few weeks before Anders Breivik struck and the reasons for their support being withdrawn needs to be explained in detail because the reasons given conflict with reality. This is for another time.

Alan Lake is the point man, so Director behind the EDL, and Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia of Civil Liberties Alliance are his endorsement and the endorsement of the EDL in the wider anti-Jihad community because it is one and the same and they have all been there since the beginning of its formation.

After 2 ½ years the EDL has grown under their direct control and influence along with that list of supporters above, which includes Fraudman and Gates of Vienna. It has also spawned off shoots all over Europe and further afield because at its core in its original form it was a righteous cause and just movement.

All of these off shoots come under the control of the EDL Directorship, and not the leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev who are just puppets, and that is Alan Lake and his group of wealthy politically minded supporters and endorsers.

These are all directly linked to all Stop the Islamisation groups spread around Europe and the U.S that is ultimately traced back to Frank Gaffney of the American Center for Security Policy and his Center for Vigilant Freedom organisation.

I am not saying any of these are behind Anders Breivik himself but their silence and tacit support of Alan Lake’s agenda if he is involved with Breivik means their complicity because without their continued endorsement of him then the EDL would have had no credibility and validity in the wider online anti-jihad community. They turned a blind eye to the truth about the EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev and what they had done and continued to do against Loyal Patriots whose Country Britain is, and also some other very serious things that I will come to next time.

All these external forces using what can only be described as useful English idiots to further their right-wing political agenda, upon English soil and under and English banner which is an affront to any true Loyal Patriot.

A hijacked basterdised version of what was originally a righteous movement and just cause.

The EDL as a movement supported all of those on the above lists political agenda’s and they did not care about anything else, let alone very serious internal disputes within the EDL.

Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia still supported “Tommy” & Uncle Kev so that was good enough for them.

Remove “Tommy” & Uncle Kev from the equation and then what did Alan Lake & Co have left as a street protest movement? Definitely something that was no longer under their control.

Remove Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia and what did their supporters have left in the EDL, and what did the EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev have? Nothing...

It was only a matter of time until one of those scenarios became a reality and they knew this, because both myself and Nick+ had attempted this coup from Malta so as to give control over the movement back to the people who made it what it was, rather than a Dictatorship under their control, using and abusing the membership with all of their lies and making vast amounts of money in the process on the back of the movement.

We were unsuccessful at that point in time because I was living in self imposed exile and Nick+ was banned from entering the UK.

The way we aimed at taking back control was to take the domain names from their hands and give them to a neutral third party, then they no longer had the propaganda control over what the membership were fed to base their opinions on, and their continual lies and conduct to the membership could be exposed for all to see and then the EDL members could form an their opinion based on the facts with which to base a judgment over.

Democracy not Dictatorship.

The domain names were under the control of the BNP Renton brothers (Jack Smith) who knew how critical control of them were after the attempted coup within the BNP that was only averted because who had control over the domain names had control of the propaganda, so they knew what they were doing and the importance of the domain names with advice from others. They are now working with expelled BNP members in the BFP and one of them was the BNP’s web controller.

That fearful of this attack on their leadership (“Tommy” & Uncle Kev) and the potential to rip everything from their hands led to their very serious and desperate actions against my family, of which the British police have done absolutely nothing about up until this point in time?

Video: Tommy "Grass" Robinson

At that time the coup was also unsuccessful because most of the EDL membership and any high level figures within the movement were still blinded to the lies they were being told and supported “Tommy” & Uncle Kev.

Since that time they have all now seen the error of their ways and realise what was said and attempted was right and justified in light of everything being proven since it was stated, when at the time they laughed it off.

This internal attempted coup is well documented.

But as you can see the danger to that EDL leadership of “Tommy” & Uncle Kev and Alan Lake was ever present especially after what they did.

Remove both those elements and what is left of that politically/financially influential groups control over the EDL?

Something that is no longer under their control that they have spent so much time, money and political influence on over the past 2 1/2 years.

It is for others to judge how much emphasis was placed upon the EDL movement by those involved with it and endorsing it, and whether or not that fits in with the motive to frame me.

Without “Tommy” & Uncle Kev they had nothing and without Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia, “Tommy” and Uncle Kev had nothing, well nothing that was going to last and become credible because they needed the support from the online ideological/political side of the anti-jihad movement that the list further above brought to the movement to seem credible in other people’s eyes.

Bedfellows.

Alan Lake, Chris Knowles and Ann/Gaia are now attempting to further their political agenda using the EDL and their puppets “Tommy” & Uncle Kev by forming an allegiance with the British Freedom Party under Paul Weston’s control, who has been another one of their endorsers since the beginning.

Further reading: EDL backers directly linked to Breivik enquiry

My name was inextricably linked to the EDL from the beginning and I had seen what they had done and were continuing to do with the movement that I had formed by bringing both elements together, and to the people involved with it on the ground who were there for the right reasons, and because of what they did to me and my family personally I relentlessly exposed them for who and what they are for others to see and judge upon over the last 18 months.

I was a direct threat to their whole plans and their reputations and was not going anywhere until the end.

Is that reason and motive enough to want to get rid of me if they could?

Remove me and there is no serious threat to themselves and their future political plans all over Europe.

They did absolutely everything to me bar killing me and I stood my ground against them and continue to stand my ground against them. And anything that comes upon them now is their own fault for what they did to me and attempted to do to me because what you sow is what you reap.

Then all of a sudden out of nowhere Breivik commits a right-wing terrorist atrocity and all fingers point in my direction as being the man behind him when I did not even know him. The carefully crafted manifesto left pointers directing to me so I was originally smeared all over the worlds media as the English ‘mentor’, thus destroying my reputation, whilst they sat back in silence with damning evidence crucial to the investigation.

Further reading: In my defence

Funny thing is, is that many of Breivik’s inspirations who he wrote so glowingly about inside its pages have been some of the EDL’s most ardent supporters and that includes Fraudman who the manifesto is named after, and Pamella Geller.

Anders Breivik was mentally immersed in that anti-jihad scene of which they are all a part of, and that includes the EDL who he spoke so glowingly about, and I had had absolutely no involvement with them for almost 2 years and was one of their most ardent critics because I knew what was going on from the inside.

Then he commits his terrorist atrocity and I am originally set up for the fall for it.

See my point?

The question is, was he working with someone else with his agenda, was it a coincidence that I got the blame, or did he set this up all on his own?

I go with the first opinion and believe Alan Lake was behind it from the beginning, but that is for others to judge based upon the evidence.

I will cover the EDL leadership of Irish “Tommy” & Uncle Kev tomorrow as Part 2 so people can see the type of people that list of influential supporters have been endorsing amongst other things that I believe are relevant to this perception of the Anders Breivik enquiry.

Breivik: In my defence

2011-12-12T13:59:00.008Z

(UPDATED BELOW)

We know Liberia is a fact, so we will go with the assumption that the English ‘mentor’ is a fact too which fits in-line with the evidence. If the English ‘mentor’ was false and from the outset Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ which we have been told by the Norwegians, then I should never have been publicly outed by the Norwegian prosecutors in search of this elusive figure. They tarnished my name, and that of my family along with ruining my reputation and my life for being the alleged man behind their Norwegian monster that was then spread across the world’s media. I was then left by everyone including the Norwegians who I had voluntarily helped, looking guilty because they did nothing to rectify my position and sitting in a very dangerous situation.

We will talk about that when this is over though!

You could argue that Breivik just wanted people to read my blog to re-enforce his ideology and thus I was his inspiration which is why he committed his acts, which on the outset looked likely, but in context was completely false and wrong.

Fraudman was his inspiration: Delusion or Reality?

The mainstream media have now gone from calling me his English ‘mentor’ to being his “possible inspiration” which is a fallacy and a complete turnaround from the original facts because I have proved in everyone’s eyes that I am not the ‘mentor’ by voluntarily travelling to Norway, but linking me somehow seems to still be the agenda so calling me his possible inspiration is now the only alternative left after their original false libelous claims can no longer hold up in the public eye.

My counter argument to the claim of being his ‘mentor’, is not only that I was not present at any meeting in London in 2002, and that I have never met Breivik or spoken to him in my life, but him pointing me out, or somebody else pointing me out was a hostile act towards me. This act was aimed at having me arrested and locked up as terrorist accomplice to Breivik himself which as you can understand isn’t the thing you do to your supposed long term friend and ‘mentor’ who has just directed you to commit a very grave terrorist atrocity against your own people in Norway. At the very least after the events my reputation would have been ruined with always being known as the man behind the Norwegian extreme right-wing monster Anders Breivik which would have suited everyone whether or not it was true or not which would have resulted in me losing all credibility within the anti-jihad movement that I had been involved in for the past 5 years.

Certain elements directly linked to Breivik himself, namely Alan Lake, Fraudman and Pamella Geller had already done their utmost to achieve this result and failed.

Coincidence?

Breivik commits his terrorist atrocity, wraps it all up in Templar iconography, names “Richard the Lionhearted” a his English ‘mentor’, says there are more cells out there ready to strike, says the base is in Malta, and talks of his ‘mentors’ links with the EDL, who he wondered was the one who formed it.

The newspapers go directly to Yaxley/Tommy of the EDL leadership who immediately fingered me and I then became the alleged English ‘mentor’ who had been sitting in Malta under self imposed exile for 2 years, so it looked like a nice clean case all round.

Get the picture?

If I was his assigned English ‘mentor’ then he sold me out at the first hurdle which even the most stupid can understand is a little bit too suspicious even for a very coherent alleged paranoid schizophrenic?

If Breivik wanted people to look at my work on this blog then all he had to do was mention me inside the manifesto like he did with Fraudman, Pamella Geller, Alan Lakes EDL and everyone else, which he did not do, not once “thankfully” which shows he did not respect me within this field. Instead he or someone else placed intelligent pointers inside the manifesto with the hope that as soon as the police started looking I would come to the top of the list and would then be arrested as part of another terrorist cell ready to strike like what Breivik has talked about in police interview. I would have then been removed from society for as long as it took to prove my innocence and not be able to publicly defend myself leaving me always tarnished with the label of being complicit to some degree with Breivik himself and, thus removing me from being a threat to anyone who deemed me a threat to their right-wing political agenda and now potential future terror campaign.

Why? The only one who had reason and motive to remove me from being a direct threat to himself and his colleagues extreme right-wing political agenda was Alan Lake, the director behind the hijacked EDL.

It was me who brought the ideological political side of the UK anti-jihad movement together with the leadership of the UPL street protest group from Luton to form the National street protest movement the English Defence League.

Video: First ever EDL interview

Alan Lake was brought into the picture by Ann/Gaia from the UK wing of Center for Vigilant Freedom that is now Civil Liberties Alliance under Chris Knowles’ control who was also present at the founding EDL meeting in Alan Lake’s London flat, along with others already mentioned.

How did Alan Lake enter that CVF group and who knew anything about him before this time that he first appeared on the scene?

Who amongst the CVF group knows anything about his real background before this time?

Alan Lake obviously had his own agenda with the UK anti-jihad movement/street protest movement because he was the first person to start sowing discord by telling the core EDL leadership and CVF group that they had to get rid of me. This can be confirmed by Dymphna of Gates of Vienna who I was friendly with at that time before they at GoV continued to support the EDL leadership of Yaxley/Tommy & Kevin after what they did to my family.

Dymphna told me directly that Lake was telling people they had to get rid of me (I have the email).

Why did Alan Lake want to get rid of me, the one who had invited him to sit at the table and not the other way around?

This suited others in the EDL leadership (BNP’s Renton/Sheridan) who also disliked my outspoken leadership and influence of the movement. The smearing of my reputation, and then an attempted character assassination ensued by Renton/Sheridan and his girlfriend at that time Gail, which ultimately ended up with very serious threats against my family by the EDL leadership of which the police have a 999 call on record from Malta. It is now common knowledge within the broader street protest movement in the UK outside of the EDL cult, that Yaxley/Tommy with his large profits from drug dealing amongst the EDL membership, pays heavies to visit people’s homes to intimidate them into silence or to back down from threatening his leadership position, like he did to Snowy for example and also Daryl Hobson who he denied ever knowing on the BBC News show with Jeremy Paxman even though there are photos of them together. Mr. Hobson was one of the people on the list of recipients of the “2083” manifesto and Yaxley/Tommy wanted all knowledge of his links to Hobson denied so paid people to terrorise his family into silence.

It boiled over to the point of no return with myself and Nick+ in 2010 which is well documented with video statements when Alan Lake publicly lied at the Newcastle demo and Yaxley/Tommy showed just how much of a disloyal disrespectful little rat that he was and ended up with him and big uncle Kev entering the sanctity of my mother’s home and threatening me. But that’s for another time to explain or they can explain it to the police.

Firstly Kinana, Ann/Gaia and Alan Lake now have to explain the meeting in Alan Lakes flat where an elusive and until now unknown ‘Richard the Lionheart’ was present, and I have all of the evidence to prove this meeting took place and who was present.

Further reading: Alan Lake’s friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’

(Continued below)
Breivik being an intelligent man, although now certified as insane, would have known all about the EDL and any high profile internal disputes with the leadership as any in-depth research on the movement carried out by anyone with an active interest will inevitably bring up mine and Nick’s+ anti-EDL videos and posts.

I am hated within EDL circles because of my continued assaults upon their ‘messianic’ leadership of Irish “Tommy” & Uncle Kev because they perceive the attacks upon them themselves. It is only those who have escaped the cult mentality formed around the lies they are told from within who have seen the light and truth about Irish “Tommy” & Co and their abuse of what was a righteous movement, that he and they turned into a money making venture with a little infamy on top. Also many now see the IRA links that are emerging that is looking like turning the EDL into a terrorist organisation on the verge of starting a terror campaign on the mainland under the English banner, using unwitting fools like Breivik. That is another story with facts for another time though, but would fit in with Breivik part 2 now he has passed the baton to the UK extreme right-wing scene under Irish “Tommy’s” leadership.

Breivik has no concept of internal UK street politics because his perception is of someone looking on from afar in Norway which is why what I know of his manifesto being strange, and the mish mash of EDL’s international financial backers do not care about the street politics of the UK as all they care about is their extreme right-wing agenda that is anti-Establishment, and the EDL is the perfect vehicle for them to use against the Establishment which is why they over look the concerns of the Loyalist community and continually endorse an IRA influenced leadership that has continually threatened and intimidated Loyal Patriots and their families to secure their power over the leadership of the EDL machine.

That being the case all someone like Breivik cared about was what he saw in the EDL which was a movement that professed to be against the Islamistion of Europe, and had the veneer of this being projected to the outside world for anyone looking from afar, and was endorsed by all the online right-wing international anti-jihad thinkers who he supported and followed and who were written into his manifesto.

With, as my belief states, his English ‘mentor’ Alan Lake being the director of it, and we don’t know who his friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’ is yet either.

I was a thorn in their side and a direct threat to someone’s future agenda with the EDL and all of its European off-shoots and Breivik would have known this, along with his English ‘mentor’ so what better way to remove me from being a thorn in their side and a threat to their agenda than to write me into the manifesto as his alleged ‘mentor’ and hope for the best? And at the worst it would still be a job well done if they destroyed my reputation and my life in the process.

Not directly name me inside because it was a blatant lie that would never hold up, but with enough intelligent pointers pointing in my direction so that I could not escape the hurricane he left behind, and then he just sits denying everything in police interview not willing to name his English ‘mentor’. This took the heat off of his real English ‘mentor’ because I took the blame.

Below are Breivik’s words to the EDL before he committed his terrorist attacks, and in light of my complete dislike of the movement because of its leadership and what it had become under their reign, if me and Breivik were friends or I was his ‘mentor’, then he would not be this supportive of a group that it was common knowledge I completely detested which puts another light on the situation.

Breivik boasted of having up to 600 EDL friends on Facebook when I have no EDL friends on Facebook so our thoughts were at odds with one another.

Quote: “Hello. To you all good English men and women, just wanted to say that you're a blessing to all in Europe, in these dark times all of Europe are looking to you in surch of inspiration, courage and even hope that we might turn this evil trend with islamisation all across our continent. Well, just wanted to say keep up the good work it's good to see others that care about their country and heritage. All the best to you all Sigurd”

Is it any wonder he did not promote me as someone to read within his manifesto?

Just noticed the spelling mistake too, I don’t know whether that was from the page I lifted the comment from but if it came from Breivik himself, it’s a bit different from his 1500 page manifesto written in perfect English that would be a feat for any Norwegian without a degree in English grammar.

Questioning the ‘lone wolf’ scenario

2011-12-11T14:06:00.008Z

Further reading: Alan Lakes friend Richard the Lionheart

Further reading: EDL financial backers linked to Breivik enquiry

Further reading: Breivik owed no money to bank

Further reading: Luton bombers secret accomplices

Quote: He appeared to be a ‘lone wolf’ suicide bomber, who blew himself up on the streets of Sweden in an act of solitary vengeance against the country’s presence in Afghanistan. But a fresh investigation into Luton bomber Abdulwahab Al-Abdaly’s last 24 hours before his attack in Stockholm has exposed some glaring holes in the lone suicide bomber theory. Swedish prosecutors, who examined evidence from December 11 last year, have questioned how the unemployed father-of-three was able to finance his mission.

If the Norwegian prosecutors stick with the ‘lone wolf’ scenario with regards to Anders Breivik then any future examination of the evidence is going to come to exactly the same conclusion as the Swedish, and that is that there are glaring holes with no explanation other than the fact that it was not a 'lone wolf' attack.

There is enough contradictory evidence in the public domain already that puts to rest the notion that Breivik acted completely alone, although the Norwegians are at pains to admit this for some reason.

The Swedish suicide bombers actions are rooted in his radicalisation in Luton which is the area I am from, and he comes from a long line of UK based Islamic terrorist acts that have originated in the area, and was the whole reason this blog was set up in the first place in 2007.

To say that Anders Breivik was radicalised, trained and “financed” online through watching youtube videos, reading blogs and websites whilst interacting on extreme right-wing forums defies belief. The one key point to bring to attention there is the financing of his operation just like with the Swedish bomber.

Where did Anders Breivik get the money to finance his whole terrorist attack from? From planning and preparing for it over a length of time, to actually committing the acts themselves?

It is public knowledge that Breivik moved back to his mother’s house and lived with her and had no financial means or income, this is supported by his sisters claims about her worries and fears concerning her brother.

So how did Breivik go from being homeless and penniless living at his mother’s house, to renting out a large farm and then buying all the necessary equipment to carry out his terrorist attack?

A glaring hole unless the Norwegian police have different evidence to support the ‘lone wolf’ theory.

There are countless glaring holes in the whole case that completely shatter the ‘lone wolf’ scenario, but for some reason the Norwegian public are force fed that Breivik was a lone nut who successfully carried out the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century, all alone from the confines of his bedroom whilst playing video games.

Are you kidding me?

The other main key point that I continually point out here on this blog is Breiviks trip to Libera in 2002, that I know is a fact because I was told in police interview that it was a fact. This is where “Operation Breivik” began and any explanation about Breivik's acts now have to be understood in light of that key piece of information.

Nobody would have traveled to Liberia in 2002 during the civil war in the Country unless they were invited, and invited by someone credible enough for Breivik to have believed he would be safe there, and what was the real purpose of him going there in the first place?

This is the birth and baptism of Anders Breivik the political terrorist.

What happened after this event is the historical evidence that led to July 22nd 2011, which includes the meeting in London in 2002, with Anders Breivik’s connections then being made to a wider group of people who had an extreme right-wing political agenda and were willing if need be, to use violence to further that agenda. For whatever reason Anders Breivik was the one chosen to be the first person from within the group to carry out an atrocity on their behalf. He was probably chosen because from their point of view, he was willing to go that step further, which would fit in with the explanation of his psychology assessment that is based upon his family background.

A willing sacrifice with a mind pumped full of ideas by those intelligent enough not to commit the acts themselves, of Breivik being a Knight, Commander, and Hero and the Saviour of the Norwegian people if he commits the terrorist attack and starts their terror campaign, based upon an justified by Fraudman's writings.

To say and believe that Anders Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’, then you might as well leave some mince pies and whisky out for Santa Clause this Christmas.

For reason we don’t know, it seems easier for the prosecutors to claim ‘lone wolf’ and then they do not have to go after the network behind Breivik that is fraught with difficulties but how does that serve justice for the memory of the 69 innocence murdered on Utoya island, or the 8 government employees killed in the bomb blast?

If there are people behind Breivik then do not the Norwegians have a responsibility to bring them to justice rather than let them walk free until the next time they commit a similar terrorist attack?

Where are the credible Norwegian counter terrorism officials giving their opinions on Anders Breivik and his terrorist attack?

Do they have any?

A quote from a Swedish expert about the Luton based Swedish suicide bomber taken from the news article: Magnus Ranstorp, research director at the Swedish National Defence College and a leading
counter-terrorism expert, told CNN: 'My understanding is that there was a level of sophistication in the detonation mechanisms and the wiring,.’
Swedish authorities say they continue to investigate whether Abdulwahab was linked to terrorists overseas, or received help in carrying out the attack.

Anders Breivik’s terrorist attack was far more sophisticated than this one in Sweden, yet we are led to believe by the Norwegian prosecutors that this was all the work of a ‘lone wolf'.

WHY?

EDL backers directly linked to Anders Breivik enquiry

2011-12-11T10:25:00.005Z

Further reading: Alan Lake's friend 'Richard the Lionheart'

Sunday Times article

Unmasked: wealthy backers behind far-right league

A City investor and a property tycoon are trying to turn the English Defence League from a rabble into a political force

Dipesh Gadher and Robin Henry Published: 11 December 2011

A property tycoon and a City-based financier quizzed by police over his links to the gunman who slaughtered 69 people in Norway are exposed today as key figures behind the rise of the far-right English Defence League (EDL).

A Sunday Times investigation has revealed that Ann Marchini, a mother from Highgate, north London, and Alan Ayling, a former director of an investment fund, have sought to mould the thuggish anti-Muslim group into a credible political force.

They are both linked to the murky world of the online “counter-jihad” movement from which Anders Behring Breivik drew ideological inspiration before committing his massacre in Norway in July. They have remained in the shadows until now by using aliases on the internet to mask their true identities.

Breivik repeatedly mentioned the EDL in his 1,600-page “manifesto” and once belonged to an Oslo-based offshoot called the Norwegian Defence League.

The EDL, whose support has mushroomed since it was formed in Luton in 2009, has organised a string of protests against what it perceives as the growing “Islamisation” of Britain.

Many have descended into violence perpetrated by a hard core of football hooligans.

However, the “brains” behind the group — which plans to field candidates at the next council elections — come from a different background.

Marchini, who is thought to be in her fifties, runs a buy-to-let property empire from her £1.6m mock-Tudor home in Highgate, a leafy suburb usually associated with liberals.

Marchini, who is believed to be divorced from an Italian banker, operates under at least two aliases: “Gaia”, the Earth goddess from Greek mythology, and “Dominique Devaux”.

She is said to have helped organise a “pivotal” meeting between EDL figures and anti-jihad thinkers in July 2009 and recently attended a discussion where the EDL agreed to consider an electoral pact with the right-wing British Freedom party (BFP).

A report by Gaia on the BFP website states that Stephen Lennon, the EDL leader, “explained that the EDL need to move up a notch — they cannot go on forever staging street demos. They are still widely perceived as a rabble, and as such cannot possibly obtain funding or be taken seriously by the political class”.

Marchini was photographed alongside Lennon, 28, at a far-right demonstration this year and the image was posted on the website of Hope Not Hate, an anti-fascist group. Her name and address also appeared on a leaked list of EDL donors.

The 2009 EDL meeting took place at the £500,000 flat of Ayling in the Barbican in central London. Lennon attended with two relatives from Luton.

Paul Ray, who claims to be a founder of the EDL, was also there. He says he travelled to the venue from Highgate with Marchini, whom he knew at the time as “Ann”, “Gaia” or “Dominique”. He says he had previously stayed for “a few months” at one of her rental flats on British Street in Bow, east London.

Ray regards the Barbican meeting as “pivotal”. “It was the key people being brought together,” he said. “It was bringing together the ideological and political side with the boots on the ground.”

Two days after the meeting, Ray received an email from “Dominique Devaux”, using the account “gaia2600@hotmail.com”. “Still very interested in helping EDF [sic] grow as a movement,” it stated. It was signed off by “Ann”.

Another email, seen by The Sunday Times, gives a mobile number used by Marchini for letting her properties.

Ayling, 57, has been operating under the alias “Alan Lake”. He is an IT expert and was a director of Pacific Capital Investment Management until January this year. The fund was dissolved in August.

Last month Ayling was interviewed by officers from Scotland Yard at the behest of Norwegian police who were investigating whether he was a possible “mentor” of Breivik.

Paal-Fredrik Kraby, an Oslo police prosecutor, confirmed that “the man known as Alan Lake” had been questioned. “But his real name is not for us to give to the press,” he said.

In an interview with a Norwegian newspaper nine days ago, Lake denied having any contact with Breivik. However, he admitted to having met a prolific anti-Islam blogger called “Fjordman”. “People ought to read him, he is good,” Lake said. Breivik named Fjordman 111 times in his manifesto.

In the same interview, Lake said Breivik was “wrong”, but added the following about Norway’s immigration policies: “You let in dangerous people who do not share your values, who will destroy your society and take your freedom. You will have to pay the price for that.”

When shown a photograph of Lake last week, two separate sources at the Barbican confirmed that the man in the picture was Ayling. A man inside his flat denied he was Ayling when contacted over the intercom and refused to step outside. Ayling did not respond to a written list of questions.

Norwegian police say Lake was interviewed in London as a “witness”. They have also spoken at length to Ray, 35, who voluntarily flew to Oslo to try to clear his name after speculation that he could have unwittingly inspired Breivik.

The Norwegian gunman, 32, who has been declared insane by psychiatrists, claimed in his manifesto that he once had an English mentor called “Richard (the Lionhearted)”. Ray, a born-again Christian who subsequently fell out with the EDL, runs a blog called Lionheart.

When The Sunday Times first approached Marchini about her EDL links on November 30, she slammed the door shut on a reporter. Last week, she and her son, Paolo, hung up at least three times when contacted by telephone.

On Friday, a lawyer for Marchini said: “Ann Marchini does not operate under the alias of either Dominique Devaux or Gaia. She is a member of British Freedom, but joined only to show support for her personal friend Paul Weston [the chairman].”

Two names on Dominique Devaux’s list of Facebook friends — Paolo and Bianca Marchini — disappeared on the same day.

Weston, a former UK Independence party candidate, said he could not recall befriending Devaux on Facebook. He described Breivik as “a psychopathic lunatic”.

Lennon admitted knowing Marchini under the Devaux alias, but denied she was influential. He said Lake was a “nutjob” and had not been involved with the EDL “for ages”. Lennon, a former member of the British National party, denied the EDL was racist and said Breivik was “a monster”.

UK Breivik enquiry – Alan Lakes friend ‘Richard the Lionheart’

2011-12-10T16:33:00.023Z

Now that Alan Lake has been interviewed by British detectives observed by the Norwegians under police caution some new revelatory information that I possessed has now come to light. I will explain this in a moment.

If Alan Lake/Ayling has lied to the police under caution then you can only deduce that he is complicit with Anders Breivik to some degree otherwise why lie, and if he has lied then he has “perverted the course of justice” in the legal discourse over the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century.

This is a question for the interviewing Detectives.

1. Did Alan Lake/Ayling deny ever knowing anyone called ‘Richard the Lionheart’? Other than pointing the finger at me who has never ever used that name once?

If yes then he has lied under police caution.

You now potentially have an extremely dangerous man out there who is an imminent threat to society who is directly linked to Anders Breivik and Alan Lake.

Why would Alan Lake deny all knowledge of him other than to protect him? This we don’t know yet, the only ones who know are the investigating officers reading this and them themselves.

Below is a screen shot of an email sent to me by Kinana in July 2009 after the first meeting in Lake/Ayling’s London flat before the founding EDL meeting a couple of weeks later. My mind was completely blank about who was present at this meeting at the time of my police interviews which I will explain in a moment.

I did state that this meeting took place though, just at the time I was not thinking deep enough and just stated Lake and Ann/Gaia.

As you will see there was a man present at that meeting who called himself ‘Richard the Lionheart’, it is the same man who posts on Jihad Watch under that alias. He is a big ginger haired guy from London, and if my memory serves me correctly he was more militant about the anti-jihad movement and that violence was the way forward, but don’t quote me on that as it was 2 ½ years ago and only a 2 hour meeting which is why it slipped my mind until my mind was jogged on Friday night.

This was a meeting to discuss and strategise about the way forward concerning the street protest movement that I was actively involved with at that time. This fits in line with Breiviks claim of his ‘mentor’ possibly being the founder of the EDL and that he sent ideological material to this person at the start of the EDL. This ‘Richard the Lionheart’ was present before the founding of the EDL leadership.

I would think, just my thoughts, that maybe Lake was the English ‘mentor’ and this ‘Richard the Lionheart’ was one of Lakes assets, just like Yaxley/Tommy and possibly Breivik if it can be proven, so could have been a conduit between Lake and Breivik. That’s for others to determine.

(Continued below - Click image to enlarge)

I have been assisting the Sunday Times on a story they have written in this week’s publication about Alan Lake, Breivik the founding of the English Defence League, and their attempt now to go into politics through the British Freedom Party and other people’s involvement in the agenda.

The Director behind the EDL (Alan Ayling/Lake) has been questioned by police over his possible links to the extreme right-wing political terrorist Anders Breivik, only unlike me whose face was splashed all over the worlds media as the English ‘mentor’ his possible involvement has gone completely under the radar so nobody knows anything about him being questioned under police caution only the Norwegians who did a little, very revealing, story about it.

Due to the little cabal’s denials over certain individual’s involvement with historical events that puts the said individual directly in the frame as a witness or suspect, the Sunday Times asked me to go back over all my old emails to prove that what I was saying was the truth. I did this because it is the truth as I am not a liar and have nothing to hide.

It was whilst going through my emails to confirm the dates, events taking place and certain individuals being present at the meetings that I came across Kinana’s email. I was shocked and stunned at what I read and amazed how I had totally forgotten. Here in front of me was written evidence from Kinana about the meeting I had forgotten he was present at inside Alan Lakes flat naming the other person present as ‘Richard the Lioneart’, as you can imagine it was a shock to me and then it all came flooding back. I had forgotten this as it was 2 ½ years ago, and my only explanation is that the Almighty blocked my mind to see it, until the right moment for it to be revealed which is now after Lakes police interview because if I had of released this information before his interview he would have been prepared for this evidence being presented to him by them.

Did he lie or didn’t he lie is the question now?

I remember saying to the Detective Inspector who interviewed me in Norway that there must be a reason why God placed me in the middle of this, and there is information out there linking whoever it is, it is just a matter of finding that evidence. Is this that bit of information/evidence?

Only time will tell now.

This email came to me by chance, although we know that nothing is by chance with God because He knows everything. I had sent an email to who I thought was Alan Lake after that first meeting, but I had actually sent it to the wrong person and sent it to Kinana instead who then replied with the information contained in the email you see above that has now sparked my memory to who was actually present at that first meeting.

An unnamed individual in Alan Ayling/Lakes flat in London who used the alias ‘Richard the Lionhert’.

Who invited him to that discussion and strategy meeting is for the police to find out.

Ann/Gaia was the person who took me to Alan Lakes London flat and when we arrived Kinana and the big ginger guy ‘Richard the Lionheart’ was present.

Kinana is I believe a Catholic priest so cannot lie about the email he sent to me because he sent it from his email account, and states himself that he was at that meeting along with ‘Richard the Lionheart’. If he lies then he will be perverting the course of justice in a very grave crime. At this stage nobody is saying Kinana has any involvement in the Breivik case other than a possible witness but it is his decision what information he tells the police when questioned. If he lies under police caution on Alan Lakes behalf then he is perverting the course of justice based on his own email, and if he tells the truth then the police will know that this unnamed ‘Richard the Lionheart’ was present in Lakes London flat and possibly who he is.

If I was Kinana I would pick up the phone and call the police and offer up a voluntary interview if not already done so. After 5 months of silence whilst sitting on critical evidence it does not look good in anyone’s eyes, not least when sitting in the dock of the Old Bailey especially when held against the light of what Anders Breivik did, and if this ‘Richard the Lionheart’ is the man Breivik talks of, then silence means complicity and could also mean very many years in a Category A British prison, somewhere like Belmarsh, Brixton or Wormwood Scrubs for being an accomplice to mass murder, or at the very least perverting the course of justice in the Anders Breivik enquiry.

This is not Norway, with the comforts of their prison system, this is Britain.

I don’t know whether the police have this information or not from Kinana, but if not, I would not like to be sitting in Kinana’s seat as I have the evidence from his email account as you can see above.

Time to put disjointed loyalty to the side and give the police the truth they need for your own sake, unless you are directly involved then you have to explain away that email, and hope that Ann/Gaia lies on your behalf.

God will forgive you for not giving the information until now, but lying and refusing to do the right thing when 69 innocent children lay dead, ripped from their families and their futures when challenged to do so is a completely different matter all together.

Ann/Gaia was also in that meeting in Lakes flat so is another witness to ‘Richard the Lionheart’ being present.

I have all the email evidence. This is no ordinary crime; it concerns the mass murder in Norway of a bunch of innocent kids on their summer camp and this groups attempt to frame me and those associated with me as accomplices.

Yaxley/Tommy the leader of the EDL was true to form when questioned about the founding meeting in London and has lied through his teeth and denied that Ann/Gaia was present at that meeting. This is nothing unusual for anyone who knows him and has watched him over the past 2 years.

“Perverting the course of justice”

You have to ask yourself why would they be lying and withholding evidence, what are they trying to hide and cover up?

The only one who did not lie because he obviously knew the legal implications of lying was Chris Knowles who just would not confirm or deny anything put to him. He knows he has committed no crime so has nothing to hide, so there is no need to lie. It’s better to say nothing, and then he is not dropping his friends in it, or himself in the process.

If Ann/Gaia lies under police caution then she will be perverting the course of justice over her possible involvement in a very serious crime in Norway, and I have all of the email evidence, and so will the police in due course.

Time to tell the truth or spend a very long time in prison for perverting the course of justice in the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century, where the memory of 69 dead children seeks justice.

Ann/Gaia, Alan Lake, Kinana, ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and myself were all present at that first discussion strategy meeting in Alan Lakes flat.

At the second meeting there was Gandalf of the Up Pompeii blog, who is the military strategist/tactician professor, Kinana, Alan Lake, Chris Knowles, Ann/Gaia, myself and Yaxley/Tommy, Kevin Carroll and another one of their family members.

Jeff Marsh was meant to be present but was diverted and sat at his meeting under the Knights Templar clock whilst third parties sowed discord, and there was another lad from Luton who should have been present at the meeting, the one who came forward with the name for the movement, but God obviously wanted him kept out of all of the trouble that He knew was going to ensue for his own protection so arranged it so he was not there, irrespective if I got the blame for it at that moment in time. God knows everything.

Makes sense in the end.

The big question now that only the police know is whether or not Alan Ayling/Lake denied ever knowing a ‘Richard the Lionheart’ separate from myself who has never used that name in my life, if he did then you have him on a plate and If he admitted knowing him then who is he, why was he at that strategy meeting and who invited him?

Anders Breivik said his friends will continue the work he started. Are these his friends?

This cabal of influential and wealthy extreme political right-wingers Alan Lake, Ann/Gaia, Kinana all knew there was another ‘Richard the Lionheart’ and did you hear any one of them come forward to state this fact at any point over the unfolding of the Breivik enquiry? Even sitting back and allowing me to take all the blame at the beginning stages before I defended myself, when they had this piece of crucial information that had slipped my mind until the Sunday Times journalist made me go looking for evidence. This journalist is a credible witness concerning this new piece of evidence and how I found it because he was the one who made me go looking.

Considering the gravity of Anders Breivik's crime why did they stay silent?

They all sold me out expecting me to sink and not swim when the hurricane came, that is their integrity and proves their motives towards me, which is in-line with my belief that it was they who used Breivik to frame me.

Now they themselves are up the creek, so let’s see if they have any paddles. From where I am sitting the only paddles that will save them are words of truth in the hands of justice, because more lies will take them to the bottom sharpish in light of the factual evidence, and more than likely mean many years in prison by the end of the investigation.

How would you feel if that was one of your sons or daughters murdered by Anders Breivik on Utoya island in the name of your extreme right-wing political ideology and agenda? Think about that one before the police come knocking on your door for your witness statement, along with the potential for a perverting the course of justice charge if you tell lies under police caution.

Lies can never stand up under the light of truth…as has been consistently shown with Yaxley/Tommy and Alan Lake.

Ann/Gaia and Kinana you both now have a choice, ignore whats coming your way or take the first steps voluntarily and cut a deal for your evidence against Alan Lake/Ayling and his friend 'Richard the Lionheart' who you both know, or at least know was in his London flat that day.

Decision…Decisions.

Maybe Alan Ayling/Lake has been completely honest with the British & Norwegian police and they already know about this 'Richard the Lionheart' who was present in his flat, and have his name and address so Ann/Gaia and Kinana will only confirm what they already know.

More evidence to follow linking them all.

Further reading: Sunday Times article

(Continued below)

(Below are copies of 2 emails I sent to the Norwegian police)

Just so you know, the anti-jihad movement is primarily based online, that is where the foundation of the movements ideology lays and where all figures within the movement are to be found.

Some figures go mainstream with their opinions but very few because the media does not give a platform to the concerns of the online global community when it comes to the perceived threat of Islamisation and Islamic fundamentalism in the West.

The EDL was only able to survive because it was endorsed by many leading online commentators like Pamella Geller, Robert Spencer, Paul Weston, Fraudman and others.

I believe you have a list of their endorsers, with some influential names on the list.

Without their ideological support network, justifying them and endorsing them in the online anti-jihad world they would never have survived or grown.

Alan Lake, Gaia/Ann, Chris Knowles were integral to that endorsed support, so in the online world they were championed as the saviours of Western Civilisation and they all believed in their superiority and invincibility because they believed in the propaganda they were being told by the ideological side of the movement.

Things went wrong about 3 - 4 weeks before Breivik struck when Roberta Moore told Pamela Geller and Robert Spencer to remove their moral support which is well documented.

My greivence with all of these people has been their support of Tommy and Kevins actions of enterning the sanctity of my mothers home in their dispute with me. They all knew what happened and chose to ignore it which was an affront to me especialy with Ann/Gaia when it was me who knew all of them before they knew Tommy and Kevin, and was the one who set the whole thing in place in the first place.

All supporters who continued to support and endorse that leadership after that event with my mother was now a direct enemy of mine.

For 18 months i continually exposed them and their lies through my blog and on the internet, and was destroying their reputations in the process.

That powerful online click with their unknown backers and supporters had much to lose after 2 years hard work with the EDL, politically and financially for their political agenda in Europe and they had made their bed and backed their horse with that leadership so now had to continue laying down with it until the very end.

I was going nowhere until the very end either.

Then all of a sudden Breivik comes from nowhere and i get the blame, thus potentially removing me from being an obstacle to their continued agenda, and taking all heat away from themselves in the process.

It was a hostile act from Breivik towards me and the only picture that fits with reason and motive is the above.

Who could have set that in place was the question i asked myself, and my only conclusion was Alan Lake.

Then it all started to fit into place and all evidence started to point in that direction.

The Swedish guy who interviewed me the other day said its funny as you have 2 people pointing the finger at each other and one has been blamed and the other hasnt. I said yes funny that, and the one who got blamed has absolutely no links to Breivik except imagery on his blog, and the other who has not been blamed has all the evidence pointing at him.

That online network has some very powerful backers for their agenda, and they have been working in this field for several years now. The EDL was the natural progression, and you could say Breivik was too, in-light of everything.

You have to ask yourself the question; did someone want me out of the way or was it just a coincidence with Breivik?

I am not his inspiration, that is Fraudman, i was alleged to be his mentor, but i was at no meeting in 2002 and have never had any contact with the man, and what he did was his/their attempt to remove me.

................................................

Funny thing aswell, is that in the beginning stages they would smear and assassinate peoples characters across the online EDL platform of anyone who challenged the integrity of the leadership and the direction the movement was taking with wicked and vicious lies that i mentioned to you about. I was one such person on the receiving end of this tactic. And then one of the original leaders who was there at Whitechapel and Birmingham on July 4th 2009 - Richard Price - was arrested for downloading indecent images of children. He is now on the sex offenders register for 5 years due to his disgusting conduct.

This was completely covered up by the EDL leadership, even going as far as supporting him, defending him, and then denying all knowledge of him.

Is that the type of moral leadership you would endorse?

(My name was linked to the EDL from the beginning so i had a responsibility to those who joined because of me, and also my reputation of being linked to what had turned into something that at its core, was a disgusting movement.)

Of course not, but that powerful and influential network didnt care, just like they didnt care with my mother, it was just swept under the carpet as if it never happened because their agenda was set, and they had backed that leadership.

Just another example of the integrity of that network and how much emphasis was placed on Tommy and Kevin, because of all the hard work and money already spent on them and the movement.

Full details covering the whole story can be found here.

http://edlnoncegate.blogspot.com/

Breivik & Lake - The common theme

2011-12-08T21:04:00.002Z

Leaked psyche report: Translated excerpts

Further reading: Experts challenge insanity

Quote: Breivik changes between referring to himself as 'I' and 'we' - that is to say, he speaks of himself in plural. The psychiatrists speculate that he might have experienced hallucinations, and that some of the people he claims to have met do not exist outside his mind. They cannot confirm this, and it's hard to judge how credible that theory is based on the summary of a report.

If you go with the official line of Breivik the 'lone wolf' political terrorist who was recruited, radicalised, and trained in bomb making and executions in his bedroom whilst watching youtube videos and reading blogs and websites, and was able to blow up his government building killing 8 and then execute 69 kids in cold blood then any talk of 'I' and 'We' are hallucinations in his own mind.

How could the State appointed psychiatrists come to any other conclusion?

I was told in police interview by Detective inspector "bleep" "bleep", that Anders Breivik did travel to Liberia in 2002 which means there are other people involved with him which means that he is a part of a network, so his 'I's and 'We's are not hallucinations.

Are there any other hallucination points within the psychological assessment? We don't know yet because the full report is not in the public domain. If not and the diagnosis of paranoid schizophrenic is based upon his 'I's and 'We's it is flawed and wrong.

Agreed, what Anders Breivik did was beyond what any normal person would do, but that is the whole nature of political terrorism.

In his mind he has reason and justification, justification based upon other peoples views that agree with his own, which is thought and deed - Political ideology & Political terrorism

You can scour his past history to find out why Anders Breivik did what he did, but that only shows the reason why he was susceptible and willing to go that one step further than anyone else, and the reason why he was recruited by his controllers to be a political terrorist. That does not explain why he committed his acts, they can only be understood by looking at his reason and justification.

If he was delusional then he would have no reason or justification, it would all be nonsense that couldn't be understood or explained.

He has stated that he has an English 'mentor' who is the one who brainwashed him with his/their vision for a future terrorist campaign and how they envision the future playing out, with their eyes on future events and not present events which is why Breivik talks about his actions making sense in the future.

It is the Norwegian polices job to decide whether or not this English 'mentor' really exists and if so who is he?

It is my belief that his English 'mentor' is Alan Lake. It is the Norwegian police's job to decide whether or not that is the case or not, and whether or not there is any evidence that points to this fact or not.

You cannot believe one word that comes out of his mouth because he is a proven liar, so the question is; why is he consistently lying?

Any journalists who have an in-depth knowledge of the case will be able to determine whether or not there is cause for suspicion based upon his thoughts and ideas in interview.

I would just like to point out a few glaring examples that show that he and Breivik think the same and use common terms between themselves. This is what would happen between a political mentorship, thoughts, ideas and words would rub off because they both have the same agenda.

Breivik callously executed 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because they were left-wing ideologically, stating they were going to be the next generation of Norwegian leaders. This was an easy target for him, because executing the Norwegian Prime minister and other top Government officials was practically impossible. Executing the Government was his ideal target though.

Alan Lake wrote about his vision of executing the British Government because of their actions that he deemed detrimental to British society.

So he and Breivik think alike here. Just like Breivik, Lake drew up a list of traitors who should be executed.

Further reading: Lakes 'Final Solution'

Alan Lake seems to have a fetish/fantasy within his mind of 'executing' people, which if he was Breivik's 'mentor' would obviously rub off on a susceptible Breivik. I have not read Breivik's manifesto so do not know whether or not he uses the term 'execution' inside its pages, but whether or not he has, he did 'execute' who he perceived to be the enemy on Utoya island which is in-line with Alan Lakes thought processes.

You cannot escape Alan Lakes mental fascination with 'executing' people because it is a common theme with him when he is interviewed. First in the Swedish documentary that was aired on Norwegian TV where he talks about 'executing' moslems, a little like Hitler cleaning the Fatherland of Jews, and then more recently in the interview with Dagbladet where he once again reveals his warped fascination with executing people. Not forgetting his 'Final Solution' where he fantasises about executing high level UK Government targets that is in-line with Breivik's ideology and actions.

For most people there is a time and a place for such talk, if at all, and definitely not when being interviewed about his possible involvement with the execution of 69 innocent kids on their summer camp, but the time and place didn't matter to him.

Not only this, it has also been revealed that he has been talking/fantasising about murdering me, who was firstly falsely accused of being Anders Breivik's English 'mentor'.

I am assuming that most people would think like I think, and think that such talk is very strange and not common place amongst the general population, especially in the context of the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century.

Murder and execution in his mind and direct ideological/physical links to Anders Breivik himself.

If the Norwegian police accept there is a network behind Breivik then they must accept there is an English 'mentor'.

Only time will tell now but there are many more ideological psychological links to be revealed.

And on another note, I was threatened again tonight by someone from the Luton EDL linked to Yaxley/Tommy so someone obviously doesnt like something that is going on.

Alan Lake & The Oxymoron

2011-12-08T13:19:00.002Z

Dagbladet: Alan Lake interview

Google: Translator

The thing when someone lies is that under scrutiny and in the face of facts those lies are exposed for what they are which is the case with Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake.

So what is he hiding from to be lying?

Firstly for any criminal psychologists or psychiatrists reading this, what professional definition or term would you give for a person who claims to feel flattered at the fact that he has been interviewed as the possible English 'mentor' and inspiration behind the Norwegian mass murderer Anders Breivik who callously murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp?

An act that Lake claimed was "the chickens coming home to roost on Norway".

Quote: I find it flattering that they think I'm so important and regard me as a kind of expert witness, says Alan Lake.

Obviously he has no mental grasp of the gravity of the whole situation he is in, and reviles in the position.

I personally found the position to be abhorrent.

Lake claims that if sat with Breivik he would break down his arguments and show Breivik that he could not even defend his argument which is a complete oxymoron when looked at in context.

This is a man who has publicly stated on Swedish TV that he would execute moslems, a little like Hitler executing Jews in Germany to rid the Fatherland, and who has been the directing force behind the English Defence League, and you only have to do a little search on the internet to see the counter claims of the EDL under his directorship and mentoring of "tommy" based upon the evidence in the public domain.

Video: Alan Lake - Breivik & Norwegian TV

In this Dagbladet interview he again talks of executing people and gives his rationale behind Breivik which could have been a motivational force behind why Breivik willingly committed his terrorist acts because based upon Lakes belief Breivik could be out in 10 - 15 years to start a new life.

Imagine rationalising that in Breivik's mind and then releasing him to commit his terrorist atrocity?

Quote: I believe that anyone who has committed more than two murders should be executed. I will not hide who I am. I am a conservative of the old school. Police said it was hard to shoot someone who stands with his hands in the air. I would have shot anyway, because he could have had a bomb on him. Breivik knew he would be shot if he surrendered. He also knew that he would get a trial with full media coverage. In your world know Breivik that he will get a maximum of 10-15 years in prison, not much at his age. He will get a new life.
In my world he would have been a short trial, and so have been executed.

Parts of the above statement would have been integral to Breivik's thinking when committing his terrorist act. He called his operation a martyrdom operation because he believed he would be shot by the police after committing his crimes and if not he would be arrested and then get a show trial which is happening now with the prospect of a short prison sentence which is inline with Alan Lakes thinking that is contrary to Norwegian public opinion.

You have to ask yourself what goes through this mans mind on a normal day if he is willing to openly talk like this in media interview in relation to his possible involvement in the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century?

Murder and executing people? doesn't sound good from where I am sitting reading it.

Whats the psychoanalysis of that?

Kind of draws a psychological parallel with Breivik who went out and executed people, and not only that he has openly talked about executing Government leaders because of their actions which is what Breivik attempted to do, but failed, so killed a load of kids instead and said "I did so, to kill the next generation of leaders", which was obviously easier for him to do.

Also this man has been integral to an extreme political right-wing form of anti-jihad throughout Europe that is directly connected to Anders Breivik, so what goes on out of sight and mind behind closed doors with his most intimate colleagues if he talks about murder and executing people openly to journalists?

What is his real agenda and ultimate goal within his political field of which he is very active?

He claims he is an "old school conservative" which is probably a little wink to his political supporters, although I would say the Iron Lady Baroness Margaret Thatcher is an "old school conservative" and she would find his words and deeds abhorrent too which is why Capital Punishment was abolished but that's a different debate and not one to be had in context with Anders Breivik.

The glaring oxymoron which was Lakes defence was that he would have rubbished Breivik's arguments so he couldnt be the mentor (which everyone would agree is an oxymoron in the eyes of anyone who has been following Lake over the past few years because their ideas, arguments and murderous intent are exactly the same).

Breivik's arguments for why he committed his terrorist acts were based upon his fellow countryman Fraudman's extensive writings, along with many other mainstream commentators directly linked to Lake himself, so are they not both singing from exactly the same hymn sheet?

The manifesto is named after one of Fraudman's essays "A European Declaration of Independence" and he is mentioned 111 times inside the manifesto.

Fraudman is the ideological extreme right-wing and Breivik the terrorist right-wing which go hand in hand for a political terrorist campaign.

Lake promoted Fraudman in interview and tells people they should read his writings which is exactly the same as what Anders Breivik did with the "2083" manifesto, just in a different context but part of the same context.

The Oxymoron of Lakes public defence.

The good thing that can be taken from this interview is that Lake already has in his mind the length of prison sentence he can receive for his involvement with Breivik.

Quote: You can keep me collectively responsible for what ABB did and imprison me for five or ten years. And you know what, for me it's okay.

Whats the psychoanalysis of that statement?

Already working out in his mind the length of prison sentence...

Further reading: The folly of Alan Lake

Delusion or Reality

2011-12-04T17:26:00.021Z

Dagbladet: Delusional

Further reading: Fraudman in court

Further reading: Fraudman not happy about court summons
(cant stand by his words, hence Fraudman)

Much of the perception of the psychiatrists who have evaluated Breivik that is in the news papers is that he is delusional and detached from reality by believing that Norway and much of the West is in a state of civil war. Those psychiatrists should read Fraudman’s essays to see where Breivik gets his perception from and then determine Fraudman’s state of mind based upon these same evaluation points. The "2083" manifesto is named after one of Fruadman's essay's "A European Declaration of Independence" and he is mentioned by Breivik 111 times inside the pages of the manifesto, so can be construed as Breivik's ideological inspiration.

It is a common theme amongst many within the Western anti-jihad movement that we are in a state of low level civil war with the ‘ummah’ living in our countries conducting Jihad against wider kuffar society based upon the Islamic teaching of Dar-al Harb and Dar al-Islam, and their daily actions against us non-moslems. Just do a little scan of the anti-jihad forums or Facebook and you will see for yourself.

Dar al-Harb and Darl al-Islam is an Islamic theological fact that you cannot understand of believe because you are not moslem.

With no understanding of Islamic theology or the ideology of the anti-jihad movement then for a white middle class liberal psychiatrist Breivik’s perception is delusional because it is alien to their normal reality. Who is right and who is wrong?

The one with no knowledge and understanding or the one with the knowledge and understanding?

I could give as many examples you need based upon public facts of the threat to modern British society by Islamic fundamentalists to support Breivik’s claim. We have a prison system over-flowing with moslem terrorists who intended to murder and main innocent British citizens as a part of their political Islamic campaign to force Britain to bow down to Islamic supremacy through terrorism so that they can enforce sharia law upon the population.

Video: Undercover mosque

For some reason (the police to find out) Anders Breivik committed his political terrorist act based upon the thoughts and opinions of many main stream commentators. He took the first violent step which can be understood in context of the totality of the larger picture.

If the psychiatrists draw their conclusions based upon the official lie of ‘lone wolf’ then it is a flawed psychiatric report.

Who did Anders Breivik travel and meet in Liberia in 2002 where “Operation Breivik” began? And was Anders Breivik in London that same year as he claims, at what he calls the founding of a false Knights Templar group where he was assigned his English 'mentor'?

We know these are a fact so contradict the official line of the ‘lone wolf’ scenario and proves there is a network involved with, and behind, Anders Breivik.

If the Norwegians admit that there is a network then it means that they will have to hunt that network down as part of the criminal process and bring them to justice, just like with President Bush and President Obama who hunted down Bin Laden and the other Al Qaeda terrorists who were behind the 9/11 attack on America and brought them to justice. The question is; does the old Viking Nation have the stomach and the courage to go after those behind Breivik and bring them to justice? Are they humble enough to now do a u-turn and state that Breivik was part of a network?

Initial perceptions say no which is why there has been a white-wash and attempted cover up of the truth with the official line being Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ nut and is now certified as being ‘insane’, so no need to look anywhere else for anyone.

Why has there been no public statement detailing who Breivik met in Liberia in 2002 for the Norwegian people?

To do so would shatter the official line in the public’s perception because they would see there was someone behind him.

Other parts of the report talk of Breivik’s perception, of being a part of a Knighthood, a Knight and a hero of the Norwegian people with so much love for them which is part of the reason why he committed his acts.

If Breivik was a ‘lone wolf’ then this can be construed as delusional because it is all a figment of his own imagination. If not and Breivik was recruited and indoctrinated by an individual/group into a mutual extreme political ideological agenda who have the same ideas and beliefs as himself then his thoughts are rooted externally from his own mind so are not figments of his own imagination, and thus his own delusions.

Breivik’s reality is then part of an external reality with there being others of the same mind as Breivik himself, with much of what Breivik believes and shares being what he was told as an individual and part of the wider groups beliefs and ideas.

They brainwashed a willing Breivik with his grandiose ideas, with his words and deeds on July 22nd being the fulfillment of what he was told by them. Breivik now believes it because he achieved it, even if the white middle class liberal psychiatrists who are toeing the official line do not, because he knows his accomplices are still in the outside world and they share exactly the same beliefs as he.

Who is delusional and who has no knowledge or understanding of the truth?

Maybe me, but it’s my thoughts and perceptions, and as I stood accused of being his English ‘mentor’ ill add them to the discourse for the sake of the 69 innocence murdered by him on Utoya island.

"Operation Breivik" & Project Gladio

2011-12-03T11:31:00.012Z

(Gladio video documentary below)

Project Gladio was set up after World War II to prevent a communist invasion and takeover of Europe.

It is comprised of secret agents willing and able to subvert their own governments by conducting terrorist campaigns against their own people which includes mass murder. It is primarily made up of extreme political right-wing thinkers and terrorists who know no bounds when it comes to their political agenda.

I wonder what mindset "an old school conservative" who constantly talks about murder and executing people would come under?

Was Ander's Breivik recruited in 2002 to a neo-Gladio style network?

Government agencies around the world will know whether or not "Operation Breivik" has the hallmarks of a Gladio style operation.

To say that Breivik was a 'lone wolf' defies belief based upon the facts because the anchor point that cannot be disputed was his trip to Liberia and then London in 2002 where he says that he was recruited into their network. Nobody would travel to the blood thirsty murderous civil war in Liberia in 2002 of which President Charles Taylor rightly or wrongly is now sitting in the Hague charged with crimes against humanity unless they were invited there by someone important who could guarantee their safety. Must have been someone very serious and credible for a young Anders Breivik to trust them enough to go there, and how was the link between the 2 made?

Breivik was not a member of the Foreign Legion or any other such military group that is operating throughout Africa so would know how to conduct himself alone in an African war zone, he was an impressionable intelligent young man, and son of the Norwegian diplomat to London.

This is where "Operation Breivik" began and culminated in July 22nd 2011

To say 'lone wolf' defies the facts but is easy for mass consumption rather than to tell people the truth, which is now in-line with his 'inasnity' label.

A 'lone wolf' nut and everyone can go back to sleep rather than face reality and the bigger picture.

Government coverup by not telling people the facts because to do so the 'aware ones' would draw their own conclusions which differ from the 'official' line. Thankfully I know different because I was roped into this by someone for some reason and the Norwegian police told me that Breivik & Liberia was a fact.

Breivik's methodology, ideology and reasoning are all grounded in reality with his own eccentricity added in for good measure based upon his own minds understanding and coming to terms with his reality and role in the right-wing terrorist network he is involved with. He was a recruited and trained agent by them. Everything he says is grounded in facts that can be explained in the context of the bigger picture if you accept that there is a bigger picture. To deny the bigger picture relegates Breivik to a delusional 'lone wolf' nut recruited, radicalised and trained in bomb making and assassination through youtube, blogs and websites.

If I did not know Liberia was a fact then I would agree with the 'lone wolf' nut, but that conflicts with my truth.

9 years planning, 3 years preparing and then successfully achieving his groups goals that is all based in logic when you look at it, is amazing for a paranoid delusional 'insane' man who even now is looking at things logically and how he can continue his personal agenda in-line with the bigger agenda he has started.

He knows what most do not, that he still has people in the outside world to carry on their mutual goals so conducts himself from that basis.

Anders Breivik is the willing sacrificial pawn to declare war against Left-wing Marxists on-behalf of the covert network who are extreme Right-wing political activists and want to topple the controlling dominant Left. Exactly what Gladio style operations are all about and the reason why he has his grandiose complex. He is their perfect Knight, the leader who they puffed up as part of his indoctrination process as being a hero of the Norwegian people and right-wing who shoved it in the face of the Left, and has left his war manual for his global right-wing audience to follow - Pretty amazing for someone the medical profession in Norway has deemed 'insane'

Who else is there in the world today like Ander's Breivik? That is why he is unique in every way and should be understood in that context, and Breivik believes in it all which is his and their reality. Might not be your reality but who is right you or him?

What is very telling is that when Breivik phoned the police to give himself up, he did not say "I am Knights Templar Breivik" he said "I am Anders Breivik of the Norwegin anti-communist resistance movement".

Gladio was set up specifically to fight communism which is what Breivik believes he is doing. It was only after this that he then brings in the Knights Templar cloak. A cloak that this group wants to dress up their terrorist campaign in because it is more fitting ideologically for a wider modern extreme-right wing audience when faced with the new threat of Islamisation on top of communism.

Round 2 has been designed for the UK which is why the EDL has been so prominent to "Operation Breivik" because there you have an extreme right-wing organisation from which to recruit willing agents from, all dressed up in Knights Templar iconography, who are nothing more than right-wingers (wolves) in sheeps clothing.

This new political extreme far-right group wants to use Templarism to wrap their campaign up in and Breivik and the EDL are proof of this point. Real Templarism is faith based and not political based. Faith is above, politics is below, God is above and the devil is below, that's why Breivik murdered 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because of their Left-wing ideas.

Communism was the first and foremost goal of Gladio and it is right-wing v left-wing which is in-line with Breivik's words and deeds.

Gladio also has its agents within Freemasonary as the video below shows which is another clear indicator of "Operation Breivik".

In my personal opinion based upon the evidence this was a neo-Gladio style operation with a network of agents behind Anders Breivik, its just who are those agents and how high up the chain does it ultimately go?

The Norwegians obviously don't want to go there that's why there is a State white-wash and cover-up going on.

Maybe we will never know, but if enough credible people call into question the 'official' line which is contrary to the facts, then it cannot be swept under the carpet out of sight and mind, then the majority can form their own opinions.

First and foremost those murdered young kids were somebodies children, grandchildren, brothers and sisters, regardless of their political persuasion, and that mass execution of innocence was a crime against humanity because it went beyond what is humanly acceptable for the majority of the civilised world. As an 'insane' man, Anders Breivik gave his logical explanation of why he committed that mass murder that can be understood in light of the bigger picture no matter how repulsive it was/is, that is the nature of Breivik & Co.

No matter how uncomfortable it might be for those in authority over this case sitting in their nice cosy jobs with nice big pay packets at the end of the month they do not want to lose so they can continue bringing up their children and grandchildren, the memory of the dead 69 innocence of Utoya deserve the whole truth to be told by all those employed to get to the bottom of the truth of "Operation Breivik" because they are no longer here to call for it, and maybe another neo-Gladio style operation by this network will be averted.

Either I am right or I am wrong here, but I am wiling to share my view for that 69 and risk my own life in pursuit of the truth because someone pulled me into this by blaming me for being behind Breivik.

Philippians 1:21 For to me, to live is Christ, and to die is gain.

In part 2 of the video you have the links to the former Yugoslavia and Balkans.

Is Breivik Sane or Insane?

2011-12-01T15:47:00.012Z

The Foreigner: Uncertainty & Criticism

Further reading: Ideology wrapped up in a straightjacket

There is much contention over the diagnosis of Anders Breivik being ‘insane’ by many leading psychiatrists, although they state that they cannot fully determine a proper prognosis without reading the full psychiatric report.

There are also calls from within Norway for a second evaluation because many in the field of psychiatry in the Country say the label does not fit the person or the crime.

I have my own experience of a flawed psychiatric report that I will come to in a minute which proves that not all evaluations are right, with even leading psychiatrists stating that their field is not an absolute when it comes to determining someone’s state of mind.

Sometimes it is a clear cut case though and others it is open to speculation that gets some sort of label because it has to have one from the "specialists".

If a psychiatrist is evaluating the person with a lack of knowledge and experience base with which to understand the mind-set of the person in front of them then their evaluation will be flawed and biased towards their way of thinking.

Lack of knowledge and experience means lack of understanding which means a flawed evaluation, unless a clear cut case.

I am sure not one of those Dr’s evaluating Breivik thinks like Breivik thinks, so his mindset is totally alien to theirs so he must be mad (mine proves this point), they just have to give him a label that best suits the way he thinks, and in this case ‘paranoid schizophrenia’.

Paranoid schizophrenia to think like all of those mainstream commentators who he quotes in the manifesto.

There must be many millions of paranoid schizophrenics out there now who think like Breivik, but would not dream of committing a horrific terrorist act like his to get their point across. That’s the difference between extreme right-wing/left-wing politics and extreme right-wing/left-wing political terrorism.

One has the ideological justification and the other pursues violent means to further those ideas.

Breivik & Fraudman

Out of that team of psychiatrists evaluating Breivik was there one or more who understands the thinking and logic behind extreme right-wing political terrorism or right-wing political thinking when it comes to immigration, Islamisation, Jihad, Marxism?

If not then how can they understand the way Breivik thinks and judge accordingly?

Out of that team of psychiatrists evaluating Breivik was there one or more who understands the thinking and logic behind neo-nazi philosophy?

If not then how can they understand where some of Breivik’s ideas come from that are in-line with the world wide neo-nazi movement.

After all, Breivik does believe he is the leader of a new extreme right-wing movement that many neo-nazis agree with, has written a 1500 page manifesto detailing his reasons and justification and there are many on a more wider basis than just the neo-nazis who are now ideologically aligned to him, his ideas and his ways.

He is a new Hitler archetype and from what I can tell, much of his thinking is based around this type of philosophy and ideas, helped along most probably by his English ‘mentor’ through the brain-washing process he has undergone to believe in himself and their mutual agenda.

This is not a run of the mill situation, it is unique in scale and scope so hard for any psychiatrist to give a proper evaluation unless it is a clear cut case of delusional madness, especially ones with no knowledge or experience base of the facts that Breivik has in his mind. This does not seem to be clear cut case of delusional madness though because there is much contention in this particular medical field over the psychological evaluation of Breivik although no one knows the full facts yet.

We obviously don’t know the full details of the report and how delusional he is perceived from those who were evaluating him, but from the outside Breivik seems sane, with reason and logic behind his actions, just with different ideas and beliefs from the mainstream majority, just like moslem extremists who we say are a minority compared to the majority, and officialdom does not label them as ‘insane’, they are labeled as criminals and terrorists.

He has declared a right-wing terrorist war against Marxists governments based around his actions and the “2083” manifesto, and how many people have done that recently other than Osama Bin Laden who declared a terrorist war against the West, with many millions heeding the call, based upon 9/11 etc and his extensive fatwa’s justifying the war?

Time will tell with Breivik.

The only good thing about labeling him ‘insane’ is that he will undergo compulsory treatment which will allow the Dr’s to get to the bottom of everything with regards to “Anders Breivik” and anyone else who is associated with him.

The most ‘insane’ act Breivik did was murdering 69 innocent kids on their summer camp because to most people that cannot be justified under any circumstances, but there are many acts that happen in the world that the mainstream majority could never justify, even committed by some of our elected World leaders.

What determines madness if it is not clear cut?

A Dr’s report because they have the initials after their name so they must be right?

How horrific what Breivik did on Utoya island is to most people, and although we do not want to admit it, there was logic and reasoning behind his actions that he has explained. It in no way justifies it, but its his logical explanation.

Are not the actions of someone who is insane illogical?

That act was a criminally culpable act and not the act of someone who is ‘insane’ and didn’t know what he was doing. It was well thought out and planned in his mind so shows criminal culpability.

It’s the propaganda and ideology that has deemed him ‘insane’ and not his actions.

Maybe another report should be undertaken on the basis that the English ‘mentor’ is real and that Breivik’s mind was filled with this persons vision and Breivik was central to that vision (the pawn), then the delusion he is said to be suffering has a source separate to Breivik himself, it is a part of a much bigger extreme right-wing agenda involving other people so fits into place logically in the bigger scheme of things.

The official line is ‘lone wolf’ so that psychological evaluation will also be flawed on this point too because it’s all a creation in Breivik’s own head, so delusional. But what if it is not all a creation in his own head and there are other people involved just as he says? That shines a completely different light on everything and explains alot.

He does say his English ‘mentor’ wrote about the perfect Knight, and now Breivik claims to be that perfect Knight, so that thinking has a different source than from inside his own mind, and now Breivik believes he has attained that position because his ‘mentor’ explained it to him, he did what he did, and now he is the poster boy of the extreme far-right for all others to follow and emulate, thus the perfect Knight in their eyes, who is waging a war against Marxists with Islam and moslems for decoration purposes and justification.

For Breivik it all started in Liberia in 2002 during the Civil war in the Country and then London that same year which are both factual points. To believe ‘lone wolf’ is like believing in the tooth fairy.

It depends on whether or not after nearly 5 months of the official ‘lone wolf’ line, the Norwegians can publicly do a u-turn and admit that Breivik is a part of a bigger network. There are calls for the head of their PST to stand down because of failings in this case and I am sure this point must come into that equation and reasoning because nobody likes to admit they have made mistakes but with overwhelming evidence to the contrary it’s a case of reputation on the PST and not an individual’s job position even if they are the boss.

Further reading: PST Director must go

I wonder who will be the first to agree publicly that this is not a ‘lone wolf’ scenario?

Or is that taboo in Norway?

Breivik might have been alone on the day and that’s about it, beyond that all evidence clearly shows a much bigger agenda involving more people that dates back to 2002.

With regards to my psychiatrist report which enables me to give an opinion on this based upon it, the last time I was in prison in 1998, the prison psychiatrist did an evaluation on me and stated that I had had a psychotic breakdown.

With out going into the full details of what happened to me, I had what is described as a ‘religious experience’ where God revealed Himself to me before I ended up in prison. I could not deny my experience which formed the basis of my new knowledge of the world around me, and I embraced Christianity as the truth because of my experience.

I was born again.

If you are reading this and do not believe in God then this is alien to you, so in your mind I must be mad, but it doesn’t mean I am mad it just means I have a knowledge and experience base that you do not have which determines my belief which is different from yours.

Who is right and who is wrong?

They once believed the world was flat until someone gained the knowledge and experience to show a different belief.

Because someone does not believe something doesn’t mean they are right and you are wrong, it just means you have a different point of view based upon your own knowledge and experience base. It’s only the narrow minded people who refuse to listen to other points of view with an open mind because they believe their truth is the only truth and everyone else is wrong whose views differ from their own.

The psychiatrist who evaluated me was an atheist so what was his report going to say when sitting with someone who had just had a Christian religious experience?

Not rocket science…

He reported that I had had a psychotic breakdown.

How could an atheist psychiatrist who refused to believe that my knowledge and experience base even existed, write in his report that I had a Christian conversion experience say ‘hallelujah’ and wish me well in my new found faith as a Christian? Of course he couldn’t, and he had to put a label on the report so his atheist mind labeled it what he did ‘psychotic breakdown’.

He did not believe in Christianity or the reality of an Almighty God because he had no knowledge or experience base – He was/is an atheist.

Was his report right or wrong?

I was incensed by it so wrote a letter to the judge to counter his labeling of me pointing out my facts that differed from his facts, and as the court asks people to swear on the Bible every time they give evidence I hope the judge listened with an open mind otherwise all courts are sham.

Since my conversion my whole life has changed and I have never been in trouble with the police again, except for a thought crime for sharing my truth with others, whereas before that time I was a young thug criminal in and out of prison every year from the age of 16.

My life proves that that Dr’s report was wrong and I could give at least 50 people who would agree that that Dr’s report was wrong because they share the same truth as me and know me personally.

The moral of the story, can Breivik’s psychiatric report be wrong or are the psychiatrists always right because they have the initials after their name?

Time will now tell…but there is already disagreement in Norway so Breivik cannot be that ‘insane’ that some psychiatrists refuse to accept the prognosis based upon the evidence.

Britain & Iranian ties are no more

2011-11-30T17:02:00.005Z

Further reading: Norway closes its Iranian Embassy

Further reading: Bomb blast at Iranian nuclear facility

Iranian Freedom Institute
And
Confederation of Iranian Students
Press Release

Basiji-led Attack on the British Embassy in Tehran

As the U.S. and its European allies begin to impose effective sanctions on the Islamic Republic, the western democracies should anticipate that the regime will initiate more of these fully-authorized, staged incidents under the guise of a student movement. The so-called students, of course, are plain-clothed basiji following orders from the regime. Even Moussa Ghornani, a member of the legal committee of the Iranian Parliament, admitted unwittingly in a statement that “the students who entered the British Embassy yesterday were members of one of the official and effective organizations within the regime.” The basiji “students” published an announcement in the Raja News (the official news agency of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad) that railed against the government of Britain because “this evil government had the audacity to sanction our Central Bank.”

The western democracies should take this incident as evidence that the recently imposed sanctions on the Central Bank of Iran (CBI) have infuriated the regime. And for good reason. The CBI sanctions will disrupt the smooth flow of revenue to the regime that is essential to pay its loyalists, the basiji, and the Revolutionary Guard Corps leadership. The Iranian Freedom Institute (IFI) and the Confederation of Iranian Students (CIS) applauded the imposition of CBI sanctions noting that this is a major step in the right direction.

Contrary to the regime’s propaganda, the Iranian freedom student movement believes the regime has lost its legitimacy and has called repeatedly for its removal. The western democracies should not be misled by the regime’s subterfuge. The Iranian freedom student movement seeks a free, democratic and secular Iran. The Confederation of Iranian Students, in particular, has been at the forefront of this fight for basic human rights and freedoms that the Iranian people desperately seek. Be clear on this point. The Iranian regime, not the average Iranian citizen, is affected by the CBI sanctions and only the imposition of oil sanctions would have a decisive impact on the Islamic Republic.

IFI and CIS believe that the imposition of oil sanctions against the Islamic Republic will cut off the life blood of the regime – the revenue essential to meet the payrolls of its domestic security forces, the basiji and the Revolutionary Guard Corps leadership. The oil sanctions report prepared by the CIS presents a detailed analysis showing how a carefully developed and implemented plan, coordinated closely with the Saudi government, would cripple the Iranian regime and avoid shocking the international oil markets during the current period of international financial turmoil. In this regard, IFI and CIS strongly support French President Sarcozy’s call for international sanctions on the Iranian regime’s oil exports, and will continue their efforts to encourage the U.S. Congress to adopt bipartisan legislation toward that end.

Breivik’s flawed psychiatric report

2011-11-30T11:39:00.007Z

The Guardian: Breivik's hatred does not come from a delusional mind

For the majority of people within civilized society Breivik’s terrorist atrocity is viewed as the actions of someone who is ‘insane’ because how could someone callously murder 69 innocent kids on a summer camp in cold blood whilst dressed as a policeman. So the psychiatric report condemning him to stand trial as someone who is ‘insane’ doesn’t come as a surprise to many people. The thing with it though is that it was a premeditated, well planned act of political terrorism which puts it in a completely different context than just the actions of someone who has gone out mentally disturbed and killed someone, it is a context that Norwegians have never experienced before in modern times, if at all.

There are other plots of terrorism within their country but none have been successful like Breivik’s so the culprits have never been psychoanalysed by psychiatrists like he has, which means unless there are some glaring examples of pure insanity within his interviews, then their knowledge and experience base is flawed which will in turn mean their assessment is flawed.

Insanity is the only explanation then.

Some key points of why they have deemed him insane are because of his grandiose complex of believing he is going to be the savior of Norwegian people, and that he is the most perfect Knight since the Second World War.

If you put those points into context of everything then they are rational points from Breivik based upon the facts.

There is an extreme right-wing movement within Norway and across Europe that Breivik was a part of, and he has logically taken their thoughts and ideas to the next level. Are they ‘insane’ to think like Breivik thinks, or have they just not crossed the line into political terrorism to get their point across?

Many of the thoughts and ideas that Breivik had came primarily from the Norwegian writer Fraudman, who was mentioned 111 times inside the manifesto, although he now wants to disassociate himself from the man whom his words inspired.

Could Breivik believe he is going to be the savior of Norwegian people by committing his terrorist acts based upon Fraudman’s writings? The prosecutors will have to work that one out, which will make Fraudman culpable.

The ideological network.

If so then that point is not a case for insanity unless Fraudman is deemed insane too, as Breivik is only taking the next logical step within the extreme political right-wing mindset, as he was encouraged to do.

Political terrorism always has rational sane justification, we might not want to accept it or believe it, but we cannot deny it which makes those who commit these acts, terrorists and criminals in the eyes of the criminal justice system, who are locked up for the safety and security of wider civil society, and not people who are ‘insane’ and sent to a mental institute.

It’s criminally sane in that context. Someone who wakes up one day delusional and kills someone is ‘insane’, but Breivik spent 9 years planning and 3 years preparing for his political terrorist attack which makes insanity quite hard to accept or believe. Psychiatrists who live in their cosy little bubbles un-affected by the ills of modern society have no experience or understanding of Breivik’s World view so have no other rational explanation than “he’s insane and delusional to think how he thinks” because its completely contrary to how they think, but there are many who think the same as Breivik, and who have the same World view as he.

Are they all ‘insane’ or just have a different view point of the world than the psychiatrists?

Breivik has a 1500 page manifesto detailing the work of many mainstream right-wing commentators that justifies why he committed his terrorist acts.

You might not want to believe their World view point because it conflicts with yours, but that doesn’t mean they are insane, it just means they have a different knowledge and experience base that has formed their World view point, and there are many millions around the world who agree with many of their points of view.

The gravity and scope of Breivik’s actions are beyond what most people would deem acceptable when looking at a group conducting a terrorist campaign, but this was Breivik’s & Co’s decision, based around their own reasoning, to maximize everything including the subsequent media attention which in turn re-enforced the importance of the “2083” manual that has now been left in the public domain. This atrocity was a tactical decision by Breivik and whoever is associated with him and he himself gives the reasons why which are rational reasons within their mindset, and agreed by many.

Premeditated, well thought out, and successful.

I personally do not believe that killing 69 innocent kids on a summer camp can ever be justified under any circumstances, regardless of their political beliefs, where as the government building in my mind, based upon other terrorist groups actions, could be viewed by some as a tactical target by a terrorist group wanting to wage a political war against their ruling class and government to get their message across.

That is the nature of Breivik & Co.

His grandiose view of himself in my opinion comes from the successful brainwashing of his English ‘mentor’, unless you stick with the official line of ‘lone wolf’ radicalised and trained online through youtube and websites, although that scenario does not hold up under real scrutiny because amongst other things Breivik was invited to Liberia in 2002 during the Civil War in the Country, and was then in London of that same year supposedly at the forming of a secretive false Knights Templar group which are both anchor points and clearly show there is a group behind Breivik and that he is not a ‘lone wolf’.

He is working within a bigger agenda which is set out in the “2083” manifesto.

That being the case, someone painted a picture in Breivik’s mind that he believed which resulted in him willingly committing his terrorist acts in-line with their mutual agenda.

Painting the picture in his mind of he, Breivik, being the first person to start the war to topple Left-wing governments based upon their groups agenda, and how he was going to be viewed as a hero after time because of his actions (starting the war), along with the knowledge he already had about the people he was involved with, it’s easy to see his puffed up ego of his self importance after successfully pulling of his terrorist atrocity.

The worlds eyes are now on Breivik, he has made his mark, issued their statement, left a manifesto for those who agree with him to follow, potentially started a Europe wide terrorist campaign to topple left-wing governments, and gone down in history.

His grandiose complex obviously comes from all of this.

Everything before and after put into context within Breivik’s mind with his knowledge and experience base, and after achieving the first major attack as a "Declaration of War", he then believed everything he had been told by his English ‘mentor’ about him being the savior because it was now a reality to him, he had achieved their mutual goal after 9 years planning and 3 years preparing, and he has been open to explain the truth so that others understand him in context when they look back.

Premeditated, well thought out, and successful, with Breivik now believing in his own importance in the scale of things based upon what his ‘mentor’ told him. Just like moslem suicide bombers who believe the lies they are told by their recruiters as part of the brain-washing process that leads to them blowing themselves up.

His belief that he is the perfect Knight is in-line with the brainwashing by his ‘mentor’ because Breivik states that his ‘mentor’ described the perfect Knight to him which was all a part of his brainwashing process. The ‘mentor’ painted the picture of Breivik being that perfect Knight after he committed his acts which Breivik believed and sought to attain, which is why he now believes it and claims it. His ‘mentor’ told him so, and his ‘mentor’ is still in the outside world to continue their mutual agenda, so it’s true to him.

Unless he is a ‘lone wolf’ then it is all delusional, but he was in Liberia in 2002 during the Civil war in the Country after being invited there by someone who recruited him?

To say he is the most perfect Knight since the Second World War means there must have been a perfect Knight in the Second World War and that can only mean Adolf Hitler who also claimed himself to be a Knight and arose to one of the most prominent positions in World history. This is all in-line with neo-nazi ideology which obviously forms the core basis of the group behind Breiviks ideology, and Breivik himself, which is why he also talks of forming a Norwegian breeding programme.

Breivik is not a Knight’s Templar in its true form, he is a charlatan, a wolf in sheeps clothing because no Knight who has his core belief based upon the Bible and teachings of Jesus would go out and kill nearly 100 innocent kids in the name of right-wing politics. He is a fraud, driven by a devil.

In the manifesto he even decries Christians as being weak minded, needing something to believe in, which is an affront to all true Knights Templar’s around the world.

You can imagine that after committing a horrendous mass murder that goes beyond the realms of mainstream societies sanity and then spending 12 weeks in solitary confinement to come to terms with what he had just done and the subsequent lengthy police interrogations would have taken a toll on his mind so that would bring doubt over its legality if there were points of contention he could explain away sanely, unless there is very clear cut cases of delusion, but Breivik has his anchor points that's why he has been clear and consistent throughout since July 22nd, from what we can glean via his lawyer from the media anyway.

And there are many who justify his acts and agree with him.

We have to wait now for more disclosure of his psychiatric report to see whether or not he really is ‘criminally insane’, so cannot be held to account for his actions.

Unless the real English ‘mentor’ is arrested which proves the above points, and there must be real speculation about the existence of this ‘mentor’ which is why I was interviewed, with it spread across the worlds news that it was me.

The psychiatrists are stuck between a "rock & a hard place" if they are to stick to the official line of 'lone wolf' because everything Breivik says has to be delusional if that is the case, thus 'criminally insane' and delusional.

“One persons madness is another person’s reality”

Breivik's ultimate humiliation: Insane

2011-11-29T01:11:00.002Z

"One persons madness is another persons reality"

Daily Mail: Breivik 'insane'

The Foreigner: Nobody happy with the 'insanity' label

The Norwegian psychiatrists have concluded that Anders Breivik was psychotic when he committed his extreme right-wing terrorist atrocity on July 22nd so he will not stand trial under normal criminal conditions. He will be standing accused as a 'mad man' who is 'insane' so will be sent to a mental institute after sentencing to undergo State controlled psychiatric treatment rather than become a part of the Norwegian prison population.

That is the ultimate humiliation for him after 9 years planning and 3 years preparing for his atrocity, although you could argue, how could someone who is 'insane' pull of such a spectacular act of murderous right-wing terrorism, with a 1500 page manifesto detailing the writings of many mainstream commentators to back up and justify his actions?

Seems very sane to me.

Doesn't say much for the Norwegian mental health service who did not detect this 'mad man' in their midst, who went on to successfully conduct the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century as an act of extreme right-wing terrorism based upon his fellow countryman Fraudman's essays.

I wonder whether Fraudman will now be sectioned under the Norwegian mental health act as Breivik's terrorist atrocity were a continuation of Fraudman's inspirational writings (what do they contain)? That is of course, unless Fraudman is directly linked to Breivik so will face criminal charges instead, as part of a wider conspiracy. He was in direct email communication with him after all, in the panic he did hide his computer when the police came looking for him, he quite possibly attended the same EDL demo as him in London, and he is directly connected to many of the ideological influences linked to Breivik which could also be Alan Lake.

The good thing about sentencing Breivik to State controlled psychiatric treatment is that the Norwegians will be able to legally pump him with mind altering drugs to try and balance his 'insane' mind out, which might result in the full truth behind everything coming to light, especially if some of those drugs have some type of effect where the persons is induced to speak the truth as part of the healing process.

Until he is certified by the courts there are restraints on what the Norwegians can legally do to obtain the truth, but once sectioned they have a duty to wider Norwegian society to try and rehabilitate Anders Breivik which would mean pumping him with some exotic mind altering substances to help his mind come back into the real world where he realises that murdering 69 innocent kids on their summer camp is beyond normal human behaviour, even for a terrorist (although some gloat over the acts). Unless your a Chechen moslem of course, who committed a similar terrorist act against a school full of children in Beslan.

Also under these State sanctioned conditions they can fully analyse his 'mind-set' so as to be able to understand what makes him tick and what motivated him to commit his acts, so as to be able to gain a clearer picture and understanding of the threat now posed to Norway's National Security from internal and external forces in relation to domestic politics.

Breivik has been very clear as to why he committed his acts, and it is to do with politics and he is only one of many who think and feel like him. Just look at the EDL leader Yaxley/Tommy's comments to Breivik's actions to prove that point: Breivik dared to come forward with his opinions

Placing Breivik in the general prison population would eventually result in him being murdered by someone who wanted to gain the status and reputation of being the person who did the Norwegian people a favour by killing him, so a mental institute is probably the best and safest place all round for him, and realistically they can keep him a lot longer than the 21 years maximum sentence he could have received if he had of been deemed sane by the psychiatrists.

One part I read which was one of the reasons why they deemed him insane was that he talked of setting up a Norwegian breeding programme. That idea comes straight from Hitler himself who did actually set up an Aryan breeding programme in Germany during the Second World War, and there are many who still idolise Hitler and seek to emulate him and his agenda today, so this from Breivik could be from the Nazi influence he has received over the course of his 9 years planning whilst educating himself on the European right-wing scene.

Are all those neo-nazis out there insane like Breivik? are they Breivik's in the making?

Video: German language neo-nazis in Germany

Yep...I reckon, and that was the whole purpose of Breivik and his acts, to gather all those ideologically aligned to him and his 'makers' based upon his actions and the "2083" manifesto so as to wage a leaderless extreme right-wing war against the left taken directly from Osama Bin Laden's terrorist manual of how to start a war in the 21st Century - The global reach of the internet that beams live and direct into peoples bedrooms across the four corners of the world 24/7.

Anders Breivik is the poster boy, although the 'insanity' label will definitely stop some of those weak minded on the edge of crossing over into that world from now doing so, because weakness does not mean a lack of intelligence or intellect.

How many Breivik followers are there out there now, who agree with him and are reading his extreme right-wing terrorist manual/Declaration of War?

In a population of 6.5 billion I would say there are quite a few, its just who goes from the ideological stage into the operational stage.

There have even been European MP's who have supported Breivik and his right-wing ideas, are they insane like Breivik?

We obviously do not know the full scope of the psychiatric report so cannot give any opinions on any key points as to why they have deemed him 'insane', but one thing is for sure, there are many people out there on the extreme right who agree with Breivik and his actions, who will take up his/their mutual cause, with Denmark, Sweden, Russia and other Countries already talking about Breivik inspired attacks.

You could say that he did a good job achieving what he wanted to achieve as someone who is 'insane', with people already following in his footsteps.

"One persons madness is another persons reality"

Awakening - A new generation - AOTK

2011-11-27T09:16:00.001Z

Egypt - Pro Al Qaeda preaching in Tahrir square

2011-11-24T18:48:00.001Z

Further reading: Islamic fundamentalists poised to take-over Egypt

'Iran strike aftermath couldn't be as bad as nuclear Iran'

2011-11-23T22:27:00.002Z

Jerusalem Post

Former Mossad head Danny Yatom says Israel can't afford to wonder if Tehran "will go crazy and throw a bomb on us," says "painful" IDF response would stop rocket fire from Hezbollah and Hamas.

The outcome of a strike on Iran's nuclear sites, no matter how destructive, can never be as bad for Israel as an Iran armed with nuclear weapons, former Mossad chief Danny Yatom said on Wednesday at a security conference at the Begin-Sadat Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University.

Yatom took up a position that is diametrically opposed to that of former Mossad head Meir Dagan, who sparked significant controversy by stating earlier this year that an attack on Iran would be a foolish move that would lead to a war with an unknown outcome.

Continue reading: Jerusalem Post

Further reading: (2007) The Future Equilibrium of Planet Earth

Breivik secretly filmed in court

2011-11-19T14:24:00.001Z

(0.55)

Not an attack or criticism of MI5/MI6

2011-11-16T17:51:00.014Z

A close friend of mine has subtly criticised me for writing my last post as if it was an attack on the British Security Services MI5/MI6.

I would like to point out that I have not criticised them or attacked them in my post because I know full well the work they do and risk they take in 'defending the Realm', all I have done is ask relevant and pertinent questions relating to the Anders Breivik murder enquiry in relation to Alan Ayling/Lake based upon the facts.

If Alan Lake had nothing to hide then he should have been on the first plane to Norway to refute any such horrendous allegations as soon as he knew that the Norwegian authorities wanted to talk to him as part of their on-going investigation.

He has so far refused to do so and hidden from all attempts to locate him for a public interview with the media, travel to Norway to refute any allegations leveled at him and answer any questions posed as part of the on-going investigation to see whether or not there is a wider 'conspiracy' and network directly connected to Anders Breivik himself and his actions, as he has stated himself within the manifesto and in police interview.

Failure to comply with the above leaves a level of suspicion surrounding him and looks from an outsiders perspective as a level of guilt for some reason is at play.

Only time will tell now that the ball has been set in motion for his appearance in front of the Norwegian police investigators.

Due to the fact that I was hung out to dry by pretty much everyone as being the English 'mentor', it has been my responsibility to defend myself and refute the accusation at every given opportunity which is that I have done, and my duty as someone in the middle of the investigation to help get to the bottom of this 'crime against humanity', if I can, for the sake of those 69 innocent dead kids who were murdered on their summer camp, and for their families left to deal with the tragedy.

Thats what true "Templarism" is about.

Being accused of being the 'mentor' behind the monster who carried out the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century is no small thing on every level.

I had no hesitation in traveling to Norway to be interviewed at the first opportunity because it was a 'despicable' lie leveled against me that originated from somewhere and for some reason, and I would have had no hesitation in looking into the eyes of any family member of the deceased from July 22nd and stated my innocence in the whole affair to them directly.

I gave the Norwegian police a detailed interview of where I believe this accusation originated from with credible reason and motive behind that accusation and now they would like to speak to Alan Ayling/Lake to see whether or not there is substance to my claims.

Knowing what I know about Alan Ayling/Lake and his murky background I asked relevant and pertinent questions in my post regarding him which should not be taken as a criticism or an attack on the UK's Security Services. This is what I actually said before questioning Ayling/Lake's links into the heart of the British Establishment and Security apparatus.

Quote: I would like to stress that I do not believe Alan Ayling/Lake is endorsed from the 'Top', well I hope not anyway, he is what I would call a compartmentalised asset who is controlled by someone or group within a section of Britain's MI5/MI6 intelligence community.

MI5 & MI6 are world renound for their work in protecting not only Britain's National Security but that of other Nations and Alan Ayling/Lake's nefarious work and his rogue unit should not be a reflection on them as a whole and their hard and often very dangerous work that sometimes results in their deaths for Queen & Country.

I am sure that those in authority who respect the 'rule of law' would also like to know the answer to my questions because of the wider implications if Ayling/Lake is behind Breivik and connected to the State in some capacity as I believe he is.

Due to the severity of Anders Breivik's crime (the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century) and the seriousness of the future implications for the whole of Europe based upon the "2083" manifesto and potentially Alan Ayling/Lakes possible involvement, and his somehow magical feat of staying hidden from any public exposure to which I received as if thrown into the 'Lion's den' by him and his EDL puppet, and now his much sought after police interview, I think the questions I posed are relevant and pertinent to the on-going investigation.

Who is protecting him and why?

The seriousness of Anders Breivik's politically motivated terrorist attack and its future implications has resulted in a department being set up in the Hague to investigate the terrorist attack in Norway, which means a full and thorough international investigation to see where this attack really came from and who are the people behind it.

Unless of course we are fed the 'official line' of lone wolf scenario where Breivik was radicalised and trained in his bedroom watching youtube videos and reading websites and blogs. Then pulled of the greatest terrorist feat in history of all on his own. There is only so long that line can hold up though as there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary, its just whether or not 'Joe Public' will be allowed to learn the full truth and further arrests are made.

This transcends domestic British affairs because it is international in scope, and all questions need to be answered, that includes all questions surrounding me as I was immediately implicated, and all questions surrounding Ayling/Lake as that is the only possible place I can see that a hostile act against me could have originated from which brings in the questions I posed.

I might be completely wrong in my assumption, but I also might be completely right, and its a matter of all those agencies investigating in every country, to prove or disprove any allegations or lines of enquiry to get to the bottom of Norway's worst human tragedy in their history.

From what I have learned (I might be wrong), the manifesto has been written in perfect English, which for a Norwegian, unless he has a degree in English is always going to be an impossibility, and Breivik after his crime was able to successfully point the 'mental psyche' he created onto the UK right-wing scene, which leaves the questions why and who really wrote the manifesto?

The main online anti-jihad writers who Breivik supports in the manifesto proclaim the "English Defence League" as the saviours of Europe, and it is comprised of many with extreme far-right political views as Breivik himself, which in my view is his/their attempt to stir up individuals within its ranks to follow his lead into political terrorism against those on the left of UK politics. Tommy Robinson is already using the platform from Breivik's acts to threaten attacks against the UK, and morally supports his views.

What or who, could be the possible link between the EDL and Breivik who might want the after effect his acts have created to be pointed towards the UK right-wing scene because he/they have their finger on the pulse?

Breivik a right wing political extremists dressed up as a Knights Templar and professing himself a Knight, and the whole EDL movement centered around Knights Templar iconography.

Video: The folly of Alan Lake

The "2083" manifesto is titled after one of his Norwegian compatriots Fraudman's essays. Fraudman is also a die hard supporter of the EDL.

What or who, could be the possible link between Fraudman, the EDL and Breivik, so able to script Fraudman in as the ideological one for more "Team Breivik's" to follow so they are all in-tune with the agenda?

Who are the ones Breivik talks of when he states that his friends with the same views as his will continue his work on the outside?

Alan Ayling/Lake was the financial and operational director behind the EDL and was the point man between its international financial and political supporters, which includes Fraudman and certain of those other ideological anti-jihad writers mentioned by Breivik in the manifesto, who are/were also die hard EDL supporters.

Is there a pattern that emerges that cannot be ignored and requires a deeper understanding?

Alan Ayling/Lake had very real means and motive to frame me, which leaves me with the question, is he one of the people directly behind Anders Breivik? and who was the military tactician in his flat at the first EDL meeting when Steven Yaxley-Lennon (Tommy Robinson) assumed the leadership role of the EDL?

No matter how uncomfortable the questions might be that I posed in my last post, is it not the British governments duty to get to the bottom of this to prove or disprove any claims surrounding Ayling/Lake? Not just for Norway but also Britain's internal security.

This was the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century after all, so it cannot just be swept under the carpet as a minor irrelevant event, especially not because of the involvement of the Hague.

Someone somewhere wants to start a right v left wing war to topple European governments and Breivik was the first pawn in their agenda.

Do they have government backing or is this the work of a 'mad man' and his associates, ready and willing to take their ideological political agenda to the next level, which means violent terrorism against their political opponents? If they dont get caught that is, or if they dont have government backing.

What are the consequences and implications if Ayling/Lake is connected in some way to MI5/MI6 and he is behind Breivik?

Not a nice thought I know, and not a nice question to pose because of the respect for MI5/MI6, but at least the Germans are facing up to their own potentially similar event.

All evidence points to the fact that he is, its just a case of whether or not there is any evidence linking him directly to Breivik himself, and there is a lot of circumstantial evidence pointing to that fact.

As a British citizen and loyal subject of the Queen, not one person has helped me through any of this, so why should Alan Ayling/Lake be afforded such protection from figures within the Establishment?

Are we not all equal before the law?

The man in his 'madness' is even talking about murdering me and nobody has said or done anything about it.

Am I not in my right to question things when I was not only attempted to be framed for being the mentor behind the monster who murdered 69 innocent kids in cold blood, and also when there is talk of murdering me by someone who is now central to the on-going investigation regardless of what light others might want to read it in?

That is not an attack on MI5/MI6 it is in my defence to ask these relevant and pertinent questions considering my current situation as a witness in the Breivik enquiry and people talking about murdering me who are potentially linked to the State.

If I was dead then I wouldn't be asking them, but I am not, contrary to other people's desires.

Isn't it time Alan Ayling/Lake was sent to Norway?

I am sure a deal can be done to keep any knowledge of Ayling/Lakes connections away from the public arena to preserve the operational integrity of the British Security Services, if he is linked to them of course and he is innocent of everything, and if he is not, and he is involved then that's other peoples problem to deal with and I would say that is his trump card.

No one in their right mind can condone or justify the cold blooded murder of 69 kids on a summer camp regardless of their naive role playing and left leaning parents.

Alan Lake - Agent/Asset of the State?

2011-11-12T13:13:00.018Z

The Guardian: Germany's MI5 linked to neo-nazi murders

The Guradian: Germany's scandal grows

Daily Mail: Many MI6 agents have died protecting us

Quote: Mr Hague is responsible for the Secret Intelligence Service MI6 and GCHQ, the electronic listening station in Cheltenham.

Home Secretary Theresa May is responsible for the Security Service MI5

I would like to stress that I do not believe Alan Ayling/Lake is endorsed from the 'Top', well I hope not anyway, he is what I would call a compartmentalised asset who is controlled by someone or group within a section of Britain's MI5/MI6 intelligence community.

MI5 & MI6 are world renound for their work in protecting not only Britain's National Security but that of other Nations and Alan Ayling/Lake's nefarious work and his rogue unit should not be a reflection on them as a whole and their hard and often very dangerous work that sometimes results in their deaths for Queen & Country.

Alan Lake has been successfully shielded from the Anders Breivik police enquiry by whoever is above him, but that will come to an end soon and then he will be brought out into the light of day and then questioned by the Norwegian police over any possible links he has to Breivik himself, and the shady dealings he as had with all those international groups financially and politically funding and supporting his right-wing agenda not only in Britain but also around Europe, and how they themselves could be complicit in Breivik's terrorist attack, his ideology behind the attack and their future agenda of starting a right v left-wing war throughout Europe based upon the "2083" manifesto.

Whether or not Alan Ayling/Lake is actually an MI5 or MI6 agent himself is yet to be known but there is enough evidence pointing to the fact that he is a State asset to some degree, aligned to some high level political group and figures within the British Establishment.

He is not your working class type and is cut from the same cloth as Anders Breivik's diplomat father and walks in similar political circles because he has the money, educational intelligence and the social contacts. Where the money comes from is a job for those looking, and who is contacts are is again a job for those who are looking, but rest assured both of those questions will unearth quite a picture of who at the heart of the British Establishment is supporting and protecting him. Not only that it will show who is ultimately behind the "English Defence League" and protecting its leaders on a State level, and endorsing Lakes political agenda in Europe.

How bad a reflection on the British intelligence community will it be if I am found to be correct here and that he is, as I say he is, an agent of the State who has been behind the "English Defence League", going up and down the Country, terrorising communities, attacking innocent people, closing down city centers, shutting businesses when owners are struggling with the recession, costing the British tax payer millions in policing, attempting to start a race war in Britain and all under the Blood Red Templar Cross, just like with the fake Knights Templar Anders Breivik and his "2083" manifesto.

(He and they stole the vision of the EDL from me and others.)

Wont look very good and its too late now because all of the evidence of Alan Lake and his actions are in the public domain, and those above him know this that's why they are protecting him because he has the potential to expose them, which in turn opens up a much bigger picture of what has been going on in the background within internal British affairs. I am sure they are not feeling very comfortable at the moment and the British angle on the Breivik enquiry will unearth these truths for those who need to know. It would be good for them to be brought out into the open so that we know who our enemies are on that level of society.

Could this along with my potential to scupper Alan Lake's agenda of using the EDL for his and their purposes be motivation enough to attempt to frame me over Anders Breivik?

If Alan Ayling/Lake & Irish tommy boy had not have pointed the finger at me then I would not have endevoured to understand where the accusation of being Anders Breivik's English mentor came from and why it was leveled at me in the first place. Thus I would not be talking in an open format about this issue and those involved with the Breivik enquiry would not be looking or listening to my thoughts and opinions.

Call it a blessing in disguise, me being placed in the 'middle' of this by the Almighty for the sake of all of those dead innocent children and their families, if I am correct.

Anders Breivik is as much a 'lone wolf' as I am his English 'mentor', its just a case of whether or not the Norwegians have the stomach to take this all the way, whether they have international support on the highest levels and to what degree the British State wants to protect Alan Ayling/Lake. Can they cut him loose or does have have too much damaging incriminating evidence on other senior figures duplicity?

I think the blood and memory of 69 innocent Norwegian children and the tears of their grieving families should be enough motivation and give enough strength to go all the way with this, and the bombing of the government building, killing 8 inside, enough political will.

There can be no doubt that at the very least Lake is an agent of the State than the fact that he is connected to influential political figures around the world, with contacts in the Swedish government, Norwegian government, and British government, that we know of, along with his connections into the American political scene.

Video: Alan Lake - Breivik & Norwegian TV

He has all of these contacts, is directly pushing and directing a right-wing political agenda and is behind the "English Defence League", so you cannot tell me that he is not connected at the very least to high level British political figures which in turn brings in the MI5/MI6 angle. Is he an asset or agent is the question that needs to be known. Asset then who is controlling him, and agent, that brings in a much more damaging scenario because of his work with the EDL. This would then account for the deafening silence about him in the media, his refusal to go to Norway, and the State level protection he and his EDL leaders seem to posses. As I say, those above him and surrounding him do not want to now get caught up in this so they have had no alternative but to protect him because in doing so they are protecting themselves, but I would say it is too late and whether we 'Joe Public' know or not, those decent figures in the British Establishment will now know and hopefully that will be enough for 'justice and retribution' to follow them the rest of their lives on earth.

How high does it go though?

Why have the British press not done any real articles on him and his involvement with the EDL? The only one I have seen is a Guardian article which incriminates him when reading it in the light of Breivik.

The evidence is everywhere when someone is guilty.

Somewhere out there in the realms of the Establishment is a department set up specifically for the "English Defence League" because at one time it was deemed as a serious threat to the 'peace and security' of Britain as there were thousands on the streets righteously protesting against Islamic fundamentalism within the country. Now it is nothing more than a hard core group of racists and aging football hooligans wanting their buzz and a leadership milking the 'fame and fortune' from the international attention, with it slowing dying a natural death because of their ineptitude.

Whoever the head of that police unit is, I would say is complicit with whoever is supporting and backing Lake on a political level because all operational decisions that could effect the EDL come from this one person and you can deduce from their actions or more like inaction that they are working to an agenda along with others on a political level behind the scenes.

This is what happens out of 'sight and mind' in high politics that we cannot see.

Irish tommy boy the EDL leader was arrested on his way to Scotland for 'stirring up religious hatred' that carries a maximum of 7 years imprisonment. His home was searched, and that of his family with items taken from both locations, which later resulted in a money laundering charge based upon cocaine dealing.

Whilst in custody the 'stirring up religious hatred' charge disappeared as if like magic, but we all know how that magic works for some people when facing Special Branch and the possibility of the exposure of the persons real identity and the looming potential 7 years. At this point Irish tommy's identity was hidden from the public because he always wore a mask and used his alias. He was terrified of having his face out there which resulted in him committing his acts against my family, which in turn resulted in me and Nick+ putting his face out there.

So its pretty safe to say that Irish tommy boy became a Special Branch asset at that point in the police station, to pass information on patriots involved with the street protest movement. Not only that there are rumours on the streets of Luton that he sold some young guy out who was arrested with drugs and weapons.

Info can be seen here: Tommy 'grass' Robinson

An asset has to be protected at all costs because of the information they are supplying but you can never take into account for the persons own actions which was shown in Blackburn when Irish tommy boy coked out of his head, targeted an ex-soldier for a punishment beating by his loyal EDL followers.

This was a clear cut 'affray' caught on video, that he and his handlers could not get out of because there was video evidence and calls for his arrest.

He was not arrested for 'affray' that carries a maximum of 3 years imprisonment, but the pitiful 'common assault' charge that holds no real consequences (6 months maximum) unlike, potentially, the 'affray' charge.

Video: The Blackburn disgrace

There are quite a few other incidents or Irish tommy boy's misdemenours that have been overlooked by those in authority charged with dealing with the EDL which can only mean complicity which then brings in other questions and lines of investigation that ultimately sits in the hands of the chief of the unit dealing with the EDL because he/she sanctions and authorises the arrests of members and leaders, or holds them back for reasons known only to themselves and their operational integrity i.e a government officials saying "yes or no".

I wonder who the Chief turns to on a political level when deciding what action to take, or inaction as the case may be?

These are questions that hopefully the British angle of the Breivik enquiry will uncover.

The main case that stands out to me is the case of Irish tommy boy and the big man uncle kev coked out of their brains entering the sanctity of my innocent mothers home (who is also a grandmother to 10 English children), under false pretenses whilst I was hundreds of miles away in Malta and ringing me from inside the house on her landline phone number and unbeknown to her, attempting to threaten and intimidate me into silence with kidnapping her unless I stopped my attack on their leadership of the EDL.

The police have a 999 emergency call from me of this event on record, along with my mothers witness statement about them lying to her to get into her home in the middle of a public dispute.

The police took absolutely NO ACTION of this crime committed by the leadership of the "English Defence League", or contacted me regarding the 999 call.

Can you see the pattern?

Must be someone high up protecting their assets, and it is that someone or plural who I and I am sure others want to know, who is making the government/police operational decisions on the EDL because in my mind they are complicit with the act committed against me and my innocent family for which I want charges brought.

From that moment anyone who continued supporting that leadership was a direct enemy of mine and those associated with me, with a whole body of evidence since that time detailing who those enemies are, and that includes whoevers decision it was to take no action after that 999 call which the IPCC complaint will get to the bottom of.

18 months later after my continued assault on them, their leadership of the EDL and the complicity of their ideological supporters, I am then accused of being the 'mentor' behind the monster of the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century. Funny thing is that I am not even mentioned in the manifesto once, and its all of my enemies who I had been writing against over the 18 months who were lifted up as the people to follow by Breivik, I just took all the blame away from them in the Worlds media and was seriously in the position of being arrested based upon the carefully crafted propaganda behind the "2083" manifesto and its implications aimed at me and those linked to me.

See the pattern.

It did not work though and thankfully someone somewhere knew there was no way this was linked to me and gave me the opportunity to defend myself which is what I have done from the very beginning of the Breivik saga. Hopefully one day I will know the truth and be able to thank that person/persons for believing in me.

Not only all of this, I have given the Norwegian police ample 'means and motive' behind Alan Ayling/Lake being the one behind Anders Breivik and attempting to frame me for it, with him now even talking about murdering me, no matter how others want to dismiss it, it shows what is in his heart and is at a time when he is now central to the ongoing Breivik investigation which doesn't look good in anyone's eyes. Knowing all of Lakes murky background, the people he is involved with and the access to money he has, its not beyond the realms of possibility that he could have paid someone to do the job for him, so the direct threat against my safety and well being at a time when I have no money to protect myself is there.

This threat against me was written about in the Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet, and my investigating officer in Norway advised me to take the information to the British police because of the potential gravity of the situation.

After being away for 2 years and coming back to the UK, homeless and then penniless it was a very hard situation to find myself in so I took the information of this threat and historical evidence to the police with a signed copy for the Chief Constable of Bedfordshire Police Alf Hancock just in case something did happen.

To this date nothing has been done about it.

See the pattern.

Considering I am a British citizen and subject of the Queen, am I and my family not entitled to the full protection of the Queens law? Or has this public institution and servant of the Queen now failed in its duty to protect the public thus making it a failed institution of State which means as a people we must re-evaluate our position with regards to the police.

Corruption on the highest level that is directly linked to the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century.

There are many unanswered questions that need answering so I hope that the British side of the Breivik enquiry will answer some of the questions posed by me here on this blog, because they are very real and very relevant questions that need answering.

After being accused in the Worlds media of being Anders Breivik's English 'mentor' and voluntarily going to Norway to prove my innocence I was told that Scotland Yard who were dealing with the British side of things would talk to me on my entry to the UK. Due to the gravity of the case, it being the worst mass murder in Europe of the 21st Century, my involvement in it, and its future implications not only to myself, but also the security of Britain and her allies, you would have expected them to talk to me considering all of the implications, but to this date not one single person in the British police has asked to talk to me about anything. Not Breivik, not threats against my family, not threats against me, not about anything.

Can you see the pattern.

From the top down, and it all now centers on Alan Ayling/Lake and his political paymasters and supporters, and whether or not he is an agent or an asset of the State, thus making me a threat to their continued business practices and whhttp://www.blogger.com/img/blank.gify there is silence on all of the above.

The silence is deafening and speaks volumes...

Further reading: Not an attack or criticism of MI5/MI6

Video: Investigate Pamella Geller (Atlas Shrugs)

The folly of Alan Lake

2011-11-11T11:11:00.011Z

Guardian: Lake demanded debate on killing PM Cameron

Quote: "I categorically condemn his actions, which have also killed friends of a friend of mine – one in Oslo and two on Utøya island."

How coincidental that Alan Ayling/Lake has a friend in Norway who lost friends at both locations in the twin terrorist attacks on July 22nd which could only mean a government level contact because those murdered were all actively involved in left-wing politics. Alan Lake is extreme right-wing, so I hope the Norwegian police find out who his friend is in government and then interrogates him/her as part of the wider Breivik police enquiry and for public knowledge inside the commission for the families of those who lost their loved ones.

Quote: But the fundamental point of that piece is correct. I am holding people responsible for the consequences of their actions." (talking about the murder of the leadership of the present British coalition government)

Is that not exactly the same fundamental point as Anders Breivik who went out and killed 69 innocent kids because of their parents political persuasion who he blames for the state of his Country?

Holding them responsible for the consequences of their actions!

Exactly the same mindest...

Further reading: Uncloaking the mind of a 'madman'

Further reading: Yaxley & Aylings finger pointing

An open letter to Christian Halto

2011-11-03T11:59:00.001Z

Dear Mr Halto,

I have decided to write this letter in an open format so that my next step is public knowledge and my reason for this.

I did try going the private route but to no avail.

I have been falsely accused in the worlds media as being Ander’s Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ which has brought with it many problems not just to my own life but also that of my family because as I hope you can understand, being labelled as the man behind the monster who murdered 69 kids on their summer camp because of their political beliefs is not only, not a very nice situation to find myself in, but also a very dangerous position and does not do my family reputation much good which in turn effects my whole families personal and work lives.

Who knows all of the complexities behind standing accused of such a grave crime and what angle the threats to my life and well being now come from.

As soon as I learned that I stood accused of being the English ‘mentor’ I publicly stated that I would travel to Norway to prove my innocence which is what I did, and after 15 hours of interview over 3 days your investigators know for a fact that the media accusation is false.

This makes me wonder why you even stated publicly that you wanted to speak to me in the first place.

Did you base your assumption on the media’s accusation or evidence that is not in the public domain and a part of the ongoing investigation?

If on the media accusation then I call into question your role as a representative of the Norwegian police and the credibility of the department that you represent, and now leaves you wide open for legal proceedings as I continue my pursuit to clear my name.

Stating that I am “only a witness” does not disprove the false claim it only leaves the label hanging over my life and continued doubt in people’s minds.

If you believed that I was the English ‘mentor’ then was it not your responsibility as a representative of a Norwegian public institution to go through the relevant “official” channels to speak to me and not issue a public statement stating to the world through the media that you wanted to speak to me, thus adding fuel to the media fire that was already raging around me?

Not only this, it took almost 4 weeks for the Norwegian police to actually talk to me and this was not because you made contact with me through the relevant official channels which is what normally happens, and then invited me to Norway for interview. It was after I went to the British Embassy in Malta asking for advice on what I should do after standing accused in the worlds media of being Ander’s Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ based not only on other peoples finger pointing but also on your finger pointing. It was all over the World news that you wanted to speak to me because you personally told this to the media in the days after Breivik’s arrest and it took me coming to you and not the other way around.

I heard nothing back from the British Embassy in over a week and in the end it was a Norwegian journalist who gave me the contact details of the investigation for me to contact someone there which is what I did.

I spoke to the investigating officer who dealt with me whilst in Norway about you issuing a public statement ruling me out from being the English ‘mentor’ as I had just proved this point after my time in your Country which I personally feel was the very least you could do.

The first response to this in conversation was that it was difficult because if you publicly ruled me out from being the English ‘mentor’ then this would leave the question in people’s minds of who then is the English ‘mentor’ which might harm the ongoing investigation.

I accepted this to begin with so as to help with your enquiry but a month or so later with absolutely no developments concerning this point that I stand accused in the world’s media I raised the issue again.

When I did raise this point again I received an email back from you stating that Ander’s Breivik had named me himself.

That is a very serious claim to make by a Norwegian police lawyer and your credibility and future position hinges on this statement because I now want to test that statement that came from you and if found to be false I want action taken.

Here are the points.

1) Has Ander’s Breivik named me as being his English ‘mentor’ in interview?

If so, then I accept that statement and then it is your responsibility to investigate why he has stated this because it is false, and if not your statement can only leave one other option.

2) Did you base your public statement on Ander’s Breivik’s claim in his manifesto that his English ‘mentor’ is called “Richard the Lionhearted”?

If so, then everyone investigating my blog and my life prior to July 22nd 2011 will know that I have never ever used the name “Richard the Lionhearted”. I used Lionheart as my nom de plume writing name as an independent name in itself and nothing to do with the historical figure, contrary to what you might have thought.

No matter how close you thought it was it was false which makes your public statement stating Ander’s Breivik named me himself false too which in turn makes you responsible in part, to my ongoing situation that has resulted from your initial statement.

As a lawyer it is your responsibility to state facts to the media and not assumptions as facts especially when they have such a detrimental effect upon someone’s life, and in this case being implicated in the worst European mass murder of the 21st Century.

At this point in time I do not know whether or not Ander’s Breivik has named me himself in police interview, only you know this, but I will safely assume he has not because he knows himself that it is a lie.

I have sought legal advice in the UK and legal representation in Norway and am now just waiting for someone to take up this case to test your statement to prove my innocence.

I did not want to go down this route as several different sources in Norway will testify too. All I wanted was for you to do “the right and just thing” by publicly ruling me out from the English ‘mentor’ position just like you ruled me in, but you have refused to do this and given me no alternative but to test your statement and prove my innocence.

I am not a pawn or scapegoat in your investigation that you can use just because it suits you because you’re the one in authority, with blame levelled at me so deflecting blame or attention from others, or other lines of enquiry. I and everyone else know that if I am not the English ‘mentor’ mentioned in the manifesto, then the big question is; who is the English ‘mentor’?

That must be a question the families of those murdered by Ander’s Breivik and those with a wider interest in the case will want to know.

An official complaint with legal proceedings will now be lodged in due course.

Yours sincerely,

Paul Ray

Birth and Baptism of Anders Breivik the mass murdering political terrorist

2011-11-02T18:42:00.003Z

Update: Breivik's stepfather is retired army Major

(Supportive embedded links will be added later)

Breivik states that he was invited to Liberia in 2002 by a Serbian warlord, which was during the civil war in the Country. It was this point that both myself and Nick+ said “no way”, but the Norwegian police confirmed it as being factual to me in interview, which puts most other key points in the manifesto as being factual too, if this truly is the case.

How a 22 year old Norwegian like Anders Breivik gets invited to Liberia by a Serbian war lord is very difficult to work out and understand until you look at what is staring you in the face. The Norwegian police said it was a fact that he was there in that country at that time, so it’s safe to assume that just like he says, he was invited there as a guest by someone, or sent on behalf of someone.

From there Breivik then states that he ended up in a meeting in London that same year as part of the formation of a false Knights Templar group. Maybe going to Liberia for whatever reason was his initiation to be trusted into their secretive group, thus earning his stripes.

So from Liberia to London involving high level people at age 22 with no military or intelligence background is strange on the outset, you obviously don’t meet these types of characters who send you off to a warzone down your local pub, but we are told that Breivik was definitely in Liberia in that year which says he must have been at the other London location too. The Norwegian and British police will know whether or not he was in London at this time and the English ‘mentor’ position hinges on this point. The Norwegian investigator did question me about being in London in 2002 and refused to confirm or deny whether this was a factual point so I go with the assumption that it was factual that’s why they asked me about it.

In my mind the only way someone like Breivik could have ever been in the company of such people is through his father who was the Norwegian diplomat to London, which is the piece of evidence staring the uninformed in the face. I cannot possibly see any other way this event occurred. Who knows where Breivik went, and who he spoke to when in London pre his 2002 trip to Liberia whilst visiting his father the Norwegian Government diplomat, or what contacts in London he made via this family link.

I wonder whether his father knows Alan Ayling (Alan Lake) or anyone connected to Alan Ayling through mutual business concerns, domestic British politics or Freemason lodges. We know Alan Ayling has connections into the British Establishment somehow. How far those connections go we don’t know yet, or whether we will ever know, but I can safely say the Queen who is head of the Realm does not sanction Alan Ayling and his nefarious political actions, and she sits at the top of British affairs, although you can never be fully sure because what do us peasants know about the affairs of State, but I would safely stand on my belief as being fact. She would not sanction an act of war against Norway, if Ayling/Lake is behind Anders Breivik so his connections can only go so high. This would be of his own doing and that of his supporters. How high up the Establishment tree his supporters go, who knows, but them themselves and MI5 who have now shone the light on Alan Ayling’s private affairs and uncovered the people he rubs shoulders with.

I wonder how far sections of the British Establishment will go to protect the reputations of those very high level people who are directly connected to Ayling/Lake via their mutual political beliefs. We know based on historical evidence that murder is a sure and safe age old tool to silence any threat to powerful Establishment figures reputations.

The only information there is about Breivik and his father is that he left him when he was a child, and that’s all we know, everything else in the media goes blank after that. Which is usually the way when Government officials do not want to get mixed up in a high profile media frenzy surrounding one of their children who has turned out to be a political terrorist/mass murderer of innocent kids on a summer camp, they all close ranks and protect the information because they have the ability to do that, unlike us mere mortals further down the food chain who are hung out to dry in the worlds media like I was.

Government coverup.

If it is true that Breivik did go to the Liberian warzone and was at a meeting in London in 2002 then I can pretty safely say it was via his father the Norwegian diplomat living in London in some way. It is the most obvious piece of evidence staring everyone in the face there is. Diplomats and those on that level of society always get invited to political functions, private parties and even military shows where arms dealers and international political figures are present, with some of them themselves having sidelines in certain business interests. We know this from our own British MP’s when the scandal breaks about their abuse of office for financial gain.

I wonder whether the Norwegian investigators have located Breivik’s fathers Swiss bank accounts yet, and traced where his money came from pre 2002 to 2011 because that has to be a part of the investigation, or whether or not he has lived above his means since 2002, with houses and yachts plotted up around the world in his name and that of those closest to him. I am sure the public enquiry will get to the bottom of this information because it’s crucial to the full case that the parents of the dead children will now want to know considering his son murdered their children callously in cold blood. Just because Anders Breivik’s father was a diplomat does not give him immunity to a full police inquiry especially over such a big one like this.

The London link definitely starts with his father, and cannot be based upon anything else, it’s just how and why does it go from London to Liberia and then back to London again?

And who is paying for all of the expenses for the trips of a 22 year old Norwegian son of a diplomat, and what better cover if it blows up in their faces whilst he is travelling in Africa?

You can see it now, Breivik stopped and arrested in some neutral third world hell hole like the Ivory Coast for his African adventure in the Liberian warzone, and what better way to get him out than use his father’s diplomatic position as an emergency get out of jail free card. Breivik was the perfect man for the job; he had all the credentials which is probably why he was recruited for the job in the first place. Luckily for them that never happened and Breivik did what he had to do under the radar for whomever in Liberia and then returned to London, to, I would imagine, the ones who sent him there in the first place – The English ‘mentor’ & Co.

We know that most people working in high positions in society are also members of the Freemasons or similar organisations which fits in with the Knights Templar meeting because for most of them I believe, a form of Knights Templar grouping is a branch that some of them take once involved in the Masons. So it would not be unusual for a London Freemason to set up his own little private group with influential friends out of the way of prying eyes to discuss mutual political and business matters close to their hearts and call themselves Knights Templar’s because it has a militant undertone which is befitting the Serbian connection.

Money, weapons, politics and war.

Breivik says that there were different people present representing different Countries at the meeting in London with someone I believe representing the Serbian because he was stuck in Liberia. At this stage of the game was Breivik an errand boy between the members of the London group and the Serbians? If so you could probably assume that there was arms trading going on at some level, especially because Breivik travelled to Liberia during the civil war there. Why else would a ethnic European son of a government diplomat travel to Liberia during the civil war?

Diplomats, private functions, supposed Knights Templar’s, Serbian war lords, civil war in Liberia and diamonds.

What’s your assumption based upon the facts and possibilities?

Arms trading.

So at 22 years or age Breivik found himself in the right place at the right time (somehow?), to be recruited into a secret group, quite possibly dealing in arms and diamonds, and for whatever reason (son of a diplomat) they trusted him and sent him to Liberia.

The test.

Norwegian diplomat to London, his impressionable young son, and an English ‘mentor’. 2 + 1 = 3

It is after this trip that the founding meeting of the Knights Templar is said to have taken place in London, and Breivik is then assigned his English ‘mentor’ from the group, and their future vision of how they are to communicate and their responsibilities is then mapped out between them.

After this we don’t really know too much, or I don’t anyway, other than Breivik travelled around getting involved in right-wing politics in Norway, and travelling around Europe meeting different neo-nazi’s and affiliated types of extreme groups. He was obviously then well on his travels walking his path but with the knowledge in the back of his mind that he was involved with people (military/business/political/quasi-religious) who were involved in very big things that he was a part of. That’s a heavy thing for a young man to carry in his mind, and to think he never spoke to anyone in almost 10 years about his secret and his African adventure is naïve, or that he was not on a Nato list pre 2011. Those in the secret Knights Templar group could not account for a Breivik with loose lips, they could only trust in him and hope for the best.

It is during the period between 2002 and 2011, I don’t know exact date, he is said to have travelled to Belarus several times, once on the radar and I believe twice off the radar after working out his way in and out of the Country without passing through border control. The Belarusian security services codenamed him the “Viking”.

So if this is true it’s pretty safe to say that he was in Belarus for some purpose that he did not want the authorities knowing about, which would fit in with the claim that he had attended training camps run by a former Soviet Colonel who is also a Chechen moslem convert. And if this is true then you can see the parallels between the target Breivik chose on Utoya Island, and the Beslan school siege. Which would mean he learned his art of political terrorism from a Chechen moslem convert.

The ultimate act of political terrorism - Target vulnerable children for shock and awe - and in this case the children of his left-wing Marxist government for maximum effect.

Was his father left or right-wing politically?

This could also count for the fact as to why he did not target moslems if he is supposed to be so anti-moslem and anti-Islamisation. After knowingly being trained in terrorism ideologically by a moslem, he wasn’t likely to go out and kill moslems even though he now claims Islam and moslems are his agenda. From what I can tell he was more anti-Marxist/anti-Government/anti-Multiculturalism with the former added on top for good measure which is extreme right-wing politics and nothing to do with Templarism. His manifesto clearly shows this, although the media propagate the line Islam and moslems was his agenda which fits in with his claim he is on a false crusade and somehow implicates me in that. That’s the cover and detraction from the real truth, and is in line with other extreme right-wing groups who support Breivik like the EDL who also run around promoting and pretending to be Templar’s when they are not even Christian.

Wolves in sheeps clothing.

After Breivik committing his act of terrorism, he now claims “anti-moslem/anti-Islamisation” in the media through his lawyer. This is a fallacy to detract from his real agenda because If Breivik was a Knights Templar concerned about the Islamisation of his country then he would have targeted Islamic fundamentalists and not innocent ethnic Christian Europeans. Instead he targeted his left-wing Norwegian political elite which is extreme right-wing politics and not faith/historical based, as with true Templar’s.

This is all obviously speculation about how Breivik was born and baptized to become a political terrorist and it’s only the Norwegian investigators who know whether or not these bits are true or false, this is just thoughts and opinions surrounding views on Breivik.

I would safely say that at some point in the time frame from 2002 - 2011 it was his Serbian paramilitary contacts rooted in Liberia in 2002 who were the ones that organised his terrorist training in Belarus that’s why they take a prominent position within the manifesto. Their finger prints are all over Breivik so it’s safe to assume they wanted their voices to be heard too, within the whole scope of Breivik’s acts. His acts were used for maximum exposure by all those concerned which included the attempt by others connected to him, to have me framed, silenced, imprisoned, discredited and my reputation ruined. I would imagine his English ‘mentor’ would have been more of the business financial side of whatever brought them together, as the Serbians were fighting a war in Liberia and the English man was sitting comfortably in London with a diary of contacts and financial/political backers to support the Serbs campaign.

It would be safe to say that whoever was involved with Breivik and any activities that could be deemed sensitive i.e the English ‘mentor’, would have taken the upmost precaution to cover his/their tracks after the 2002 meeting, literally ceasing all contact with each other for a period of time, with them both going their separate ways walking separate paths only meeting on several occasions over the years for an update on life’s happenings. But you can never fully 100% cover your tracks because you have to take into account factors outside of your control, and even mistakes that you never think will come back to bite you, so I am sure there are tracks to find somewhere over the 10 year period.

We have no idea who was at that first meeting in London or the type of people they are, their background, or what their lives are all about, but we can safely say they were all highish level people with money, involved in politics foreign and domestic and linked somehow to Serbians, possibly via the Balkan war and then the Liberian civil war.

Arms trading.

I wonder who was on the MI5 radar in the UK for supplying arms to Serbians in Liberia in 2002, or on the UN list of known arms smugglers trading in Liberia that can be linked back to London. I cannot imagine it being more than a handful of people.

How the connections were made amongst the group are unknown and how they all came together is unknown, it’s all speculation because only those present know the truth, but I should think they are sweating right about now, or the ones who can be exposed at least because one of their group did not become the martyr he wished for and is now sitting alive in police custody under intense scrutiny (I would have water-boarded him by now). With investigators all over the world now trying to get to the bottom of this act of extreme right-wing political terrorism so as to prevent another bloody atrocity somewhere in the world, and find out the groups political agenda, although Breivik & Co have spelled it out in the manifesto. Unless of course the Norwegian investigators stick with the line that Anders Breivik was a lone wolf radicalised and trained in his bedroom watching youtube videos and reading blogs who then exploded and became a well trained terrorist and mass murderer of children on their summer camp because of their political persuasion.

I would say that an inexperienced 22 year old like Anders Breivik made many mistakes before July 22nd 2011, and now it’s a case of the Norwegian police joining the dots to form the bigger picture (conspiracy) and other peoples involvement with him.

What we do know for a fact is that for some reason over the last few years Anders Breivik has been immersed in the European/American anti-jihad movement. After many years apart, with them walking their own paths in their own Countries, did he and his English ‘mentor’ come back together again over a common more recent political cause possibly pre 2007, under a different political climate and discuss their future agenda in this new era as false Knights?

It was probably at this point that everything made sense to Breivik and that is why he was willing to commit his acts in the name of the bigger cause that his English ‘mentor’ is involved in, but also not forgetting his Serbian brothers in arms who helped train him. Look at the manifesto to see the bigger cause (I haven’t read it). The key to Breivik’s act is someone lodging in his psyche that he will go down in history as the one who started “their” war “A European declaration of Independence” based primarily on his fellow countryman Fraudman’s political ideological writings, culminating they believe, in upwards of 1 million ethnic Christian Europeans being murdered through political terrorism before “2083”. Under the right conditions it was easy to get Breivik to believe in his own immortality and place within history, so as to go out and commit his act of terrorism and mass murder. The only thing to stop this now is for the conspirators and their agenda to be exposed to the public which nips their terrorist campaign in the bud and sends a clear message out to the world.

Unless of course this is all sanctioned on some very high level and we will never know the full truth and the Norwegians will state “Lone wolf” and more terrorists will follow Breivik’s lead based upon the “2083” manifesto.

Breivik also had good friends amongst the Russian community in Sweden.

I wonder whether Breivik and his English ‘mentor’ ever met in Sweden as a neutral country.

How did Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake get contacts directly into the British and Swedish governments?

With regards to Fraudman, how coincidental is it that an online writer about extreme right-wing politics hailed as the dark prophet of Norway amongst a small group of influential ideological writers in the online Western anti-jihad movement was from the same Country as Breivik? That link is way too suspicious just like the link with his father, and then you look at all of the people surrounding Fraudman which gives a clearer picture and shows that someone/or more, amongst Fraudman’s supporters is linked directly to Breivik.

Up pops Alan Lake & Co who also had reason to frame me as being the English mentor to remove me from being a threat to their life long political agenda that pulls in lots of money from around the world for their present political cause and gains them influential friends from around the world to climb the political social ladder. Is that reason and motive enough to frame me if they could? Only ALL circumstantial evidence points to Ayling/Lake, and he has a well documented base of supporters and financial donors throughout Europe and the US in the public domain, who are supporting his present grass roots political campaign which fits in with the English ‘mentor’ role. He is currently the mentor behind the EDL’s leader Irish tommy boy, raising funds for their mutual extreme right-wing cause in the UK and potentially throughout Europe, and there is no greater proof of this fact than tommy boy has gone from a nervous little boy in 2009 – 2010 reading from a bit of paper wearing a mask on stage to someone who can now actually speak in public, although you cannot believe one word that comes out of his mouth because he is a pathological liar.

All of my closest people who have been with me throughout my dealings with the EDL state exactly the same “he has been coached”, and low and behold Alan Lake is behind him in every way, with tommy boy even doing Masonic signs in some of his fund raising videos, so the question is; who recruited him into Freemasonry or taught him the hand signals?

Has to be Alan Ayling/Lake, there is no other possible conclusion which then takes you back to Breivik in 2002 who was also recruited into a form of Freemasonry whilst in London and assigned an English mentor.

Also in line with a wider political agenda based upon Breivik’s acts, Irish tommy boy threatened the UK live on BBC news with a bombing campaign if his EDL were not listened too. That is the modus operandi of a terrorist campaign and in this instance based around Breivik’s terrorist acts, even Fraudman is now back out pushing the Breivik line in the public domain.

These are just my thoughts surrounding the pieces of information that are in the public domain, with everything written supposition based upon facts, certain parts of Breivik’s manifesto, and my own opinion.

We don’t know anything yet about anything other than Breivik was definitely in Liberia in 2002 and his father was a London diplomat, everything else is just opinion surrounding these facts. Also that Breivik named his manifesto after his fellow countryman Fraudman, mentioning him 111 times inside.

London is central to Breivik before and after his actions on july 22nd 2011 and what a coincidence that his father was the Norwegian diplomat to London.

Its not rocket science…

I wonder what Fraudman’s passport turns up when looking at how many times he travelled to the UK, or how many times he met with those surrounding Alan Lake & Co in mainland Europe at Stop the Islamisation conferences including in Sweden and Norway? We know he was in London at the EDL demo with Ayling/Lake & Co whilst Geert Wilders was being entertained in the House of Lords by Lord Pearson. Although Geert Wilders from the very outset has always refused to endorse the EDL and if I am right, has publicly criticised them for wanting to jump on his bandwagon. He is a true European political figure with his own voice about the concerns befalling his country and the rest of Europe who does not need to be tarnished with the support of extremist groups who petrol bomb mosques and spray irrelevant graffiti all over them.

There is never a perfect crime unless Breivik was a lone wolf sitting radicalised in his bedroom thus removing any thought of accomplices in the bigger scheme of things, but travelling to Liberia in 2002 during the civil war there and meeting warlords completely discounts that myth in an instant. It’s just how far are the Norwegians and their allies willing to go to get to the bottom of this, and how much they are going to tell us Joe public.

So there can be no Government coverup with the lone wolf line, because the facts clearly say otherwise, and the people of Norway, Europe and the World following this case will now want to know all of the facts that stem from that publicly known Liberian meeting in 2002 so that we all have a clearer picture of Anders Breivik’s political terrorism/mass murder and who is behind him and with him for our own peace of mind and security.

Alan Ayling aka Alan Lake is already talking about wanting to murder me. He is a little snake, who couldn’t punch his way out of a paper bag let alone kill someone that’s why he encourages others to do the job. He wouldn’t know what to do with a knife or a gun if you gave one to him, but he has the connections politically and amongst his extreme right-wing groups that also includes drug dealing Irish IRA gangsters in Luton via tommy boy and the money to pay them. If he was not concerned about anything then why would he be talking about murdering me and why is he not willing to go to Norway without any lawyers present to prove his innocence in the whole affair?

What would a jury think about these points?

Role on the truth behind the conspiracy concerning Anders Breivik the mass murdering political terrorist and their declaration of war against ethnic Christian Europeans in the name of extreme right-wing politics, and my complete exoneration in the whole affair.

Inspiration plausible but not the public/media accusation. Mentor factually impossible, so who is the English ‘mentor’?

Lionheart of England

Alan Lake threats to murder me

2011-10-27T09:15:00.000Z

(13/10/11)

Psalm 105:15 “Do not touch My anointed ones, And do My prophets no harm.”

Dagbladet article: Alan Lakes talk of murder

Reuters: Norway police would like to question Lake

Alan Lake the man who I believe is the English mentor behind the political mass murderer in Norway Anders Breivik, who I believe subsequently used Breivik's actions to frame me and brother Nick+ by placing subtle pointers in our direction in his blood soaked manifesto to remove us as a threat to his political aspirations, has been talking about murdering me and asking how much it would cost.

I would not print my thoughts on the matter!

So thats his Luton Irish EDL IRA supporter puppet's "Tommy" and uncle Kev supposedly putting a price on my head amongst other serious things they have committed, and now him talking about murdering me.

Does anyone think they want me out of the way or is it just me?

And I thought it was Islamic fundamentalism that was the enemy upon our English shores...

Further reading: Motive

The sooner the Norwegian police interrogate him the better and for his inhumanity when he commented "the chickens have come home to roost on Norway", when 69 innocent kids lay dead on Utoya island after being murdered in cold blood by a man dressed as a policeman. I can gladly say that "The chickens have now come home to roost" on Alan Lake.

And if they can link him to a wider conspiracy with Breivik, because there is a mountain of circumstantial evidence linking him to Norway and directly to Breivik himself, then I will gladly take the witness stand to testify for the sake of the memory of those innocent dead kids and their families, not least because he would have been complicit in framing me for it - Call it justice

Time will tell.

Enjoy your trip to Norway Alan but be careful though because you never know whats lurking in the shadows out there when your on your own, and you might not make it home for a good few years if they have got that crucial link.

I doubt the State will halt any extradition for you interrogation either as they owe the Norwegians one over the murder of Martine Magnussen.

Video: Alan Lake - Breivik & Norway

4,000 foreign criminals set free

2011-10-27T08:31:00.004Z

Nice for the future stability of Great Britain.

Thousands let out of detention centres because there was ‘no prospect of them being deported in a reasonable time'

Nearly 4,000 foreign criminals who should have been deported are at large on the streets of Britain, an official report revealed last night.

Human rights claims and red tape are giving them their freedom while they fight deportation orders.

The criminals include dozens of former prisoners convicted of offences such as murder, rape and sex crimes against children.

The figure emerged in a report by John Vine, chief inspector of the UK Border Agency.

He revealed there were 3,775 criminals in May this year who had been released from immigration detention centres because there was ‘no prospect of them being deported in a reasonable time’.

Continue reading: 4,000 foreign criminals set free

A breakdown on Breivik

2011-10-22T07:23:00.011Z

“Breivik dared to come forward with his opinions” that was the statement of the extreme right-wing English Defence League leader Irish tommy boy robinson, who himself knows all about crossing lines.

It is not a case of daring to come forward, to put it the way it was meant, it’s a case of Breivik being willing to cross the line and go that step further than anyone else within their expression of the anti-jihad movement in Europe which has resulted in the bombing of the government building in Norway and the murder of a bunch of innocent unarmed kids on a summer camp at Utoya island.

Breivik was the perfect ‘subject’ for any recruiter aiming to start a terror campaign in Europe to further a political ideology, and in this case the extreme far-right anti-Marxism/anti-Islam cause. Breivik was just like those sought out by the likes of Al Qaeda recruiters or any other terrorist group wanting to wage a political terror campaign.

Finding that person willing to sacrifice their life for the cause by going that one step further than anyone else, fuelled by intelligent minds painting a picture (brainwashing) for the person to believe then go out and commit the act.

Unless of course Breivik was a “lone wolf” radicalised in his bedroom watching youtube videos and reading right-wing blogs and websites, and never mentioned a single word to anyone ever about his thoughts feelings and intentions over a span of 10 years concerning his Marxist left-wing government and the effect of Islam in Europe and what he wanted to do about it.

Then all of a sudden he blasts himself into the worlds psyche from nowhere and nobody saw or heard it coming?

Pull the other one…

I go with the former opinion because there must be someone somewhere he shared his inner thoughts, feelings and intentions with, look at Pamella Geller for example who openly received an email in 2007, and if those people who he did talk to have not come forward to state this fact about Breivik talking to them, then that means they are complicit in some way. To think a man heavily involved in extreme right-wing politics over 10 years, even travelling around the world in pursuit of other likeminded individuals, did not over that time share his thoughts and feelings with others is not based upon reality or human behaviour under such conditions. Breivik would have waited till he found the right people and then discussed openly about his thoughts feelings and intentions and they would have then directed him towards their mutual bigger agenda – The willing sacrifice

Harnessing the horse and directing it.

Or Breivik was recruited to a false Order of Knights Templar’s, so if this is true then there are others out there which means this is a conspiracy and not a “lone wolf”. A group of people who recruited him and directed his political and ideological convictions that resulted in July 22nd 2011 to further their mutual goals. It’s just a case of who are they? Government backed or wanna be extreme right-wing political activists and terrorists looking to wage a terror campaign against left-wing governments in Europe?

Recruiting an impressionable young man to what he believed was an Order of Knights and then filling his head with “what they wanted” was always going to eventually produce Anders Breivik the terrorist, if he was ever recruited to such a thing by men also driven to commit such acts with their similar political ideological convictions when he was 22.

He might have been a 'lone wolf' on the day but to say in the scale of things that there were no other accomplices is a little hard to believe, especially because Breivik had actively travelled to seek out these people. He was not an obscure recluse like the American uni-bomber who did not speak to anyone throughout the duration of his political bombing campaign because he was, in the definition of the word, a recluse. Breivik on the other hand was different, he was an active grass roots activist with his face in several crowds meeting different people, and even being a part of the NDL at the beginning of its inception, and travelling to the UK to attend EDL demos - In the thick of it in other words

He also made direct contact with Fraudman who is mentioned 111 times inside the manifesto, with it even named after one of his essays.

You can only wonder whether or not they ever had non-electronic traceable communication considering they both live in Norway, and whether or not Fraudman & Co would have been willing to harness the Breivik horse for their mutual political agenda?

You only have to look through Fraudman’s compendium of essays to answer that question.

Fraudman’s essays are the justification for Breivik’s acts and if you look around the web, most Fraudman supporters are justifying the acts, just like fundamentalist moslems do after Al Qaeda commits a terrorist atrocity.

The writing is on the wall as they say.

Everyone within the spiders web mentioned inside the manifesto have been Breivik’s influences that’s why they are there, so that his “2083” followers can turn to them for ideological guidance now he has blasted his/their vision into susceptible right-wing thinking minds across the world via the internet with the blood soaked and cursed manifesto. Just like Al Qaeda towards the moslem world after 9/11. Does that type of ingenuity strike you as the mind of a ‘madman’ created in his bedroom on his own?

You can pull the other one if you do…

The question is, who is the spider/spiders in the middle of that web who directed Anders Breivik and has the bigger picture of the players and the goals within their field of operations?

I was falsely accused of being that spider and I am not even a part of that web, not even being mentioned inside the manifesto itself, yet I conveniently took all the media and police heat at the very beginning straight after the terrorist attack.

Blatant set up but by who? Breivik alone sitting in his bedroom for no apparent reason because I don’t even know him, or the spider/spiders within that web surrounding all of those mentioned inside the manifesto?

Further reading: Yaxley & Lakes finger pointing

I even have individuals within that web openly talking about murdering me, which shows what is the intent within their heart towards me. Someone who is central to the leadership of the extreme right-wing EDL, so has a large pool of brain dead recruits to choose from and the money to pay them, but no class to pull it off.

I think it’s about time those strands holding up that web around the spider/spiders started to break free for your own sakes now you have the chance. You cannot hide from the truth, no matter how many lies you tell because truth stands under the light, and lies are exposed for exactly what they are which then makes you complicit in a court of law it’s called ‘perverting the course of justice’ that carries a heavy prison sentance running into years and not months. Also one of your own is talking about murdering me which makes you complicit in my eyes and I know who you all are and where some of you live.

Didn’t Fraudman hide his computer as well? If that does not say “GUILTY” of something in the eyes of most people considering the gravity of Breivik’s crimes and the level of the subsequent investigation, then I don’t know. I wonder what a jury would think about that action in context.

We will see who bites the hardest, only my bite does not involve a bunch of unarmed innocent kids on a summer camp.

Makes me laugh how obvious it all is. Yet I’m still hung out to dry with the label as Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ by the Norwegian authorities and worlds media. God help Norway if you cannot even investigate such a conspiracy and come up with the truth for the Norwegian people when it’s staring you in the face, and do the honourable thing when called upon which is to publicly state what you know is the truth, that I am not Breivik’s English ‘mentor’ so I can move on with my life.

Then start interrogating those who are currently hiding from you like the rats that they turned out to be.

You never know, I might be completely right about my view because Breivik being a ‘lone wolf’ does not add up in most people’s minds, and why would people be talking about murdering me if they had nothing to hide?

The Norwegian psychologists are trying to work out whether or not Breivik is sane or insane before he goes to trial. It is stated that they are even going as far as wanting to give him a brain scan, anything to prove he is a ‘madman’ and ‘insane’, then it’s probably easier to understand than just accept he is a rational extreme right-wing terrorist and part of a larger network with intent.

Something Norway has probably never had to comprehend before.

If he was a ‘lone wolf’ who created everything in his bedroom without telling a single soul then he is definitely a ‘madman’ and ‘insane’, genius but insane just like the uni-bomber. Although we know Pamella Geller had an email from him in 2007, if it was from him. If not there is another Breivik sitting in Norway with a large cache of weaponry ready to explode just like Breivik. He was also in direct communication with Fraudman and was attending EDL demos in the UK where the likely suspects were all present, so not telling a single soul or not committing his acts on behalf of others is hard to believe especially because the manifesto is there for everyone to read with Breivik having direct communication with some of them inside, not least Fraudman.

There is enough evidence contrary to the stated opinion of ‘lone wolf’, even if he was economical with the truth with parts of what he said within the manifesto. Some of that was bravado for his followers to make out he and things are bigger than they seem, it’s called propaganda, and other bits to lead the police away from the truth which is tactical.

There are key truths in there though, that I know without ever having read it because why go to the trouble of compiling a 1500 page manifesto, emailing it to 1000 people and then committing the terrorist acts? Unless he is insane and nothing adds up and it’s all a complete fantasy and murdering those kids was just to fulfill his lust for murder. But we know thats not true because he has political and ideological justification for his acts.

To class Breivik as insane would not do justice to the dead and their families because Breivik was far from insane, and the proof of that point is that no one can conclude yet whether he is or not. It is not usually very hard to determine whether or not someone is sane or insane when committing a criminal act.

These 2 examples are insane example 1 - example 2

Breivik did not commit a run of the mill murder or criminal act, he committed an act of political terrorism and it should be viewed in that light. He can justify his actions based upon Fraudman’s essays and the writings of many others mentioned within the manifesto which means his actions are based around other people’s thoughts and opinions. Are they insane? No they just never crossed the line; Breivik was the horse to do that job while they do theirs.

Are the many people around the world who agree with Breivik insane? No they can justify it ideologically and politically just like Breivik, only Breivik was the one who “came forward with his opinion” as Irish tommy boy stated. It’s the extreme far-right mindset, just like those who still glory in Hitler today who gassed and murdered millions of people.

We cannot comprehend how someone can commit such an act like Breivik’s so we automatically say ‘insane’ without looking at it in context, because most of us do not care, we read it label the person ‘insane’ and move on with our lives. Only those looking trying to understand are seeking to work it out whilst looking at Breivik and his actions in context.

Was Hitler insane? The Third Reich and the millions of German Nazi’s didn’t think so at the time he was gassing millions of Jews and declaring war on Nations. Or where they all insane like him? Rightly or wrongly they could justify it in context of the bigger picture which is why they supported him – Politically, ideologically and physically.

Exactly the same as with Anders Breivik.

This was not a random murder like the 2 examples above, this was a pre-meditated well thought out and planned terrorist attack against Norway with Breivik himself able to justify it based upon what he knows more than what we know, about the group of people he has been involved with over the years who support him and his actions.

That’s why he continually states he views his actions as an act of war and that he is at war, which was the whole purpose of the terrorist attack in the beginning. It was a “Declaration of European Independence” a “Declaration of War” Someone has declared a terrorist campaign using Breivik as the first of what could be perceived by some, as a ‘soldier’ in this war who has sacrificed his life for the cause. The mainstream majority of any Country would call him a terrorist plain and simple.

The question is; Who?

The IRA bombers who targeted Omagh in Northern Ireland, killing scores of people and wounding many more, do we say they are insane because of their actions? Of course not they are terrorists who can justify their acts politically and ideologically, just like Breivik.

Anders Breivik declared war on behalf of someone/group and they are the ones left on the outside to carry on the agenda, politically and physically when they find another horse to direct just like Breivik. Irish tommy boy of the EDL is already threatening similar attacks against the UK population on prime time TV, so you work out for yourself whether or not there are many more horses to be found within Britain inside the EDL, and why Breivik links back to the EDL?

Breivik committed his terrorist acts and then pointed to the EDL, kind of like passing the baton for those who are to come after him targeting innocent people in Britain in the name of their extreme right-wing political agenda.

Its just who is going to be the one to stand up first and follow suit.

tommy’s & co’s motley crew are enemies of all civilised society, and many of them are starting to wake up and realise this fact and leaving the group. Those that don’t never will, and they are your Breivik’s in Britain, they just have not found their way into the spiders hands yet, although some might have already? Who knows?

We know they are already threatening and intimidating people and talking about murdering me amongst other things so nothing is beyond the realms of possibility with this bunch, and there is more information to come.

We will see who the last man standing is…

Queen & Country…No Surrender

IRA plan terror attack on London

2011-10-21T14:29:00.007Z

Further reading: EDL leaders attend IRA mans funeral

Video: EDL's tommy & The IRA Part 2 tommy the IRA & more lies

Video: EDL war & The money

Quote: In an audio recording, Campbell is heard discussing how easy it would be with the type of equipment on offer to plant a bomb in London and escape.

'You can imagine us getting over to England... you imagine, with a six-hour timer, we could be over to London and back,' he says in an audio clip after mulling over a price list for explosives and detonators. 'Just tick, tick, tick, tick... gone.'

Campbell's arrest was part of an international sting operation aimed at incapacitating the Real IRA, which broke from the IRA in 1997 over its support for a peace deal. The group is regarded as a terrorist organisation by the UK and the United States.

Continue reading: IRA plan terror attack on London

Breivik - Sane or Insane

2011-10-20T20:33:00.010Z

The Norwegian criminal psychologists have extended their evaluation period on Breivik to determine if he is sane or insane which determines how he will be tried and the punishment he receives.

Firstly, if he created parts of his manifesto around myself and Nick+ which has put us directly in the spotlight with me falsely alleged to be his English ‘mentor’ then he is insane because his mind is in some warped un-real fantasy world because neither or us know him or have had any dealings with him.

Or have we been subtly implicated by a third party to remove us as a threat?

Thus meaning Breivik is sane on this point.

If I was supposed to be his English ‘mentor’ he did not do a very good job at hiding the fact by putting intelligent pointers in my direction and claiming there are other cells out there ready to strike. Bit of a no brainer towards me who he is supposed to protect at all costs isn't it?.

All the Templar iconography and then subtly pointing the finger in my direction with the help of his EDL buddies?

Not a very nice thing to do if I was really his English ‘mentor’ is it?

Id be locked up nice and tight right about now, under the same evaluation as himself.

Who stood to gain from having me removed, so helped type the manifesto to create the illusion that I was to blame and a direct threat to the ‘peace and security’ of Europe so should be arrested immediately?

Thus deflecting blame from the real perpetrators.

If he is not insane and those pointers were placed in the manifesto to have the desired outcome, then the third party must have put them in there.

It all hinges on whether or not he is living in a fantasy world and that’s why he believed we were a part of his fantasy. That’s a job for the investigators with his sanity resting on this point, amongst others.

If he is sane then I would say that the pointers surrounding the English ‘mentor’ are true, just tweaked a little bit to deflect the blame from the real person, like with putting ‘Richard the Lionhearted’ into the manifesto because that was always going to shine the spotlight on me, even though I have never ever used that name. It was close enough but not true. I would think on something like this, a “declaration of war” from an extreme right-wing group, it’s always best to use the facts so your taken seriously and tweak them a little so that it adds up to a truthful account when investigated - Like the 2002 meeting in London

Breivik & Co knew this is a verifiable fact, so unless he is insane and it’s a lie, he was in London in 2002 with an English man he calls his ‘mentor’, so is sane on this point.

The Norwegian and British police know whether this is fact or fiction?

I say fact otherwise he would not have said it, which means he is sane on this point, which means his real English ‘mentor’ is still walking the streets watching everything unfold.

Breivik believes that he is the one who will start the War in Europe against the Marxist Elite’s and drive Islam and moslems from Europe.

Did he come up with the idea of being the savior of our Western world on his own in his bedroom watching youtube videos and reading blogs, or did someone fill his head (brainwashing) with a vision that Breivik was an integral part of, that’s why he committed his acts with no remorse and continually declares he is in a state of war and that it was an act of war.

He is definitely insane with the mind of a mad man if he came up with that idea and carried out his acts based upon watching youtube videos and reading blogs – That’s the Lone wolf scenario so he should be certified if that's the case.

Or are there people behind him so he knows he is sane and working towards a bigger plan which is a war against European Marxist Elites, and Islam, with his co-conspirators still free in the outside world to continue the work he has started?

He named his blood soaked manifesto after one of his Norwegian counterparts Fraudman’s essay “A European Declaration of Independence” which sounds war like on the back of Breivik’s actions; with the whole world now having a compendium of Fraudman’s essays to read which supports and justifies Breivik’s acts ideologically and politically.

If he is completely insane then he has done a very good job as a delusional mad man sitting at home on his computer.

If he is sane then he is a part of a wider conspiracy involving other people, and what do they gain?

There is a whole right-wing political movement surrounding Fraudman that emanates from the U.S involving ultimately Frank Gaffney, and spreads across into Europe through his SIO groups and their online presence like with the GoV and Atlas Shrugs blogs, and they are all gathered around the same view and belief about Europe (Fraudman). Marxists and Islam are the death of Europe. (I am not saying Frank Gaffney is involved but that links go back to his frontdoor and bank account).

They were all mentioned inside the manifesto.

I agree in part about Islam and the Marxist's allowing the problem to fester out of control, but not at the cost of 69 innocent kids murdered by someone dressed as a policeman whilst on their summer camp and then blaming me as being complicit in the crime.

All of those political die hard Fraudman supporters are the same die hard political EDL supporters who have been my direct enemies over the past 18 months due to their unswerving support of “tommy” boy.

You all know who you are.

Next thing Breivik the one that bites commits his acts, elevates Fraudman & Co to his “2083” followers and then attempts to set me up as his English ‘mentor’ which could have resulted in my arrest and false imprisonment and removal from being an obstacle to their political agenda. Catching my drift? Breivik knows it’s not true; me being his ‘mentor’ so could not come out right and say it because it is a provable lie and would have undermined everything else he has said in the manifesto and it would have looked a little suspicious. He kept it as close to the truth as possible so that the cloud of suspicion rested clearly on my shoulders as being guilty which is exactly what happened.

Did he subtly point towards me in the manifesto as part of a fantasy dreamed up in his bedroom or is he completely sane and working with others involved in a conspiracy based around a "declaration of war" against the Norwegian people, who have a long term political agenda based around Fraudman & Co’s writings?

Ones who wanted me removed: Alan Lakes talks of murdering me

They are all finished now anyway, it’s only a matter of time and they knew this that’s why they have done everything in their power so far to have me removed, like using Breivik, in my own opinion. Fancy using and backing IRA supporters to lead an English movement – Clowns – but they made their bed, spent their money, and backed their horse so they have had no alternative but to lay in it and see it through to the bitter end.

(God knew everything and it goes much deeper about the IRA in Luton and why Al Qaeda declared war against the UK from there on 7/7, but that will be explained another time.)

We are still alive, free, and we know who our enemies are from amongst our own people and you don’t even realise whilst sitting back with your money and political influence. That will not save you from the truth and the truth is staring you in the face.

That’s a different ball game; let’s get Breivik out of the way first.

Now is the time to show your true colours if you know I was set up, and we will call it water under the bridge, for the sake of those dead kids and their families. The Norwegian police have my witness statement anyway, so now is the time to show people where you stand. They are coming anyway.

If you are going to commit such an act of war then at least own up to it so everyone knows who they face at the table and not try blaming others for your actions. Or maybe they have except the Norwegian police do not want to accept it, especially after it’s named after one of their own’s work “Fraudman”. So they claim lone wolf who "declared war" on Norway from his bedroom based upon watching youtube videos and reading right-wing blogs so as to not accept the facts staring them in the face. Or I am completely wrong.

Everyone is watching the credibility of Norway as a Nation State now because of Breivik’s criminal acts and how they conclude it.

Lone wolf doesn’t wash and even Fraudman himself admitted he was in direct email communication with Breivik, then his superiority complex kicked in when he coined Breivik who is a mass murderer as no different from a vacuum cleaner salesman compared to himself. And if it is correct, Breivik was at the EDL demo in London where Fraudman, Ned May, Chris Knowles and Alan Lake etc were all present whilst Geert Wilders was in the House of Lords being entertained by Lord Pearson.

All of the likely suspects at the same place at the same time…at an EDL demo in London.

Yet I am supposed to be his English ‘mentor’?

I thank whoever said NO WAY…it’s not him, that’s why I wasn’t arrested as part of another alleged terrorist cell waiting to carry out a similar act to Breivik’s whilst sitting on a tiny island.

Breivik seems pretty sane to me and he can back up and justify his actions based upon Fraudman’s work.

His actions are incomprehensible to a sane mind but put into context of the bigger picture of an extreme far-right agenda then he is sane and means everything he says based upon the people he knows are on the outside (The English mentor) to carry their mutual work along, apart from the 60 – 80 other cells out there. Fear mongering, hoping 60 – 80 will follow suit after reading the manifesto and Fraudman’s essays.

Terror tactic.

They are my thoughts about Breivik’s sanity and what points relating to me that tests his sanity on these points of the manifesto.

Further reading: Uncloaking the mind of a mad man

“It’s better to make the right friends than the wrong enemies” Lionheart

UK helps Norway on Oslo terror

2011-10-20T13:22:00.002Z

Norwegian Minister of Government Administration, Reform, and Church Affairs Rigmor Aasrud is in London to learn about British anti-terror measures.

Amongst themes discussed during her visit will be British strategies on government security following the 2005 attack in London, including ministers and buildings in the UK.

The first meetings are with the Home Office’s Minister of State Damian Green, also covering bilateral UK-Norway contact following the Oslo attacks, the Royal United Services Institute for Defence and Security (RUSI) representatives, and Sir Peter Ricketts, National Security Advisor and Head of the National Security Secretariat at the Home Office.

Continue reading: UK helps Norway

Yaxley & Lakes finger pointing

2011-10-19T14:58:00.015Z

As soon as the current Leadership of the 'English Defence League' were asked who is the English 'mentor' they both pointed the finger at me, which resulted in me turning it upon Lake himself and giving motive.

There is a well known and "very nasty" historical dispute with the both of them.

Then the worlds media painted me as Breivik's English 'mentor' based upon their accusations because it looked like a perfect fit on the outside when you look at this blog. Which was the whole purpose of the exercise in the first place because the EDL leadership was always going to be the first port of call for any journalists after the manifesto came out so I was the perfect fall guy.

The question is why and who from?

Either Breivik set me up for arrest on his own, as someone who does not even know me in close quarters, although he does not even mention me directly in the manifesto or any of my blog posts I have written, or this blog itself, it is other people who did the 'accusation' job for the media, so that cannot be the right answer otherwise my name would be in there with bright shiny lights like the likes of Pamella Geller. Or someone else who wanted me removed so used Breivik and his actions, thus killing 2 birds with one stone as a part of a larger terrorist conspiracy?

A terrorist conspiracy goes through different stages from before the attack, and after the attack, and the ultimate thing for those involved in the conspiracy is to not get caught. Although this group's fingers are all over it, with the manifesto even named after one of Fraudman's essays.

Yet I get the blame?

They are all so closely linked to Breivik (Fraudman, Ned May, Alan Lake, Chris Knowles etc) that someone else had to take the blame at the beginning to deflect attention from themselves. The intelligent minds behind the conspiracy in its totality would have had the different stages mapped out with what they thought was likely to occur to keep things on track, not just the acts alone, before and after, but the "call to war" based upon the "2083" manifesto.

Then those who agree with Breivik have a whole compendium of political essays from Fraudman scattered around the net and in different languages to read. Justifying future right-wing terrorist attacks from lone wolves or groups ideologically aligned with this nucleus of right-wing anti-jihaders mentioned by Breivik himself. It doesnt take Einstein.

Who stood to benefit from me being arrested and locked up as part of another one of the terrorist cells Breivik speaks of, involved in a large right-wing terrorist conspiracy against all European governments?

How much money does the EDL as a grass roots movement turn over per month through contributions and funding from outside sources like the Canadian Jewish Defence League and the American SIO backers, along with Rabbi Shifrens Tea-party fund raising?

The political financial EDL cash cow controlled by foreigners under an English banner.

Probably the fund they would like to use to murder and silence me with.

What lengths would certain individuals go to, to protect their political financial enterprise? Especially if they are a bit 'mad' in the head anyway?

Call it irony...

Their plan (Alan Lake & Co) has been to role the EDL out across Europe as a model of resistance for European countries, and they use the Blood Red Cross and Christian banner in exactly the same way as Breivik.

Wolves in sheeps clothing...

Yaxley - Lake and the EDL have done so much damage to the Blood Red Cross that you sometimes feel embarrassed to wear it in the open because of the drunken anti-social racist image they have given it through their platform to the British public. Yaxley is a stone island man aswell so does not care about the Cross, just like he didnt care about being dressed as a Rabbi. The seeds of my removal from the EDL were sown when I protested at the beginning for them taking out the Cross on 8/8 2009 in Birmingham. This will be explained in more detail another time. I would not be involved in what could be perceived as a right-wing protest on 8/8 HH Heil Hitler because I have Jewish friends who I support and who support me. No one would listen accept one who jumped ship and dug his feet in with me on the issue. Those Jews backing Yaxley & Co and giving them money to "defend Jews in Britain" and carry the Israeli flag have absolutely no idea and have driven center ground patriots into the arms of the extreme far-right anti-Jew brigade which you could say is a win for the old school Irish pro-Palestinian IRA supporters living in Luton. Like EDL's No.1 and No.2 Yaxley & Carroll's parents.

Some of them must be that blind to the truth that they see "tommy" boy as their messiah...He smiles and says the right thing to your face and then stabs you in the back when your not looking.

Video: Alan Lake - Breivik & Norway

Video: Tommy - Lake & Breivik

An aggressive Russia – War or something else?

2011-10-19T10:53:00.015Z

Daily Mail: World is on the brink of a nuclear 9/11

For the Russians to be poisoning a dissident agent with polonium 210 in London potentially causing a major Nuclear incident in the UK’s Capital City was a "serious-credible" incident but we only know of one death that has come from it and that is Litvinenko’s.

How and why did Litvinenko get so close to someone carrying such a substance?

Im sure the Russians could have done a much cleaner job than contaminate London with one of the most hazardous nuclear substances known to man. The only way of obtaining such grade is from a State Nuclear Industrial source. That source led all the way back to Russia (Literally).

What is the greater significance?

The Russian finger prints all over it.

Why?

Was it a Russian sponsored terrorist act upon British soil in peace time?

Or was Litvinenko attempting to buy the substance on-behalf of the Chechens from what he thought was a reliable rogue KGB source, who then turned around and assassinated him?

It is noted that Litvinenko became a converted Chechen moslem.

Why would Chechen moslem converts living in Britain linked to Russia be on the black market looking to buy the chemical needed for the trigger mechanisms inside suitcase nuclear bombs. And why London?

Russians killed 2 birds with one stone.

Exposed the nature of the threat now within the UK and killed one of the direct threats in the process, not just to the UK but America and Russia too, and then showed you everything that was carried out and why, that’s why poisoning him with the chemical he wanted to purchase couldn’t leave anyone in any doubt, especially not because Russia knows the whole game and the threat that we all face because those missing suitcase nukes are ultimately theirs from a by-gone era.

The Russians know about the Chechens in the UK raising funds for their Islamic war against Russia.

The Chechens are like wild dogs with no sense of humanity when it comes to war that’s why they targeted a school in Russia and set bombs off and killed as many children as possible for the shock tactic within terrorism against the Russian State.

Anders Breivik carried out an almost identical style attack which was carried out for sheer shock tactic against the Norwegian State just like the Chechens.

If you blow up what could be perceived as a legitimate target i.e a government building, then those inside would be viewed as collateral damage for being in the building in the first place.

To hunt down and kill 69 innocent kids on their summer camp whilst dressed as a police officer to lure them out into a false sense of security as an act of political terrorism, was not what could be perceived as a legitimate target in most sane people’s minds.

Except of course, the extreme far-right who despise the European Marxist Elites.

The only other type of terrorist groups out there who carry out such attacks as acts of terrorism are the Chechens. They have form for it.

There is talk of Breivik being trained in Belerus by an ex-Soviet Colonel who it is stated is a Chechen moslem convert after marrying the daughter of a Chechen leader.

Is Russia a friend or foe for spreading polonium 210 around London and killing a rouge Russian moslem dissident in the process?

Relations over the Nuclear incident cant be that bad after the British PM just visited the Country.

Russians, Chechens, British/foreign Jihadi’s and suitcase nuclear bombs.

What if?

Who would be the first person you go too if you were a defeated Soviet Colonel who had suitcase nukes to trade?

Osama Bin Laden.

How many of those missing Soviet made suitcase nuclear bombs have been retrieved?

I should imagine a few in Afghanistan where their Pakistani nuclear engineers worked on them, with a few scrap ones laying about, probably retrieved by Coalition forces, and the rest, primed and sent out into the world pre-911.

Then Bin Laden declared war against a Nuclear Nation (America) with the threat of nuclear terrorism as the ultimate weighing balance within the war. America is the only Super Power left for Islam to conquer before having military dominance across the whole earth based upon the military wing of the ‘Ummah’ now waging Jihad against the West. That is the ultimate aim of Islam based upon the Koran, and Bin Laden’s call for a global jihad against America and the West is to assert Islam’s dominance upon the earth globally through terrorism until Islam eventually rules the earth religiously and politically - The Caliphate

Holy War in the chemical nuclear and biological age...

The military wing of the ‘Ummah’ in Afghanistan destroyed the Soviets and now believe it is their destiny to destroy America. They are religious fanatics who do not believe anything other than their war in gods name against America and the West and dying in the process waging that war and there can only be one winner at the end of a war.

Who was in the market to buy and sell Polonium 210 to Litvinenko the moslem? Or is there a bigger meaning.

All Foreign governments know that it is only a matter of time until a large scale chemical, nuclear or biological weapon goes off somewhere in the World, in the name of the global Jihad.

There are millions of crazed lunatics around the world even living in Britain who want to kill us in the name of their religion and in the process think they are doing god a favour by ridding the earth of us unbelieving infidel scum so that Islam can cover the whole earth.

Its just when and where, and what protective preventative measures are in place to track those suitcase nukes in their possession before they set them off. Or what procedures are in place for the day after?

21st Century warfare in the Nuclear age with Iran now the Worlds No.1 State sponsor of terror along with a wealth of nuclear knowledge after its own highly publicised programme.

The coming Islamic terrorism in the nuclear age.

Launch pad UK to the greatest battlefield of the 21st Century - The American homeland

Docum drama: Dirty bomb in London - Part 2

Gilad Shalit released

2011-10-18T20:17:00.005Z

An Israeli hero - 5 years in captivity at the hands of Hamas.

Israel's UK Ambassador: At its root, the decision to make the deal was not won by pragmatic arguments or realpolitik. We are bringing Gilad home, and paying the painful price, not because we know that this is the correct strategic decision, but because of our profound conviction that it ought to be. The bittersweet joy of the moment presents a challenge to us all. If this indeed is not a world in which placing supreme value on a single human life is the best course of action, then let us work to make it one.

Telegraph: Live coverage

Futher reading: Operation Cast lead "An English view"

Further reading: Defence of the Promised land

Russians target Breivik's lawyer

2011-10-18T18:14:00.000Z

Website: Norway news

Breivik's attorney, Geir Lippe City, says his daughter (3) found Russian journalists in their kitchen. The daughter of Anders Breivik’s attorney surprised two Russian journalists prowling in their family home. According to VG, Lippe City’s daughter (3) found the journalists in the kitchen of their locked home. Apparently, the journalists were searching for information on the terrorist case. “She came running in after discovering them. I told them to go very quickly, and they did,” said Lippe City to VG.

Most of the evidence is at the police station in Oslo. Any sensitive information in Lippe City’s home is secured within a locked safe.

Lippe City has experienced intense media pressure in the terrorist case. He praises Norwegian journalists for their "exemplary behavior" - compared to foreign media.

As of Saturday afternoon, Lippe City had not returned Dagbladet’s calls.

Nuclear terror in London

2011-10-17T11:07:00.004Z

Quote: At this moment in time the major frontlines in this modern war are in Iraq and Afghanistan, but there is another Nation now in on the mix of things – Iran.

An open War with Iran at some time in the future is an inevitability because of the Iranian nuclear programme and the apocalyptic aims and ambitions that it has planned once the Islamic Religious leaders of the Nation acquire the capability to build the A - bomb. The free world cannot sit back and allow Iran to go nuclear because of the consequences to planet Earth, so will have no other option but to take open military action to prevent this Islamic Nation going nuclear.

Iran knows this; we know this, which is why there is an undeclared war with Iran in Iraq and Afghanistan. Iran is the invisible Nation state ‘hand’ that is behind the Islamic enemy we face within these two conflict zones.

Continue reading: Nuclear terror in London